best-match searching techniques that allow the metasearch system to interpret theresults of multiple searches and present custom result displays.Metasearch vendors and system developers are exploring best practices and system designs thatutilize information technologies such as local link resolving, OpenURL, OAI protocols, andDigital Object Identifiers (DOIs). The OpenURL standard provides a streamlined mechanism forexpressing and transmitting metadata (data describing an information resource—authors, title,journal name, volume, publication year, URL of full-text resource, etc.) between differentsystems. The OAI is based on the preprint server movement and provides protocols forharvesting remote metadata. Libraries and information centers can
model, consider a recent engineering college study.18 While this very specific study probably proves very little it should cause us to think, discuss, and experiment in a similar fashion. The study’s purpose was to “…provide insights into the research question of whether freshman undergraduate engineering students can be more innovative than seniors.” Student teams were challenged to design a “next-generation alarm clock” and analyze the Page 26.421.7 results for “originality and technical feasibility.” Conclusion: “Freshman-level students generate designs with higher levels of originality than their
studentnotebooks and information in the course portfolio best represents the continuous assessmentprocess and course improvement each program had implemented. Each course portfolio is abinder containing the items discussed earlier in this section. It is stored at a central location thatcan be easily accessed by the course coordinators and reviewers. During the 2003-04 academicyear all information in the portfolio were updated at the end of each semester for the coursestaught during that semester.Each course peer review subcommittee reviewed the portfolio and collected student notebooks.The course assessment rubric form was designed and used in this assessment process. Afterreviewing the contents of the course notebook (samples of students work) and the
Paper ID #10302Students’ Persectives on Homework and Problem Sets in STEM CoursesMs. Lea Marie Eaton, Stanford University Lea Eaton is a senior undergraduate student at Stanford University. She is working towards her B.S in Mechanical Engineering with a focus in Product Design.Dr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besides teaching both undergraduate and graduate design and education related classes at Stanford University, she conducts research on engineering education and work-practices, and applied finite element analysis
-residential program, so students areresponsible for their own transportation to and from campus each day. And exampleschedule of a camp week is shown in Appendix A. During the course of the program,participants experience a variety of tours, speakers, hands-on activities, and field trips. Alarge component of the week is a group project where teams of students design, build andlaunch a model rocket made from high-tech engineering composites. During all of theseactivities, camp participants are able to interact with faculty, graduate and undergraduatestudents, and representatives of local industry. Images of the campers in action are shownin Figures 1 and 2. Additional information about the first year of the program can befound in the 2012 paper by
Student Exchange, Faculty Exchange, and Faculty Collaboration – both instructionand research and development. We then share some of the key characteristics that make eachpossible and successful. Key factors, such as timetable matching and course equivalencymapping for accreditation and time-to-degree considerations, will be described and exampleprocedures and documents to these ends will be shared.This paper provides, not a conceptual exploration of what might be, but rather a practical, reality-based sharing of best practices that derive from our two institutions’ more than two year effort toevolve sustainable linkages. We are reporting on lessons learned from the real experience ofadministrators, faculty and students, not only exchanging but
andcreate an environment for engineering faculty to transition students into engineering [2].Research focusing on FYE programs has addressed curricular design and coursework to promotestudents’ success [3]. Furthermore, Reed et. al. noted that FYE programs improve students’persistence within engineering and is the quickest path to graduation [2].Orr et al. observed that universities in the Multiple-Institution Database for InvestigatingEngineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD) use one of six matriculation models [1].The first model is the one noted earlier which admits first-time-in-college (FTIC) students into aformal FYE program that focuses on broad engineering coursework, mathematics, physics andchemistry. Students are required to
