Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 6 Design Pedagogy

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul Leidig, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Robin Adams, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

PersonalizedInterdisciplinary Design Playbook Assignment,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(2),pp. 541-555, 2020.[15] A. C. Strong, M. Lande, and R. Adams, “Special session: Put me in coach! Developing a designplaybook for instructors to help engineering students do design,” IEEE Frontiers in EducationConference (FIE), 1–2, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658648[16] A. C. Strong, M. Lande, and R. Adams, “Teaching without a Net: Mindful Design Education.” In D.Schaefer, G. Coates, and C. Eckert, Design Education Today: Technical Contexts, Programs and BestPractices. Springer, 2019.[17] J. Kolko, How I Teach. Brown Bear Publishing, 2017.[18] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix,” Journal

Collection

2010 North Midwest Section

Authors

P. B. Ravikumar

Understanding Individual Personality Types and Their Effect on Team Dynamics in a Senior Design Project Course P.B. Ravikumar Professor, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Wisconsin, Platteville, WIAbstractProspective employers expect graduating engineers to be knowledgeable in bothscientific/technical and engineering management aspects. It is often a challenge to includeengineering management content in a tightly packed engineering curriculum. The challengemust be met by carefully selecting key engineering management topics and implementing themacross the curriculum. The Senior Design Project course in

Collection

2020 Fall ASEE Mid-Atlantic Section Meeting

Authors

Ping-Chuan Wang, State University of New York at New Paltz

/device operations and materials science/stress analyses,respectively, to contribute to the course design and learning effectiveness.The course framework was structured with the following learning objectives in mind.• Establishing relevance: Based on a preliminary survey results from a total of 31 engineering students in the department before the course was offered, including 20 ME and 11 EE students, the majority of ME students (about 75%) did not consider taking the course. Most of them assumed it involved advanced circuit analysis and electronics architecture that they were not familiar with. About 36% of EE students did not think the course was relevant, with some of them linking reliability to failure of mechanical

Conference Session

Virtual Instruction and Collaboration

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Nina Magpili

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Conference.8. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry- based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.9. Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L. D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472-51210. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.11. Tien, L. T., Roth, V., and Kampmeier, J. A

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus; Susan E Chappell, Penn State University

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships

Paper ID #17772A Model for Development of Employer Engagement at a Small CampusDr. Joseph Ranalli, Pennsylvania State University, Hazleton Campus Dr. Joseph Ranalli is an Assistant Professor at Penn State Hazleton, and is the Program Option Coor- dinator for the Alternative Energy and Power Generation Engineering program. He previously earned a BS from Penn State and a PhD from Virginia Tech, both in Mechanical Engineering. Prior to his cur- rent appointment, he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the National Energy Technology Lab in Morgantown, West Virginia. Dr. Ranalli’s current research interests include

Collection

2020 Mid-Atlantic Spring Conference

Authors

Abigail R Brown; Barbara Cerefin, Rowan University; Lauren Gallo, Rowan University; Sarah Ramsey, Rowan University; Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University

commonlearning styles. Another top theme at the beginning was Motivation. Many students discussedwhat they liked about certain classes in high school and how that motivated them to excel andcontinue their education through an engineering degree. There was a shift in top theme from thebeginning to the end of the semester from Learning to Time Management-Balance as shown inTable 4. By December, students have experienced a full college workload and can reflect on howwell they handled it. Additionally, a top theme for the final reflection was Study. As finals areapproaching, studying is at the front of students’ minds and they commonly mentioned how theyimproved or changed their habits throughout the course of the semester.Table 3: ​Most Popular Themes for

Conference Session

Design in the BME Curriculum and ABET Assessment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glen Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Renee Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

2006-2385: VERTICAL MENTORING: CLOSING THE LOOP IN DESIGNGlen Livesay, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology GLEN A. LIVESAY is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses on biomechanics, capstone design, experimental design and statistics and data analysis, and experimental biomechanical testing of soft tissues.Renee Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology RENEE D. ROGGE is an Assistant Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering. Her teaching interests include orthopaedic and sports biomechanics, biomaterials, capstone design, and introductory level mechanics courses

Conference Session

ME Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Scott Kiefer; Nihad Dukhan

be used later in new course offerings. This paper describes some research work that was conducted by undergraduatemechanical engineering students at the University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez during the past threeyears. The general research topics were heat transfer in open-cell aluminum foam andmicroprocessor control. The students’ attitude, professionalism, independence, work habits, andintelligence ranged from average to outstanding. The upper-echelon students produced highenough quality work for presentation in engineering conferences and, with some extra input fromthe faculty, in engineering journals. The students were listed as co-authors in all publications.Three of the best students gave presentations of the results in four

