, "Developing an Integrated Curriculum-wide Teamwork Instructional Strategy," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake city, UT, 2018.[9] A. S. o. C. Engineers, "the Vision for Engineering in 2025," ASCE, Reston, VA, 2007.[10] A. S. o. M. Engineers, "Vision 2030: Creating the Future of Mechanical Engineering Education," ASME, NY, 2012.[11] S. G. S. C. H. L. D. K. L. G. E. Ö. L. M. &. T. G. Sheppard, "Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) (TR-10-01)," Center for the Advancement for Engineering Education., Seattle WA, 2010.[12] K. J. B. Anderson, S. S. Courter, T. McGlamery, T. M. Nathans-Kelly and C. G. Nicometo
Entrepreneurship no. 1 (1):5–19.[3] Gerhart, A. L., & Melton, D. E. (2016, June), Entrepreneurially Minded Learning:Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery, Opportunity Identification, and Value Creation intoProblem-Based Learning Modules with Examples and Assessment Specific to Fluid Mechanics,Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana.10.18260/p.26724[4] Bell-Huff, C., & Morano, H. L. (2017, June), Using Simulation Experiences, RealCustomers, and Outcome Driven Innovation to Foster Empathy and an Entrepreneurial Mindsetin a Sophomore Engineering Design Studio, Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference& Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. https://peer.asee.org/27425[5] Zhu, H., & Mertz, B. E. (2017
compare participation and outcomes for (a) the one high school student National Weather Service Quantitative Precipitation Proceedings of the 2018 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference The University of Texas at Austin April 4-6, 2018 he or she judges had the highest level of success, (b) the SEES was implemented in 2016, 100% are pursuing STEM one high school student he or she judges experienced the degrees when they enter college. TSGC will track the SEES least amount of success in the internship program, and students for graduation rate, major, and
., 2002.[5] B. Palmer and R. M. Marra, “Individual Domain-Specific Epistemologies: Implications for Educational Practice,” in Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs, M. S. Khine, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008, pp. 325–350.[6] J. H. Yu and J. Strobel, “Instrument Development : Engineering-specific Epistemological , Epistemic and Ontological Beliefs,” Proc. Res. Eng. Educ. Symp. 2011 - Madrid, pp. 1–8, 2011.[7] J. P. Gee, How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit., 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge, 2014.[8] J. Maeda, “STEM + Art = STEAM,” STEAM J., vol. 1, no. 1, 2013.[9] A. Oner, S. Nite, R. Capraro, and M. Capraro, “From STEM to STEAM: Students’ Beliefs About the Use of Their Creativity,” STEAM J., vol. 2, no. 2
PM and3:30 PM−4:45 PM on Tuesdays and Thursdays.The class time was spent on the following: a) students individually answered three to six conceptual questions followed by peer-to-peer discussion and explanation by the instructor [9] - [11], b) students worked on as many procedural exercises out of the six assigned per topic, and c) instructor delivered micro-lectures on topics requiring extra explanation based on what students struggled with in the pre-class assignments.Only the conceptual questions were graded.Summary of ResultsResults and outcomes based on an analysis of the ALP performance metrics, final examination,surveys, and focus groups were determined and are summarized below.The student-level ALP metrics included
engineering education. Kitana is an active member of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) at WSU, and serves as their Graduate Student Chair for the 2018-19 academic year.David B. Thiessen, Washington State University David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in 1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid physics, acoustics, and engineering education.Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie, Washington State University Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State
to Out-of-Class Participation: Profile of Civil Engineering Student Engagement,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, p. 04017015, 2018.[7] A. J. Barlow, B. D. Lutz, N. P. Pitterson, N. Hunsu, O. Adesope, and S. A. Brown, “Development of the Student Course Cognitive Engagement Instrument ( SCCEI ),” Rev., 2018.[8] B. D. Lutz, A. J. Ironside, N. Hunsu, C. J. Green, S. A. Brown, and O. Adesope, “Measuring Engineering Students ’ In-class Cognitive Engagement : Survey Development informed by Contemporary Educational Theories,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Proc., 2018.[9] A. J. Ironside et al., “Incorporating Faculty Sense Making in the Implementation and Modification of an Instrument to
this pack? The backpack has dimensions 25”x13”x8”. Assume A = 6 lbs, B = 10 lbs, C = 3 lbs, D = 5 lbs, and neglect the weight of the backpack itself. Make other assumptions as needed. https://herpackinglist.com/2013/09/how-to-pack-a-backpack/ Reflect: 1. The backpack is held up by your shoulders and hips. Which of these should support the more weight to maximize efficiency? 2. The video says to tighten the compression straps once the pack is on to stabilize and streamline the pack. Where might these straps be placed, and how should they shift the load of the pack? 3. Does the expert way to pack the backpack align with how you would pack it given
