Page 7.884.8 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ã2002, American Society for Engineering Educationbeen used successfully in our introductory microprocessor class, and will continue to formthe focus for that laboratory in the foreseeable future.References 1. Carroll, C. R., “Early Engineering Exposure Using A Microcontroller-Based Personal Lab Station,” 1990 North Midwest Section Meeting of ASEE, Houghton, MI (1990).BiographiesCHRISTOPHER R. CARROLLChristopher R. Carroll received a Bachelor of Engineering Science from Georgia Tech, and M.S. and Ph.D.degrees from Caltech. After teaching in Electrical Engineering at Duke University, he
Paper ID #6783Multi-robot Communication for Education and ResearchMr. Robert L. Avanzato, Pennsylvania State University, Abington Bob Avanzato is an associate professor of engineering at the Penn State’s Abington campus where he teaches courses in electrical and computer engineering, computer science, and information sciences and technology. His research interests are mobile robotics, intelligent systems, virtual world technology and innovative education. Page 23.919.1 c American
at CBUChristian Brothers University is a small Catholic university. The School of Engineeringoffers degrees in electrical, mechanical, chemical and civil and environmentalengineering. The CEE program requires studies in structural, soil, traffic andtransportation, hydraulics and water resources in addition to other courses in physics,chemistry, mathematics and the liberal arts. Only the courses in the geotechnicalsequence are described here. Three required courses are offered in geotechnicalengineering (geotechnical engineering, geotechnical engineering laboratory and design offoundations) along with elective courses. In the first two courses, students learn thefundamentals and in the third course, they are required to design various types
spaces before transitioning to higher education.Dr. Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego Dr. Alex Phan is the inaugural Executive Director for Student Success in the Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego. Prior to his appointment, he has served as a project scientist, engineer, and lecturer, teaching across multiple divisions, including the Jacobs School of Engineering (Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Eng., Dean’s Office Unit) and UC San Diego Division of Extended Studies. His teaching interests and expertise are in experiential learning, holistic education models, active learning environments, and metacognition. In his current role, he leads the IDEA
Linux dual operating systems. Various EDA tools are available tostudents. Some EDA tools are: Cadence PSPICE, Synopsys (Tetramax ATPG, Design Vision,DC Shell, etc.), Mentor Graphics tools (IC Station, Design Architect, Accusim), etc. All thecomputer labs are equipped with ceiling projectors with multimedia support, and networkprinters.A Digital Design Laboratory is also available, which is equipped with 10 workstations. Eachhas a PC, programmable Altera boards, 2 power supplies, and oscilloscope, functiongenerator, different kinds of TTL chips, Altera boards, Xilinx boards, multimeteters, andother related hardware. Furthermore, we have a Microprocessor Laboratory/EmbeddedSystems Laboratory. It has 10 stations. Each has a personal computer
instruction for all types of learners. She received her Master’s Degree in Modern Languages from Central Connecticut State University in 2011. She earned her Bachelor of Arts in Hispanic Studies and her teaching certificate from Connecticut College in 2001.Dr. Sarira Motaref P.E., University of Connecticut Sarira Motaref is an assistant professor in residence in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at the University of Connecticut. She has been teaching large classes such as CE 2110 (Applied Mechanics I) and CE 3110 (Mechanics of Materials) which are major requirement across multiple disci- plines in the School of Engineering since 2013. She has led the efforts within the Department to develop and
agreement of the three teachers (see Table 2), the following generalizations are made: 1. Working with the robotics materials helped students practice problem solving and inquiry skills. 2. The NSES goal of promoting inquiry was addressed in the small group work with the robotics materials. This work involved inquiry/ exploration and problem solving among the groups members and in some cases between groups as well. 3. Small group work with the robotics materials helped make the physical science content more interesting to learn. The robotics material also made the physics content more relevant. 4. Teaching strategies that use visuals and/or concrete materials such as those found in laboratory investigations, can
andcurriculum needed to set up high school courses in this subject at their respective schools.MTI-trained teachers found this training to be very beneficial to their teaching. Their students(221 students at 7 high schools) reported that the courses: a) made them much more interested in Page 8.378.3a science career b) increased their enjoyment of laboratory activities; and c) helped them developProceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright3 © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationtheir skills fo r working with equipment and in the laboratory
