progress describes a pilot to incorporate critical reflection activities, completed byindividuals and by teams, during the implementation of design activities in an early-career,project-based learning context. As described in full below, critical reflection has beendemonstrated as a high-impact practice that can deepen learning and cultivate a productivefuture-oriented mindset [1]–[3]. Thus, activities that incorporate reflection into projects havegrown in use and garnered increased attention in engineering education for their transformativepotential [4]–[6]. Further, consistently engaging in reflection on learning as a community has thepotential to develop environments and classroom cultures that value student growth andcommunity [7].Critical
Paper ID #36430The Capstone Course – A New ApproachFernando Romero Galvao Prof. Romero has been working globally as a Construction Project and Program Director. The knowledge acquired over his career of more than 30 years, opened doors for him to have an international career in the area of project management working in several countries, including Japan, China, South Korea, Austria, Germany, Greece, Cyprus, Suriname, Venezuela, Peru, and Brazil. While his professional career permitted him to manage projects covering the full scope of construction and with a value of more than $18.5 billion, he also possesses wide
-prepared to analyze and design processes in general, they will be well-prepared for any situation they may encounter in their careers, beyond the particular technologies andtheories that are being taught today.“The curriculum must include in-depth instruction to accomplish the integration of systems usingappropriate analytical, computational, and experimental practices.”Throughout the curriculum, students are the application of tools to stochastic and "real world" natureIndustrial and Systems Engineering problems through a variety of means. First and foremost, thecapstone/ senior design courses provide a real-world laboratory for the students to practice the theorylearned in the classroom. By solving actual problems, for real clients, the students
Recent graduate with considerable amount of Caucasian work experience. Graduated with 1st class honours, working in postgraduate position. CA F French Professor whose research work has industrial Caucasian applications RS M British Emeritus research associate who spent most of Caucasian his career in industry. DL M Israeli Professor of engineering education Caucasian SS M British Graduate of engineering who has set up own
Alice Pawley (she, her) is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Gender, Women’s and Sexuality Studies Program and Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. Prof. Pawley's goal through her work at Purdue is to help people, including the engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged, and socially just. Her research group's diverse projects and members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of
Instruction (SI). This peer support is a non-remedial way to usenear-peers to increase success in traditionally difficult academic, gate-keeper, courses. Typically,these courses are chosen because about 30% of students earn a D, F, or W. In this study thesupport is Technology Assisted Supplemental Instruction (TASI) in Statics courses and itsimpact on Latinx students. Students’ sense of belonging and self-efficacy indicators weregathered and paired with final course grade as an academic marker of effectiveness of theintervention. This study is also notable, as it uses anti-deficit lens to understand not only theliterature but the effectiveness of the intervention.LITERATUREDespite being equally likely to pursue careers in STEM [1] and narrowing rates
tutoring centers, writing and speakingcenters, and even career centers. Students can use job posting sites from both schools whenlooking for internships and jobs, giving them a broader view and a better chance of findingsomething that fits for them. Although there are many advantages to this dual degree program, there are still somedrawbacks as well. The major drawback is from an institutional side and is related to one of thestudent advantages. Students never see bills from the secondary university. Everything is sentthrough the business offices between the two schools. The communication between these officescan be difficult at times, and sometimes students will get lost in the shuffle. Those bills end upnot being paid and billed
positions • Communicate their experience and background in a professional manner • Complete initial online safety and responsible conduct of research training • Describe the required techniques for record-keeping and documentation during research projects • Describe how research is disseminated through journal articles and conference presentations • Describe pathways to pursue a research career and the application for advanced degrees in STEM fields • Describe the importance of inclusion and diversity within the research communityThe seminar topics (Table 1) mirrored the professional development sessions often embedded in NationalScience Foundation Research Experiences for Undergraduates site programs. The articulated
