AC 2009-1227: DID IT WORK? - ANALYSIS OF WAYS TO MEASURE THEIMPACT OF AN AFTER SCHOOL ROBOTICS OUTREACH PROGRAM.Austin Talley, University of Texas, Austin AUSTIN TALLEY is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. His research focus is in design methodology and engineering education. He received his B.S. from Texas A&M University and M.S.E. from The University of Texas at Austin. Contact: Austin@talleyweb.com.Marilyn Fowler, Austin Children's Museum MARILYN L. FOWLER is a science educator with over 35 years experience with schoolchildren. Her years in education include classroom teaching at the elementary and college levels
conciselyconvey technical information to people who do not have an engineering background. This alignswith the goal of The Engineer of 2020 and is important to consider in curriculum development inengineering. Similarly, the key areas that students feel least confident in can be consideredopportunities to help them learn. For example, we found the students do not feel confident inidentifying the audience for whom they are writing, expressing ideas clearly to others, clarifyingthe source of problems on teams when they arise, identifying verbal and non-verbal behaviorsthat may be due to cultural norms, and creating visuals that communicate concepts, narratives, orarguments.Communication instructors, we hope, can benefit from our study by developing
study are presented.Online Homework Problem Development for Advanced Mechanics of Materials CourseThe junior-level Advanced Mechanics of Materials course in the Mechanical Engineeringprogram at Louisiana Tech University is the third in a sequence of four mechanics of materialscourses. The sequence begins with an integrated Statics and Mechanics of Materials coursewhich covers the basics of mechanics of materials and is required of all engineering students.Next is an Intermediate Strength of Materials course which focuses on topics like beamdeflection and statically indeterminate scenarios and is taken primarily by civil and mechanicalengineering students. Following the Advanced Mechanics of Materials course, mechanicalengineering students
theEngineering Accreditation Commission of ABET as well as with the 17 United NationsSustainable Development Goals [1]. The framework is supported by ASEE and has beengrowing in popularity recently.While the framework itself includes a wealth of information through the assembly of the ideasand opinions of many different experienced professionals, it also includes an overwhelmingamount of information and outcomes if the intent is for it to be integrated into an existingengineering curriculum. There are also some unique challenges that accompany efforts tointegrate the framework into an engineering curriculum at a Christian institution, such as the oneat which the authors teach. This paper explores the development of a heavy adaptation of theEOP framework
performance, teaching effectiveness and collaborative learning.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the engineering assessment specialist at the Integrated Teaching and Learning Pro- gram (ITLL) and the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center in CU’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from the Louisiana State University, and an M.S. degree in industrial/organizational psychology and a Ph.D. degree in counseling psychology, both from the University of Tennessee. Dr. Knight’s research interests are in the areas of re- tention, program evaluation and teamwork practices in engineering education. His current duties include
Paper ID #38526Nuestro Impacto: An Insider Look into the Connections between Our PastExperiences and Current Teaching and Mentoring PracticesDr. Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her research areas of interest are hidden curriculum, multi-modal methods, mentoring, and professional development.Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro is an instructional assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida.Dr. John Alexander Mendoza, University of Florida John Mendoza Garcia is an Instructional Assistant
reverse engineeringand re-design in engineering curriculums, as well as: “[RE] is the process for discovering the fundamental principles that underlie and enable a device, object, product, substance, material, structure, or system through the systemic analysis of its structure and, if possible, its function and operation” [16],defined by Robert W. Messler Jr. in his textbook “Reverse Engineering: Mechanisms, Structures,Systems & Materials”, in which he frequently critiques the unethical and illegal uses of RE.While these definitions have an academic setting in mind, the reverse engineering processcommonly occurs in industry and government as a part of their benchmarking process [16]–[18].Benchmarking often
strategies for improving student engagement and performance. Additional experience working with Faculty on the integration of Instructional Technologies in the class- room. Major strengths in innovative problem solving; modeling and simulation (mainly for business analysis and government consulting); operations research and decision sciences (risk analysis, investment valuation under uncertainty, financial engineering). Additional skills in optimization, statistical analysis and systems engineering. Page 24.160.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 An Exploratory
Paper ID #38526Nuestro Impacto: An Insider Look into the Connections between Our PastExperiences and Current Teaching and Mentoring PracticesDr. Idalis Villanueva Alarc´on, University of Florida Dr. Villanueva Alarc´on is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the Uni- versity of Florida. Her research areas of interest are hidden curriculum, multi-modal methods, mentoring, and professional development.Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro, University of Florida Dr. Laura Melissa Cruz Castro is an instructional assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at University of Florida.Dr
Paper ID #26083Developing a Framework for a New Technical Elective: Prototyping Multi-functional Urban Micro-farms as an Experiential Learning Strategy for Ar-chitecture and Construction Management StudentsMr. Eugene Kwak, Farmingdale State College, State University of New York Eugene Kwak is a licensed architect and an assistant professor in the Department of Architecture and Construction Management at Farmingdale State College, State University of New York. He has been running research and grant-based projects, including the George Washington Carver Community garden design in New Iberia, Louisiana. During his tenure in the
