issues.The specific aims of the grant are three-fold: 1) Establish new and strengthen existing trainingprograms in biomedical engineering in sub-Saharan Africa; 2) Train biomedical engineers andmedical doctors to evaluate newly developed HIV-related and other testing and therapeuticdevices; 3) Train post graduates from business schools to scale-up development and launch newhealthcare practices. In support of these specific aims we have created four distinct annualtraining sessions: 1) week-long annual planning meetings hosted by either UNILAG or UI andfacilitated by the NU team; 2) ten-week long biomedical engineering training programs at theUniversity of Cape Town (UCT) facilitated by UCT and NU faculty ; 3) participation in two-week long Kellogg
transferring the creditsearned at the other institution: and (3) professors at UB visit WUST to teach courses, whileWUST faculty members from China visit UB for professional developments as visitingscholars.In this paper, we present a three-year experience of collaborative program between UB andWUST. This paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2, we describe our designand implementation of the collaborative program between UB and WUST. Next, in order toevaluate the collaborative program, the assessment plan and its results are presented inSection 3 and 4, respectively. Finally, concluding remarks and future directions arediscussed. 2. Program DevelopmentIn this section, the collaborative program between
Contemplation Contemplation I have considered using the instructional practice but have not taken any steps to implement it Preparation Preparation I am currently developing plans/curriculum to implement the instructional practice in my course Action Action I will implement the instructional practice for the first time in my course this upcoming term Maintenance Maintenance I have been regularly using and modifying the instructional practice in my course Termination Standardized
participant.Due to the limited resources, we only plan to test our workshop with around 30 students. Sinceour goal is to help student with lower visuospatial skill, we chose students with relatively lowerscore in the pre-course PSVT:R test. In the end, we selected 30 of them with an average PSVT:Rscore of 21.3 (SD= 5.31) to join our online workshop. By the end of the semester, total of 17students completed our online workshop. Participants who completed the workshop received $50cash as compensation. Online Visuospatial Skill Workshop. The online workshop was adapted and modifiedfrom an existing visuospatial workshop in our university and contains a series of exercisesspanning seven diverse related topics (Sorby, 2011). Those topics included 1
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017A Tiered Mentoring Model for Deepening Student Learning AcrossUndergraduate and Graduate Design CoursesAbstractThe authors are experimenting with implementation of a tiered mentoring model acrossundergraduate and graduate-level concurrently-taught design courses.The undergraduate course is a senior-level design course in which students learn the fundamentalsof designing steel structures. It is structured around an authentic semester-long team-based designproject in which student design teams develop the structural plans for a real building based on anarchitectural concept. A series of intermediate project deliverables are sequenced throughout thesemester to ensure that the undergraduate
potentially inhibitoryor suppressive presence of boys. The activities are designed to leverage girls’ existing interestsby showing how STEM fields require creativity, can improve lives, or can make the world abetter place. Over one-thousand girls between the ages of 3 and 13 have participated in the lastthree years, and feedback demonstrates that the event has been successful at getting girlsinterested in engineering. This paper will detail how to plan and implement a successful event tointerest young girls in engineering utilizing industry partners, student organizations, and fungirls-only activities.IntroductionCareers in STEM-related fields will comprise much of the future job growth in the U.S. andworldwide [1]. Innovation in science and
Observation Protocol (RTOP).InstrumentsValue, Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS)To assess faculty dispositions towards, and use of, specific active learning strategies, the Value,Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS) was utilized [23].VECTERS measures dispositions towards, as well as current and planned use of, three activelearning strategies: (1) Using formative feedback to adjust instruction (2) Integrating real-world applications (3) Facilitating student-to-student discussions in classVECTERS prompts respondents to consider each strategy and consider the degree to which they(a) expect the strategy to be successful, (b) find it valuable, and (c) believe it is costly (e.g
-examination with feelings of fear, anger, guilt or shame 3. A critical assessment of assumptions 4. Recognition that one’s discontent and the process of transformation are shared 5. Explorations of options for new roles, relationships, and actions 6. Planning a course of action 7. Acquiring knowledge and skills for implementing one’s plans 8. Provisional trying of new roles 9. Building competence and self-confidence in new roles and relationships 10. A reintegration into one’s life on the basis of conditions dictated by one’s new perspective [4, p.22]Oregon State University and the School of EECS are committed to providing transformativelearning experiences. As Mezirow and other transformative theorists have pointed out