. basic science in a veterinary medicine setting,” Med. Ref. Serv. Q., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21–37, 2002.[2] M. Hepworth, “A framework for understanding user requirements for an information service: Defining the needs of informal carers,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 695–708, 2004.[3] N. K. Sheeja, “Science vs social science: A study of information-seeking behavior and user perceptions of academic researchers",” Libr. Rev., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 522–531, 2010.[4] E. Herman, “End-users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age,” Aslib Proc., vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 431–457, 2001.[5] B. M. Hemminger, D. Lu, K. T. L. Vaughan, and S. J. Adams, “Information seeking
provided feedback on our coding process, Noa Bruhis and Ieshya Anderson for theirperspective and advice, and the reviewers of this manuscript for their support and thoughtfulsuggestions.References[1] T. Church, “Returning Veterans on Campus with War Related Injuries and the Long Road Back Home,” J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2009.[2] L. Zinger and A. Cohen, “Classroom : How Can Colleges Be Better,” Contemp. Issues Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2010.[3] L. McBain, Y. Kim, B. Cook, and K. Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members,” 2012.[4] A. Shackelford, “Documenting the Needs of Student Veterans with Disabilities
Paper ID #27210”I Wish I Could Do More”: A Qualitative Meta-analysis of Early Career En-gineers’ Perceptions of Agency in their WorkplacesDr. Benjamin David Lutz, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Ben Lutz is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Design at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. His research interests include innovative pedagogies in engineering design, conceptual change and develop- ment, school-to-work transitions for new engineers, and efforts for inclusion and diversity within engi- neering. His current work explores how students describe their own learning in engineering design and
construction sequence and processes of building the Dayanta in 3D models. All of the requisite materials – materials, equipment, tools, substructure and superstructure – must be reviewed thoroughly before the student can proceed. Once this evaluation is completed, the student may repeat the process after a two-week time period has passed. This two-week time interval can be tailored to any period. The purpose of this hiatus is to avoid the retention of the results the students have just received [9].B. Score range: from 60 to 80 If a student earns +60 to +80 at first trial, indicating that he/she missed only a few steps, the system will still encourage him/her (though not mandatorily so) to review only related information
” Engineering Studies vol. 2, no. 1, 2010.[11] C. Zoltowski, W. Oakes, and M. Cardella, “Students’ Ways of Experiencing Human-Centered Design,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[12] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. J. Saleem.“Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners.” Journal ofEngineering Education, vol. 96, no. 4, 359 –379, 2007.[13] W. A. Sugar, “What is So Good About User-Centered Design? Documenting the Effect ofUsability Sessions on Novice Software Designers,” Journal of Research on Computing inEducation, vol. 33 no. 3, 2001.[14 ] J. B. Scott, “The Practice of Usability: Teaching User Engagement Through Service-Learning,” Technical
. Atman, O. Eris, J. McDonnell, M. Cardella and J. Borgford-Parnell, “EngineeringDesign Education,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, Ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016, pp. 201-226.[6] M. Zhang, F. Zhong and J. Yan, “Construction of the Course System for GasGeology Based on Training Objectives,” Education Teaching Forum, pp. 70-73, Jan.2019 (In Chinese).[7] X. Liu, S. Zhang, A. Chen, J. Li and B. Li, “Construction of Practical TeachingSystem for Resource Exploration Engineering in Kunming University of Science andTechnology,” Chinese Geological Education. vol. 27, pp. 32-35, 2018 (In Chinese).[8] S. Liu, J. Liu, W. Zhang and C. Chen, “Research on Problem and Strategy forChinese Engineering Practice Education
Paper ID #26915Gender Equality in the Information Systems and Technology Fields: A Com-prehensive Diagnosis at the School of Engineering of the University of MinhoProf. Rosa Maria Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos, University of Minho Rosa Maria de Castro Fernandes Vasconcelos is a Associate Professor at the Department of Textile Engi- neering since 2005. Degree in Textile Engineering by the University of Minho. Professor at the University of Minho since 1984. PhD in Engineering –Technology and Textile Chemistry by the University of Minho in 1993. Rieter Award, 1993. Responsible for several curricular units in the integrated
