Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 721 - 750 of 1210 in total
Conference Session
Minoritization Processes and Critical Responses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Madeleine Jennings, Arizona State University; Rod D. Roscoe, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University; Suren Jayasuriya, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
engineering education and how their experiences reflect broader structural andsocietal inequalities present in engineering education.Dr. Suren Jayasuriya is an assistant professor in the Arts, Media, & Engineering program atArizona State University, and serves as Madeleine’s mentor on multiple projects. Hisbackground and research are in electrical engineering and computer science, although he has newresearch projects in engineering education, including epistemologies and student experiences ininterdisciplinary engineering and the arts/humanities programs. His subjectivity in this projectmostly focused on the application of queer theory and philosophy in the works collected in thisliterature review, including analyzing how effectively those ideas
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Team/Project-based Pedagogy and Approaches
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
James D. Carrico, University of Mary; Javad Anjum, University of Mary; Audra Anjum, Ohio University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
examines the effectiveness of interprofessional project-based service learning (PBSL)experience in fostering a deep orientation to learning, and professional skills (especiallycommunication and teamwork). Learning orientation describes a student’s attitude towards andmotivation for studying. It is desirable that engineering students adopt a so-called deep learningorientation, emphasizing understanding as well as reflection on the applicability of course contentand the transferability of learning experiences to professional settings 5 . The need for a focus onprofessional skills has been emphasized since the 1990s due to the preponderance of engineeringjobs being in commercial industry, where the ability to function as part of a cross
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Mona Eskandari, University of California, Riverside; Ville Mikael Taajamaa, City of Espoo; Barbara A. Karanian, Stanford University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
results is on events andforces emerging from the primary character and the setting. Images and themes in the partici-pants’ responses become a tool in uncovering hidden interpersonal perceptions not typicallyfound in other, more quantitative research tools. Debate exists concerning whether the meas-ure reflects how individuals perceive themselves, how they perceive others, how they actuallybehave, norms, stereotypes, bias or some combination of these possibilities, yet experts agreethat the TAT is capable of capturing images not likely to be expressed with other techniques[10].Emotion Scale (PANAS): Mood ReportThe second measure, supplementing the story results, is a short version of the PANAS multi-ple-item, two factor scale that ensures content
Conference Session
Mechatronics and Robotics I
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Christopher Pannier, University of Michigan-Dearborn; Carlotta A. Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Melissa Morris, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University; Xiaopeng Zhao, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
on things that have a deep significance to them, so if developers comefrom a diversity of backgrounds and sensibilities, their innovations will have a greater impact onthe world. Nichols states that the culture of robotics changed between 2008 and 2018, and due tothe rapid change in technology, it will continue to change [10]. However, in the past, due to theexpense, technical challenges and programming language complexity, roboticists were veryspecialized, and the workforce reflected the very limited persistent stereotype of an engineer.This stereotype was that the majority of people who work in robotics, engineering, and computerscience are white males. Due to these challenges, women and minorities became severelyunderrepresented in
Conference Session
Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Katherine Dornian, University of Calgary; Mohammad Moshirpour, University of Calgary; Laleh Behjat P.Eng., University of Calgary
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
reflect on this paper as awhole.2. Background2.1 Software engineering curriculum guidelineIn order to evaluate the engineering aspects of digital skills programs, we first need to look at theproposed skills an engineering graduate would be expected to achieve. The SoftwareEngineering 2014 Curriculum Guidelines (SE2014) [12] propose the knowledge areas thatsoftware engineers should master in post-secondary education. SE2014 define the corecurriculum skills needed in software engineering education as: - Computing essentials - Mathematical and engineering fundamentals - Professional practice - Software modeling and analysis - Requirements analysis and specifications - Software design - Software verification & validation
Conference Session
Engineering Management Division 3: Teaching and Learning in Engineering Management
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Marnie V. Jamieson, University of Alberta; Lianne M. Lefsrud P.Eng., University of Alberta; Fereshteh Sattari; John Donald, University of Guelph
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
learning to design teaching and learning, program content and structure, student assessment, and continuous course improvement techniques. She managed and was a key contributor to a two-year pilot project to introduce blended learning into the chemical engineering capstone design courses, and is the author of a number of recent journal, book, and conference contribu- tions on engineering education. Her research focusses on how to teach innovation and sustainable design practices to engineers and develop a curriculum reflective of engineering practice requirements. Recently she has taught a short course on how to design and teach process engineering courses to professors in Peru and workshops on Metacognition and
