AC 2012-5166: PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS TO ENHANCE MODEL-ELICITINGACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATIONDr. Andrew Kean, California Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian P. Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-12 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education
outcomes, and use thedata for establishing a process for continuous improvement. From Raytheon’s perspective, therewas a commitment to work with its academic partner, but also an awareness that this joint effortwould strengthen the relationship, significantly benefiting Raytheon for the reasons outlinedabove. More importantly, Raytheon personnel had something to contribute that was truly neededand helpful.This partnership was also intended to help faculty in the College of Engineering focus onABET’s EC 2000 – utilizing industrial expertise and experience with Quality-related processesto teach faculty about Quality, its importance and using Raytheon success stories to illustratehow it can lead to positive change. Although industry is more concerned
maingoals as “teaching K-12 students the importance of engineering” 1. Involving potentialstudents on campus with fun and educational activities should stimulate an interest incollege 2, hopefully in your discipline, and if all goes well, may encourage them towardyour department!The Young Scholar Program - General Overview:The Young Scholar program at IUPUI (Indiana University Purdue UniversityIndianapolis) was started more than ten years ago, and has been administered throughthe Department of Education for the prior two years. Until three years ago, all of thecourses offered were in the liberal arts. In the past three years, two classes have been Page
: Structural Courses - Structural Analysis - Computer Applications in Structural Design - Reinforced Concrete Design - Structural Steel Design - Reinforced Masonry and Wood Design - Building Structures Design Laboratory Page 3.6.1This paper describes the curriculum characteristics of the structural portion of the structuraldesign and construction management emphasis, referred to hereafter as the “SD/CM” emphasis.One of the principal positions of the graduates of this emphasis is that of structural designer
system. Specificationand installation of the hydroelectric system, replacing an again incumbent and upgrading a watercollection system. Specification and installation of 4.3kW photovoltaic panels and controller.Interconnection to fossil fuel / biofuel generator. Inverter and energy storage description. Gridinterconnection to load, including all electrical interconnection, construction of an appropriatepower house, and buried cabling to nine-cabin and research laboratory load. This project wasmanaged as a teaching opportunity in accordance with a successful model proposed by Klein et.al. Professor and students presented the keys to the caretaker on 23 July 2010.IntroductionAn integrated electric power system has been designed for and installed in
instructionaltechniques. A course management tool named Blackboard 5 (BB5) was utilized tomanage course logistics such as acting as the project data server, providing solutions,updating and personalizing grade reports, and posting announcements. A wirelessPersonal Address (PA) system worn by the instructor was utilized in laboratory sectionsto enhance the instruction in a team setting where discussions among group memberswere encouraged during class. Teaching techniques using computer laboratoriescompletely transformed the course. Four projects, each requiring significant computermodeling and engineering, were implemented to replace and augment homework sets.The four projects were (1) geometric design with AutoCAD, (2) traffic flow analysis withCORSIM, (3
pedagogies (e.g. traditional chalkboard writing, presentations, field trips,labs, etc.) to appeal to different student learning preferences and create a more inclusive learningenvironment. Utilizing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, instructors focused on the first twodichotomies, Extroversion vs. Introversion and Sensing vs. Intuition. With an innovativeapproach towards CE Materials, the goal of stimulating independent thinkers and assistingstudents with the retention of core course material is being achieved across a range of studentlearning preferences. By teaching the course in a way that encompasses all learning preferences,a greater breadth of students can succeed in and enjoy a civil engineering curriculum.IntroductionTypical civil engineering
Paper ID #6960An Effective Learning Approach for Industrial Robot ProgrammingDr. Guanghsu A. Chang, Western Carolina University Dr. Guanghsu A. Chang is currently an associate professor of the Engineering and Technology Depart- ment at Western Carolina University. He has spent the last 21 years in teaching industrial and manufactur- ing engineering programs. His research interests involve the study of robotic applications, manufacturing automation, Design for Assembly (DFA), and Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) applications. He was a vice president of Southern Minnesota APICS (2009-2012). He holds both MSIE, and Ph.D. degrees
