/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_1_01_a. RetrievedJanuary 26, 20162- G Barbose, Tracking the Sun VI- An historical summary of the installed price of photovoltaicsin the United States from 1998 to 2012. eScholarship University of California LBNL PaperLBNL-6350E, scholarship.org/uc/item 2j2888zv, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 20163- The State of the Union Address of President Barack Obama. (2016). Retrieved January 22,2016, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/12/remarks-president-barack-obama-%E2%80%93-prepared-delivery-state-union-address.4- S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P.Wenderoth. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, andmathematics
Negron, Niya King, Tameka Coly and Shaerya Patel .REFERENCES1. Kant, J. M.; Burckhard, S. R.; Kilts, W. K.; Min, K., Increasing Diversity in Engineering: Capacity Building Matters. 2014.2. Schunk, D. H.; Miller, S. D., Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. Academic motivation of adolescents 2002, 2, 29-52.3. Shumow, L.; Schmidt, J. A., Enhancing Adolescents' Motivation for Science. Corwin Press: 2013.4. Schmidt, J. A.; Shumow, L., Change in self-efficacy in high school science classrooms: An analysis by gender. Psychology of self-efficacy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers 2012.5. Zeldin, A. L.; Pajares, F., Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers
assessment evolutions. Based onfeedback from each assessment, the program evolves as the Center seeks to close gaps betweenthe program expectations and goals, and students’ experiences. Moreover, the Center strives tointegrate best practices per new research. Concurrently, assessment instruments are updated toreflect the updated programs elements and activities. For example, 50% or more of all theparticipants in the Cohort 2 reported large or very large gains in their laboratory safetyknowledge, openness to having their views challenged, openness to work with people withdifferent beliefs, and openness to consider and discuss new research ideas; however these itemswere added to the assessment after review of Cohort 1’s experiences (thus Table 3 does
. 8References1. Drash, W. (2015). Imagining daddy: A rig worker's daughter and her dreams. Retrieved September 2, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2015/04/10/us/oil-rig-victim-families-five-years-later/2. Juhasz, A. (2011). Black tide: The devastating impact of the gulf oil spill. Hobokon, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.3. Li, F. J., Duggal, R. N., Oliva, O. M., Karki, S., Surolia, R., Wang, Z., . . . Antony, V. B. (2015). Heme Oxygenase-1 protects Corexit 9500A-induced respiratory epithelial injury across species. PloS one, 10(4).4. Klimasinska, K. (2012). Deepwater permits in U.S. Gulf exceed pre-BP spill level. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2012-10-17/deepwater-permits-in-u-s-gulf-exceed-pre-bp-spill- level.html5
– Very good).Analysis of program ratings revealed overall satisfaction with the REU program (M = 4.17; Mo =4). Ratings of “Good” or higher, as evidenced by mean and mode responses, were obtained forthe following REU elements: working relationship with research mentor(s) (M = 3.17; Mo = 4);working relationship with research group members (M = 3.75; Mo = 4); the amount of time spentwith research mentor(s) (M = 2.83; Mo = 4); the advice given about careers and graduate school(M = 3.45; Mo = 3); and the research experience overall (M = 3.25; Mo = 3). The REU elementof the amount of time spent doing meaningful research received a “Fair” rating overall (M =2.83; Mo = 2), suggesting an important area of improvement for the research program.Table 5
: Students’ subject preferences and discussions of gender and subjectability. Oxford Review of Education. 26(1), 35-48.2 Younger, M. & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observationsfrom the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 17, 299-314. Downey, D. B. & Yuan, A. S. V. (2005). Sex differences in school performance during high school: Puzzlingpatterns and possible explanations. The Sociological Quarterly. 46(2), 299-321.3 Hannover, B. & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Whyhigh school students do not like math and science. Learning and Instruction. 14, 51-67.4 Peetsma, T., Hascher, T., van der Veen
my path inlearning the skills required to become an engineering librarian at an American University inthe UAE.IntroductionMany academic librarians who liaise with a specific subject area(s), are aware that a certainamount of knowledge about the subject area will help immensely when aiding students andprofessors with their information needs. My own personal experience has shown that with mybackground in biology, I can easily help scientists with library related queries, as I amfamiliar with the terminology. In my first library job, I worked at a medical library in which Iwas required to take a short course in medical terminology to better help the patrons withtheir queries. This short course helped me immensely as I worked in medical
