-friendly workforce development on-line classroom tailored to specific opportunities forstudent improvement.The consulting team began by interviewing graduating seniors who had recently taken theWorkKeys assessment. They expressed their frustrations with finding specific lessons buriedamongst thousands of pages across nearly two-dozen PDFs with no indices or tables of contents.This required the students to open each PDF in order and scroll through every page until finallyidentifying the desired lesson. This was an extremely time-consuming process for the studentsespecially those without high-speed internet access at home.Rather than immediately seeking a solution, the team was instructed to first conductbenchmarking research of best practices in
research and design phases of their projects.Following the literature on social construction of technology (in particular Guston and Sarewitz, 2002), we callthis pedagogical approach “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” The aim of this approach is to provide anexplicit mechanism for observing, critiquing, and influencing social values as they become embedded ininnovations. This approach to technology assessment differs from traditional models that typically focus on“impact assessments” of what the effects of a new technology are on society after the technology has beenintroduced. Real-time technology assessment attempts to incorporate potential societal implications into theactual “real-time” design processes that go into the construction of a new
in the room, as “a-ha” momentshappen for each of the students.Increased Impact and Student Numbers through Cross-Coupling and SynergyThe ability to better articulate a common vision and mission that provides technical leadershipdevelopment to students at all stages of their MIT journey, from sophomore year throughpost-graduate study, will allow us to reach more of the MIT student population, increasing theirability to leverage their technical skills for greater impact. This will be to the benefit of thestudents, the programs, MIT, and the world. We highlight the potential student pathways betweenthe individual programs in Figure 8.In practical terms, better messaging about these pathways results both in more students enteringthe individual
Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS), Master of Business Administration (MBA) and in Engineering Education (PhD). Homero has 15 years of international experience working in industry and academia. His research focuses on contemporary and inclusive pedagogical practices, industry-driven competency development in engineering, and understanding the experiences of Latinx and Native Amer- icans in engineering from an asset-based perspective. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, and was inducted in the Bouchet Honor Society. American
AC 2011-2041: INTEGRATING COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTION THROUGH-OUT COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CURRIC-ULAJanet E. Burge, Miami University Janet Burge is an Assistant Professor in the Miami University Computer Science and Software Engineer- ing department. She received her Ph.D. in Computer Science from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2005) and performed her undergraduate work at Michigan Technological University (1984). Her research in- terests include design rationale, software engineering, AI in design, and knowledge elicitation. She is a co-author (with Jack Carroll, Ray McCall,and Ivan Mistrik) of the book ”Rationale-Based Software En- gineering”. Dr. Burge is a recipient of a NSF CAREER Award for
related to autonomous robots, in which I was able to apply theoretical and practical knowledge acquired throughout my academic and professional career.Marcelo Sacilotti Villas Boas Control and Automation Engineering student in Instituto Maua de Tecnologia, interested in subjects like mechanics, electronics, programming and control, works as intern at Instituto Maua de Tecnologia in a autonomus vehicles research group.Dr. Anderson Harayashiki Moreira, Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia Graduated in Control and Automation Engineering from Instituto Mau´a de Tecnologia (IMT) (2008). Master in Mechatronics Engineering from the Instituto Tecnol´ogico de Aeron´autica (ITA) (2011). PhD in Mechatronics Engineering from the
. Lobbestael is a member of the United States Society on Dams, the American Society of Engineering Education, and the ASCE Geo-Institute and is a member of the G-I Committee ”Embankments, Dams, and Slopes.”Dr. Matthew Sleep, Oregon Institute of Technology Matthew Sleep is an assistant professor of civil engineering at Oregon Institute of Technology. Prior to Oregon Tech, Matthew received his PhD at Virginia Tech researching slope stability, levees, transient seepage and reliability. Current research includes reliability, slope stability and geotechnical engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Investigating the Effectiveness of New Geotechnical Engineering
Ashland O. Brown, Professor of Mechanical Engineering, University of the Pacific He has served as dean of engineering for ten years at both the University of the Pacific and South Carolina State University and headed engineering groups at Ford Motor Co. and General Motors Corp. The engineering groups included a product design section composed of product analysis engineers finite element analysis experts and prod- uct development engineers. He has taught engineering courses for over twenty years in thermodynamics, solar engineering, graphics, dynamics, machine design, and finite elements methods at the University of the Pacific. He has over fifty referred technical research publications, and conference papers with
classrooms and programming under the broad theme of improving the environment to improve people’s quality of life.Melissa M. Bilec (Associate Professor)April Dukes Dr. April Dukes is the Faculty and Future Faculty Program Director for the Engineering Educational Research Center (EERC) and the Institutional Co-leader for Pitt-CIRTL (Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching, and Learning) at the University of Pittsburgh. She leads local professional development courses and facilitate workshops on instructional, advising, and mentoring best practices for both current and future STEM faculty. I also work alongside faculty seeking to better the experiences of undergraduate and graduate students through educational research