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering in K-12 and the First Year
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura P Ford, The University of Tulsa; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; Jennifer Cole, Northwestern University; Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University; Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta; Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University; David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky; Bruce K Vaughen P.E., American Institute of Chemical Engineers; Margot A Vigeant, Bucknell University; Stephen Ward Thiel P.E., University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student learning.Prof. Marnie V Jamieson, University of Alberta Marnie V. Jamieson, M. Sc., P.Eng. is an Industrial Professor in Chemical Process Design in the Depart- ment of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta and holds an M.Sc. in Chemical Engineering Education. She is currently the William Magee Chair in Chemical Process Design, leads the
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Hitesh D. Vora, Oklahoma State University; Brad Rowland, Oklahoma State University; Joe Conner, Oklahoma State University; Brian K. Norton P.E., Oklahoma State University; Qinang Hu, Oklahoma State University; Toni Ivey, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
) through activelearning than passive learning. Throughout our evolution, technology has been passed down bypupils imitating their mentors. This natural preference for learning is reflected in the genericlearning pyramid that was first proposed by National Teaching Laboratory Institute at theirBethel, Maine campus in the early 1960’s and the related work have been proposed by severalother researchers [31-34]. Though rightly criticized, the pyramid provides a measure of contentretention from lectures (5%), laboratory experiments (70%), and design projects (90%). Thisdisparity in content retention was recognized by the 5th century B.C Chinese proverb, “What Ihear, I forget. What I see, I remember. What I do, I understand.” ENDEAVOR harnesses
Conference Session
Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ryan Banow, University of Saskatchewan; Sean Maw P.Eng., University of Saskatchewan
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: Learning Tools (Virtual)
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Clara Novoa, Texas State University; Bobbi J. Spencer, Texas State University; Leona Hazlewood, Texas State University; Araceli Martinez Ortiz, Texas State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
for Engineering Education, 2020 Spatial Visualization Skills Training at Texas State University to Enhance STEM Students Academic SuccessAbstractA diagnostic of thirty questions administered to incoming STEM students in Fall 2013 and Fall2015 - Fall 2018 reflects that their spatial visualization skills (SVS) need to be improved.Previous studies in the SVS subject [1], [2], [3] report that well-developed SVS skills lead tostudents’ success in Engineering and Technology, Computer Science, Chemistry, ComputerAided Design and Mathematics. Authors [4], [5] mention that aptitude in spatial skills isgradually becoming a standard assessment of an individual’s likelihood to succeed as anengineer.This research reports the
Conference Session
Instruments and Methods for Studying Student Experiences and Outcomes
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Zhen Zhao, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University; Alison Cook-Davis, Arizona State University; Jean S. Larson, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University; Wendy M. Barnard, Arizona State University; Megan O'Donnell, Arizona State University; Wilhelmina C. Savenye, Arizona State University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
reflect on your understanding of the NSF-funded Engineering ResearchCenter (ERC). Rate your present level of understanding, as well as your level of understandingprior to participating in the ERC for each of the items below.” No items in this section wereshown to be highly correlated with one another (see Appendix A).A two-factor structure emerged through EFA (Table 1): 1) present understanding, and 2) priorunderstanding. Both factors achieved good reliability levels; Cronbach’s alpha of 0.909 forpresent understanding and 0.907 for prior understanding.Table 1. Factor structure and factor loadings for understanding the ERC Item Present Prior
Conference Session
Research on Engineering Ethics Education and Practice
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Madeline Polmear, University of Florida; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder; Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc.; Chris Swan, Tufts University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
segments and todevelop themes. These themes are presented in the Findings and Discussion.LimitationsThe focus groups were limited to the perspectives of those present. Since participation wasvoluntary, it cannot be assumed that the voices were reflective of the rest of the students in thecourses. Recruitment in qualitative research has been linked to interest in the subject matter [31]so the focus group participants might have been more interested in ESI. The 4DDD was chosenas the theoretical framework as a way to interpret the potential of a micro-insertion to contributeto ethical development through its conceptualization of instructional design for holisticdevelopment. However, there are a number of models and theories related to effective