of a university professor and a graduate student mentor. Developed through a grantfunded by the NASA Curriculum Improvements Partnership Award for the Integration ofResearch (CIPAIR) program, the summer internship program integrates research with curriculumimprovements by providing the framework for students to use their research experiences todevelop instructional materials to improve the engineering curriculum. The paper highlights theresults of the research done by the mechanical engineering student group who helped develop anovel haptic apparatus and associated curriculum for teaching upper division mechanicalengineering laboratory courses in control systems, mechatronics, and haptics. Over the ten-weekprogram the group made significant
), “Teaching Cellular Automaton Concepts Through InterdisciplinaryCollaborative Learning,” Chem. Eng. Ed., 34(4), 204-309, 315.10 Heitsch, A. T., Ekerdt, J. G., and Korgel, B. A. (2009), “NANOLAB at the University of Texas at Austin: AModel for Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education,” Chemical Engineering Education,43(3), 225-231.11 Hunter, K. W., Matson, J. O., and Dunn, R. (2002), “Impact of a Fifty-Minute Experiential Team-BuildingProgram on Design Team Performance,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition, Session 2257.12 Biernacki, J. J. and Wilson, C. , (1999) “Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Advanced Materials - A Team-OrientedInquiry-Based Approach,” NSF
introduce students to qualitative and quantitative perspectives of four factorsthat affect design, construction and management of the structures we live and work in. Thesefour factors, Safety, Sustainability, Style and Society, comprised the four principle modules of thecourse. The course explores the modules separately, as well as their interconnectedness. Inaddition, the course focused on drawing as a language for communicating building design andperformance. The class was organized as a weekly 2.5 hour seminar course to allow time forfield trips, laboratory activities, and class discussion, which were designed to strengthenstudents’ ability to analyze and communicate ideas about building design across disciplines.Weekly readings shaped the focus
Institute ofTechnology. The first of these courses is oriented toward the undergraduate students and consists of a generalsurvey of particle technology which provides a good theoretical basis, but also features coverage of suchapplications as the students are likely to encounter when they have graduated and have entered industry. Asecond course is intended for graduate students and is oriented more towards theoretical aspects, includingmathematical modeling and computer simulations which can predict bulk behavior of particulate flows from theproperties of the material. This course also presents recent research developments in the field not yet appearingin standard textbooks. The third course will take place in the laboratory where students will
sophomore levelengineering mechanics course that incorporates topics in statics and dynamics; the courseincludes a laboratory component. The course is part of the required curriculum in theEngineering program at James Madison University; the program is not discipline specific.Classification of frames and machines Analysis of frames and machines is a topic that typically follows coursework in equilibriumof forces and moments; it describes how multi-member objects can be analyzed using a group ofrelated equilibrium equations. For this article, eight textbooks were reviewed to provide basisfor observations related to typical presentation of the frames and machines topic. The eighttextbooks are: Statics: Analysis and Design of Systems in
assigned during their topics’ designated time periods as shown in Figure.2, oncethe instruction on the software and processes are completed. The laboratories are conducted by agroup of students within 7 to 10 day periods, depending upon the requirements of the laboratoryassignment and the number of students within each group. Students are given 3-D solid models ofwork-pieces and tooling to reduce lead-time of model preparation. However, they are required tocreate simpler (2-D) geometries. The individual student’s effort and learning on each laboratoryassignment is measured by including laboratory related questions in exams and by theirparticipation during lectures and their interaction with faculty and teaching assistants.Processes and Software
, in turn, blames the industry for focusing on short term profits as opposed to longterm strategic technical goals [5]. Resources for new research in both arenas have been severelycut (e.g., dismantling of Bell Laboratories, and reduction in industry-sponsored basic research onuniversity campuses), further compounding the problem. Is there a sudden disillusionment withan educational system that has served us so well for over three decades, or are some industry anduniversity players crying wolf? The National Academy of Engineering also recognizes thisproblem and argues for an educational system that is relevant to the needs of the community [3].If one accepts that there is some truth to this claim, the underlying causes for this