by Vigeant and Golightly [12] recommends buildingcourse attributes to take advantage of intrinsic motivation including topics such as realproblems, topics focused on their career, and something that is personally meaningful.In order to leverage intrinsic motivation, the SafeChE initiative modules are built uponreal industrial incidents that were investigated by the CSB. The expectation of theSafeChE initiative is that these real-world case studies will show students howknowledge they are obtaining in their current class can be applied to safety within afuture career in industry. Also, since the CSB investigates incidents within the UnitedStates, some of our domestic students may study an incident that occurred “close tohome”.Another aspect
. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2022. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/beyond-trial-error-iteration-to-learn-using-computational-paper-crafts-in-a-steam-camp-for-girls[32] D. Paris and H. S. Alim, Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies: Teaching and Learning forJustice in a Changing World. Teachers College Press, 2017.[33] L. M. Anstey et al., “Reflections as near-peer facilitators of an inquiry project forundergraduate anatomy: Successes and challenges from a term of trial-and-error,” AnatomicalSciences Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 64–70, 2014, doi: 10.1002/ase.1383.[34] M. Jett and D. Yourick, “Laboratory near-peer mentoring of jr/sr high school students bycollege undergraduates provides experience and incentives to enhance careers in
mentee cannot find a desirable mentors, the programadministrator finds a suitable mentor for him/her and make the connection for the student. Tosupport the users, the system also has some built-in questions and resources for both mentees andmentors. Both mentors and mentees can utilize these resources during the mentoring process.Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, the mentorship used to happen face-to-face but was then shiftedto virtual meetings. Furthermore, the system sends automated reminders to both mentees andmentors from time to time to ensure that the mentor-mentee conversations are timely andrelevant (such as about mid-term exam, Thanksgiving break, spring break, finals, career fairs,etc. depending upon the time of a semester).With respect
from these surveys were used to improve the workshops over timeensuring they met the needs of the families involved.MethodsFor this paper, we chose an autoethnographic approach. Autoethnographies allow for the first-hand examination of researchers’ experiences [31]. Others in engineering education have usedsimilar approaches to share experiences as graduate students (e.g., [32]), instructors (e.g., [33])and early career faculty (e.g., [34]). As researchers in these informal learning spaces, we werefascinated by the past work of others and interested in understanding the similarities anddifferences between our lived experiences in informal STEM learning spaces. Our goal was togenerate recommendations for others interested in working in this
fashion. Knowledge and expertise are passed on from one intern to the next.This is a very visible form of self-directed social constructivism as described by Vygotsky [10].The interns will find themselves outside of their current development zone in an attempt tosupport a customer and will turn to a “more knowledgeable other” for support. At times the otherintern will have the answer and on other occasions the two students will work together toconstruct a solution. As a community college, we have a fairly rapid turnover of our interns andare always training about half of our staff.At the end of each semester the students undergo a review. Many of the criteria are provided bythe campus career services program and focus on communication, work
imparts disciplinary knowledge to students, PBL is targeted to prepare students with theabilities to acquire knowledge and skills in an active, collaborative, and inquiry-based fashionthat crosses subject boundaries [1]. It not only improves knowledge attainment and learnerenthusiasm [2], but also trains students in skills and competencies that are required for theirfuture careers, such as teamworking, interpersonal communication, problem-solving,interdisciplinary learning, and critical thinking [3], [4]. For instance, over two thirds of 2,500graduates of Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), which has been practicing a PBL curriculumsince the 1970s, reported that PBL has “much” or “very much” impacted their ability to solveproblems, function
of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), and a BS in Biotechnology from Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (Zhenjiang, China). ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Is There a Relation Between Research Topics and High-Impact Journals in Biomedical Engineering?AbstractSome early-career biomedical engineering researchers believe in a theory that some researcharticles are more likely to get published in high-impact journals simply because their researchtopics are favored. This theory is tested by regressing the journal impact metric against thebiomedical engineering research topics across thousands of recent academic journal articles inbiomedical engineering. The