Conference Session
Insights for Teaching ECE Courses
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Laura K. Alford, University of Michigan; Amir Kamil, University of Michigan; Andrew Deorio, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
’ ratings fromone moment in time to another. Each survey included 13 questions intended to capture a student’soverall sense of community, derived from the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction andFrustration Scale [22]: Thinking about your experiences in your undergraduate studies so far, please indicate how true each statement is for you on a scale of 1 (Not at all true) to 5 (Extremely true). Each question also included a ”Not Applicable” option. 1. I feel a sense of choice and freedom in what I undertake 2. I feel capable at what I do 3. I really like the people I interact with 4. I feel confident that I can do things well 5. I feel that my decisions reflect what I really want
Collection
2020 ASEE North Midwest Section Annual Conference
Authors
Douglas W. Jacobson, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Diane T. Rover, Iowa State University; Joseph Zambreno, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Allegra Frickel, Iowa State University
guide students and their mentors [16]-[20]. We mentioned that not only would the poster help them in their careers, but it would help us seek funding to continue the program. Interestingly, several of the students were genuinely excited about our desire to continue the program going forward, and they wanted to know how they could help. This was equally exciting for us to see. ● Reflections: In the final session, students talked about their projects and experiences. Most of the session was spent having various informal conversations. We also announced that each student would receive an additional $600, which was the remainder of the NSF funds.Mentor – Student InteractionAll of the faculty mentors were serving as
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Eleanor Leung, York College of Pennsylvania; Inci Ruzybayev, York College of Pennsylvania; Brandy Maki, Minnesota State University, Mankato
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
autoethnography.MethodsAutoethnography is a qualitative research method that aims to improve sociological understandingthrough drawing on personal experiences with social phenomena [7, 8, 9]. It looks at whatexisting literature says about these topics and relates it to one’s personal experiences throughrigorous self-reflection [10]. The researcher becomes the research subject. The process can besubjective and, as such, can only be properly experienced and understood by the self [7].This study originated when an informal discussion between two of the co-authors occurred aboutthe struggles female faculty face when teaching a predominantly male student population. Manyof the experiences articulated were found to be similar to those of individuals facing gender bias.Published
Conference Session
College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David Pistrui, University of Detroit Mercy; Darrell K. Kleinke P.E., University of Detroit Mercy; Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy; Ronald Bonnstetter, Target Training International; Eric T. Gehrig, Target Training International
Tagged Divisions
College Industry Partnerships
professionalcompetency development reflects this. They are found to be goal oriented and demonstrate somelevel of interpersonal skills. The Next-Gen Skilled Trades people comprise multiple generationsand thus represent a more eclectic and diverse set of individuals. They demonstrate stronginterpersonal skills and show appreciation for others.Next-Gen LeadersTable 3 provides a deeper look into the professional competencies associated with each segmentof the talent pipeline. Table 3 compares the average competency by segment to the mean of allpeople who have taken the same suite of TTI TriMetrix® DNA assessments (hundreds ofthousands of people across all professions). The intention is to get a benchmark comparison ofeach segment against an aggregate mean of all
Conference Session
Design Across the Curriculum 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lindy Hamilton Mayled, Arizona State University; Ryan J. Meuth, Arizona State University; Brent James Sebold, Arizona State University; Eric Prosser, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
sets were significant across the classroom types (p < .05).Figure 2. Sprint Retrospective Reports Analysis. Error bars indicate standard deviation. *indicates significant difference with Pro Mentor classroom type (p < .05).Sprint Retrospectives are progress report documents generated by the student team every 2weeks. These reports include a list of tasks committed and completed during the last workperiod (a two-week "sprint"), a breakdown of the relative effort of the team members, descriptionof the feedback received by the team from their project sponsor, and a reflection on teaminteractions.As seen in Figure 2, across the Sprint Retrospective averages, the ProTA mentored students hadthe highest average score, followed by the Fall 2019
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Technical Session: Pedagogy I - Best Teaching Practices
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Patrick Alan Linford, U.S. Military Academy; James E. Bluman, U.S. Military Academy; Gregory Martin Freisinger, U.S. Military Academy; John R. Rogers, U.S. Military Academy; Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
modified so as to reflect a corrected understanding ofthe concept. In-line corrections are preferred, which usually requires the student to space theiroriginal work out appropriately, and neatness is rewarded. If the original submission is almostcompletely worked, the “correction” largely becomes an aided rework of the problem. At thispoint, copying of the solution is possible, but discouraged. In such a situation, the student wouldget a very low grade on the original submission and then get a very high grade on the “corrections”portion of their submission. Given the weighting between each assignment, the overall grade isstill failing. In either case, the first part of the grading is to assign a score to the correctionsthemselves based on how