respondents includedinformal oral feedback (oral) during course, one-on-one discussions outside class times,occasional solicited input, and reading reflectionsTable 6 summarizes responses to a question that asked instructors to indicate the types offeedback they give to students (check all that apply). Table 6. Percentage of instructors who provided various types of feedback to students Types of feedback to students % selected Students see graded assignments ① 91.8% Students see graded midterm exam(s) ① 83.6% Students explicitly encouraged to meet individually with you ① 67.2% Students see
. Merrill, "CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008.3. C. Charyton, and J. Merrill, "Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, 2009.4. M. Perl, "Developing creativity and innovation in engineering and science," Inter. Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 27, 2008.5. H. S. Fogler, S. E. LeBlanc, B. Rizzo, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 2013.6. T. Simpson, R. Barton, and D. Celento, "Interdisciplinary by design," Mechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 9, 2008.7
project that was firstpiloted in Spring 2012 and revised.8 For this project, student teams were required to develop aninteractive and educational MATLAB-based program that: “that engages peers (first-year and sophomoreengineering students) in learning how Size & Scale and a least one other big idea of nanoscience apply toone or more engineering disciplines via model(s) or simulation(s).” Each team member was to contributea MATLAB-based simulation tool backed by a mathematical model to their team’s cohesive package.The teams iteratively developed their simulation tools through nine milestones and with continuousfeedback from instructors and the project partner.9 Further explanation of the design projects implementedin Spring 2012 and Spring
. This paper describes the newprototype strategy planning tool, the pilot experiment, and results and conclusions. The veryencouraging pilot results provide a template and strong motivation for conducting a larger scaleexperiment for generic prototyping applications.1 IntroductionAn engineering prototype (physical or virtual) is an initial manifestation of a design concept,either a scale or full-size model of a structure or piece of equipment, which can be used toevaluate performance, form, and/or fit. Prototyping is the process of generating prototype(s),usually between concept generation and design verification stages. Prototypes provide designengineers the opportunity to determine if a concept is technically feasible, optimize
NSF S-STEM grant to increase the recruit- ment, retention and development of underrepresented populations in electrical and computer engineering. She has approximately 20 peer-reviewed publications with two in the Computers in Education Journal. She also recently published a book on Mobile Robotics for Multidisciplinary Study.Dr. Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette Monica F. Cox, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Inaugu- ral Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor at Purdue University. She also serves as the Executive Director of the International Institute for Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). She ob- tained a B.S. in
. New York Garland Pub. (Inc, 1992).8. Willingham, D. T. Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach? Arts Educ. Policy Rev. 109, 21–32 (2008).9. Facione, P. A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. (1990).10. Facione, P. A. Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae CA Calif. Acad. Press Retrieved April 1, 2004 (2011).11. Norris, S. P. Synthesis of research on critical thinking. Educ. Leadersh. 42, 40–45 (1985).12. Norris, S. P. The generalizability of critical thinking: Multiple perspectives on an educational ideal. (Teachers College Press, 1992).13. Yinger, R. J. Can we really teach
SolidWorks Flow Simulation was performed using thefollowing estimated parameters: Velocity 1m/s Fan swirl 2rad/s Turbulence intensity 5% Turbulence length 0.0254m.These parameters and the physical model require refinement based on both measured data andboundary conditions. In SolidWorks, one boundary condition that is pre-programmed for the useris a fan. However, initial experience with this boundary condition indicates that there may not bea convenient way to simulate the rather large center hub area of the real condenser unit fan thathas no blade surface and does have a vacuum. This might be simulated by working on theaccuracy of the fan swirl estimate and by either putting a blocking plate in the center of the fanopening in