civil engineering curricula and to facilitate broad adoptionof the new BOK concepts in civil engineering education, CAP^3 established the BOKEducational Fulfillment Committee (BOKEdFC) in early 2008. This new committee was chargedwith (1) fostering the creation of a learning community of scholars interested in engineeringeducational reform, (2) reviewing the work products of the Body of Knowledge Committee andproviding feedback, and (3) documenting how programs can incorporate the Body of Knowledgeinto their curriculum. A key input to this work is the second edition of the Civil EngineeringBody of Knowledge for the 21st Century. The “companion paper” by Nelson, Fridley, and Hallprovides an insight into this committee’s work.25The Body of
beneficial.Specifically, reasons include using engineering design as a framework to design and organizeany curriculum and to integrate students’ studies in mathematics, science, and technology.5There has also recently been a push to include multidisciplinary open-ended design in first-yearengineering courses. Previously, many established first year engineering programs and most highschool summer STEM programs utilized robot projects or predefined problems to teachengineering design. However, assigning students a problem to solve diminishes some of theengineering design process, which often starts with a questioning, iterative brainstorming sessionto identify problems on a global or personal scale that can be solved by an engineered solution orproduct. From
these experiential learning experiences. The SE department is within a large, private university which is committed to experiential learning within its undergraduate engineering curriculum. The university has one of the oldest cooperative education programs in the country and firmly believes in learning through doing. This presentation will describe how an experiential learning model is used to improve learning and accelerate needed academic cultural changes within the department. The experiential learning methodology is based on an existing educational model which includes four basic stages; active experiences, reflective observations, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. This experiential learning model is used
project for this course was to demonstrate the integration of physics andart in a tangible deliverable, and one group of students studied the influence of friction fromdifferent colors of paint on rolling balls down an inclined track. As shown in Figure 6, thestudents produced artwork while studying the variances in both frictional and normal forces asthey changed the colors of paint, the size of the balls, and the angle of the track. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference Figure 6: Artwork made by coating balls of various sizes and shapes (including stress balls and golf balls, as indicated by the hexagonal pattern from the golf ball
. This course, ENGR 365 Global Engineering andTechnology, also has the potential to be offered on campus with an internationalized curriculumfor students who cannot afford a trip, although we have not offered it on campus yet. The travelcourse approval has been a crucial step in this initiative, as this course is in the world culturecategory (one of the required liberal studies curriculum categories, but students have manycourse choices in each category on campus), open to all the students on campus who areinterested in how cultures affect engineering designs and sustainability plans, but not just open toengineering and technology students. This step poured the foundation for interdisciplinarycollaborations among faculty, staff, and students
teammembers. Second, considering that updates could be needed as the requirements, legislation,standards, and audiences change, we were looking for a tool that would allow us to easily changecontent, potentially by subject matter experts with limited computer knowledge. Given thissecond objective, our hope was to find an integrated tool that would provide both contentcreation/editing capabilities and the ability to export this content to the appropriate standard. Page 25.1284.9Based on possible deployment options, there are two categories of tools to consider: desktopapplications and web-based tools. With the majority of the web-based tools still in
Paper ID #5792Live Energy: An Initiative for Teaching Energy and Sustainability Topicswith the most Up-to-date and Relevant ContentDr. Christine Ehlig-Economides, Texas A&M University Dr. Ehlig-Economides has been full professor of petroleum engineering at Texas A&M University in the Albert B. Stevens endowed chair since 2004. Before that she worked for Schlumberger for 20 years in well test design and interpretation, integrated reservoir characterization, modern well construction design, and well stimulation. She has worked in more than 30 countries and authored more than 60 papers. Dr. Ehlig- Economides has
as a psychometrician, program evaluator, and data analyst, with research interests in spatial ability, creativity, engineering-integrated STEM education, and meta-analysis. As a psychometrician, she has revised, developed, and validated more than 10 instruments beneficial for STEM education practice and research. She has authored/co- authored more than 70 peer-reviewed journal articles and conference proceedings and served as a journal reviewer in engineering education, STEM education, and educational psychology. She has also served as a co-PI, an external evaluator, or an advisory board member on several NSF-funded projects. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #22891Undergraduate STEM Students and Community Engagement Activities: Ini-tial Findings from an Assessment of Their Concern for Public Well-beingAlexandra ErwinDr. Jason Borenstein, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Jason Borenstein is the Director of Graduate Research Ethics Programs and Associate Director of the Center for Ethics and Technology at the Georgia Institute of Technology. His responsibilities in- clude administering a Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) policy for all new doctoral students at Georgia Tech and instructing undergraduate and graduate courses on topics at the intersection of science
American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Design, Code, Build, Test: Development of an Experiential Learning Summer Engineering and Computer Science Outreach Program for High School Students (Evaluation)AbstractThe Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) “pipeline” that is imagined to guidestudents from middle school into successful STEM careers implies a single path. This path oftenrequires students to develop an interest in STEM by middle school, choose particular math andscience courses in middle- and high-school, and gain experience and exposure in STEMactivities through their high school tenure. While successful for approximately 7% of studentswho entered 9th grade in 2001, this system has
