Community. IEEE Security &Privacy, pp. 61-63, September/October, 2004.[4] HANSCHE, SUSAN. Preparing the Next Generation of SE Students for a Brave New World: Making the Casefor an Early Introduction of ISSE. Proceedings of the 8th Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education,pp. 21-30.[5] SCHNEIER, BRUCE. Secrets and Lies. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., August 2000.[6] TUCKER, ALLEN B., BRUCE H. BARNES, ROBERT M. AIKEN, KEITH BARKER, KIM B. BRUCE, J.THOMAS CAIN, SUSAN E. CONRY, GERALD L. ENGEL, RICHARD G. EPSTEIN, DORIS K. LIDTKE,MICHAEL C. MULDER, JEAN B. ROGERS, EUGENE H. SPAFFORD, AND A. JOE TURNER. ComputingCurricula ’91. Association for Computing Machinery and the Computer Society of the Institute of Electrical andElectronics
Practicing Real World Design, Teamwork, and Communications through Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering Projects Richard R. Schultz and Arnold F. Johnson University of North Dakota Department of Electrical EngineeringAbstractStudents enrolled in the B.S.E.E. with an Aerospace Focus program at the University of NorthDakota (UND) receive a traditional electrical engineering degree, along with aviationcoursework and a private pilot’s license. Cross-campus collaborations with UND’s world-renowned aerospace program provide the students with many experiential learning opportunitiesthat satisfy EAC/ABET EC2000 design, multidisciplinary
) 17.1) Graduates are prepared with an understanding of fundamental technical sciences that are integrated with the applied technical specialty, such as engineering materials and mechanics, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, and electrical circuits, developing analytical techniques and problem solving skills necessary to adapt to technological changes, and for a career in mechanical engineering technology. (a, b, f)2) Graduates acquire industry relevant experience within the academic environment through laboratory projects, experimentation, classroom lecture and demonstrations, and acquire in- depth technical knowledge in areas such as applied mechanics, computer-aided engineering graphics, design, and manufacturing processes. (a, c
An Innovative Rapid Processor Platform Design for Early Engineering Education Yong-Kyu Jung Texas A&M University-College StationAbstractA new course for the early stage of digital design education is demonstrated. An innovativeusage of technologies and an effective organization of numerous subjects to leverage the currentclassroom practices are presented. In particular, the new course objectives and organization areexplained to provide an overall view and details of our rapid design process, as well as to achieveengineering educational goals for reducing a gap between the technologies used in industry andin academia. Expected
used to gauge student’s learningprogress along with other techniques.AQM involves a) Active listening, b) Maintaining a Portfolio that reflect student work in total,c) Interactive learning, d) Intro to concepts through project implementation, d) Cooperativecollaborative learning 4 through team approach, and e) Assessing students at the micro levelusing what we call a “ten minute” quiz that is given at beginning of every lecture hour to keepthe students in a continuous study and inquiry mode.The AQM was initiated in our department back in fall 1994 with stream lining of theprerequisites to our circuit courses. College Algebra was changed to a prerequisite rather than apre/co requisite. This change helped the students in applying algebra to
experiences for students in all engineeringprograms at UMD. The course also provides a setting in lecture format for describing to studentsthe engineering topics identified as the “Professional Component” of engineering by ABET, andembeds topics in advanced composition relevant to engineering professions. Through a series oflectures and lab assignments, this course specifically addresses the “Professional Component”ABET topics and provides multidisciplinary design experiences that students enjoy.References 1. Carroll, C. R., “Engr 4001: Engineering Professionalism – Teaching the “Soft Side” of Engineering,” Proceedings of ASEE North Midwest Section Conference, Milwaukee, WI , 2004. 2. Fleddermann, C. B., Engineering Ethics
to: a) address the quality and quantity of theteaching of engineering topics (possibly as a subset of technology education topics) in publicschool through college, and b) develop first-rate, cross-disciplinary, rigorous and quantitativeeducational research programs that will produce graduates prepared to teach or to assumeleadership positions that will shape engineering, science, and math education curricula andpolicies at the college, local, state, and federal levels.The engineering education degree programs currently being developed are:• A Certificate in Engineering Education to supplement graduate work in a traditional engineering discipline or provide advanced study to licensed K-12 teachers and postsecondary teachers. Required and