student motivation: students in the software field aremost interested in working towards a functioning end-product rather than documentation orprototypes. Furthermore, this gives them the experience of how prototypes and client feedbacktranslate into the finished product. This was also observed by Mohan and Chenoweth 9: it isimportant that students “carry their requirements projects forward into design and development,sufficiently that they can see the importance of the time spent learning to do requirements” 9.Nevertheless, it is important to note that student teams spend the larger part of the semester(about 70%) interacting with the client, building mockup/prototype(s) and obtaining clientfeedback, which they then use to create their SRS
Flipped Flipped Lab no change no change no change no change no change no change Instructors S S, K, L, P K, T S, K, S, K, K, T Teaching Teaching Assistant Assistant Enrollment - 145 168 - 20 58 - 20 160 - 40 150 - 40 per 52 - 20 per Class Size per per per section section section section section In-Class Traditional Group Group Group Group Group Activity Problem
Commission(CONICYT) through grant FI-11130067.References[1] Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey ofAwareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–207.[2] Litzinger, T., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R., & Newstetter, W. (2011). Engineering education and the developmentof expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150. Page 26.1166.12[3] National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.[4] Felder
sstudents andd/or very baddperformaance of otherrs. Figure 2 shows s the peercent of stuudents who pperformed well (i.e. whoobtained >= 7 in the assessmentss) in the diffeerent program mming conccept assessm ments. The figgureillustrates why computer program mming coursses are gatew way courses with low paassing gradess: inmost con nceptual cateegories less than t 50% of students perrformed at an adequate llevel.4.2 Explo oratory Facto or AnalysisTo furtheer understandd the nature of students’ understandiing of computer program
way that has lessimpact on the environment than fossil fuels. There are several different types of water wheeldesigns, such as undershot, overshot, pitchback, breastshot, and pelton wheel. This project wasfocused on the design and implementation of an undershot water wheel. The water wheel wasassumed to be set into a river system with an assumed flow of 10 ft/s. The components designedfor the water wheel system are wheel, shaft, belt, pulley and bearing. The wheel shaft is to beconnected to a generator with a belt system. A journal bearing was selected based on the loadrequirements. The waterwheel’s vanes encountered bending moment and shear force from thetangential flow of water to its circumference. A shaft was designed for torque
5 19% 28%Administrators responded to a question about in which year(s) students study design.Responses are shown in Table 9, noting that respondents were free to select multiple years ifapplicable. Table 9 – In which year(s) do undergraduate students study design? Dept. Head Dean Year (N=166) (N=64) 1 36% 36% 2 51% 48% 3 71% 59% 4 72% 67% 5 or higher
. Linda Katehi, Greg Pearson, and Michael Feder, Editors. Committee on K-12 Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.3. Davis, L.A. & Gibbons, R.D. (2002). Raising public awareness of engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.4. Wulf, W. A. (1998, Winter). The image of engineering. Issues in Science and Technology. Retrieved from: http://issues.org/15-2/wulf-2/5. Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x6. Sadler, P.M., Coyle, H.P., &
subjects that might presenta struggle. Peer and professional tutors are available through the academic achievement centerto assist with technical subjects as well as writing and math. The college caters to workingadults by offering courses after typical working hours, on weekends and online. Facultymembers teaching online curriculum have undergone training and use universal course designtechniques (S. Burgstahler, 2006 16) to cater to all learning styles.Student advising starts prior to entering the program. Students meet with a designated Collegeand Career Navigator who is the first point of contact for each student participating in thiscertificate program. The College and Career Navigator assists with the application process andremains a point
? What specific topics or information do you hope will be covered as part of the professional development activities during this summer research experience?The focus of the post-experience survey was to assess academic and developmental outcomesassociated with program participation, as well as students’ experiences. Many of the questionsfrom the pre-experience survey were repeated in the post-experience survey, which alloweddirect comparison of individual answers across the 10-week program. The post-survey alsoincluded a set of open ended questions: What part(s) of the summer program did you find most valuable or helpful? What part(s) of the summer program did you find least valuable or helpful? Please share any
