understanding of and a commitment to address professionaland ethical responsibilities including a respect for diversity2.To provide a collaborative academic environment for cross-border students, an emphasis wasplaced on technology development in multidisciplinary teams. Collaborate with the ComputerSystems (CSE) engineering program from Tecnológico Nacional de Mexico /InstitutoTecnológico de Matamoros (TecNM/ITM), presented an opportunity for the students to shareideas and analyze how other engineering program frame the problem and conceptualize thepotential solutions.The language barrier was present, but the international engineering standards and diversesoftware platforms were used by the students as the initial bridge to start communicating
science and engineering education and careers in Qatar. These surveys usedLikert scales and asked respondents to assess the level to which they agreed or disagreed with agiven statement. For each program, the first survey was administered on the first day of theprogram, before any presentations or activities. The second survey was administered at the endof the two-week program. The same statements were presented on the pre-program and post-program survey, with the post-program survey adding additional questions.Over the course of the two 10-day programs, students joined morning plenary sessions in whichthey participated in presentations on topics such as engineering ethics, critical thinking, technicalcommunication skills and the role of
, USAID Who We AreOne of Four Original Executive Branch DepartmentsSecretary of State Third in Succession to PresidentFirst Archive for State Documents Declaration of Independence ConstitutionFY12 Budget ~ $47 billion - State, USAIDState - 61,000 employees 12,500 Foreign Service - 7,000 Generalists - 5,500 Specialists 8,500 Civil Service 40,000 Foreign Service NationalsHQ, 163 Embassies, 98 ConsulatesUSAID – 6,000 employees (2,500 in Washington), 90 Missions SET for Grand Challenges• Science, engineering and technology (SET) have disruptive (good and bad) impacts on social, cultural, ethical, civil, economic, political and military affairs• Disruptive
ethical practices Patience and Persistence Contribute to society as an active citizen Technical Knowledge Life-long Learning Networking Ambitious but collective Team Management Aggressive but nurturing Communication Skills Critical Thinking Honesty and Integrity Emotional Maturity Achievement Orientation Interdisciplinary approach Table 1: The enriched list based on the survey and the leading modelsDeriving the top competencies based on views of expert entrepreneursWe then
Diego Mark Peters received a Bachelors degree in Economics from Georgetown University and then pursued a business career in New York City, working in many of the major business disciplines. Over the past twenty years, Mark has worked and consulted for large corporations, professional organizations, hospitals, churches, and universities. Dr. Peters earned a Masters Degree from the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry and a Ph.D. in Leadership Studies from the University of San Diego. He has taught in a variety of disciplines including: Business Management, Organizational Leadership, Economics, Ethics, and Leadership Stud- ies, at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Dr. Peters has twice served on the
populations, such as low-income students in engineering, by replacing previousmeasurements with this one that accounts for other considerations beyond just income. We claimthat any use other than what is proposed violates the basis and ethics of our work. Figure 1. Socioeconomic inequality as informed by neighborhood socioeconomic inequality.In our framework, we consider neighborhood socioeconomic inequality to be a product of multipleforms of oppression, informed by joint understanding of different localities such ZIP codes andcounties, which have histories of discriminatory redlining [27]. Information about income by ZIPcode and County Code are both available through the United States Census Bureau [32]. Further,multiple forms of discrimination
, Rowan University Dr. Scott Streiner is an assistant professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department (ExEEd) at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, with a focus in engineering education. His research interests include engineering global competency, cur- ricula and assessment; pedagogical innovations through game-based and playful learning; spatial skills development and engineering ethics education. His funded research explores the nature of global com- petency development by assessing how international experiences improve the global perspectives of en- gineering students. Dr. Streiner has published papers and given presentations in global
ethics requirements). Even though we have over500 students on our undergraduate degree course (approximately 140 per year), in total, 189students completed questionnaires, across all 4 years of the programme: year 1 (52), year 2(39), year 3 (40), year 4 (22) and did not state (36). An open-comments box was madeavailable following the survey questions for each of the 4 discrete topics for students to addtheir own comments if they so wished, which were also collated anonymously. Additionally,we have started conducting interviews with individual students. Again, an email was sent toall students across the 4-year programme seeking volunteers (they were reimbursed with £10vouchers). As students received a financial incentive and we were faced with
Understanding of Engineering Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28153 7. Bielefeldt, A. R., & Polmear, M., & Knight, D., & Canney, N. E., & Swan, C. (2017, June), Incorporation of Ethics and Societal Impact Issues into First-Year Engineering Course:: Results of a National Survey Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/28515 8. Whalen, R., & Freeman, S. F., & Love, J. O., & Schulte Grahame, K., & Hertz, J. L. (2018, June), Evolution of Cornerstone: Creating a First-year Culture with a Multifaceted Approach Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference
; and (6) grand challenges. Each of the modules is comprised of two or threelessons that introduce each topic, with lessons accompanied by hands-on activities and in- andout-of-class reflections to actively engage the students.World-Class Engineering Attributes: This module is comprised of three lessons—world-classengineering attributes, teamwork, and leadership and ethics—that are broadly applicable to anyengineering discipline. These lessons invite the students to reflect on their own experiences, theirown motivations for pursuing engineering, and to think more broadly about the role ofengineering and engineers in society.Systems Thinking and Sustainability: This module incorporates core lessons on seeing the “bigpicture”, i.e., systems
professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Valparaiso University. His sci- entific research is in the area of nanotechnology. His pedagogical research interests include creativity, design, ethics, and computer programming. 2019 FYEE Conference : Penn State University , Pennsylvania Jul 28 Promoting Student Confidence in a First-Year Electrical and Computer Engineering Course Jennifer Felder Marley and Douglas Tougaw Valparaiso University, jennifer.marley@valpo.edu, doug.tougaw@valpo.eduAbstract – First-year electrical and computer engineering programming fundamentals, and the analysis of electrical(ECE) students who have not yet
digital library, and professional development workshops such as the STEM Think Tank (Goal 1). D. Have their STEM interest sparked by using modern engineering tools and gaining new knowledge of engineering careers (Goal 2). E. Understand the social relevance and ethical implications of engineering activities related to manufacturing (human rights, environmental impact, etc.) (Goal 2). F. Share knowledge, ideas and concepts working on teams with professional and pre- service teachers, research mentors and industry partners (Goal 2). G. Acquire collaboration and networking possibilities through interaction with real-world engineering industry and government mentors and partners (Goal 3). H. Attain
. Severalapproacheshavebeenusedtoattempttobridgethisgap.Theapproachesincludepairingengineeringfacultywithfacultyfromotherdisciplinessuchasthesocialsciences,liberalarts,andpeacestudiestodevelopcontentandtolearnformeachother.Inaddition,avarietyof“FacultyEmpowermentWorkshops”wereoffered.Faculty Empowermentworkshops are events dedicated to providing the faculty with preparation needed to effectivelyteach professional skills such as teamwork, communication, social impact, and ethics. Thesealso include discussions of effective pedagogies (e.g. active learning, or project-based learning)and innovative approaches such as incorporating everyday examples. Three FacultyEmpowerment Workshops were held during the past year, which include:• Teaching Student Teams This workshop, from Matthew Ohland at Purdue University, was designed to help faculty design, implement, and evaluate positive
projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Susannah C
associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Introduction and Assessment of iNewton for the Engaged Learning of
include funding opportunities for students who starttheir engineering studies at ECU and students who elect to begin their engineering studies at acommunity college. Currently 23% of seniors scheduled to graduate from the engineeringprogram at ECU in either May or December 2018 began their college experience at a communitycollege. It has been observed that transfer students tend to be more mature than many of thestudents who started as freshmen and have a very strong work ethic. This makes transferstudents, who have proven they are capable of completing college course for two years, lessrisky investments for scholarship funds. In the 2015-16 academic year, 49% of bachelor’sdegree recipients had been previously enrolled in two-year public
classrooms andprovided with opportunities to visualize what process skills look like in student interactions andstudent written work.IntroductionIt is generally recognized that students need to become proficient in skills that help themoptimize their education in active learning environments and prepare them to be successful in theworkplace. Recent National Research Council (NRC) reports [1, 2] focused on undergraduateeducation in STEM fields noted that current global challenges require people working in sciencefields to be skilled in solving problems, reasoning, communication, and collaboration withpeople in other disciplines. In a similar fashion, the engineering community listed teamwork,communication, and ethics/professionalism as being critical
director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
that includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and ethically-sound application of knowledge to improve the health of Canadians, provide more effectivehealth services and products, and strengthen the health care system.” [1]. Knowledge translationis emphasized in health care especially because: 1) there are high costs associated with longtemporal lags and 2) there are large gaps between new research and clinical practice which leadto an inefficient use of limited health care resources [2–4]. This area of scholarship has advancedto the stage where there are journals (e.g., Implementation Science) dedicated to addressing theseconcerns specifically. In practice, knowledge translation can be applied to the initial design ofresearch protocols [5
Paper ID #23879Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Peer AssessmentDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing.Dr. Ferry Pramudianto, North Carolina State University Dr. Ferry Pramudianto is a Senior Research Engineer at Computer
- Year Students as of 2009 The reasons for the low retention in the minority undergraduate students were identified in the literature as lack of academic preparedness, campus climate, lack of commitment to educational goals and the institution, problems in social and academic integration and the lack of financial support [5]. The authors’ institution, the only HBCU with the Water Resources Management and Environmental Engineering majors, has a professional and ethical obligation to change this situation by providing financial support and academic guidance through the faculty and peer mentorship to the African American students, especially the female students from the low-income families. In addition, the department
