Paper ID #11784Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into AcademiaProf. John Wadach, Monroe Community College John Wadach is a professor and department chair of the Engineering Science and Physics Department at Monroe Community College in Rochester, NY. He has taught a variety of physics and engineering courses in his 30 year career. Wadach is most inspired by the use of design-build projects in his engineering courses. Infusing a Concurrent Engineering Model into Academia is the title of the NSF TUES grant that he and co-PIs George Fazekas and Paul Brennan were awarded $200,000. Wadach has been the co-organizer of
Paper ID #11385MAKER: Whack-a-Mole for PLC ProgrammingDr. Sheng-Jen ”Tony” Hsieh, Texas A&M University Dr. Sheng-Jen (”Tony”) Hsieh is Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. He holds a joint appointment with the Department of Engineering Technology and the De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state
Paper ID #12039Teaching Freshman Design Using a Flipped Classroom ModelDr. Ann Saterbak, Rice UniversityDr. Matthew Wettergreen, Rice University Page 26.1474.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Teaching Freshman Design Using a Flipped Classroom ModelAbstractA team of faculty at Rice University and other institutions are creating instructional resources tosupport a flipped classroom for first-year engineering design. The traditional ‘class’ in whichfaculty lecture on the design process has been replaced by in
Paper ID #12111Utilizing BIM In A Design-Build Competition ProgramMr. Norman Henry Philipp, Pittsburg State University Norman’s professional work experience includes consulting and lecturing on BIM, architecture, archi- tectural engineering, design-build, acoustics and project management. Mr. Philipp has dual bachelors and dual masters degrees in the fields of Architecture and Architectural Engineering. He received his PE in Architectural Engineering from the State of Kansas in 2013. His course work includes building information modeling, BIM management, construction graphics, building systems, engineering project
Paper ID #12534Building a STEM Pathway with Engineering by Design andMs. Laura E. LeMire, The Community College of Baltimore County Upon graduation from the University of Maryland at College Park with her masters in geotechnical en- gineering, Laura went to work for Baltimore Gas and Electric where during her career there she was responsible for substation and transmission line construction projects, relocation and installation of BGE facilities for Oriole Park at Camden Yards and for the Light Rail, and for improving service reliability. After obtaining her MBA, Laura became the Director of Corporate Purchasing and was a
Building Community Relationships with a Senior Design Experience Profs. Scott Kiefer, Kala Meah, James Moscola, and Tristan Ericson Department of Engineering and Computer Science York College of Pennsylvania York, PA 17403The Mechanical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering Programs at York College havemandatory co-op programs in which each student receives three semesters of engineering workexperience. Our senior design courses further develop our students’ design and projectdevelopment skills by intentionally targeting projects that emphasize working within a largerteam. For example, we have built autonomous robots for the
Demand Side Optimization using a Load Shifting Algorithm A proposed load shifting algorithm for reduction of peak power consumption in residential areas
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Planning for a Health Care Technology Certificate Walter W. Buchanan Texas A&M University Ali Mehrabian, Alireza Rahrooh Daytona State College M. Kudret Yurtseven Izmir UniversityAbstractHerein will be described the planning to reactivate a Health Care Technology Certificate in theDepartment of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution in the College ofEngineering at Texas A&M University College Station. The
Paper ID #13336A reflection on the process of selecting, developing, and launching a new de-sign project in a large-scale introduction to engineering design courseMr. Kevin Calabro, University of Maryland, College Park Kevin Calabro is Keystone Instructor and Associate Director in the Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Research Assistant Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes
Paper ID #13649Engineering Leadership as Principled NonconformityDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Educa- tion/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and is particularly interested in the role of liberal education in developing engineering leaders. Page 26.631.1 c
Paper ID #13566Communication as Both the Ultimate Interdisciplinary Subject and a Fieldof Specialization Encompassing More Than Technical Writing: Communica-tion Instruction Across DivisionsDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engi- neering & Society in the School of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Virginia. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division and winner of the Sterling Olmsted Award for outstanding contributions to liberal education for engineers
ABET Accreditation Model for a Multi-Option General Engineering Program at Multiple Locations By Kenneth E. Dudeck, Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering, Penn State University, Hazleton,Joseph A. Ranalli, Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Penn State University, Hazleton.AbstractThe first graduates of a new BS General Engineering program received their degrees inspring 2014. The General Engineering program is offered at three separate campuslocations within The Pennsylvania State University, each with a unique focused option.The program, detailed in previous work, consists of