).InstrumentsValue, Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS)To assess faculty dispositions towards, and use of, specific active learning strategies, the Value,Expectancy, and Cost of Testing Educational Reforms Survey (VECTERS) was utilized [23].VECTERS measures dispositions towards, as well as current and planned use of, three activelearning strategies: (1) Using formative feedback to adjust instruction (2) Integrating real-world applications (3) Facilitating student-to-student discussions in classVECTERS prompts respondents to consider each strategy and consider the degree to which they(a) expect the strategy to be successful, (b) find it valuable, and (c) believe it is costly (e.g., time,resources). The survey
, engineering, and math education and careers for which she recently served two years at the National Science Foundation as a grant adminis- trator. Dr. Rogers provides statistical and methodological consulting on a variety of research, evaluation, and assessment projects.Ms. J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona J. Jill Rogers is the assistant director for ENGR 102 HS at the University of Arizona. ENGR 102 HS is an AP-type, dual credit college level, introductory engineering course offered to high school students. In 2014, the ENGR 102 HS program won the ASEE best practices in K-12 and University partnerships award. Over the years Rogers has developed K-12 science summer camps, conducted K-12 educational re- search
the mark, and what that might do to whether or not it is able to be read, either by human eyesor scanning devices. Figure 5 illustrates two views of the same test grid of UDI codes on rawtitanium plate. Figure 5 - Directly reflecting light can almost make markings disappearThe view on the left has the light source in such a position as to be projecting light onto the gridsurface which is not reflected into the camera lens. The view on the right does have the lightpositioned so that light is reflected directly into the camera lens. Notice how the entire column Bon the left appears to be very dark in contrast with the surrounding material. When the light inthe right view comes into play, however, the effectiveness of column B is
option forthe first four years of the survey, many students still wrote that in as their preferred approach.Below are some representative comments from students who preferred assigned, self-selected, orthe combination.Comments from students who preferred randomly assigned teams: • I would choose assigned teams. I think sometimes not being w/friends can increase productivity. I was in the weird circumstance where even randomly assigned teams put me w/my friends. We worked well together, but obviously was tension between members b/c we didn't want to hurt our friends' feelings on certain things. • I would prefer randomly selected teams; I was on a team w/2 friends and I felt like an outsider. • Assigned -- everyone feels more
. A. Mynderse, A. Sandstrom and Z. Sun, "Dynamic Decoupling of Driveline Dynamics from NVH Driveline Dynamometer: an Industry Sponsored Senior Design Project," SAE 2015 Noise and Vibration Conference and Exhibition, 2015.[3] J. A. Mynderse, R. W. Fletcher, L. Liu, A. L. Gerhart, S. Arslan and K. E. Yee, "A Three-Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on an SAE Collegiate Design Series," ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2016.[4] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Book I: Cognitive Domain, Longman, 1956.[5] J. A. Mynderse, L. Liu, A. Gerhart, X. Xie, W. Jing and K. Yee, "Assessment of a Three-Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone
that influence faculty motivation of effective teaching practices in engineering,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 23-26, 2013, https://peer.asee.org/19604[13] A. Furco, and B. E. Moely. “Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: A multi-campus study,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 83, no. 1, 128-153, 2012.[14] H. M. Matusovich, M. C. Paretti, L. D. McNair, and C. Hixson. “Faculty motivation: A gateway to transforming engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, 302-330, 2014.[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Thousand Oaks
not interested in using the system. A large percentage (87.5%) of thestudents enjoyed the music options provided.Discussion and Future WorkGestural Accuracy and Task CompletionThe low recognition rate/task completion of the core mathematical operational tasks suggestedthat the system was not trained enough to elicit proper results. For some students, the inability togain gesture recognition in the basic four math functions prevented some of them from being ableto succeed in the more complex math tasks (tasks 12 and 13). For the majority of both of thosetwo tasks, students a) could not get the system to recognize the operational gesture and/or or b)just did not know how to solve the problem (with or without the system). Of the 7 students