geotechnical engineering in 2020 and 2021,respectively, and returned to their home institution as faculty members. Their experiences areexplored as case examples in this paper.3. Faculty Transition QuestionnaireThe New Faculty Transition in Learning Organization (NFTLO) questionnaire [9] is a five-partcomposite survey that provided an essential building block for our study. Three parts of theNFTLO instrument were integrated into our survey: Predictors of New Faculty Success (PNFS)Scale, Learning Organization Survey (LOS), and Newcomer Adjustment Tactics. The PNFSScale [10] is a 24-item survey that measures the perception of new faculty’s expectations,collegiality, professional and personal balance, and location. Chan [9] uses the short version ofLOS
secondary and post-secondary education.Prof. Paul Imbertson, University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesDr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and higher education mathe- matics, science, and engineering classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her research agenda focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning. She is creating and testing innovative, interdisciplinary curricular approaches that engage students in developing models of real world problems
obsolete, manually controlled, universal testing machine into a hot press withcommunication capabilities. This required utilizing load cell, heating platens, and meters tocontrol and monitor the process.The Capstone Course is designed to be offered in the last semester of the Industrial Technologyprogram. This course provides students with an opportunity to tie together some key learningoutcomes from the curriculum and be able to demonstrate some competencies that they have Page 11.360.4learned during the major. The students are assigned to teams of three to four students and eachteam has its own single project. Each team has a faculty advisor who
integrating local institutional and/ordepartmental practices with disciplinary norms to transform student experiences.5. Conclusions and future workThis exploratory study sought to better understand local variations in the broad characterizationsof engineering teaching and learning culture across both disciplinary and institutional lines.Because an academic department serves as a site of enculturation for students entering theirchosen field, we explored the ways in which students engaged and interpreted departmentalcourses through semi-structured interviews. Our findings revealed that across threethemes - approaches to learning, perceptions of teaching, and perceptions of disciplinaryvalues - a complex relationship exists among disciplinary
University. She teaches elementary science methods and secondary science and mathematics methods courses with emphasis on multicultural education and equity pedagogies. Her research interests include both formal and informal STEM education, with specialization in the integration of engineering and computer science into science education through preservice and inservice educator development.Dr. Stacie I Ringleb, Old Dominion University Stacie Ringleb is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at Old Dominion University. Dr. Ringleb received a B.S. in biomedical engineering from Case Western Re- serve University in 1997, a M.S.E. from Temple University in Mechanical Engineering in 1999
Paper ID #40318Board 356: Perspectives from an Intervention Model to Improve Retentionand Success Among Low-income Hispanic Engineering StudentsDr. Manuel A. Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez Dr. Jimenez is a professor at the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department in the University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (UPRM). He earned his B.S from Universidad Autonoma de Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic in 1986, M.S. from Univ. of Puerto Rico Mayaguez, and Ph.D. from Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI.Dr. Luisa Guillemard, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez
Paper ID #43555FIE 2023: An Aggregate and Statistical Analysis of the Results and Feedbackof the ASEE ERM Premier International Conference on Engineering EducationHillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University College of EngineeringAnna Stepanova, Texas A&M University Dr. Anna Stepanova is a researcher at the Sketch Recognition Lab at Texas A&M University. She holds a Ph.D., Master’s and Bachelor’s in geology. Anna’s research interests are in geosciences, micropaleontology and education.Dr. Saira Anwar, Texas A&M University Saira Anwar is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering
of the program’s curriculum has been a short course inmechanical engineering. This course, which is taught by a representative of the mechanical engi-neering department (a faculty member or doctoral candidate) in conjunction with a local secondaryschool educator, is intended to introduce the fundamentals of mechanical engineering in an infor-mative, yet approachable, manner.Structurally, the mechanical engineering course is divided into ten two-hour academic units, eachof which includes a brief technical lecture (approximately twenty minutes in length), a varietyof hands-on demonstrations, and a competitive group project of a design-build-test nature. Thecourse’s curriculum presently consists of three distinct sections: (i) mechanical system
during each application cycle. Regardless of the specific academic role, allREEFE participants were integrated into the institution as a part-time visiting faculty member.The expectation was for each REEFE participant to contribute his or her engineering educationexpertise in the assigned role for the improvement of the host institution. REEFE fit the untestedcriterion of the EAGER funding line, because to our knowledge, this program was the first tocreate an on-site, long-term internship for engineering education. The project wasinterdisciplinary by design because the host institutions did not have engineering educationdepartments. We believed REEFE was potentially transformative based on the researchregarding internship experiences and because
institutions to develop aQuality Enhancement Plan (QEP), which must focus on improving specific student learningoutcomes and/or student success. Our SACSCOC accreditation was most recently reaffirmed in2016 and our QEP, EDGE: Enhanced Discovery through Guided Exploration, was designed toenhance student learning by infusing creative inquiry (CI) throughout the undergraduateexperience. With EDGE, we implemented an integrated curricular and co-curricular plan thatenabled our students to develop the skills to formulate CI questions, decide on proper approachesto address them, explore relevant evidence, and produce and present their findings or creations.From 2016-2021, 170 EDGE course grants were funded in all eight of our Colleges or Schoolsfor faculty