. Frederick, A. Byars-Winston, A.-B. Hunter and J. Handelsman, "Increasing the Persistence of College Students in STEM," Science, vol. 341, pp. 1455-1456, 27 September 2013.[4] J. G. Cromley, T. Perez, and A. Kaplan, "Undergraduate STEM Achievement and Retention: Cognitive, Motivational, and Institutional Factors and Solutions," Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, pp. 1-8, 2015.[5] L. Espinosa, "Pipelines and Pathways: Women of Color in Undergraduate STEM Majors and the College Experiences that Contribute to Persistence," Harvard Educational Review, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 209-241, 2011.[6] E. Seymour, A.-B. Hunter, S. Laursen and T. DeAntoni, "Establishing the Benefits of Research Experiences for Undergraduates in
Psychology, 92, pp. 191-201.3. Ansari, J., Ansari, A., Agrawal, K., 2009, “Enhancing Undergraduate Research Infrastructure,” Proceedings of theASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX.4. Evans, M., Welch, R., 2004, “Undergraduate Independent Study Research Projects,” Proceedings of the ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.5. Meyer, M., Marx, S., 2014, “Engineering Dropouts: A Qualitative Examination of Why Undergraduates LeaveEngineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, 103, pp. 525-548.6. Wilson, D., Jones, D., Kim, M. J., Allendoerfer, C., Bates, R., Crawford, J., Floyd-Smith, T., Plett, M., Veilleux,N., 2014, “The Link between Cocurricular Activities and Academic Engagement in Engineering Education,” Journalof
perceive engineering asan overtly hostile environment – in fact, they acknowledged the challenges but seemeddetermined to overcome them. Sheryl Sandberg’s presence at Facebook will only help.References1. Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. E. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief, (4-11).2. Gibbons, M. T. (2009). Engineering by the numbers. ASEE [Internet]. [revised 2009:1-36. Available from http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/2009-profile-engineering- statistics.pdf3. Kvale, S. Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews, learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd
in the Classroom. 3rd Edition, New York, Routledge.5. Leasure, A. R., Davis, L., & Thievon, S. L. (2000). “Comparison of Student Outcomes and Preferences in a Traditional vs. World Wide Web-based Baccalaureate Nursing Research Course.” Journal of Nursing Education, 39: 149-154.6. Cole, R. A. (2000). Issues in Web-Based-Pedagogy: A Critical Primer. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.7. Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Barnett, M., & Squire, K. (2001). “Constructing Virtual Worlds: Tracing the Historical Development of Learner Practices.” Cognition and Instruction, 19 (1), pp. 47-94.8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). “Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning.” Educational Researcher, 18 (1), pp
clinical immersion. To further guide students through the design process, team-basedactivities related to workshop topic(s), readings, and case studies were assigned for individualteam discussions.Program Deliverables and Surveys: By the conclusion of the CIP, teams were expected to generate a single, succinct problemstatement based on their primary research in a clinical environment. Moreover, new to thisprogram year, students were taught the basics of concept exploration and were expected to applythis knowledge to their identified problem. Three deliverables were generated by the programparticipants: individual blog entries, a written team report, and team presentation. The individualpublic blog aimed to document each student’s experience
Statistical Graphic Interface Manipulation Specialties Curve Analysis s Moderate Custom Scope Tables, Menus & SySPSS Gradual Moderate Good ANOVA & ntax Medium Multivariate Versatility Analysis Broad Panel Data
,” Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 47–72, Jan. 2001.[5] S. M. Chance, “University leadership in energy and environmental design: How postsecondary institutions use the LEED Green Building rating system,” 2010.[6] H. A. Simon, Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason, vol. 3. MIT press, 1982.[7] D. H. Meadows, Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, 2008.[8] J. L. Blizzard and L. E. Klotz, “A framework for sustainable whole systems design,” Des. Stud., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 456–479, Sep. 2012.[9] F. Charnley, M. Lemon, and S. Evans, “Exploring the process of whole system design,” Des. Stud., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 156–179, 2011.[10] B. Greer, “Overview of the Papers: Why is