their best interest. Most students, however, willprepare if there is an immediate negative consequence for lack of preparation. Often they aremore responsive avoiding negative consequences than they are at seeking positive outcomes. Thetiming of the negative consequence is much more important than its magnitude. This is thephilosophy of the unit quiz, a primary instrument used to emphasize and measure conceptualknowledge. The unit quiz is particularly effective in the engineering science courses that mayemphasize operational knowledge at the expense of conceptual knowledge.The Unit Quiz (a.k.a. the Reading Quiz) Originally referred to as a “unit quiz” because it is based on a “reading unit,” in practice it isoften referred to as a “reading
also served as a committee member on the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for a Strategic Network Grant. He has been a member of several International Research Organizing Committees and currently is the Treasurer for the Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics. Throughout his time at the University of Calgary Les has taught many undergraduate and graduate courses in Mechanical Engineering as well as general engineering classes such as ENGG 349 and ENGG 317. He has consistently maintained a high Student Approval Rating and has been awarded numerous Undergraduate Teaching Excellence Awards. These include: the University of Calgary Student Union Teaching Excellence Award (2014), the
AC 2012-4816: LEVERAGING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELINGTECHNOLOGY IN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGE-MENT EDUCATIONDr. Namhun Lee, East Carolina UniversityDr. Carrie S. Dossick, University of Washington Carrie Sturts Dossick is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management in the College of Built Environments, and the Executive Director of the Pacific Northwest Center for Construc- tion Research and Education, where she has been developing a new course for Integrated Project Delivery called ARCH404/CM404 Integrated Design-Build Studio. Dossick’s main research interests focus on emerging collaboration methods and technologies such as Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) and Building Information
systems. The year the class is taken was represented from a scale of 1-4, with 1representing the first year, and 4 representing senior year. So, if a particular class is taken as asophomore in half of the departments and a junior in the other half, it would be represented as a2.5.Data for master programs were taken from institution websites and public graduate studenthandbooks. If a school had multiple programs, such as thesis and coursework, only the thesisprogram was considered.Faculty information was taken from department web pages. For classifying professor positions,faculty ranks were classified as associate, assistant, or full, and either tenure-track or lecturer(e.g. professors of practice, and teaching professors).Teaching data was taken
; Bransford, J. D. (1999) Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educational Technology Research and Development. 47(2). p 39-60.4. Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional Design Theories and Models: Volume II. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.5. Harris, A. L. (2000). VaNTH Observational System. Unpublished document. Vanderbilt University: Nashville.ROBERT J. ROSELLIRobert J. Roselli is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University. Healso serves as Director of Graduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical
for Engineering Education, 2011 Navy Metrology Engineering Center STEM Outreach through the STEP Program: Challenges, Lessons Learned and Application to DoD StrategyBackground:The United States and especially the Department of Defense (DoD) has historically reliedheavily upon scientists, technologists, engineers and mathematicians to innovate, design, produceand maintain a technically superior capability to defend and advance the interests of the UnitedStates, both at home and globally. The United States maintained a leading edge technologicadvantage through and beyond World War II until it was stunned by the Soviet Union‟s launchof Sputnik 1 on October 4, 1957. Sputnik 1 was the first artificial
Committee has four strategic goals for WATERS Network • Bring together educators, scientists, engineers, administrators, and citizens to form a powerful collaborative that will transform the current state of formal and informal education in environmental engineering and hydrologic science. • Propagate “best practices” in education that are informed by rigorous cognitive and pedagogical research in order to create a diverse, internationally competitive workforce. • Enable synergistic interactions among scientists and pre-collegiate/collegiate/graduate educators in setting research agendas and distributing results for the benefit of society. • Provide broadly accessible, state-of-the-art information bases and
by theCenter for SCM in collaboration with the Engineering School and run primarily by the studentsthemselves, where engineering and business students collaborate to analyze the data presented ina SCM focused case study, and then propose actions that resolve the case in a manner thatbalances delivery, quality, cost, and flexibility. Cases are chosen that require both engineeringexpertise and business acumen to successfully analyze their data and synthesizerecommendations. The 2015 case focused on the impact of 3D Printing (additive manufacturing)on SCM in China; integrating theory and practice through experience-based learning,collaboration, innovation, and globalization.Figure 1: Logo for the Race to the Case Competition Developed and