policies. Currently, the federal government is threatening to rescind theDeferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Consequently, at the time ofsubmission, there was more disagreement than consensus regarding DACA recipients andimmigration policies in general.This political climate is important because SCC is located in a state with a large population ofDACA recipients and a large population of immigrants. When creating the recruitment survey,our research group initially wanted to ask questions about US citizenship, but given the largeimmigrant population at our study site, ethics, and overall empathy, we decided not to includethis question on the survey. Additionally, we believe that this political climate might influencesome students
literate citizen needs to have: (1) a basic vocabulary of scientific terms andconstructs; and (2) a general understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry [5, 6]. The sixelements of science literacy are: (a) understanding basic science concepts, (b) understandingnature of science, (c) understanding ethics guiding scientists’ work, (d) understandinginterrelationships between science and society, (e) understanding interrelationship betweenscience and humanities, and (f) understanding the relationships and differences between scienceand technology [7]. The proportion of U.S. adults qualifying as being scientifically literate isnow 28% and has doubled over the last two decades, but the current level is still problematic fora democratic society that
for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Khalil Najafi, University of Michigan Khalil Najafi is the Schlumberger Professor of Engineering, and Peter and Evelyn Fuss Chair of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering at the University of Michigan since September 2008. He received the B.S., M.S., and the Ph.D. degrees in 1980, 1981, and 1986 respectively, all in Electrical Engineering from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. His research interests include: micromachining technologies, micromachined sensors, actuators, and MEMS; analog integrated circuits; implantable biomedical mi- crosystems; hermetic and vacuum
courses that: Accumulate project knowledge Transmit project knowledgeFor social implications – important concepts are those that: Promote and safeguard the health and safety as well as the welfare of the public; Demonstrate an awareness of the consequences any negative impact; Follows a code of ethics that promotes integrity and engineering professionalism.Students that adhere to this process are expected to work on different aspects of their seniorprojects as they take classes that deal with the above concepts in a gradual but interactive format[18].ConclusionThe senior project course EGT417 outcomes are mapped according to the ABET accreditationcriteria [1], as depicted in table 2. Similarly all other MMET program courses are
to modern problem solving andprogramming methods using C. Students use appropriate tools and discuss ethical issues arisingfrom the impact of computing upon society. Topics in this course include Unix; representation ofinteger, floating point, and character data; declarations; loops and conditionals; functions andparameter passing; searching and sorting; structured data types; and pointers. The students usedIaaS to implement one of the three programming assignments during the course.The learning objectives for this class are as follows: 1. To demonstrate understanding of the basic problem solving process of implementing a computer program to solve a problem. 2. To write and run simple computer programs using C 3. To appreciate
roughly 1000 freshman engineering students form, teamwork, and literature search. The winter quarter’severy year. A working group consisting of faculty last three weeks focus on project management, engineeringrepresentatives from all engineering departments within the ethics, and metacognition (reflecting upon the lessons learnedcollege was formed to formulate the revision based upon a in the passing two quarters and understanding how to applyprior taskforce’s identified areas of emphasis. Two faculty them in future projects). To emphasize more hands-onrepresentatives, one from the Engineering Technology learning during class, lectures and assessments were placedDepartment and another from the Engineering
Computer Engineering at Valparaiso University. His scien- tific research is in the area of nanotechnology. His pedagogical research interests include working with first-year students, design, ethics, and computer programming. 2018 FYEE Conference: Glassboro, New Jersey Jul 25 Completing a Lab in 50 Minutes: Optimizing Student Attention Span Jennifer Felder Marley and Douglas Tougaw Valparaiso University, jennifer.marley@valpo.edu, doug.tougaw@valpo.eduAbstract – Accommodating students’ relatively short pedagogical overhead to such a strategy, especially requiringattention spans is a significant
professional expectations of engineering as a career and discipline [9], [10]. Someprograms also use these courses to foster engineering ethics, writing and communication skills,teamwork competencies, and to develop community and engineering identity within students toaid in retention of engineering students [11], [12]. In other words, first-year engineering designstudents are typically gaining other competencies beside academic objectives (the what part ofengineering) in addition to learning how competencies are enacted within the engineeringdiscipline.While all engineering programs may structure their first year and design experiences differently[11], engineering education and design literature concurs that the emphasis on authentic andexperiential
do students place on their first-year engineering experiences? 2) What connections do students make between their first-year engineering experiences and subsequent engineering courses and professional experiences? 3) What technical content and skills do students suggest for a first-year engineering experience?Course BackgroundThe first-year engineering experience at Ohio Northern University is comprised of twosequential 3-credit hour courses. During the time at which the study participants took the course,the fall semester was comprised of several multi-week projects and contained various topics suchas visual modeling, technical writing, basic circuits, Excel, units of measurement, ethics,engineering design fundamentals, and