Conference Session
Programmatic Integration of Liberal Education
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College; Kristen L. Sanford P.E., Lafayette College; Julia Nicodemus, Lafayette College; Benjamin Cohen, Lafayette College
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
ethnoracial minorities remain under-represented in engineering education andpractice [22]. Despite constituting just over half (51.5%) of the US population, women compriseonly 40% of the science and engineering workforce, and just 13% of professional engineers.African-Americans, though 12.3% of the general population, are underrepresented within scienceand engineering (7.7%) [23]. Underrepresentation is a concern for both utilitarian reasons ofeconomics and prosperity [e.g. 24] and also for moral reasons: it is simply unjust for the world tobe constructed by a professional community that does not reflect the demographics of that world.Interventions and investigations over many years have identified some factors that improve theexperience and increase
Conference Session
Preparation for Graduate Research
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Bala Ram P.E., North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University; Tobin N. Walton, North Carolina A&T State University; Stephanie Teixeira-Poit
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
position individuals assimilar or different from others within networks of relationships and organizational structures (see Burkeand Stets, 2010; Walton & Jones, 2018). These self-meanings can be based in beliefs about one’s personalor individual characteristics (e.g., I can learn new things quickly), one’s role in relation to others in agroup (e.g., I am a problem solver, organizer, leader), and one’s membership in broad social groups orcategories (e.g., I am a black, female, graduate student). Each of these different bases of identity (Burke,2003; Deaux and Burke, 2010) provide self-reflective meanings that are “built-up” from interactiveprocesses and experiences through which individuals seek self-verification, or a correspondence of
Conference Session
Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
reflects the individual student’s average rating acrossall five categories as compared the average of the team overall. This factor can then be used toadjust team deliverable scores to individual grades. CATME has been widely used in engineeringeducation across a range of disciplines and levels of students, with use at over 1000 institutionsby nearly 6000 instructors and over 300,000 students (https://info.catme.org/about/our-user-base/).It is important to understand the extent to which peer ratings may be influenced by unconsciousor implicit bias [8]. Studies of unconscious bias have established the following situationalelements as being more likely to result in unconscious bias: lack of information, time pressure,stress from competing tasks [9
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Teresa J. Cutright, University of Akron; Rebecca Kuntz Willits, University of Akron; Linda T. Coats; Debora F. Rodrigues, University of Houston; Lakiesha N. Williams, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Feedback research statements Video conference with former ACADEME participant Developing cover letter Tenure track explained, expectations assistant professor Interviewing tips Teaching and mentoring Equipment and start up packages Learning styles Time management Developing course learning outcomes- ABET Mock grant review Discipline based education research Finding sources of funding Guest lecture-Actualizing education theory in classroom Preparing proposal budget Mini lesson – development, video tape, feedback Collaborations Reflection – strategies to improve teaching Proposal tips Use of assessments
Conference Session
Engineering Leadership Skills Development Across the Undergraduate-to-Workforce Transition
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder; Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder; Julie Dyke Ford, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
experiences are similar, or the participant used knowledge from capstone in the workplaceCapstone Advice The participant is providing advice for the capstone course (e.g., to better align it with work)Figure 2 shows the process of data analysis for this study starting from the interview data to theresults. One of the sub-codes from the coding scheme was “leadership” which was defined as anactivity where the participant described ‘acting as a leader or an action that reflected aleadership behavior’ while working in a team. For this study in particular, we used the dataexcerpts which were coded under ‘leadership’ and analyzed the data using the four leadershipprofiles of the
Conference Session
Assessing Ethics Learning
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Peter Wesley Odom, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
. This paper explores qualitative results from a special administration of the EERI wherestudents were asked to provide additional information about how they perceived items from theinstrument. The students were prompted to do individual reflections as well as teamed reflectionswhere they discussed differences of opinion regarding various items. Afterwards they returned toanswer some follow up qualitative and quantitative questions. This paper takes this data andinvestigates if there are any connections between what students reported and the 17 items whichwere identified as problematic during the PCFA. Results from the qualitative data supportedseveral of the outcomes from the PCFA while providing fewer insights regarding other items.Overall, it