formally and in a co-located postersession. Future plans are to expand multidisciplinary senior design projects, and this effort ismoving forward as curriculum catalog changes were made to create a unified two semestersenior design sequence for all engineering majors. With better time alignment, moremultidisciplinary teams are expected to form.Pros and Cons of Elements of Senior Design DayIn an effort to convey the lessons learned from our Senior Design Day, a Pro & Con list wasmade for the major decisions and changes that were made to the event. It is hoped that thesePros and Cons will be of value to schools seeking to expand their senior design day events, andthat some of the lessons learned at Texas State University will help others to
education students receive. This background allowed thecourse committee to design a course for non-technical majors which achieves learning objectivesthrough application of technical concepts. All graduates enter into a military career ascommissioned officers and are expected to make informed decisions on topics ranging from spaceoperations to routine military installation maintenance and management. To address this widerange of occupational responsibility, the primary learning goal is for the students to be able tointegrate and advocate for sustainability principles in plans and decisions affecting the builtenvironment at the conclusion of the course. Course design worked backwards to accomplish thisgoal beginning with the summative assessment and
Paper ID #27802Research Experience for Community College Students: Design and Opti-mization of Non-Volatile Latch using Anti-Fuse Memory TechnologyMr. Michael Gee, Canada College I’m a third year Mechanical Engineer major at Canada Community College and I plan to transfer to a CSU or UC in the Fall of 2019.Anthony Akash LalAlex E HerculesTyler Sheaves, San Francisco State University A graduate researcher at San Francisco State University’s Nano Electronics and Computing Research Lab (NeCRL). He has assisted in multiple projects involving hardware and IP security, typically focus- ing research efforts on development and
).InstrumentsValue, Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS)To assess faculty dispositions towards, and use of, specific active learning strategies, the Value,Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS) was utilized [23].VECTERS measures dispositions towards, as well as current and planned use of, three activelearning strategies: (1) Using formative feedback to adjust instruction (2) Integrating real-world applications (3) Facilitating student-to-student discussions in classVECTERS prompts respondents to consider each strategy and consider the degree to which they(a) expect the strategy to be successful, (b) find it valuable, and (c) believe it is costly (e.g., time,resources). The survey
institution had the financialmeans to create, build and sustain an engineering program. These studies revealed both the needand the necessary resources to develop an engineering program. The next step was the hiring ofa Dean of Engineering to develop the curriculum plans, seek approval from the regional accredit-ing body (SACS) by way of a substantive change, and securing approval through the university’scurriculum committee, recruit students, and hire faculty to deliver the courses.Adding engineering is not free of impact on other disciplines. Additional students are recruited tothe university and they need to take specific math and science courses, as well as take courses tosatisfy the general education core. This potentially requires additional
problems was closely linked to the environment inwhich the problem was presented.One theme that was common between all instructors was providing “minimal background.”Instructors wanted to provide as much time as possible for class discussions rather than lectures.Some instructors achieved minimal lecture in class by using a “flipped classroom” approach.Instructors viewed in class discussions and “contextualizing mathematics” as a better use of classtime.Instructors described a need to be flexible in terms of the amount of time they spent on eachpresented task. The code “dynamic lesson plan” captures the need to recognize that students willfind certain tasks more or less interesting than originally anticipated. This can be difficult topredict
together.Once students arrived at a topic, they were then asked to perform a literature search and identifyrelevant prior work. In particular, they were asked to determine whether their research questionhad already been answered (and, if so, how conclusively). They were also asked to identify themost relevant reference material from the prior work that is most closely related to their area ofresearch.Once the topic was refined through the literature search, student participants were asked todevelop a project plan, working with their faculty mentor. In most cases, these plans involvedthe development of a software system and its use for data collection to answer a researchquestion. A few relied upon existing systems and presented configuration and data