within the overall nationalpopulation. Faculty members and administrators play key roles in academia, from deciding whogets hired in faculty roles to teach and advise students, to deciding policies and practices thatsupport student retention and graduation. Thus, the beliefs of STEM faculty members andadministrators about who belongs in their institutions, in their disciplines, and the types ofopportunities and access they should have speak to the decision-making that shapes the exclusionthat occurs in STEM.PurposeThis study is part of a larger research project designed to investigate factors that help or hinderindividuals from minoritized racial and ethnic identities when pursuing careers in the STEMprofessoriate. The research questions that
AC 2012-3567: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF GLOBAL VIRTUALTEAMS TO TRADITIONAL STUDY ABROAD PROGRAMS IN ENGINEER-ING EDUCATIONMr. Aaron G. Ball, Brigham Young University Aaron G. Ball is a mechanical engineering M.S. candidate at the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University. He is also concurrently a M.B.A. candidate at the Marriott School of Management at Brigham Young University. He graduated summa cum laude with a B.S. me- chanical engineering degree from Brigham Young University, Idaho. Ball has previously worked in the automotive and aerospace industries. His current research is focused on identifying and validating global competencies for engineers and developing and
department is responsi- ble for ensuring the quality training of program evaluators, partnering with faculty and industry to conduct robust and innovative technical education research, and providing educational opportunities on sustainable assessment processes for program continuous improvement worldwide. She is Principal Investigator of a NSF-funded validity study of her direct method for teaching and measur- ing the ABET engineering professional skills and is adjunct associate professor in the School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University where she co-teaches the senior design capstone sequence.Dr. Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof is
throughconsequent structural and curriculum amendments to the present. The strengths, challenges,weaknesses and ongoing evaluations of that program are presented, with particular referenceto innovations in delivery and assessment.At this time when research is showing that the process of “becoming an engineer”15 and theconstruction by students of their engineering identity16,17 are important issues for retention, Page 14.736.4the opportunity for the early development of the sense of belonging and affiliation, providedby a common program taught entirely in-house suggests that this paper may provideexemplars of best practice for other programs.History and
InnovationIn addition to our discussion of these four factors’ impact on corporate innovation, the secondmajor element of each corporate visit was each industrial partner’s recommendations ofcompetencies, mindsets and knowledge for future engineering innovators, especially those notprovided by today’s engineering education. Both corporate innovation leaders and recentengineering graduates provided over 160 recommendations. The second part of the paperpresents a summary of their answers and reflections of the authors in the section title “The Voiceof Corporate Innovation Leaders.” Page 23.17.4 The Culture of
research to a broader audience, training is provided tobuild the fellows’ professional development skills including time management, researchpresentation skills, and interviewing skills.In this paper we will share our best practices in the IMPACT LA program on enhancing thepipeline to recruit minority students and prepare them for advanced degrees in engineering fields.We also present the preliminary assessment data to show the positive impact on K-12 students’perceptions of engineers and on the professional development of our graduate fellows.Constituents of the IMPACT LA PipelineTo strengthen the K-20 engineering pipeline for underrepresented minorities, specificallyHispanic students, the IMPACT LA program has formed partnerships with the Los
rankings for the last 10 years, WSU’s writing inthe disciplines program functions as a national leader for prioritizing writing across courses, andfor emphasizing a rhetorical approach to writing support wherein students are asked to produce avariety of genres for different audiences and disciplines. The writing program at WSU is representative of the kinds institutional writing programsthat have developed in response to the Writing in the Disciplines (WID) movement. The WIDmovement, too, has contributed to pedagogical research on lab report writing. The research inengineering education mostly addresses pedagogical strategies and best practices for promotingwriting to learn principles. Often, these studies tend to focus on the efficacies of
2005semester.BackgroundLast year at this meeting the authors presented a paper describing the University of Texas atTyler Electrical Engineering Laboratory Style Guide and assessing its impact on the writing of Page 10.1009.1upper-division EE students (http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2004-457_Final.pdf). The StyleGuide is a document drafted to help junior and senior-level electrical engineering students write Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationstronger, more coherent laboratory reports. The authors’ research
143 On Exploring the Connection between Hispanic Engineering Students’ Educational Goals and Communal Obligations: for Project-Based Learning through Community Engagement Lily Gossage, College of Engineering California State University, Long BeachAbstractThe goal of this research was to acquire a deeper understanding of the perceptions held byLatino/Hispanic engineering students, specifically what factors students associate theireducational efforts with and the extent to which their communal goals impact their academicgoals. Blending the concurrent nested and
discussion is generally rewarding for students who are more “verbally gifted” inwritten expression and may create advantages for certain groups of students over another onespecifically those whom English is not their first language. Verbal communication is an essentialskill for engineers and the impact of the online discussion on developing communication skillscould be studied in the future research. The strategies and tools discussed in this study could beinspiring for instructors as to how they may repurpose the available resources and learning toolsto maximize their instructional practice. While the approach presented in this study is focusedon using a specific discussion tool, the presented approach can be implemented for other onlinecourses
graduates. 16 Page 17.34.17INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION Engineering education research results will be translated for the design of future interventions such as workshops and seminars. ISTE will work towards the establishment of an alliance with leading technological universities in the world that would include an interchange of faculty, students and curricula to do research and offer post-graduate degree programs. 17 Page 17.34.18INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION ISTE would like to organize a series of