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationthis paper will explore the efforts of the 2004 UNI solar boat team and give a glimpse of whatthe future holds for the 2005 team.The team approached the project as a problem solving exercise. As in previous years, theproblem could be defined as: “Finding effective and efficient alternatives to internal combustionpowered aquatic recreational transportation”. There are several reasons beyond the educationalexperience for undertaking this project: • Finding an alternative method of getting from point A to point B without emitting roughly 8.6 kg of
-share and also support of tworesearch projects: (a) Tannery Waste Treatment, and (b) Medical Waste Treatment. These twoprojects are fully funded by BUET from its own resources.Through this program, BUET Chemical Engineering Department gained experience andexpertise in developing short courses and workshops on various topics in the area of pollutionprevention and environment management. The faculty members of BUET ChE Department arenow committed to continue the work through their Directorate to Continue Education (DCE).They plan to offer short courses and workshops as part of outreach and capacity building to theprivate and public sector on a regular basis. There is a huge demand for these courses inBangladesh and BUET ChE Department is well
Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR,June 2005.[4] G. Suckarieh, A. Prabhakar, and T. Wal ke r ,“ Impleme nti ngaWe b-Based Knowledge Base for a ConstructionComp;any: Industry-Ac ademiaCol laborat ion,”Pr oceedin gsoftheAme r icanSociet yf orEng i n eeringEdu c at
layout of the network for two of the student stations is illustrated in Figure 3.The network layout shows station A and station B, which are back to back student stations thatshare a common assembly system, Figure 1, used for programming problems. The PLCs andcomputers are linked by a local Ethernet LAN that is connected to a server that supports theautomation laboratory. A second DeviceNet network links the I/O from the assembly system tothe Control Logix system. Note that a switch is used to direct which student station has theDeviceNet network attached to the assembly system. The DeviceNet includes a valve controlblock and Block I/O with discrete and analog inputs and outputs.The operator switch and pilot lamp panel has a cable and plug (see
networks, whose primary utility is in solvingclassification problems. These properties are: (a) they can solve complex classification problems,(b) they converge fast to a solution, after a few iterations through the collection of the data usedfor their training, (c) they possess on-line learning capabilities, thus not requiring re-training withold information as they are being exposed (learn) new information, (d) they offer easy tounderstand explanations for the answers that they provide, (e) they have been proven to be verycompetitive (compared to other techniques) classifiers on a variety of classification problems.We then continued the lectures by emphasizing on one of the most celebrated ART neural
Tech PrEP: Seeding Technology Careers via Michigan Tech University’s Enterprise Program John B. Lehman, Mary B. Raber, David H. Stone Michigan Technological UniversityAbstractSince the fall of 2000, Michigan Technology University’s undergraduate Enterprise Program(www.enterprise.mtu.edu) concept of cross-disciplinary problem solving and product generationhas created active learning environments for undergraduate students across campus. Within theprogram, teams of students from a broad base of disciplines are provided an opportunity to workfor several years in a business-like setting to solve real-world engineering problems supplied byindustry. Through
: Additional competencies Specialist Manager A. Ability to change (x2) 4.5 5.0 B. Ability to work in teams (x6) 3.7 4.3 C. Social skills (x5) 3.3 4.6 D. Planning and Organizing/Systematic Planning (x2) 4.0 4.0 E. Continuous education (x2) 5.0 4.5 Table 3: Most suggested additional competencies by the expert panel and their importance to engineering managers and engineering specialists (1
ofMaine, working with the U.S. Department of Energy and the Maine Department ofEconomic and Community Development, has created a web-based implementation ofRutgers University’s Self-Assessment Workbook for Small Manufacturers. The initialapplication was completed using Java applets, but further consideration of the issues ofscalability, ease of maintenance, and system compatibility resulted in implementing thefinal application in PHP (which recursively stands for PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor). Page 10.1459.1Keywords: web site management/development tools, knowledge management applications, client/server systems, middleware1.0