. Students write about their experience during the last ten (10) minutes of class. Students wrote they felt “refreshed” after the meditation experience and were going to try to add reflective time to focus on stress management into their schedules. Many students were very concerned about their Life Stressors Index and wrote about coping mechanisms they plan to employ in order to improve their own lives. They also wrote about how they will look for signs of distress in their construction crews and work to improve work-life balance for themselves and their subordinates.Week 4 – Leadership, Personality, and Learning Styles The module begins by juxtaposing the definitions of leadership and management. For this first class in the
“realistic” than that offered within the business school. The term “realistic”will undoubtedly mean different things to different people. Still, there are a few elements of areality oriented engineering entrepreneurship curriculum that seem non-controversial, including: • An enhanced focus on intellectual property development and protection • A focus on real technology development and commercialization (as opposed to mere business plan development offered by most business school based programs) • Internships or practicum experiences that include placement within an entrepreneurial environment • Basic knowledge of business principles that enable identification of knowledge gaps and how to fill them with relevant
their first year of engineering. Most students have a highschool resume complete with all of their awards, music and athletic accomplishments, but nowthey need an “engineering” resume for an internship, a scholarship, or a research position inengineering. The resume can also serve as an excellent career-planning tool, establishing aframework on which to build and a guideline for gap analysis. Creating this new resume isdifficult for most students. They need help translating and prioritizing their previous experiencesinto “skills” that are useful in engineering. With the help of a Career Services representative,who is in close contact with what industry wants on a resume, and the director/mentor ofacademic scholarship programs, who follows
place,where the learning is not necessarily at the forefront for the students and is effectivelycovert. Chick’s great enthusiasm for the wonders of science spreads to the kids and theirparents by means of the museum. The school science teachers may also use the place toillustrate science principles as part of their lesson plans. The SciTechatorium alsoseemed like a wonderful place to highlight Materials Science & Engineering (MS&E) toyoung people.The student coordinator of our outreach program was persuaded to write a proposal to theASM Foundation Student Chapter Grants program3 “to excite young people in materials,science, and engineering careers.” Our grant was funded to purchase demos and builddisplays that highlighted MS&E for
associate and bachelor degrees. The steps along this path are chronicled through thedescription of the meta-steps of creating a project partnership, developing a program,implementing a curriculum, determining industry workforce requirements, and adjusting theproject plan and expectations in order to stay aligned with evolving industry needs.First Step: a need identifiedThe US robotics industry, which has a strong presence in Pennsylvania (PA), is experiencingmarket growth from healthcare to manufacturing, with large growth in defense and homelandsecurity. Industrial automation is an important robotics market segment; however, significantregional growth is occurring in service robots or “agile robotics” applications. These are theemerging generation
Instrumentation Grant) thenacademic faculty was unlikely to have been involved in planning its acquisition orimplementation. • If interested representatives were not involved in the planning of visualization facilities,what have been the ramifications? The generalization can be made that the less a broad representation of interested academicprograms were involved in the planning, the more isolated and less embedded the technologies. • If organized as a center, is there an established mission statement? Are there identifiedoutcomes and methods established to assess them? Several centers had established mission statements. However, outcomes assessment wasunheard of among visualization personnel. All centers were required to participate in
powerengineering students will be highlighted. Lastly, plans for the implementation of the powersystem outreach experiments for larger groups of non-engineers and high school students will bepresented.II. Power Distribution Laboratory Facilities The electric power distribution system experiments targeted for power engineering studentswere developed and embedded within the RDAC laboratory. RDAC has four identicaldistribution stations, each of which has: 1. a power station providing three-phase 208V ac / 120V dc with 1 three-phase 1:1 autotransformer – this serves as the source of power (the substation); 2. a nine-bus distribution feeder box containing two feeders including four three-phase power distribution lines and four three