Combining Individual Lab Work Outside Of Class With Group Peer-To-Peer Learning In Class To Increase Student Ability In Electronics Design Nisha Kondrath and Mark A. Jupina Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085 While no single pedagogy will work best all of the time when instructing students, we seek to create a learning environment to educate students to become erudite self-learners in our rapidly changing world. Active learning strategies were employed both inside and outside of the lab environment in a two-course electronics sequence at the
A Deep Dive Faculty Workshop for Infusing the Entrepreneurial Mindset into the Engineering Core Curriculum Gary A. Gabriele, Drosdick Endowed Dean of Engineering Edmond Dougherty, Director, Engineering Entrepreneurship College of Engineering Villanova UniversityVillanova University’s College of Engineering (COE) has embarked upon a two-yearplan to substantially increase the number of full-time faculty who employentrepreneurially minded learning (EML) concepts in their undergraduate courses. Theplan is an extension of the College’s initiative to convert core curriculum courses to aninverted or flipped classroom format. The EML concepts come
Strategic Responses to Cyclical Environments: An Entrepreneurial ImperativeEllyn A. Lester, Assoc. AIA Linda M. Thomas, JD, PhDConstruction Management Program Program Director, Construction ManagementCivil, Environmental and Ocean Engineering Civil, Environmental and Ocean EngineeringSchaefer School of Engineering and Science Schaefer School of Engineering and ScienceStevens Institute of Technology Stevens Institute of TechnologyEngineering education centers on accreditor-mandated core knowledge. The skills andknowledge required to tackle engineering problems are the focus. Only recently has engineeringeducation expanded to include the liberal arts and
AN EVALUATION OF MUSIC TECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM IN SELECTED COLLEGES Grace O. Talabi Dept. of Communication and Performing Arts, Music Unit, Bowen University, Iwo,Osun State, Nigeria talabi_grace@yahoo.co.uk Oludare. A. Owolabi Department of Civil Engineering Morgan State University, Baltimore MD oludare.owolabi@morgan.eduABSTRACTThis paper investigates the Music Technology curriculum of five (5) colleges with the view toascertaining its relevance or otherwise. Furthermore, it examines the
Paper ID #11454A review of practical design integration methods for existing engineering cur-riculumElissa T. Morris, Texas A&M University Elissa Morris is a third-year PhD student in mechanical engineering at Texas A&M University. Her graduate advisor is Dr. Daniel A. McAdams, and her research focuses on the development of bioinspired design methods for self-assembling systems as well as topics in engineering education. Her anticipated graduation is in August of 2016. She received her Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at San Antonio in 2011.Dr. Daniel A. McAdams
Paper ID #11353Modular Integrated Stackable Layer (MISL): An Academic-Public SectorPartnership for Rapid Prototyping and DevelopmentDr. Joseph A. Morgan, Texas A&M University Joseph A. Morgan has over 20 years of military and industry experience in electronics and communica- tions systems engineering. He joined the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department in 1989 and has served as the Program Director of the Electronics and Telecommunications Programs and as the Associate Department Head for Operations. He has served as Director of Engineering and Chief Technology Officer in the private sector and
Alignment of the SCAEI a. Strong Alignment - The item’s content ALIGNS STRONGLY with the indicated content domain (passive, active, constructive, or interactive). b. Acceptable Alignment - The item’s content ALIGNS with the indicated content domain (passive, active, constructive, or interactive). c. Insufficient Alignment - The item’s content ALIGNS SLIGHTLY with the indicated content domain (passive, active, constructive, or interactive), but other domains are more appropriate. d. No Alignment - The item’s content DOES NOT ALIGN with the indicated content domain (passive, active, constructive, or interactive). e. Unable to Judge – The item’s content is TOO DIFFICULT TO JUDGE its alignment to
Survey ofCollege Graduates (NSCG). These data are made available by a variety of government agenciesand present the STEM workforce generally and engineering technicians and technologists inparticular in varying degrees of detail. The educational datasets used in this analysis are theIntegrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), the Baccalaureate and Beyond2008/2009 (B&B), and the Career/Technical Education (CTE) Statistics. These educationaldatasets are produced and distributed by the Department of Education’s National Center forEducation Statistics. The various data sources are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of engineering technology data sources Education data Employment data ACS
difference in word count between promptsreduced as the quarter proceeded. We speculate the students may have started to pay lessattention to the instructions as they became familiar with both prompts. Alternatively,data from earlier in the term may simply be anomalous. To further probe differences inresponses from the prompts we qualitatively analyzed data from early in the term,described next.Coding AnalysisReflection responses from Weeks 2 and 5 were coded using definitions from Tables 1-3.An overview of the responses in the form of word clouds21 is shown in Figure 2. a. Muddiest Point – Week 2 b. Most Surprised – Week 2 c. Muddiest Point – Week 5 d. Most Surprised – Week 5Figure 2. Word clouds of