Conference Session
Engineering Librarian Collaborations in the Library, On Campus, and Beyond
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Pauline Melgoza, Texas A&M University; Tina M. Budzise-Weaver, Texas A&M University; Sarel Lavy, Texas A&M University; Tiyamike Kunje
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
student study as a lifeline to their assignments. Thistheme included the desire to have available technology in their study locations, for exampleWIFI, electrical outlets, laptops, printers and access to computer labs. The themes Comfort (9%),Proximity to Amenities (8%), and Study Materials & Accessories (8%) illustrate the needs tocreate the perfect study experience. Comfort included comments that reflected the overallcontentment of the chosen study location, such as comfortable couches, large tables, and size ofroom. The students also had a strong preference towards their Proximity to Amenities, whichincluded distance to food (restaurants) and convenience of getting from home to the College ofArchitecture buildings on campus. Study
Conference Session
Teaching Assistants, Supplemental Instruction, and Classroom Support
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
David John Orser, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Kyle Dukart, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Changhyun Choi, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities; Frances Wood, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
? – Multiple Choice: 0, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 letter gradesThe responses to both of these questions reflect very favorably on the PLA program (shown inFigure 3). There is a clear positive bias in the responses with the mean at 5.1, 76% >5, and 90%>4 on a 6-point Likert-like scale. The median response indicates that students, in general, feltPLAs contributed to their success, resulting in a perceived net improvement in studentperformance by at least half a letter grade (79% of responses.) To reiterate, the students indicatethey feel the peer assistants provide a positive impact on their learning. The authors did notattempt to obtain individually identifiable grades. Figure 3: Student responses to Q3 (left) and Q4 (right)An even
Conference Session
ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tess Hartog, University of Oklahoma; Megan Marshall, University of Oklahoma; Amin G. Alhashim, University of Oklahoma; Md Tanvir Ahad, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
. Findingsindicated design neurocognition differed when problem-solving versus designing, particularly inthe sketching task, as indicated by transformed power and task-related power within the EEGreadings.4.3 Current use of other techniques in the study of ED&CGWhile not a primary talking point of this paper, a notable investigation with the use of functionalnear infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is worthy of mention. This technique works via theabsorption or reflection of hemoglobin in certain areas of the brain. Researchers in [64] utilizedfNIRS to investigate the neurological differences in freshman and senior-level engineeringstudents during an engineering design brainstorm. Even though this study did not look at thenovelty of ideas generated, this study
Conference Session
First-Year Programs: Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation #2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Megan Gray, Duke University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University; Sophia T. Santillan, Duke University; Michael Rizk, Duke University; Jessica Sperling, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
[22] Engineering skills (tinkering) self-efficacy [22] Engineering design self-efficacy [23] Engineering academic engagement n/a, original instrument Creativity Creative self-efficacy [24] Value of creativity [25] Personal Development General self-efficacy [26] Grit/perseverance [27] Professional Skills Teamwork skills [28] Communication skills [28] Leadership skills [28] In the T2 instrument, we additionally utilized a retrospective pre-assessment,implemented at semester end but asking participants to reflect on
Collection
2020 ASEE North Central Section conference
Authors
Xinyu Zhang, West Virginia University; Liangcheng Yang, Illinois State University
and Two or more races [1]. A study in UK showed minority students(60%) are more likely to work during term-time compared to white students (53%) [16].However, minority has statistically significant less probability of term-time employment inChina, particularly minority students with higher socio-economic status work significantly less interm-time and in college [17]. In Latvia, ethnic Belarussians, the second largest minority group,has marginally statistically less probability to work compared to ethnic Latvians [10].2.3 Socio-economic statusDifferent indicators have been used in literatures to reflect the socio-economic status of workingstudents, including but not limited to family income/parental income [15, 18], independentstudent income
Collection
2020 Gulf Southwest Section Conference
Authors
Jeff Cunion; Brigitte Barbier
course as well asManufacturing and Industrial Managements students who are pursuing an IndustrialManagement concentration. For other engineering technology students, however, this could bethe only manufacturing related course a student might take.Table 1 lists and describes the module/topics covered in the course and reflects how SAP topicsare integrated into this particular course. SAP specific topics are noted in bold. Downloadinstructions for the SAP application are provided to students early in the course to allow time toresolve any technical issues. Navigation and transaction input case studies are incorporated at theend of the course to reinforce theoretical concepts covered which are related to purchasing andmaterials management. Notably