Conference Session

Improving Teaching & Learning

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Sandra Courter; Mary McEniry; Cid Freitag

Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1987.2. Argyris, Chris. Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming BarriersOrganizational Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., 1993.3. Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W. Snyder. Cultivating Communities of Practice.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.4. Senge, Peter M. Schools That Learn. New York: Currency Doubleday, 2000.5. Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, eds. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, andSchool. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.6. Hildreth, Paul, C. Kimble. Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice. IdeaGroup Publishing, 2004.Biographical InformationSANDRA SHAW COURTER is director of the Engineering

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Poster Session

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

James Gibson; Dorene Perez; Rose Marie Lynch

engineering design student: “The marketing students want a prototype by Monday. We don’t even have a design yet.” • An electronics student: “We can’t get the money out of the accountants to buy parts for a prototype.” • An accounting student: “The engineering and electronics students won’t give me any numbers.” Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Page 9.878.5 Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering • A business student: “The electronics and CAD students had their minds

Collection

2001 Annual Conference

Authors

Kevin Murphy; Ismail Orabi

this in mind during the experiments.).Issues to Address1. To begin, look over the LabView VI and make sure you know roughly what’s going on inside the VI. Note that on the front panel, you have complete control over the sampling rate and the sampling duration. Page 6.897.6 Proceeding of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education2. Based on your physical understanding of the golf club system, you should choose an appropriate sampling rate and a sampling duration. Choose a sampling rate

Collection

2013 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting

Authors

Jeffrey Georgette; Brian Self; James Widmann; Kathryn Bohn; Eric Wang

-Based Activities to Repair Student Misconceptions in EngineeringDynamics. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Laws, P., D. Sokoloff, and R. Thornton, Promoting Active Learning Using the Results of Physics Education Research. UniServe Science News, 1999. 13.2. Prince, M. (2004) Does Active Learning Work: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Engineering Education, pp 223-231.3. Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking, How People Learn: Body, Mind, Experience and School. 2000, Commission on Behavioral and Social Science and Education, National Research Council

Collection

2025 ASEE North Central Section (NCS) Annual Conference

Authors

Elin Jensen, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

. Theseenhancements would ensure the activity continues to evolve, preparing students for the complexchallenges of sustainable engineering. Finally, inviting decision-making practicing engineerand/or building owner’s representatives to provide context for the assignment can also increasethe students’ appreciation for communication with stakeholders.AcknowledgmentThe author wishes to thank Dr. Andrew Gerhardt, Lawrence Technological University, and Dr.Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, Merrimack College, for hosting the “2024 LTU EML KIT FacultyDevelopment Workshop” motivating faculty to create entrepreneurially minded learning modules.References[1] Y. Zhong, F. Y. Y. Ling, and Peng Wu, “Using Multiple Attribute Value Technique for the Selection of Structural

Conference Session

Issues in Computer Education

Collection

2004 Annual Conference

Authors

Tulio Sulbaran; Chad Marcum

challenges. One of these challenges is the lack ofeducational resources to accommodate the ever-growing student population needs [1]. As moreand more students seek out education at all levels – primary, secondary, and tertiary –educational institutions are hard pressed to expand enough for accommodating their enrollment.However, with this in mind, and the advent of the communication revolution, distance educationhas begun its’ push to the forefront in helping rectify this problem [1]. One emergingtechnological resource in this push for distance education is the ability of virtual reality to beused over the Internet on desktop computers. The use of virtual reality over the Internet allows agroup of geographically separated users to interact in real

Conference Session

WIED: Community

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Callie Miller, James Madison University; Daniel Castaneda, James Madison University; Melissa Aleman, James Madison University

Paper ID #36717Creating Sanctuary in Academia: Tales from the PandemicCallie Miller (Visiting Assistant Professor) Dr. Callie Miller is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. A self- described mathematically inclined bioengineer, her expertise ranges from computational biology, image analysis, mechanics, mathematical modeling, to project based learning pedagogies.Daniel Ivan Castaneda (Assistant Professor) Daniel I. Castaneda is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. Daniel earned his PhD in 2016 and his Master's in

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 4

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori Houghtalen, University of Texas at El Paso; Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Paper ID #43808Faculty Transformation: a Study of Professional TransitionDr. Lori Houghtalen, University of Texas at El Paso Lori Houghtalen is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and Leadership at The University of Texas at El Paso. Dr. Houghtalen’s research interests include the professional formation of engineering students and faculty. Her teaching experience has been focused on designing industry-based senior capstone courses and leadership and professional development for undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso An Associate Professor at

