committees. Dr. Springer is internationally recognized, has authored numerous books and articles, and lectured on software development methodologies, management prac- tices and program management. Dr. Springer received his Bachelor of Science in Computer Science from Purdue University, his MBA and Doctorate in Adult and Community Education with a Cognate in Exec- utive Development from Ball State University. He is certified as both a Project Management Professional (PMP) and a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR).Gary R. Bertoline, Purdue University, West LafayetteMark T Schuver, Purdue University, College of Technology, West Lafayette, IN Mark Schuver is the Associate Director of the Center for Professional Studies
The Nuclear Sun Shines Bright on South Carolina T. W. Knight, M. Garland, and A. Bayoumi Department of Mechanical Engineering University of South Carolina, Columbia, South CarolinaAbstractThe confluence of a number of in-state and out-of-state factors has motivated the establishmentof a new graduate nuclear engineering program at the University of South Carolina (USC) in theFall of 2003. One factor weighing greatly in favor of this effort is the large and thrivingcommercial nuclear industry in the State of South Carolina. The growing and expectedcontinued need for nuclear professionals makes the establishment of this program timely andpositioned to
paper is based on the view that good assessment promotes good learning, and the two shouldrun smoothly in parallel as a ‘two-lane learning highway’. This view is based on and illustratedby an examination of theory relating to; why, what and how assessment is conducted in UKHigher Education.However the practice of assessment and students learning in the UK is subject to manyobstructions which act as roadworks on this learning highway. This paper concludes with adiagrammatic representation of these obstructions, illustrating practical factors which should beconsidered in order to make optimal use of the theory.2.0 Assessment and learningAssessment is an integral and essential element in the higher education process. There is an onuson academics
Supplementing FE Exam Results for Continuous Assessment Ben J. Stuart and Eric P. Steinberg Ohio University, Department of Civil Engineering, Athens, OH, 45701 Phone: (740)593-9455; Fax: (740)593-0625; email: stuart@ohio.eduConcurrent with the development of specific program outcomes for ABET review, it is necessaryto identify assessment vehicles for each stated outcome. One attractive assessment characteristicis the ability to compare student performance from a specified department at the home institutionto that of other students in the state and in the nation in a similar department. Ohio University’sCivil Engineering (OUCE) faculty identified the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE
A Double Pipeline of US Domestic Undergraduates for the University of Cincinnati Nuclear and Radiological Engineering Graduate Program G. Ivan Maldonado, John Christenson, Eugene Rutz Nuclear & Radiological Engineering Program, University of Cincinnati1. IntroductionAttracting a greater number of US domestic students into graduate programs and enhancing the ethnicdiversity of the graduate student pool are goals shared by virtually all engineering graduate programs.For a nuclear engineering program, in particular, achieving or striving toward these goals can gobeyond simply improving the visibility of a particular program. In fact, it can reshape and improve theattractiveness of the program to
for the practice of civilengineering at the professional level in the 21st century.Recognizing the preceding and in keeping with the leadership role of civil engineers inthe infrastructure and environmental arena, the ASCE Board of Direction acted. InNovember 2001, this fundamental issue facing the civil engineering profession led to theadoption by the Board of ASCE Policy 465 which “supports the concept of the Master’sdegree or equivalent as a prerequisite for licensure and the practice of civil engineering atthe professional level.” The Board believed that education beyond the current bachelor’sdegree was needed to adequately prepare engineers for practice.The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) created the Task Committee onAcademic