and evaluation and special knowledge about STEM education in community colleges and four-year institutions. She presently serves as the external evaluator for seven NSF-funded projects. These include evaluation of two projects aimed at increasing participation in undergraduate research for students from minoritized populations and an ini- tiative to increase diversity in a predominantly white elite engineering college through collaboration with local community colleges. Eva is also evaluating an ATE project to recruit and prepare community college students for careers in bioscience and a project to train and support faculty to use Mastery-Based Grading in STEM courses. Past projects include evaluation of an NSF
-300 PLC, we make theprevious course more comprehensive and closer to industrial manufacturing applications. Thesimulation and student manual provide students with an effective and interactive way to learnabout industrial automation and control, giving them the knowledge and skills, they need tosucceed in their careers. Figure 4: Networks 9 to 13 In the Testing Station ProgramFigure 4 represents steps 9 to 13 of the testing station code. The testing station program detectsthe colors of the top and bottom pieces of a product. Based on the colors of the two pieces, thetesting station provides information about the colors to the storage station, which then places theproduct on the appropriate storage rack. Figure
TEAMWORK AS A CORE COMPETENCE IN CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION Saeed Rokooei, Raheleh Miralami, George FordAbstract The specialization of careers in various industries has created a multitude of professional networks that demand close collaboration between parties when working toward a common goal. Additionally, the exponential growth of information technology has evolved with the workflows among various entities involved in a project. Therefore, professionals in various construction or engineering positions must work with their peers closely to form teams. As an interpersonal skill set, the ability to work in teams is gaining
attribute emphasized by industries and businessesfor a successful career in STEM fields. Nevertheless, the current scenario is that students inSTEM fields, with their increased demand for more specialized skills in fewer credit hourscombined with a lack of emphasis on writing from engineering faculty members, makeaddressing this need difficult. In addition, students in engineering fields often do not valuewriting skills and underestimate the amount of writing they will do in their careers. Hence, it isessential to understand and quantify the level of writing skills STEM students exhibit in theirtechnical courses so that mitigation efforts can be designed using commonly available resourcesto enhance this important skillset among the students
that UCO employs tosupport their students’ growth. Other examples of institutionalized efforts are centralized throughstudent support offices or career services. For example, the University of Colorado Boulder’sSkills for Success program assists students in recognizing skills they have and in learning skillsthat they lack [5], and the University of Minnesota’s Office for Student Affairs has adoptedStudent Development Outcomes that go beyond typical program outcomes and help preparestudents to be “engaged and effective citizens.”Within the context of engineering colleges, we find numerous models on how they develop theirstudents’ non-technical skills, three of which are frequently referenced in the literature. First,some programs aim to develop
industry contexts. Learning to implementboth technical skills and soft skills in the workplace is of paramount importance for students inadvancing their careers in the future. Details of the implement have been discussed by theauthors in the previous paper [3].The authors plan to continue collaborating closely with the partner companies at the New YorkJobs CEO Council, to gather ongoing feedback about how to better align educational andindustry needs, for the ultimate purpose of improving employment outcomes for CUNY studentswho participate in the apprenticeship program. Two cohorts of students have already completedthe apprenticeship program, and it is worth noting that many participants within these cohortshave already been extended with job
discussion about methodologies to improve thisconcerning situation is imperative.The Micro Nano Technology Student Scholars Research ProgramThe Micro Nano Technology Student Scholars Research Program (MNT-SSRP) is a remote,interdisciplinary, multi-component project, with the overall goal of increasing the number ofunderrepresented students, such as African Americans, Latinx, women, and veterans, that enter theSTEM workforce. The program stemmed from Pasadena City College’s Early Career UndergraduateResearch Experience (eCURe) program and is a component of the Micro Nano Technology EducationCenter (MNT-EC), which is located at PasadenaCity College and has both community collegeand research university partners [22]. MNT-ECis an NSF Advanced
Paper ID #33163Responding to the COVID Pandemic: Results and Reflections on Round-TableDiscussions at ASEE 2020Dr. John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007 and was appointed as a Distinguished Teaching Fellow in 2015. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction
inconstruction. Additionally, students also involved in extra-curricular activities of organizationssuch as the International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction (IAARC)which is affiliated with the central homonyms association and serves as an interdisciplinaryplatform that encourages collaboration among university students and entices them towards aprofessional career in a growing and vast field of automation and robotics in construction.Different data collection methods, goals, and analysis used in the research are as shown in Figure2. Figure 2. Research overviewThe study utilized a statistical ordered probit regression analyses to determine the impact ofdifferent variables that increases the
teleconferencing technologies and providing a means to sustain the collaboration during the academic yearOne of the factors that limit the success of some study abroad programs is the number of facultywho are interested in participating. Faculty may consider these programs to be a lot of work andtime spent may not align with other career aspirations. To remedy this, we solicited input andbuy-in from a range of individuals to ensure the program’s future, as well as to build “bench-depth.”While the explicit target audience was engineering majors, the program was also open to non-engineering majors with suitable STEM backgrounds. A major emphasis of the program was toattract currently under-represented students – female, first generation, and minority
them to understand the rigor and timecommitment required to be successful in the completion program. The overarching goals for thecourse are threefold: 1. Is engineering the right path for me? 2. Is the discipline I have selectedthe right choice for me? 3. What career opportunities are available for engineers in my chosendiscipline? Since the evening students have less options without starting over, they generally donot explore the second goal as much.Some additions and changes have been focused on broadening student perspectives and givingstudents tools to understand the curriculum and increase persistence which in turn improvesretention. Both groups have benefited from a Women in Engineering panel, generalizedestimation practice such as
issues. Graduates with an MSET degree will not only build theirunderstanding of leading-edge concepts in their technology arenas but will also become able tostrategically apply these concepts and technology at all levels of the industry.The MSET degree is designed to allow students to achieve their career objectives by offering aflexible, 30 credit hour plan of study in which each student chooses a focus area from thefollowing three areas. Construction Management Fire Safety and Explosion Protection MechatronicsThe university’s approach of merging engineering technology with other areas of study such asproject management, engineering ethics, and financial studies allows the MSET students tocustomize their plan of study to branch
, Master’s, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, Dr. Kerzmann began his career as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at Robert Morris University which afforded him the opportunity to research, teach, and advise in numerous engineering roles. He served as the mechanical coordinator for the RMU Engineering Department for six years, and was the Director of Outreach for the Research and Outreach Center in the School of Engineering, Mathematics and Science. In 2019, Dr. Kerzmann joined the Me- chanical Engineering and Material Science (MEMS) department at the University of Pittsburgh. He is the advising coordinator and associate professor in the MEMS department
and interested in the social impacts of engineering. Women tend to have ahigher interest in people than men [6], higher prosocial motivations [19], higher communal goals[2], and more positive social responsibility attitudes [20, 21]. Studies have also noted high socialmotivations related to career goals among groups from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups[22-24]. Engineering students’ motivation toward public welfare and social responsibilityattitudes may decrease as they increase in rank during college [25, 26], a phenomenon Cechtermed a culture of disengagement in engineering education [25]. Differences in the publicwelfare, helping others, and/or social responsibility attitudes of engineering students have beenfound among students
Portuguese language classes and collaborate with University students in Brazilon a sustainable energy design project.Specifically, this international, faculty-led program focused on global sustainability issues andhow to produce innovate engineering solutions to these problems. Additional added benefits tostudents who participate in these international experiences are that they become more globallyaware and global citizens, more personally and socially aware, and strengthening their career andacademic choices [2,3,4]. The desired student learning outcomes of this program are:1. Understand and solve problems related to scientific engineering principles that governsustainable energy technologies.2. Understand engineering, socio-cultural, environmental