Collection

2012 Northeast Section Meeting

Authors

Jessica Dawn Ventura

different backgrounds. INTERCULTURAL SENSITIVITYWhen designing and implementing engineering programs, it is important to keep the following questions continuallyin mind: Where are the students at in their cultural understanding? and Where do we want them to be? MiltonBennett divides the six stages of intercultural sensitivity into two categories: ethnocentricism and ethnorelativism[10]. He describes the term ethnocentricism as the experience of one’s own culture being central to reality, “the waythings are.” The three stages within this category are Denial, Defense, and Minimization of difference.Ethnorelativism is then “the experience of one’s own culture as just one organization of reality among many

Collection

2023 ASEE Midwest Section Conference

Authors

Hossein Saiedian

possess the potential to enhance learningexperiences, facilitate content creation, and revolutionize pedagogical practices.Educators are encouraged to embrace the transformative power of LLMs whileremaining vigilant about ethical considerations and academic integrity. By harnessingLLMs effectively, educators can inspire a generation of learners equipped with theskills to navigate an AI-driven world.ResourcesO. Acar (2023), Are Your Students Ready for AI? https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/are-your-students-ready-for-aiM. Hua, M. McCarthy, and M. Barrett (2023), Exploring the Potential of Generative AI inEducation: Integrating AI Tools in a Course for Enhanced Learning, presented at the20th CMU/SEI Software Engineering Workshop for Educators

Collection

2025 Rocky Mountain Section Conference

Authors

Katherine Nielsen

Title: Discussing AI: Patterns of Classroom Collaboration2025 Conference of American Society for Engineering Education, Rocky Mountain SectionAuthor: Katherine NielsenAbstract:The benefits and risks of face recognition surveillance, autonomous weapons, and superintelligence call out for civic discourse that goes beyond internet polarization. The threecollaborative discussion formats I outline in this paper invite students to step into greaterresponsibility for their participation in these important topics. I situate these discussion formswithin the scholarship of teaching and learning, describe some of the key procedures andprinciples in their design, and share how I implemented them in classroom discussions aboutArtificial Intelligence

Conference Session

FPD 8: Teaching Design in the First Year

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wallace Martindell Catanach III, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Christopher Stephen Smith, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

for a more systematic approach to evaluation ofthe Product Challenges quiz and data analysis, both quantitatively and qualitatively.13The author’s would like to thank the Pennsylvania State University, College of Engineering, Page 24.612.14Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education for support of this project.Bibliography1. Bransford, J. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: NationalAcademy Press.2. Rowe, Christopher and Stacy Klein. "A study of challenge-based learning techniques in an introduction toengineering course." ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Honolulu: American

Conference Session

Mentoring First Year Students

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daina Briedis, Michigan State Univesity; Nathaniel Ehrlich, Michigan State University; Colleen McDonough, Michigan State University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Thomas Wolff, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

AC 2010-420: THE EEES/CONNECTOR FACULTY PROGRAM: SURVEYS OFATTITUDES, EXPERIENCE AND EVALUATIONSDaina Briedis, Michigan State Univesity Dr. Daina Briedis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Elise Barrella P.E., James Madison University; Eric C Pappas, James Madison University; Jesse Pappas, James Madison University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

lead students to effective behavioralchanges, ones that support intentional self-development.In this research, we have focused on creating cognitive dissonance between students’ statedvalues and subsequent behaviors across sustainability contexts. Using a variety of settings, tools,and methodologies, we have focused primarily on individual sustainability (emotional, social,physical, philosophical, and intellectual) and the self-knowledge that informs professional self-minded engineers, enhances decision making and problem solving in engineering and thesciences, cultivates mindfulness as an approach to sustainable living, and promotesunderstanding of the self as a sustainable system.This paper is based on work completed under an NSF Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; James Corkins, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University

learning strategies to promote the kind of conceptualchange that repairs students' "commonsense" misconceptions and develops a conceptualframework with deep conceptual understanding and knowledge of materials for use in fartransfer of new areas to design and manufacture of contemporary engineering components,devices, and systems.The emerging understanding of the science of learning is described in How People Learn: Brain,Mind, Experience, and School3, which highlights some of the most important findings in thefield. One finding, which is about how experts and novices learn and transfer knowledge to newcontexts, suggests that, to develop competence, students must develop deep contentunderstanding and need to learn to organize their facts and ideas

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Philip Parker, University of Wisconsin, Platteville

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Education & Practice. 1995;121(2).3. Berthouex P.M. Honing the writing skills of engineers. Journal of Professional Issues inEngineering Education & Practice. 1996; 122(3).4. Bransford J. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press;2000.5. Yalvac B, Smith H.D., Troy J.B. Promoting advanced writing skills in an upper-levelengineering class. Journal of Engineering Education (Washington, D.C.). 2007; 96(2).6. Carvill C, Smith S, Watt A, Williams J. Integrating writing into technical courses: Stepstoward incorporating communication into the engineering classroom. Proceedings of the 2002American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition

Collection

2000 Annual Conference

Authors

Bernard Hoop; Eric W. Hansberry; Gerard Voland

ahabit of reflective thought. ACE proposes that the hallmarks of every universitystudent’s education are to build on knowledge already acquired, to develop skills andunderstanding that can be transferred from one academic discipline to another and fromthe classroom to life experience. The second model offers team-based projects tostudents across the University which are integrated with traditional programs of study.The IPRO Program is distinctive in that it builds broad participation by students andfaculty in projects that integrate professional programs (engineering, science, business,design, law, psychology and architecture) with graduate and undergraduate teammembers from all educational levels, and faculty advisers who contribute

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Laura Ann Gelles, University of San Diego; Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Materials

semester that integrated social context into a technically focused course. Thiscourse, a third-year Engineering Materials Science course taught by the second author, is arequired course for Integrated Engineering and an elective for Mechanical and Industrial andSystems Engineering students. This course was designed to introduce engineering students to thefundamentals of materials science engineering. Modules were accompanied by homework andexam questions to reinforce the relevance of these topics to the overall class. Incorporating socialcontent into engineering courses requires an intentional, sustained, and consistent approach thatbears in mind student’s limited time, conflicting priorities, and level of maturity.Of the four modules, two have

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin Emery Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Energy Conversion and Conservation

theproject was used, but the 8 outcomes below reflect accurately the consistent goals of the courseand form a basis for what features needed to be included in a project. 1. Students will develop problem statements and design criteria/requirements by evaluating a project scenario using design techniques (such as mind mapping or functional decomposition). 2. As a part of a design team, students will use the engineering design process to design, create, and evaluate a prototype that addresses realistic design constraints and requirements. 3. Students will self-assess, select, pursue, and demonstrate competency with a variety of tools, methods, and software as determined by their program. 4. Students will analyze

Conference Session

Improving Communication Skills in ME

Collection

2003 Annual Conference

Authors

Theresa Jones

correctly perceiving theirexpectations despite their repetitive efforts to convey these expectations. This study used bothquantitative and qualitative methods to understand both sides - the instructor’s expectations ofstudents and the students’ perceptions of the instructor’s expectations -in an open-ended, student-centered classroom. Four students and the instructor were interviewed throughout an upper-division undergraduate mechanical engineering course. This paper describes the research methodsand preliminary results from this study. With the increasing integration of project-centeredpractices in the engineering classroom, the results of this study are anticipated to be beneficial toother instructors who are trying to transition students from

Conference Session

Breaking barriers, building futures: Narratives of equity and inclusion in STEM education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Paper ID #41492Addressing Issues of Justice in Design Through System-Map RepresentationsDr. Alan Cheville, Bucknell University Alan Cheville studied optoelectronics and ultrafast optics at Rice University before joining Oklahoma State University working on terahertz frequencies and engineering education. While at Oklahoma State he developed courses in photonics and engineering design. After serving for two and a half years as a program director in engineering education at the National Science Foundation, he served as chair of the ECE Department at Bucknell University. He is currently interested in engineering design

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sajan Saini, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Erik Verlage; Anuradha Murthy Agarwal; Drew Michael Weninger; Samuel Serna Otalvaro; Saif Rayyan; Glenda Simonton Stump, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Trevor Morrisey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Christian Gabbianelli, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Ira Fay, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Caitlin Feeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Jeff Bertrand; Bhargav Vipul Upadhyay; Achint Jain; Richard Eberhardt, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alan R. Kost, University of Arizona; John Ballato, Clemson University; Kapil Chalil Madathil, Clemson University; Sri Priya Sundararajan; Kenan Cicek; Dominic Gastaldo; Judith Perry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Eric Klopfer; Randolph E. Kirchain Jr., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Richard Roth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Frank R. Field III, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Moore, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; George Westerman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Lionel C. Kimerling, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

sensing—intend to support an on-ramp toenlist a new generation of photonics learners and workforce practitioners. Keeping in mind theoft-quoted seven-to-two ratio of technicians to undergraduate engineers[24], it is imperative toco-design these education and training tools with affordances to discover, skill, reskill, andupskill, for learners at both 2- and 4-year colleges[25].In addition, the emphasis in an online learning Agile Continuous Education (ACE) [26]methodology presumes a critical need for life-long skilling, in highly modularized andincremental learning experiences, for advanced manufacturing workers. In the case of integratedphotonics, there is a timely opportunity to assess the early-impact of such ongoing reskill andupskill