Extrapolation3.0 Application 4.1 Analysis of Elements4.0 Analysis 4.2 Analysis of Relationships 4.3 Analysis of Organizational Principles 5.1 Production of a Unique Communication5.0 Synthesis 5.2 Production of a Plan, or Proposed Set of Operations 5.3 Derivation of a Set of Abstract Relations 6.1 Judgment in Terms of Internal Evidence6.0 Evaluation 6.2 Judgment in Terms of External Criteria Table 2. Affective Domain Categories and Sub-Categories 23. 1.1 Awareness 1.2 Willingness to Receive1.0 Receiving
components that guide human reasoning 28. The threads of coherent reasoning are built around questions that humans ask and the answers they receive. Answering deep-reasoning questions articulates causal chains; goals, plans, and actions; and logical justification 28. The question-answer rhetorical structure is the most common dialogue pattern in naturalistic conversation 29. Question-driven explanatory reasoning predicts that learning improves to the extent that learners generate and answer questions requiring explanatory reasoning 29. Questioning is grounded in discourse theories of informal reasoning, and it is an essential process involved in problem solving, especially design problems 30. Questions arise in reciprocal
: 1. Develop inquiry skills which support technological decision-making and policy development, including planning, collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and presenting empirical data. 2. Analyze product usability and perform usability research. 3. Develop proficiencies in planning, implementing, and reporting a technology assessment. 4. Identify and forecast the risks and impacts of technological decisions upon society and the environment. 5. Make informed, sound decisions regarding technology based upon empirical evidence and sustainability principles.Essentially, the course is organized around two themes with approximately six weeks of the 16-week course dedicated to a
engineering skills associated with design andcommunication and on personal characteristics associated with good teamwork and effectiveleadership. Small group discussion related to course readings are used to increase studentunderstanding of abstract engineering concepts. Design projects are used to facilitate studenttransfer of their understanding to new contexts.The course sequence has been piloted in the Mechanical Engineering program and was shown tobe quite successful with regard to student achievement and student satisfaction. Plans are beingmade for college-wide implementation of a similar freshman experience emphasizing skill andpersonal characteristic development.1.0 IntroductionThe issues of engineering student engagement and persistence and
technical courses.1.2 Game Design and DevelopmentEntertainment technology splits roughly into two categories: hardware and software. Whereashardware might range from toys to amusement rides, software involves virtual and interactiveexperiences, i.e., games. Some programs, like ETC, often bridge both areas. The process ofmaking a game closely relates to the engineering process, in which designers plan an environmentcomposed of physical and/or virtual constructs that interact according to a set of rules. Thedevelopers employ technology to implement the plans, working in an iterative fashion incollaboration with the designers4, 5. Page 12.1137.21.3
) program for P-4th grade studentsand a Summer Residential Program for students in grades 5-12. 12 GERI courses are taught byinstructors, predominantly graduate and undergraduate students, who develop curriculum, designlesson plans, and teach the courses.Participants. Participants in this study are 3rd and 4th grade students in the week-long SummerSession II, which was held on June 12 - June 16, 2006. There were a total of 49 studentsenrolled in the 3rd and 4th grade classes in this summer session. Participants for this study wererecruited by mailing an invitation letter and consent form to parents of the 3rd and 4th grade GERIstudents. Students who returned signed parental forms were eligible to volunteer for this study;these students signed an
: Gathering the DataIntroductionFor the past several years, faculty at the University of Texas at Austin have been developingweb-based educational modules designed to help Engineering faculty integrate the teaching ofethics into their existing courses. These undergraduate educational modules, known collectivelyas PRiME (Professional Responsibility Modules in Engineering), cover topics such asProfessional Ethics, Ethical Leadership, and Credibility of Sources and are already being used byfaculty at UT and elsewhere: http://www.engr.utexas.edu/ethics/primeModules.cfm. Inspired bythe success of these undergraduate modules, several faculty have outlined a plan to expand theeducational offerings by creating, with the help of a grant from the National
? (Nursing, Paper Science, Computer Science for example in the School of Engineering and Applied Science). Will such an inter- disciplinary approach be beneficial to the success of the project ? Do we need different equipment or instrumentation facilities? Do we need experts from industry or commercial establishments? 3. Conduct an extensive background search that focuses on salient features of the main project and address the key issues that may arise as the project unfolds. Always have a “Plan B.” Be prepared to handle contingencies. You may be very diligent in your design, planning and implementation; regardless, things may go wrong. (Example: Bridge Building Service Learning