needs of underrepresented students. The project design is grounded ineducational theories including retention/integration, cumulative advantage, engagement, andconstructivism. It incorporates established best practices for working with URM students such asSTEM identity formation through experiential programs including student research andinternships, a focus on critical junctures, training of faculty and staff to enhance culturalcompetency, and building of academic integration and STEM self-efficacy. An extensiveevaluation plan designed around the project logic model will be used as the basis for projectassessment. This paper includes a description of the project, partner institutions, and first yearresearch and evaluation results.Introduction
Technology (IT) profession [15]. The alignment of an organisation’sinformation technology to its business strategies is a recurrent theme in IS research[6]. The increasing complexity of today’s business and IT environments makes itmore difficult for organisations to design an Enterprise architecture that supports thecompany’s business objectives and enables the IT staff to deliver applications thatalign with business goals.Enterprise Architecture is about understanding all of the different elements that go tomake up the Enterprise and how those elements interrelate. The InformationTechnology Management Reform Act of 1996, better known as the Clinger-CohenAct, refers to Enterprise architecture as "an integrated framework for evolving ormaintaining
-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education," London, Kogan Page, 1998.5. Ssemakula, M.E.: 'Transforming a Traditional Course into a Long Distance Course.' 1999 Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov. 10 -13, 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico.6. Osterndorf, V.A., "The Two-Way Video Classroom," 1996. (Workshop Manual).Biographical SketchMUKASA E. SSEMAKULA graduated from the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology,UK, with a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 1984. He joined the Wayne State University in 1993 and is currentlyteaching courses in Manufacturing/Industrial Engineering Technology. His has research interests and has publishedwidely in the areas of Manufacturing Systems and Computer
Paper ID #27377Work in Progress: Discovering Pathways of Engineering Undergraduate Stu-dents Related to Engineering IdentityMiss Pearl Elizabeth Ortega, Texas A&M University Pearl Ortega is a PhD student at Texas A&M University, College Station studying Interdisciplinary En- gineering with a focus on Engineering Education. Ms. Ortega received her undergraduate degree in Industrial Engineering from St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, TX and a M. Eng. degree in Industrial Engineering from Texas A&M University with a research focus in remote healthcare. She currently works as a graduate assistant for the Aerospace
, and interactive engagement. Utilizing thecapabilities of digital media enables authors and instructors to convey the subject matter in amore efficient way and provides students with various avenues of learning. Several researchers[9],[10],[11] have shown the influence of visualization on the effectiveness of engineeringeducation and how the lack of visualization capabilities among engineering students can preventeffective knowledge transfer. The eBooks that are designed for print include the figures in a two-dimensional format even if the object was modeled in three dimensions. However, many digitaldevices that are currently available are powerful enough to render even complicated three-dimensional models and provide students with a real time
part of a larger NSF-funded STEM + Computing project, participating teachersexplored a pilot unit that uses engineering and computer science to infuse computational thinkinginto the teaching of linear functions in secondary algebra. Using a design-based researchframework that intertwines innovative learning environments and the development of theories oflearning, the research team engaged teachers as learners, classroom leaders, and collaborators ininquiry [3] [4]. This collaborative approach heightens the relevance of the designed interventionto teachers’ practice while also yielding key insights for research. In the case of the teacher institute, focusing on dispositions provided an anchor thathelped teachers navigate the ambiguity of
withprocedural approaches to technical writing that serve as incomparable supports when they arelater tasked with larger, more open-ended writing tasks.Using quantitative and qualitative results, this paper provides evidence that experiential learningopportunities in an engineering-focused Technical Writing and Communications course is a bestfit for this demographic’s learning preferences and creates measurable course impacts.Longitudinal data collected from these outcomes allow for a better reading of studentperformance gains, and results will guide future instructional design choices.IntroductionTechnical writing pedagogy, aimed at engineering students, must feature experiential learningand writing-to-learn practices in order to best address the
teams is an important skill that students need to develop in Page 14.330.2order to succeed in engineering practice.1,3,4 This has led to increased use of pedagogy thatembraces cooperative learning and greater emphasis on group projects in various engineeringcourses. An important challenge of engineering professors is to group their students in a mannerthat will set the stage for effective learning. Many researchers have suggested criteria thatshould be used when instructors form the teams.18,22,27,28 Common strategies are to form teamsof three to five students with a heterogeneity of grades and/or abilities, and avoid isolatingminorities. Best
best-match searching techniques that allow the metasearch system to interpret theresults of multiple searches and present custom result displays.Metasearch vendors and system developers are exploring best practices and system designs thatutilize information technologies such as local link resolving, OpenURL, OAI protocols, andDigital Object Identifiers (DOIs). The OpenURL standard provides a streamlined mechanism forexpressing and transmitting metadata (data describing an information resource—authors, title,journal name, volume, publication year, URL of full-text resource, etc.) between differentsystems. The OAI is based on the preprint server movement and provides protocols forharvesting remote metadata. Libraries and information centers can
studentnotebooks and information in the course portfolio best represents the continuous assessmentprocess and course improvement each program had implemented. Each course portfolio is abinder containing the items discussed earlier in this section. It is stored at a central location thatcan be easily accessed by the course coordinators and reviewers. During the 2003-04 academicyear all information in the portfolio were updated at the end of each semester for the coursestaught during that semester.Each course peer review subcommittee reviewed the portfolio and collected student notebooks.The course assessment rubric form was designed and used in this assessment process. Afterreviewing the contents of the course notebook (samples of students work) and the