this pilot helped directour newest revision to the orientation [4]. The schedule for the Fall 2018 Engineering GSIOrientation is shown in table 1. The italicized print indicates new or updated sessions. 5 minutes Welcome from the College of Engineering 15 minutes Overview of the Program, Policies and Resources 25 minutes Introduction of the Science of Learning 95 minutes Inclusive Teaching Theater Performance 55 minutes Concurrent Workshops A (One from: The Science of Learning, Leading Discussion Sections, Managing Lab Classes, or Handling Office Hours) 55 minutes Concurrent Workshops B (One from: The Science of Learning, Teaching Problem Solving, Grading, or Handling Office Hours
personological issues suggests thatgovernmental, industry, and educational stakeholders need to address the issue of a clearlystated, commonly used definition of AM to attract investors, recruit workforce participants, andguide effective educational opportunities.AcknowledgementThis work was supported, in part, by National Science Foundation award 1700581.References[1] B. Esmaeilian, S. Behdad, and B. Wang, "The evolution and future of manufacturing: A review," Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 39, pp. 79–100, 2016.[2] P. Panchak, "The manufacturer's agenda: Why we need a better definition of 'advanced manufacturing'," Industry Week, November 14. [Online]. Available: https://www.industryweek.com/leadership/manufacturers
Predicting whether student completed a project B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)Sex -0.087 0.200 0.188 1 0.665 0.917Race/ethnicity African American -0.162 0.203 0.640 1 0.424 0.850 Hispanic -0.092 0.420 0.048 1 0.827 0.912Parent or guardianeducation Father college degree 0.020 0.217 0.008 1 0.928 1.020 Mother college degree 0.156 0.225 0.482 1 0.488 1.169Current performance: Better than most 0.039 0.209 0.034 1 0.853 1.040 Don't know or worse -0.016 0.334 0.002 1 0.961 0.984Grade level
, in well-chosen readings, accurately represented.The essence of a “B” grade for graduate courses is adequate participation in class andassignments. Achieving this level of participation includes attending most classes andaccomplishing assignments with a mix of mostly check minus and checks on assignments. Iconsider this to be the minimum for graduate students.The essence of an “A” grade for graduate courses is appropriate participation in class and inassignments. Achieving this level of participation includes active and thoughtful participation inthe classroom, incorporating feedback from peers and me as instructor into revisions of papers,and achieving a mix of mostly checks
during the discussion section the night before the homeworkassignments were due. The help session was led by an undergraduate teaching assistant. All ofthe homework assignments were graded and comprised 20% of the student’s grade. Thesolutions for the homework assignments were posted on-line shortly after the assignments wereturned in. A typical homework problem might be: (a) Show that the circuit in Figure P3.2 isfunctionally equivalent to the circuit in Figure P3.1. (b) How many transistors are needed tobuild this CMOS circuit?Three open-book, open-note non-comprehensive exams were given. The students were allowedto use their phones, tablets, or laptops to access their notes, lecture slides, and homeworksolutions. The first two exams were
Southern Queensland. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/ 2992/1/Cater-Steel_Tan_Summary_of_ITIL_Adoption_Survey_Responses.pdf8. Cater-Steel, A., Toleman, M., & Tan, W. G. (2006, December). Transforming IT service management: The ITIL impact. Paper presented at the 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/1612/1/Cater-Steel_Toleman_Tan.pdf9. Cervone, F. (2008). ITIL: A framework for managing digital library services. OCLC Systems & Services, 24(2), 87-90. doi:10.1108/1065075081087543010. Chan, Y. E., & Reich, B. H. (2007). IT alignment: What have we learned? Journal of Information Technology, 22, 297-315. doi:10.1057
Courses,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[10] T. Odumosu et al., “Dimensions of diversity in engineering: What we can learn from STS,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[11] R. F. Clancy, J. R. Sessford, L. An, and Y. Ge, “Which Factors are Correlated with Engineering Students’ Expectations of Ethical Issues?,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.[12] J. A. Leydens, K. Johnson, S. Claussen, J. Blacklock, B. M. Moskal, and O. Cordova, “Measuring Change over Time in Sociotechnical Thinking: A Survey/validation Model for Sociotechnical Habits of Mind,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
. A., & Keller, M. W., & White, I. M., & Brummel, B. J., &Daily, J. S., & Cheville, R. A., & Wolk, J. (2012, June). The Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics Education: Highlights from a CCLI Phase 3 Initiative, Volume 3. Paper presentedat 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.https://peer.asee.org/22113.[7] Berry, M.S. (2014). The effectiveness of extended orientation first year seminars: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 105.http://dx.doi.org/10.18297/etd/105[8] Kuep, J.R. (2006). The impact of curricular interventions on intended second year re-enrollment. Journal of College Student Retention, 7 (1-2).[9] Landis, R. B. (2013). Studying