August 3,2000. Copyright 1993-1999.3. D. Kashy, G. Albertelli, G. Ashkenazi, E. Kashy, H.-K. Ng, and M. Thoennessen, IndividualizedInteractive Exercises: A Promising Role for Network Technology, IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference Proceedings, ISBN: 0-7803-6669-7, vol. 31, p. 1073, 2001.4. G. Albertelli, B. Minaei-Bidgoli, W.F. Punch, G. Kortemeyer, and E. Kashy, Concept Feedback inComputer-Graded assignments, Frontiers in Education, 2002.5. G. Kortemeyer, G. Albertelli, W.Bauer, F.Berryman, J.Bowers, M.Hall, E. Kashy, D. Kashy, H. Keefe,B. Minaei-Bidgoli, W. Punch, A. Sakharuk, and C. Speier, The LearningOnline Network with Computer-Assisted Personalized Approach, Computer Based Learning in Science Conference, Cyprus, 2003.6. Guy Albertelli
Technology (IDPT-Vol. 3), Society for Design and Process Science, pp 97-104.4. Todd, R., Magleby, S., Sorensen, C., Swan, B., and Anthony, D. 1995. A Survey of Capstone Engineering Courses in North America. Engineering Education: 165-174.5. McKenzie, L., Trevisan, M., Davis, D., and Beyerlein, S. 2004. Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Salt Lake City, June 2004.6. Ulmann, D. 1992. The Mechanical Design Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.7. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. 1996. Engineering Design, 2nd Edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.8. Dym, C. and Little, P. 2000. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. John Wiley
Manufacturing Module,” Amy J. Moll, William B. Knowlton, Michelle B. Sabick, Patricia A. Pyke, and John F. Gardner, Proceedings ASEE 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, June 12-15, 2005.[3] National Research Council, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.[4] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc., 1999.Biographical InformationELISA H. BARNEY SMITHElisa Barney Smith is an associate professor in the Electrical & Computer Engineering department at Boise StateUniv.. She received a B.S. in Comp. Sci. and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical
. Page 10.793.4 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” Table 1. Survey QuestionsQualitative Assessment 1. What is your major? 2. What is the name of your capstone project? 3. Did your project span 1 or 2 semesters? 4. Which of the following describes your project? (Circle one or more) a. Curriculum-based industrial design project b. Cross functional design team that may include non-engineering team members c. National competitions (SAE challenges, DOE challenges, etc.) d. Decision Analysis e
sufficient time for extensive, hands-on work. Theintroduction of engineering practice into these courses would be very limited. Forexample, students can be given assignments which require them to study professionalstandards.Laboratory experiments are often combined into specific laboratory courses wherestudents tend to be given detailed, step-by-step instructions on how to use the laboratoryequipment and calculate the results. This approach is not the best way to learn thematerial, since (a) the lecture and the lab are not presented at similar times and (b) it doesnot accurately reflect the reality of professional engineering practice. Further, thelaboratory experiments used in these courses often are intended simply to illustratefundamental
, MA, 1993.22. Bucciarelli, L., Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.23. Chi, M. T. H., “Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of verbal data: A Practical Guide,” Journal of the Learning Sciences Vol. 6 No. 3, 1997, pp. 271-315.24. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., “Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview,” in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage Publications, 1994.25. Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P., “Chapter 2: Concepts and Coding,” in Making Sense of Qualitative Data, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, 1996.26. Dick, B., “Grounded theory: a thumbnail sketch,” 2002, http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/grounded.html, (November 24, 2004).27. Atman, C. J. and Bursic, K. M
Winston8. Baker, E. H, Paulson, S. K., 2004, Experiential Exercises in Organization Theory and Design, Thomson Learning9. Films for Humanities & Science website http://www.films.com10. Oakley, B., R.M. Felder, R. Brent, and I. Elhajj. "Turning Student Groups into Effective Teams." Journal of Student Centered Learning. Vol. 2, No. 1, 2004, pp 9 –34BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATIONZBIGNIEW J. PASEKDr. Pasek is the operations manager and an assistant research scientist in the NSF Engineering Research Center forReconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, College of Engineering, University of Michigan. His research interestsinclude systems engineering, manufacturing automation, global product development, and informal technologyeducation. He is a member of