Technology Kamal Joshi is the HRS Database Manager at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His interests include evaluating student outcomes, program assessment, data streams, and pattern matching. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. in computer science at New Jersey Institute of Technology. Page 11.631.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Factors Affecting Student Performance and Satisfaction in Distance Learning CoursesAbstractDuring the past few years, the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) has initiated severalprojects to determine best practices in distance
. Prior to beginning that role, she spent five years an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering and Expe- riential Engineering Education Departments at Rowan. Kaitlin has a BS in Chemical Engineering from Cornell University and an MS and PhD in Environmental Engineering in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 The Effect of a Collaborative Environment on Engineering Students' Social NetworksAbstractIn this full student-led research paper, we examine how collaborative learning impacts the socialnetworks of engineering students. We believe this is important because it will provide us withinsight into
a structure that is faithful to the disciplinary structure of the content, and they must integratethe content into their existing cognitive structure (i.e., knowledge).Stepping back from this extremely brief overview of meaningful learning, it is evident that theinstructional role of the teacher is very important but perhaps more important is the role of thelearner. For no matter what the instructor does, if the learner lacks the prior knowledge, theintention, and/or the skills to accomplish meaningful learning; it simply will not take place.This is not to diminish the challenges of designing effective pedagogical practices. Assessingstudent’s existing knowledge, providing content of a high level and structured so that it ispotentially
Consortium for Product Development Leadership in the 21stCentury (PD21), customizes course materials and elective courses to meet the needs of theirrespective constituency. The program balances technical and business perspectives in an effortto provide technical leaders with the skills and knowledge to create best-in-class productportfolios.The program at RIT, known as the Masters in Product Development (MPD), is a joint effortbetween the College of Business and the Kate Gleason College of Engineering. In addition to acourse in Leadership in Product Development, the core of the curriculum consists of threesystems design and management courses: Systems Engineering (SE), Systems Architecture (SA),and Systems and Project Management. Students are also
TechnologyTECH 12000 – “Design Thinking in Technology”, is a freshman level survey course designed todevelop a students’ perspective and enhance their skills in living and working in a technologicalsociety while introducing them to Purdue Polytechnic. Two sections of TECH 12000 wereutilized by the researchers to recruit volunteers for this study.Originally, the instructors, who are also the authors of this paper, planned to introduce the topicof VR to the class by digital presentation (e.g. PowerPoint). However, from experience anddiscussions they decided that for someone to fully understand and appreciate what currentimmersive VR is, they must experience it first-hand. This idea and the need to assistadministration with classroom technology procurement
meeting the partner in the second week ofclasses. As they begin project implementation, learning and community relations are intermixedwith issues of the design itself and meeting deadlines. Community relations and impact comeinto play when they generally interact with the partner or are needing input and feedback. The balance seen in these reflections is similar to what has been seen in other data from theoverall program. In particular, a study of alumni [13] found that it was the interplay of thesedimensions that was cited by graduates that created the exceptional learning experience. Thegraduates found that the balance of the real project with a real user but within a safe learningenvironment created a synergy that was valuable for learning
for potential future research topics for MS and/or PhD graduate studentsinterested in studying the static liquefaction triggering mechanism. Last but certainly notleast, it can also be used as demonstration laboratory activities to help attract more highschool students to attend Purdue University Northwest to study civil and geotechnicalengineering programs.Concluding RemarksThe importance of active, hands-on learning for students studying a discipline in theSTEM industry is becoming more and more relevant every year. There is a conflictbetween university professors and students in regard to the methods of teaching andlearning that works best for an individual. It is in human nature for us to have aninductive approach to learning whereas