model, consider a recent engineering college study.18 While this very specific study probably proves very little it should cause us to think, discuss, and experiment in a similar fashion. The study’s purpose was to “…provide insights into the research question of whether freshman undergraduate engineering students can be more innovative than seniors.” Student teams were challenged to design a “next-generation alarm clock” and analyze the Page 26.421.7 results for “originality and technical feasibility.” Conclusion: “Freshman-level students generate designs with higher levels of originality than their
Paper ID #10302Students’ Persectives on Homework and Problem Sets in STEM CoursesMs. Lea Marie Eaton, Stanford University Lea Eaton is a senior undergraduate student at Stanford University. She is working towards her B.S in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Product Design.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis
-residential program, so students areresponsible for their own transportation to and from campus each day. And exampleschedule of a camp week is shown in Appendix A. During the course of the program,participants experience a variety of tours, speakers, hands-on activities, and field trips. Alarge component of the week is a group project where teams of students design, build andlaunch a model rocket made from high-tech engineering composites. During all of theseactivities, camp participants are able to interact with faculty, graduate and undergraduatestudents, and representatives of local industry. Images of the campers in action are shownin Figures 1 and 2. Additional information about the first year of the program can befound in the 2012 paper by
Student Exchange, Faculty Exchange, and Faculty Collaboration – both instructionand research and development. We then share some of the key characteristics that make eachpossible and successful. Key factors, such as timetable matching and course equivalencymapping for accreditation and time-to-degree considerations, will be described and exampleprocedures and documents to these ends will be shared.This paper provides, not a conceptual exploration of what might be, but rather a practical, reality-based sharing of best practices that derive from our two institutions’ more than two year effort toevolve sustainable linkages. We are reporting on lessons learned from the real experience ofadministrators, faculty and students, not only exchanging but
andcreate an environment for engineering faculty to transition students into engineering [2].Research focusing on FYE programs has addressed curricular design and coursework to promotestudents’ success [3]. Furthermore, Reed et. al. noted that FYE programs improve students’persistence within engineering and is the quickest path to graduation [2].Orr et al. observed that universities in the Multiple-Institution Database for InvestigatingEngineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD) use one of six matriculation models [1].The first model is the one noted earlier which admits first-time-in-college (FTIC) students into aformal FYE program that focuses on broad engineering coursework, mathematics, physics andchemistry. Students are required to
their best interest. Most students, however, willprepare if there is an immediate negative consequence for lack of preparation. Often they aremore responsive avoiding negative consequences than they are at seeking positive outcomes. Thetiming of the negative consequence is much more important than its magnitude. This is thephilosophy of the unit quiz, a primary instrument used to emphasize and measure conceptualknowledge. The unit quiz is particularly effective in the engineering science courses that mayemphasize operational knowledge at the expense of conceptual knowledge.The Unit Quiz (a.k.a. the Reading Quiz) Originally referred to as a “unit quiz” because it is based on a “reading unit,” in practice it isoften referred to as a “reading
; Bransford, J. D. (1999) Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development. 47(2). p 39-60.4. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: Volume II. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.5. Harris, A. L. (2000). VaNTH Observational System. Unpublished document. Vanderbilt University: Nashville.ROBERT J. ROSELLIRobert J. Roselli is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. Healso serves as Director of Graduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical
also served as a committee member on the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for a Strategic Network Grant. He has been a member of several International Research Organizing Committees and currently is the Treasurer for the Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics. Throughout his time at the University of Calgary Les has taught many undergraduate and graduate courses in Mechanical Engineering as well as general engineering classes such as ENGG 349 and ENGG 317. He has consistently maintained a high Student Approval Rating and has been awarded numerous Undergraduate Teaching Excellence Awards. These include: the University of Calgary Student Union Teaching Excellence Award (2014), the
AC 2012-4816: LEVERAGING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELINGTECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGE-MENT EDUCATIONDr. Namhun Lee, East Carolina UniversityDr. Carrie S. Dossick, University of Washington Carrie Sturts Dossick is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management in the College of Built Environments, and the Executive Director of the Pacific Northwest Center for Construc- tion Research and Education, where she has been developing a new course for Integrated Project Delivery called ARCH404/CM404 Integrated Design-Build Studio. Dossick’s main research interests focus on emerging collaboration methods and technologies such as Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Building Information
systems. The year the class is taken was represented from a scale of 1-4, with 1representing the first year, and 4 representing senior year. So, if a particular class is taken as asophomore in half of the departments and a junior in the other half, it would be represented as a2.5.Data for master programs were taken from institution websites and public graduate studenthandbooks. If a school had multiple programs, such as thesis and coursework, only the thesisprogram was considered.Faculty information was taken from department web pages. For classifying professor positions,faculty ranks were classified as associate, assistant, or full, and either tenure-track or lecturer(e.g. professors of practice, and teaching professors).Teaching data was taken