AC 2011-1957: USE OF FLUENT SOFTWARE IN A FIRST-YEAR ENGI-NEERING MICROFLUIDIC DESIGN COURSEBarbara Elizabeth Carruthers, The Ohio State University Barbara E. Carruthers is a Mechanical Engineering graduate student at The Ohio State University and a Graduate Teaching Assistant for the OSU Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH) Program. Ms. Carruthers with graduate with her M.S.M.E. from Ohio State in 2012.Paul Alan Clingan, The Ohio State University - EEIC Lecturer - First Year Engineering Program Engineering Education and Innovation Center The Ohio State University MS - Chemical Engineering - Bucknell University - 1988 BS - Chemical Engineering - Buck- nell University - 1986
Paper ID #42965Reflections of Undergraduate Engineering Students Completing a Cross-DisciplinaryRobotics Project with Preservice Teachers and Fifth Graders in an ElectromechanicalSystems CourseDr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Associate Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons.)Dr. Jennifer Jill Kidd, Old Dominion University Dr. Jennifer Kidd is a Master Lecturer in the Department of Teaching and Learning at Old
, participation in STEM based gamified activitiescan serve as an alternative opportunity to develop collaborative and social communication skills.The AR Drone lab affords students with ASD a chance to participate in an activity based on theirinterest while also providing an opportunity to develop the critical social skills for future success.3. Learning Elements3.1. Project-Based Learning in a Laboratory EnvironmentA widely used pedagogical tool in STEM classrooms is PBL.4 One key attribute of PBL is“doing something” to “learn about something,” instead of the usual classroom teaching withsingular focus on “learning about something.” This interactive technique allows teachers tocapture students’ attention by finding an element of fun in the task they are
Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His current research is focused at the convergence of frontier technologies (e.g., robotics, artificial intelligence, augmented/virtual reality, and blockchain) with applications to natural and intuitive human-robot interaction, digital health, and STEM education. Under the Research Experience for Teach- ers Site, GK-12 Fellows, DR K-12, and ITEST projects, all funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative, funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has conducted significant K-12 education, training, mentoring, and outreach activities to integrate engineering concepts in science classrooms and labs of dozens of New York City public schools. His STEM
‐chip device. Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 102(1): p. 117-140.3. Cadwell, B., Teaching Systems Engineering by Examining the Engineering Education System, in ASEE Illinois/Indiana Section Conference, . 2007: Indianapolis, IN.4. Cattano, C., T. Nikou, and L. Klotz, Teaching systems thinking and biomimicry to civil engineering students. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education & Practice, 2010. 137(4): p. 176-182.5. Chenard, J.S., Z. Zilic, and M. Prokic, A laboratory setup and teaching methodology for wireless and mobile embedded systems. IEEE Transactions on Education, 2008. 51(3): p. 378-384.6. Guardiola, I.G., C. Dagli, and S. Corns, Using university-funded research projects to teach
of the instructor was shared withthe distance learning students and at the same time, was projected to the classroom monitors forthe in-person students. The virtual room audio was connected to the classroom audio system sothat the distance learning students could hear their in-person peers speak during the class andvice versa. In addition to the classroom audio-visual technology, the real-time chat functionalityof the virtual room was used to interact with the distance learning students in a more efficientway. An experienced graduate teaching assistant (GTA) moderated the chat throughout the classand answered most of the questions from the distance learning students. If any question or issueraised in the chatbox needed the instructor’s
Career outcomes. This paper reports both on baseline access, retention, andcareer data and a logic model associated with a comprehensive curricular reform resulting fromthe access, retention and career baseline data. As a result of this baseline data, the ERCeducational team has found innovative ways to infuse inductively based, situated curriculum andinstruction in addition to a student-centric outcome metrics into all aspects of the BMEcurriculum and associated laboratory experiences. These assessment measures build on theprinciples established in educational psychology and include pre and posttest BME conceptinventories, rubric-based laboratory assessments, BME efficacy measures and employersatisfaction measures. A comprehensive assessment