Program Evaluation Aligned With the CDIO Standards Doris R. Brodeur and Edward F. Crawley Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe CDIO Initiative is a collaboration of engineering programs at universities in morethan eight countries in North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia.Collaborators have developed a set of twelve standards that characterize CDIO programsand provide the basis for program evaluation. This standards-based program evaluationextends the evaluative criteria of ABET's EC2000 and other outcomes-based approaches.Evidence of overall program value is collected from multiple sources, using bothquantitative and qualitative methods. Evidence and results
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”experiences [1]. Beginning with the 2003-04 academic year, the College of Engineering createdthree different tracks for first-year engineering students, depending on their major. Students whohad elected to major in Aerospace, Civil, Industrial, or Mechanical Engineering were assigned toTrack A. Students who had elected to major in Computer or Electrical Engineering wereassigned to Track B. Students who had elected to major in Biomedical, Chemical, or PetroleumEngineering were assigned to Track C. Content of the two first-year engineering courses in eachtrack was modified to reflect the goals of faculty members in
needs more than just knowing which equations and parameters to use. Miller (24) pointsout that industry expects to hire engineers who “can go beyond the numbers” with anunderstanding of the impact of the technical results.Another difference is how the results are communicated. In the classroom, the professorreceives the calculations on an engineering pad with the answer placed in a box. But in theworking world, e-mails are now a major form of communication. Figure B is an outline of thesedifferences in style, intent, and format between the classroom communications and e-mails.I found discussions in the literature on e-mail etiquette, structure, and audience. One Web pagearticle has a strong focus on what the reader needs to know (1). The co
Session 1510 STEPing into the Classroom: An Alternative Capstone Experience Karen C. Davis, Megan L. Perkey, Nicholas B. Harth, Nathan Dees Electrical & Computer Engineering and Computer Science Department University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH 45221-0030This paper describes the experiences of three Electrical Engineering seniors who chose analternative to a traditional capstone design project; they applied their undergraduateengineering education in high school math and science classrooms as NSF STEPFellows. Project STEP: Science and Technology Enhancement Program is sponsored bythe
Preparing Engineers for an Outsourced World—Strategies for Change Dr. Charles Pezeshki School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Washington State University Pullman, WA 99164-2920 pezeshki@wsu.eduAbstractGlobal outsourcing has the potential to become the primary challenge facing youngengineers entering the job market today. As more jobs are shipped to subcontractorsoffshore, there will be a continued hollowing-out of intellectual property in the U.S., withthe brunt of that loss being borne demographically by new graduates.In this paper, industrial perspectives are presented that give
maximum) • 2.5 weeks – Phase 2 status report due (1 page maximum) • 2.5 weeks – Phase 2 report due (5 pages maximum)The following guidelines were provided for the reports: A. Introduction: What hypotheses are you testing? What questions are you going to answer? Why? Page 10.1118.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education B. Methods: Fully describe your model. What assumptions have you made? Based upon what? Include illustrations and all model parameters. C. Results
Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering EducationBibliography1. J.E. Spear, A Problem-Solving Process, . Professional Safety, Apr2002, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p25-312. B. Goldsmith, Innovative Problem Solving, AFP Exchange, Jul/Aug2001, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p783. L. Burton, Thinking Things Through, Oxford, England: Blackwell.4. R. Rockland, Use of Problem Solving Skills in an Introductory Microprocessor Course, 1999 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, NC, June 19995. R. Rockland, Teaching Problem Solving Techniques in a Circuits Analysis Course, 2001 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Albuquerque, NM, June 20016. A.R.Eide, R.D. Jenison, L.H. Mashaw, L.L. Northrup
information. Ability to demonstrate technical knowledge in your academic discipline. Ability to use computer skills. Demonstrated ability to use decision-making skills. Ability to use problem-solving knowledge and skills. Ability to integrate theories learned in the classroom with actual “hands on” experiences. Opportunity to apply what was learned in the classroom. Knowledge about a specific academic discipline. Improved interest area as related to my academic discipline. Improve communication through: a. Oral skills. b. Listening skills. c. Writing skills. d. Using a variety of media to transmit ideas. Page