Copyright© 2003, American Society for Engineering Education“prep year” administered as a separate unit from the college. Statistics have shown that over 80%of first year students attend “prep year”. The effectiveness of present pre-engineering “prep year”is under scrutiny, and the consensus is that radical changes are required including: relevantcurriculum, more appropriate teaching methods, and meaningful assessment schemes.Over the years, thousands have completed their engineering education at one of the eight collegesof the Region (Table 1) and have either filled government positions or joined the private sector,side by side with expatriates. Some have established their own business or moved up the ladderinto responsible managerial positions
community data tocalculate the mean and standard deviation for each, and then create a simulation to model thepopulation in the study. The final requirements are to analyze the data and prepare a writtensubmission. The laboratory material presented to the students is included as Appendix A.Assessment of student work and analysis of the Monte Carlo modeling lab will be completed in2016.ConclusionA preliminary survey of undergraduate environmental engineering courses was conducted toassess interpretation of risk and uncertainty criteria at different ABET programs. The majorityof hours within typical courses was dedicated to teaching topics of risk using the USEPA HHRA(BOK 5.1 and BOK 5.5). It was not surprising that courses allocate the least amount
undergraduate courses in particular, due to time constraints, instructors willlikely need to develop potential clients prior to beginning the project. Additionally, co-teaching,if desired, to help promote teamwork and collaboration must also be developed and prepared.3Lab managers may be able to assist in distributing equipment and instructing students onoperational procedures. Once an initial model is established, faculty time requirements maylessen; however, built-in feedback loops, which may be time intensive, will be required forsuccessful long-term implementation of student projects.Required resources. Students in an introductory environmental engineering program willtypically have minimal laboratory experience or this term project may be their
of knowledge in school andbeyond. Thus, teaching students self-regulatory skills in addition to subject-matter knowledge isone of the major goals of education. However, SRL is not well known and utilized by theEngineering and Technology education community for facilitating student learning.Self-regulated learners are purposive and goal-oriented, incorporating and applying a variety ofstrategies to optimize their academic performances. However, the application of self-regulationto learning is a complicated process involving not only the awareness and application of learningstrategies but also extensive reflection and self awareness. This paper describes the developmentof the instructional strategy and its implementation plan, which integrates
in the engineering and basic sciences courses as well as in the humanities and social sciencecourses and is accomplished by having the students work on a design project. Two weaknesses existin the current teaching of capstone design courses in most engineering curricula. First, the chosendesign projects may not necessarily be real-life or may not relate to a real engineering problem in thefield. Hence, it is highly likely that these design projects, when completed, will not advance to theproduction line. Second, most design projects are required to be completed within one semester.Depending on the scope of a project, a one-semester long time frame may not be adequate when adesign project demands a complete cycle of multidisciplinary
Paper ID #11847Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentProf. Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Page 26.1667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentAbstractHow to enhance student learning is a critical issue in academia. Throughout the author’sacademic career, teaching effectiveness has always been an on-going challenge.Consequently, he has experimented with different teaching techniques and approaches.The author’s
disciplines in Spanish, focuseson integrating physics and calculus for first-year engineering students13. The Fis-Mat coursemeets three times a week for a total of 5 blocks of 80 minutes each in three sessions (one blockon Monday and two consecutive blocks on Wednesday and Friday). In terms of teaching load,two blocks correspond to the Physics course, two blocks to the Mathematics course and oneblock corresponds to the Physics Laboratory. Both professors were present and participating atall times. During the actual sessions there was no distinction between the blocks, each professorled the class depending on students’ needs. The course program was structured in a coherent andarticulated way without paying much attention on whose block corresponded
).Dr. Steve Chenoweth, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Steve Chenoweth is associate professor of computer science and software engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. There, he has participated in launching bachelors and masters level software engineering programs, and a minor in robotics. His prior experience included teaching and assessing systems at Bell Laboratories, as well as teaching and designing software at NCR Corp. He brought from industry the alternative perspective of how training programs are assessed for effectiveness there.Dr. Kay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee received a B.S. degree in chemical engineering, and M.Eng. and Ph.D. degrees in biomedical engineering
, Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2006.[15] E. W. L. Cheng and I. Hampson, “Transfer of training: A review and new insights,” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 327–341, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00230.x.[16] T. T. Baldwin and J. K. Ford, “Transfer of Training: A Review and Directions for Future Research,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 63–105, 1988, doi: 10.1111/j.1744- 6570.1988.tb00632.x.[17] P. W. Thayer and M. S. Teachout, A climate for transfer model. Armstrong Laboratory, Air Force Materiel Command, 1995.[18] P. Gombu, K. Utha, and K. Seden, “Effectiveness of Backward Design Lesson Planning in Teaching and Learning Physics
effectively uses modern technology whileteaching at Miami University. He has utilized World Wide Web and InteractiveVideo Distance Learning extensively in addition to other teaching techniques. W.W.W.and I.V.D.L. actually supplement other routinely used audio visual techniques such aspower point presentations, tutorials, problem-solving sessions, written research reports,peer group discussions, poster presentations etc. The author utilizes a variety of instructional tools to communicate with studentswho may prefer to have different learning styles (Kolb, 1985). The author alsorecommends and encourages students to utilize the resources that are readily available atthe university, such as Library, Writing Center, Computer Laboratory, etc
laboratory as a place for innovation in education for sustainability for all students,” Educ. Sci., vol. 5, pp. 238–254, 2015.[52] J. E. Dyment, A. Hill, and S. Emery, “Sustainability as a cross-curricular priority in the australian curriculum : A Tasmanian investigation,” Environ. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1105–1126, 2015.[53] J. Schon, K. Eitel, J. Hougham, and D. Hendrickson, “Creating a research to classroom pipeline: Clossing the gap between science research and educators,” J. od Sustain. Educ., vol. 8, no. January, 2015.[54] M. Hacker, D. Crismond, D. Hecht, and M. Lomask, “Engineering for all: A middle school program to introduce students to engineering as a potential social good,” Technol. Eng. Teach
experiences and opportunities. In other words, thereal challenge in college teaching today is not covering the material for the students, but ratheruncovering the material with the students 2.There are several strands of pedagogies of engagement under the umbrella of active learningmethods that have received attention by engineering educators world-wide 2, 3. Thesemethods/approaches are known to increase students’ active engagement in learning and alsopromote cognitive elaboration, enhance critical thinking, and contribute toward social andemotional development. For many faculty, there remain questions about what “active learning” isand how it differs from traditional engineering education, since the latter involves activitiesthrough homework
retention of new knowledge and acquisition of desirable personal traits.Any such method that engages students in the learning process is labeled as: “active learning”method. In essence, active learning requires doing meaningful learning activities in groups underthe guidance of an informed and experienced teacher. As stated by Christensen et al (1), “To teachis to engage students in learning.” The main point is that engaging students in learning isprincipally the responsibility of the teacher, who becomes less an imparter of knowledge andmore a designer and a facilitator of learning experiences and opportunities. In other words, thereal challenge in college teaching today is not covering the material for the students, but ratheruncovering the
://flagpole.mit.edu/10. iLab Heat Exchanger Project Home Page. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 16 February 2005 < http://heatex.mit.edu/default.htm >.11. Lehman, Thomas. Hybrid Science Labs: Flexible and Hands-on. Online Cl@ssroom, February 2004. Retrieved 16 February 2005 < http://www.spjc.edu/SE/newsletter/OnlineClassroom.pdf >.12. Distance-Learning Remote Laboratories using Labview. National Instruments. Retrieved 16 February 2005 < http://zone.ni.com/devzone%5Cconceptd.nsf/webmain/7BD0B01FCF3CF61A86256B510059F0FB/$ File/WP2238.pdf >H. RANDOLPH HOLTMr. Holt is an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology in the Department of Technology atNorthern Kentucky University. Teaching duties are at both the
for Underwriters Laboratories UL-746: the database for polymeric materials. In her free time, Ms. Kurr facilitates professional development workshops for Tau Beta Pi, the Engineering Honor Society, and the CyberAmbassador program.David Icove The University of Tennessee (UT) Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Professor of Practice, Dr. David Icove is an internationally recognized forensic fire engineering expert with over 40 years of experience. He is the co-author of the leading expert treaties in forensic fire investigation, including Kirk’s Fire Investigation, Forensic Fire Scene Reconstruction, and Combating Arson-for-Profit. Dr. Icove presently coordinates the Graduate Program in Fire Protection Engineering at UT