grants in physics-based virtual reality. He is now a tenured associate professor at San Diego State University, revisiting and researching human bone remodeling algorithms and muscle models using advanced tools of the cyberinfrastructure. He has created a curriculum in which students learn mechanics not by using commercial simulation software, but by creating their own. His interests include opera, sociology, and philosophy. He is currently enjoying teaching his two young children how to ride bicycles. Page 14.495.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Distance Learning and
their scientific communication skills. ´Mr. Jerome Harrison, Ecole de Technologie Sup´erieure ´ Jerome is a M.A.Sc. student at the Imaging and Orthopaedics Research Laboratory at ETS. He specializes in medical image processing, analysis and visualization. ´Mr. Prasun Lala, Ecole de Technologie Sup´erieure ´ Prasun Lala is a member of SARA’s team at the Ecole ´ de technologie sup´erieure (ETS), in Montr´eal, where he focuses on helping graduate students learn skills
2006-1312: FEATURES OF A CONSTRUCTIVIST MICROCLIMATE SITUATEDIN A BEHAVIORIST LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AT A UNIVERSITY-BASEDENGINEERING RESEARCH CONSORTIUMGiri Venkataramanan, University of Wisconsin-Madison Giri Venkataramanan received the B.E. degree in electrical engineering from the Government College of Technology, Coimbatore, India, the M.S. degree from the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, and the Ph.D. degree from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. After teaching electrical engineering at Montana State University, Bozeman, he returned to University of Wisconsin, Madison, as a faculty member in 1999, where he continues to direct research in various areas of electronic power
engineering profession. Enrollments and the recruiting ofyoung students into manufacturing engineering majors have been matters of substantial concernfor at least three decades. The dialogue in 2010 still sounds remarkably like that in 1980;persuading bright youngsters to enter the challenging world of manufacturing engineering hasbeen a hard sell throughout this entire period. In parallel, the struggle to equip and maintain Page 15.272.2modern teaching laboratories has changed little over three decades. Perhaps more so than mostengineering disciplines, manufacturing laboratories are expensive of both space and equipment,and persuading the
his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. from Rutgers University. Prior to joining Rowan, he was Professor of ChemicalEngineering at Manhattan College. Dr. Slater's research and teaching interests are in separation and purificationtechnology, laboratory development, and investigating novel processes for fields such as bio/pharmaceutical/foodengineering and specialty chemical manufacture. He has authored over 100 papers and several book chapters. Dr. Page 9.728.9Slater has been active in ASEE, having served as Program Chair and Director of the Chemical Engineering Division.He has held every office in the DELOS Division. Dr. Slater has received
exception of the director, will be filled in a special-title series. These positions are primarily upper division nine-month teaching appointments. However, due to thenature of the Paducah program, these appointments involve additional assignments, including studentrecruitment from local high schools and the business community, undergraduate laboratory and Page 5.222.3computer software development, assistance with summer job placement for students, and professionaldevelopment. The traditional responsibilities involving instruction, academic advisement, anduniversity service also apply. Because of these unique responsibilities and the
studentscan either choose correct combinations by analytical means based on gear train theory or by trialand error by attempting to assemble different combinations in the virtual environment.This laboratory exercise was administered to 35 mechanical engineering students, who weredivided into groups of 2 or 3. The detailed procedure of this laboratory exercise and the learningeffectiveness of the laboratory exercise were discussed in detail previously25.Here, the focus is on the process of the students performing the assembly in the virtualenvironment. From the student activities in the laboratory, it was observed that all groups wereable to complete the assembly (with the help of a teaching assistant). Also, it was noticed thatmost groups followed
. Education has been a part of the partnering phenomenon from its earliestbeginnings, with some of the most dramatic examples involving the donation ofequipment, software, and the favorable pricing of systems by Apple Computer, Inc.Business and education have been partners for a very long time. Educators rely onbusinesses for contributions to classroom technology, executives on loan, aides andinternships, endowments, and a host of other important inputs that raise the capabilitylevels of local schools, colleges, and universities well beyond what could be achievedindependently by those institutions. At the same time, educational institutions teach the