by theCenter for SCM in collaboration with the Engineering School and run primarily by the studentsthemselves, where engineering and business students collaborate to analyze the data presented ina SCM focused case study, and then propose actions that resolve the case in a manner thatbalances delivery, quality, cost, and flexibility. Cases are chosen that require both engineeringexpertise and business acumen to successfully analyze their data and synthesizerecommendations. The 2015 case focused on the impact of 3D Printing (additive manufacturing)on SCM in China; integrating theory and practice through experience-based learning,collaboration, innovation, and globalization.Figure 1: Logo for the Race to the Case Competition Developed and
Committee has four strategic goals for WATERS Network • Bring together educators, scientists, engineers, administrators, and citizens to form a powerful collaborative that will transform the current state of formal and informal education in environmental engineering and hydrologic science. • Propagate “best practices” in education that are informed by rigorous cognitive and pedagogical research in order to create a diverse, internationally competitive workforce. • Enable synergistic interactions among scientists and pre-collegiate/collegiate/graduate educators in setting research agendas and distributing results for the benefit of society. • Provide broadly accessible, state-of-the-art information bases and
Technology Kamal Joshi is the HRS Database Manager at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His interests include evaluating student outcomes, program assessment, data streams, and pattern matching. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in computer science at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Page 11.631.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Factors Affecting Student Performance and Satisfaction in Distance Learning CoursesAbstractDuring the past few years, the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) has initiated severalprojects to determine best practices in distance
. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Expe- riential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. Kaitlin has a BS in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University and an MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Effect of a Collaborative Environment on Engineering Students' Social NetworksAbstractIn this full student-led research paper, we examine how collaborative learning impacts the socialnetworks of engineering students. We believe this is important because it will provide us withinsight into
for Engineering Education, 2011 Navy Metrology Engineering Center STEM Outreach through the STEP Program: Challenges, Lessons Learned and Application to DoD StrategyBackground:The United States and especially the Department of Defense (DoD) has historically reliedheavily upon scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians to innovate, design, produceand maintain a technically superior capability to defend and advance the interests of the UnitedStates, both at home and globally. The United States maintained a leading edge technologicadvantage through and beyond World War II until it was stunned by the Soviet Union‟s launchof Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957. Sputnik 1 was the first artificial
a structure that is faithful to the disciplinary structure of the content, and they must integratethe content into their existing cognitive structure (i.e., knowledge).Stepping back from this extremely brief overview of meaningful learning, it is evident that theinstructional role of the teacher is very important but perhaps more important is the role of thelearner. For no matter what the instructor does, if the learner lacks the prior knowledge, theintention, and/or the skills to accomplish meaningful learning; it simply will not take place.This is not to diminish the challenges of designing effective pedagogical practices. Assessingstudent’s existing knowledge, providing content of a high level and structured so that it ispotentially
Consortium for Product Development Leadership in the 21stCentury (PD21), customizes course materials and elective courses to meet the needs of theirrespective constituency. The program balances technical and business perspectives in an effortto provide technical leaders with the skills and knowledge to create best-in-class productportfolios.The program at RIT, known as the Masters in Product Development (MPD), is a joint effortbetween the College of Business and the Kate Gleason College of Engineering. In addition to acourse in Leadership in Product Development, the core of the curriculum consists of threesystems design and management courses: Systems Engineering (SE), Systems Architecture (SA),and Systems and Project Management. Students are also
TechnologyTECH 12000 – “Design Thinking in Technology”, is a freshman level survey course designed todevelop a students’ perspective and enhance their skills in living and working in a technologicalsociety while introducing them to Purdue Polytechnic. Two sections of TECH 12000 wereutilized by the researchers to recruit volunteers for this study.Originally, the instructors, who are also the authors of this paper, planned to introduce the topicof VR to the class by digital presentation (e.g. PowerPoint). However, from experience anddiscussions they decided that for someone to fully understand and appreciate what currentimmersive VR is, they must experience it first-hand. This idea and the need to assistadministration with classroom technology procurement
meeting the partner in the second week ofclasses. As they begin project implementation, learning and community relations are intermixedwith issues of the design itself and meeting deadlines. Community relations and impact comeinto play when they generally interact with the partner or are needing input and feedback. The balance seen in these reflections is similar to what has been seen in other data from theoverall program. In particular, a study of alumni [13] found that it was the interplay of thesedimensions that was cited by graduates that created the exceptional learning experience. Thegraduates found that the balance of the real project with a real user but within a safe learningenvironment created a synergy that was valuable for learning
for potential future research topics for MS and/or PhD graduate studentsinterested in studying the static liquefaction triggering mechanism. Last but certainly notleast, it can also be used as demonstration laboratory activities to help attract more highschool students to attend Purdue University Northwest to study civil and geotechnicalengineering programs.Concluding RemarksThe importance of active, hands-on learning for students studying a discipline in theSTEM industry is becoming more and more relevant every year. There is a conflictbetween university professors and students in regard to the methods of teaching andlearning that works best for an individual. It is in human nature for us to have aninductive approach to learning whereas