auniversity survival skills course for the College.STEPHANIE BLAISDELL is the acting director of Women’s Programs for the College of Engineering andApplied Sciences at ASU. Stephanie previously served as the assistant director for the program since itsinception in 1993. Stephanie holds a master’s degree in Counseling, and is a Ph.D. candidate in CounselingPsychology at ASU. Her research focuses on women’s career development in non-traditional fields.CATHERINE COSGROVE earned an MS in Environmental Resources from Arizona State University (ASU).She was the Director of Recruitment and Women's Programs for the College of Engineering and AppliedSciences at ASU. She designed and implemented programs to attract, support and retain students toengineering and
Fellow. She joined the Construction Science faculty at the University of Oklahoma in 2010. Dr. Holliday is a registered Professional Engineer. Her research interests have been in the areas of structural engineer- ing, earthquake resistant buildings, low-cost earthquake solutions, and design and construction of earthen buildings – specifically Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB). Dr. Holliday participated in the assessment and evaluation following the May 20th 2013 Moore, OK tornado. Her most recent research interest is healthy and safe school designs.Camilo Pena, University of Oklahoma Camilo Pena is a Graduate Student in Architecture at the University of Oklahoma and a Research As- sistant for the College of
Engineer in Florida.Dr. Marie A. Boyette, FLATE Dr. Marie Boyette is the Associate Director for the FLATE Center, a NSF Center of Excellence located at Hillsborough Community College. Dr. Boyette’s research centers around data structure and analy- sis which deliver meaningful impact for projects and programs. She earned a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction from the University of South Florida with a triple emphasis in Measurement and Research, Adult Education, and Communication. Her practice includes development of experiential learning strate- gies providing measurable instructional outcomes for educators, traditional, and non-traditional students. ”Summer Camp Style” professional development workshops for teachers
sociotechnical issues in the context of engineering practice. • They were conducted by researchers whose primary or core expertise was not in the disciplines that contribute most directly to the professional skills, more specifically, almost exclusively by people with advanced engineering degrees. Their engagement with the professional skill-related outcomes is an example of the expansion of horizons and concerns that EC2000 sought to promote. Nonetheless, it limited the depth with which they could articulate their evaluation criteria. As the outline for a scenario designed to assess understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (reproduced below from McCormack et al. 2014, table 6
Page 25.738.2expertise appropriate for professional practice”. Civil engineering graduates must “demonstratethe ability for self-directed learning, and develop their own learning plan”. “Self-directed 1learning is a mode of lifelong learning because it is the ability to learn on one’s own with the aidof formal education”.In the literatures on civil engineering education, however, few research efforts have been foundto deliberately cultivate students’ self-directed learning or SRL skill development by usingexplicit integrative instructions based on effective theoretical frameworks from cognitive scienceand educational psychology. It remains up to
StartGreater Lafayette Research and recommend improved data management tools forRecreational Soccer the leagueAllianceCaregiver Created and installed a website for the organizationCompanionPurdue’s Boiler Researched and identified ways to improve data management ofVolunteer Network volunteersFreshman Designed and implemented outreach curriculum for middleEngineering school childrenTrinity Mission Developed training materials for fixing computers and appliances for thrift store sales.Hanna Community Tutored after school children and reported on ways to improveCenter facilities through technologyImagination Station Designed
AC 2010-1106: INTEGRATING COMMUNICATION AS A NEW LEARNINGCOMPONENT INTO CHINESE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING PROGRAMFanyu Zeng, Indiana Wesleyan University Page 15.758.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Integrating Communication as a New Learning Component into Chinese Software Engineering ProgramAbstractEngineering programs in China generally focus on development of student’s ability in learningmathematics and engineering theories with limited exposures to their practical skill development.Recent research finds that lack of soft skill training on human communication may severelyaffect student’s ability in conveying their thoughts and
in detail how the engineering design process was used to include: o Identification/description of the need being addressed, working criteria and goals/objectives o Gathering of needed information: describe results of your research including a patent search o Description of the method(s) used (Ex: brainstorming) to search for creative solutions, how the method was implemented, and what the results were o Description and preliminary design(s) of at least 2 alternative designs/ideas for your toy/game o Describe how the best solution from the alternatives was selected and include an Evaluation Matrix Include a paragraph explaining
at the University of Colorado Boulder. Her research focuses on ways to encourage more students, especially women and those from nontraditional demographic groups, to pursue interests in the eld of engineering. Janet assists in recruitment and retention efforts locally, nationally, and internationally, hoping to broaden the image of engineering, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020
that have been attempted over the past two decades at asummer science camp for high school students. The most successful designs are showcasedalong with the teaching methodology that produced them. The project was designed to teachstudents about engineering research, teamwork, and electrical engineering principles. To assessthe outcomes, the journal papers written by the teams of high school students and feedback fromformer students who are now engineers were analyzed. The student’s papers show that everyyear the project resulted in a circuit that could at least produce sound. The students surveyedoverwhelmingly considered the project an influentially positive experience. Former studentsconsistently reported that the greatest impact was not