prompts: 1. What was/is your role in the development of the IRE program? 2. How did you get involved? 3. When you first got involved, what did you think of the idea? Why? 4. Did your thinking about the program change during the process? How? Why? What influenced your thinking? 5. What do you feel was the biggest challenge in getting the program started? How was that overcome? 6. What challenges is IRE still facing? 7. What do you think of the current program? a. What do you feel are IRE’s strengths? b. What do you feel could be done differently? 8. What do you anticipate in the future for the program? 9. What advice would you give others who are involved in similar projects? Lessons learned
impact offirst time freshman's first mathematics class on persistence and graduation was dramatic. Forfirst-time-freshman students with A or B in a math course above calculus I, 80% persisted tograduation, while students whose first math course was calculus I had 65% persistence tograduation and for students whose first math course was below the level of calculus I had only35% persistence to graduation. For students at any level who withdrew or received a grade of Cor lower, their chances of graduating from engineering were less than 20%. The third area wasco-curricular student support programs, experiences, and activities such as UndergraduateTeaching Assistants, Tutoring Center, Supplemental Instruction, and Student ResidentialCommunities; and
the transitive property in mathematics, transitivity as a social construct posits that if Achooses B as a friend, and B chooses C as a friend, then A will choose C as a friend.15 Researchhas demonstrated that the transitivity principle applies in about 70-80% of all cases across manyand varied small group situations.22 Groups, including SELECT, recruit their members primarilythrough social contacts. Since most social contacts tend to be with similar others, groups tend tobe homogenous. The more homogeneous these sets of people are, the more their relationshipstend to be with similar others.14-17 Voluntary organizations in particular, such as the SELECTstudied here, historically are characterized by extreme racial and gender segregation
-phase analogs was analyzed usingthe Casson model, a constitutive relation that describes the rheological behavior of two-phasefluid [6]: Page 26.1210.4 1 1 1 ! $ 2 τw 2 = b + a #γ r & 2 " %A single phase, 80% glycerol solution was used to simulate blood plasma. Chitosan
categorized separately fromthe qualitative results by three individuals. Individual A, the corresponding author, is a formerhigh school mathematics teacher now pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering withteaching experience both at the secondary and collegiate level and experience in teaching someof the courses surveyed, though not a current instructor. Individual B is a student in a 5-yearbachelors and masters combined program in environmental engineering. Individual B also hasexperience in analyzing qualitative data gained during a summer research experience analyzingqualitative reflection data through video and written work. Individual C is another student in the5-year program, however with no formal training or experience in coding
.15. Meadows, L. A. & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The influence of gender stereotypes on role adoption in studentteams. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.16. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Teams that work: campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal ofengineering education.17. Laeser, M., Moskal, B. M. Knecht, R. & Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering design: examining the impact of genderand the team’s gender composition. Journal of engineering education.18. Boeing. (2015). Diversity programs and events. Retrieved fromhttp://www.boeing.com/boeing/aboutus/diversity/programs.page19. Department of Defense. (2012). Diversity and inclusion strategic plan. Retrieved fromhttp
subsequent sections. Students were not required, but highly encouraged, toparticipate in the actual design competition and participation did not impact final student gradesof the capstone design course.During the first semester, EnvE 5305, students were provided a real-world problem of providingupgrades for the municipal WWTP adapted from the WEAT student design prompt. The studentswere required to address enhanced nutrient removal to meet future stringent regulations,enhanced solids treatment for production of biosolids A versus biosolids B and provide 1 milliongallon per day (MGD) type 1 reclaimed water. Students were tasked with performing a capacityanalysis, performance evaluation, develop a design process selection criterion for selection
distinct variations: (a) Start alone, End together; and (b)Start alone, End almost together.Start alone, End togetherStudents who reported studying this way tended to decide in advance that they would begin atask or assignment alone and also would come together toward the end of an assignment or studyperiod and meet to review their work and resolve any disagreement in solutions or approaches toproblems. For example, Becky observed that most of the students in her major (bioengineering)cohort studied this way: In my major, the most often I would say was the second scenario where you do have a study group but everyone has already attempted to try to do the problems, and then we kind of just go over the problems that we don't quite understand