courses build upon concepts to address professional and ethical fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, covered in beginning level course work. responsibilities including a respect for practice, and social responsibility in ways 6.3.7 Application of Mathematics and diversity; consistent with its mission. Science: Appropriate applications of the j. a knowledge of the impact of
; Information Networks 17, no. 1/2: 43-56.[15] Moore, Melissa. 2004. "Reeling 'em in: How to draw teaching faculty into collaborative relationships." Resource Sharing & Information Networks 17, no. 1/2: 77-86.[16] Callison, Rachel, Dan Budny, and Kate Thomes. 2005. "Library Research Project for First-Year Engineering Students: Results from Collaboration by Teaching and Library Faculty." Reference Librarian 43, no. 89/90: 93-106.[17] Weiner, Suzanne T. 1996. "Librarians as teaching team members in a mechanical engineering senior design course." Science & Technology Libraries 16, no. 1: 3-10.[18] Bhatt, Jay, Joanne Ferroni, Bob Kackley, and Dorilona Rose. 2005. "Drexel University, the University of
on active learning [6], which provided a framework for the strategies designed into the SFIP faculty development program. 4. The affirmation by the National Research Council of the National Academies that innovative teaching in STEM courses requires time that exceeds normal course development, as well as additional funding [7]. Borrego [8] also mentions these same issues, among others, in stating that diffusion of educational innovations in engineering is a challenge that has defied a satisfactory solution for decades. 5. The desire of both new and experienced faculty at this school of engineering to improve their teaching. A survey performed in 2009 showed that 96% of the engineering faculty members at
and political critique informed by Africana Philosophy and Critical Race Theory, Lisa invites readers and interlocutors to a space of reflection through (re)presenting and (re)languaging racialized experiences. Her research interests include culturally liberative mentoring, critical race pedagogy, STEM doctoral mentoring, and race and racism in non/informal adult education.Marah Lambert Marah Lambert just completed her first year in UNC Charlotte's Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation Ph.D. program. She is working as a graduate research assistant part-time. She recently earned her Master's in Research Methods in Education from the University of Kentucky. She taught middle school math for 5 years in the
Engineering Communications Program (ECP) have developed a sophomore tosenior, communication-across-the-curriculum plan, called the “MAE/ECP Initiative,” to meet theneeds of students, faculty, the college, and industry alike in their quest to heighten the pre-professional skills of graduating students. At its core, the partnership encourages the students'development of communicative self-efficacy in meeting the complex communicative demandsrelated to performing technical work in mechanical and aerospace engineering. This paperdiscusses the pedagogical framework, the research paradigm, the foundational concepts(engineering communication: communicative practice, context, communicative design, andengineering identity), communication modalities (written
digital notebook to document their experience inthe STEM.The seventh-grade program is a virtual reality class trip to New Zealand. The trip is for thestudents to see where The Lord of the Rings was filmed. The program consists of three designchallenges. The first is “Stranded”, the second “We Need Water!”, and the third “BalancingAct”. Throughout these design challenges, the student uses the engineering design process, aswell as many science and mathematical concepts, while maintaining a digital notebookto document research, designs, and team experiences.The eighth-grade program is the building of an underwater robotic vehicle (ROV) sponsored bythe Office of Naval Research. The program which they have designed allows teams of studentsto work
to see more impact is in the major designexperience class (ECE Capstone) and later alumni surveys.Artisanal hardwareAs described in more detail in4 our embedded computing course uses custom-designed andlocally manufactured header boards interfaced to the Texas Instruments MSP430 LaunchPad 7.Programs are written in C and are developed using TI’s Code Composer Studio8.Many introductory classes in embedded computing use components that are designed for easyintegration and hide the details. Indeed many of our students have used such introductoryrobotic systems in high school, first-year intro classes or in extracurricular activities. Ourapproach in this class is instead designed to confront the details to gain a more completeunderstanding of
theoretical and practical topics revealed in the lectures.Lecture time during Wednesday's class was devoted to the students presentations - students wererequired to research and present a technical journal paper on topics related to the class subjectfollowed by submission of a comprehensive technical written report. Friday class time was leftopen for the students with faculty been available for questions and discussions. The studentperformance was evaluated and graded by the faculty and classmates and was based on severalfactors such as: the ability to extract the key technical concept of the paper, the technical Page 23.1259.7knowledge of the