.Did these transatlantic exchange students believe that the teaching styles encountered abroad were more effective in supporting learning than those at home? 4.What changes in style (at home and “study abroad” institution) do they believe could be adopted as a result of their experience?In the case of theme two, as an output of the semi-structured interviews, five important“course related” variables emerged as being of interest and worth exploring further. Thesevariables were: a. The amount of course related “homework” typically employed. b.The amount of “self directed learning” undertaken. c. The extent of the credit weighting for “continuous assessment”. d.The degree of enforcement of attendance at lectures and laboratories. e. The
the new requirements are different from the old requirements. The philosophy ofthe course outlines is different. The learning objectives and goals are also new and different.We have introduced several new courses and modified several existing ones.We also propose using new teaching methods such as Group Study approach and Project-BasedApproach to help student learning.There are many challenges to implementing our proposals. One of them is ability to providelaboratory equipment and design laboratory experiments for the new and some existing courses.To be able to help meet this need, we propose using available tools such as MIT’s iLab, etc.In addition, we also have availability of MIT Open Courseware which can be downloaded freeonline and has
time. Contemporary manufacturers have the option of selecting optimumtechnologies or processes to suit their manufacturing environment. Fast paced transformations inEngineering Technology (ET) field require new and enhanced learning and teaching strategies inengineering technology curriculum. More than ever, the educational advance is leaning towardsmeeting the demands of industrial world. Engineering Technology curricula needs to adapt tonovel technologies and modern tools by enabling students to acquire meaningful and relevantpractices. Laboratory activities should be incorporated into dry-lectured courses, being vital toET programs, since they are ultimately enhancing the understanding process, leading towardsdeveloping experience-led
; Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”References1. Some fundamental topics in introductory circuit analysis: a critique;Davis, A.M.; Education, IEEE Transactions on , Volume: 43 , Issue: 3 , Aug. 2000Pages:330 3352. A new design-oriented laboratory for the introductory circuits core course at Penn StateUniversity; Mayer, T.S.; Medunick, J.R.; Chunyu Zhang; Jackson, T.N.; Frontiers in EducationConference, 1997. 27th Annual Conference. 'Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change'.Proceedings. , Volume: 1 , 5-8 Nov. 1997 Pages:506 - 510 vol.13. Laboratories for introductory circuits and electronics; Takach, M.D.; Heeren, R.G.; Frontiersin Education Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 1995 , Volume: 2 , 1-4 Nov. 1995 Pages
Session 1413 Life-long Learning Experiences and Simulating Multi-disciplinary Teamwork Experiences through Unusual Capstone Design Projects Joseph A. Shaeiwitz Richard Turton West Virginia UniversityIntroductionThere is significant consternation among engineering educators regarding the teaching of and theassessment of “an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams,” and “a recognition of the needfor, and an ability to engage in life-long learning.” 1 Questions commonly heard are: “Are werequired to have a multi
Annual Conference, St. Louis, June 2000.12. Kumar, D. and Meeden, L., “A Robot Laboratory for Teaching Artificial Intelligence,” Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Atlanta, 1998, pp. 341-344.13. Russell, S. and Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, 1994.14. Arkin, R., Behavior-Based Robotics; The MIT Press; 1998.15. Brooks, R., “A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot,” IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, Vol. RA-2, 1986, pp. 14-23.JERRY B. WEINBERGJerry B. Weinberg is an Assistant Professor in the Computer Science Department at Southern Illinois University -Edwardsville. He teaches courses and conducts research in artificial
also part ofCAMP. Projects appropriate to the academic calendar and student abilities provide experience forCAMP students and an aid to industry. The three faculty co-directors work with six graduate studentsand a dozen undergraduates who are managers and mentors for 33 CAMP student leaders who in turnlead multidisciplinary projects which involve approximately 100 students. Since many of these projectsare connected with courses, approximately 400 students are indirectly affected.IntroductionThe role of engineers has changed in recent years from solitary designers in the laboratory tomembers of teams that have to sell their ideas and work with customers. Engineering educationis changing to meet these changed needs; however, teaching effective