A Multi-Dimensional Nuclear Engineering Partnership John Ford, William Burchill, Marvin Adams and Ron Hart Texas A&M University Dan Suson, Paul Cox and Lionel Hewett Texas A&M University Kingsville Milton Bryant, Irvin Osborne-Lee, Sukesh Aghara and Richard Wilkins Prairie View A&M University Kenneth L. Peddicord Texas A&M University System In 2002, the Texas Partnership was awarded a grant as part of the DOE Office of NuclearEnergy, Science and Technology Nuclear Engineering University Partnership
Integrating Practical Experience in a Geotechnical/Foundation Engineering Class: The Role of the Adjunct Faculty Waddah Akili Professor of Civil Engineering (Retired) Principal, Geotechnical Engineering Ames, Iowa, 50014Abstract:This paper examines the status quo of adjunct faculty in engineering institutions and argues thatadjuncts do enrich an academic engineering program by bringing in their practical experienceand by introducing relevant applications and design venues to the classroom. Adjunct faculty doalso help in setting up linkages with the industrial sector, which often
Seem Like Play," Syllabus, Engineering & Science, pp. 12-16, Number 2, Fall 1993.[8] “Sound Analysis Laboratory For Undergraduates,” Ismail Jouny, Patrick S. Hamilton, and G. Lyle Hoffman, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, pp. 654-657, June 25-28, 1995.[9] “The CUPLE Physics Studio,” Jack M. Wilson, Core Engineering, School of Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1995.[10] “Cooperative Learning: Effective Teamwork for Engineering Classrooms,” Karl A. Smith, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, November 1-4, 1995.[11] Linear Systems and Signals, B. P. Lathi, Berkeley-Cambridge Press, California, 1992.[12] Signals and Systems, Alan V. Oppenheim, Alan S. Wilsky, Ian T. Young, Prentice- Hall, New
pulse generator by an ADC, or test the control algorithm when externaldisturbances enter the control loop. In the motor control case, the computer simulation resultsand the actual/experimental system performance characteristics are in close agreement.The concepts presented/implied are general and can be applied to design other types of digitalcontrol systems.Bibliography[1] G. A. Perdikaris, Computer Controlled Systems: Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, reprinted in 1996.[2] D. Y. Ohm, “A PDFF Controller for Tracking and Regulation in Motion Control,” Proc of the PCIM Conference on Intelligent Motion, 1990.[3] J. G. Ziegler and N. B. Nichols, “Optimum settings for Automatic Controllers,” Trans ASME, Vol. 64, pp
peripheral participation. New York:Cambridge University Press.6. Hutchins, E., Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.7. Dreyfus, H.L., and Dreyfus, S.E., Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York: Free Press, 1986.8. Rogoff, B. (1990) Apprenticeship In Thinking: Cognitive Development In Social Context, New York: Oxford University Press.9. Schön. D.A., Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.10. Woods, D.W., “Review of IQPs Completed in 1998/99 – Report to the Faculty”, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 1999.NATALIE A. MELLONatalie A. Mello is currently the Director of Global Operations in the Interdisciplinary and Global Studies
can be obtained from interfacing the three basic teaching methods are a)lecture/design (LD), b) lecture/case study (LC), and c) lecture/design/case study (LDC). Model ApplicationThe faculty of the Architecture/ Environmental Design Studies Program at Bowling GreenState University decided in 1991 to incorporate lighting and other environmental controlsubjects into a newly developed, second-year level, two-course sequence in buildingsystems technology. Lighting, covered through lecture and laboratory sessions, wasinstituted as a segment of Building Systems Technology II (BST II), the second course inthe sequence. Chronologically, lighting succeeded the segment on building electricalsystems. In its lecture
, Provo, Utah, 1991.4. O. A. Soysal, FSU Online Labs Home Page, http://www.frostburg.edu/dept/engn/soysal/eelabs/home.htm5. S. P. Liou, H. Soelaemon, P. Leung, "Distance Learning Power Engineering Laboratory," Page 5.164.9 IEEE Computer Applications in Power, Jan 1999, pp. 51-56.6. B. Yang “Virtual Lab: Bring the Hands-on Activity to Online Courses," ASEE 1999 Annual Meeting, Session 3220.7. J. M. Heneghan, " Real Time, Remote Circuits and Electronics Laboratories for Distance Learning," ASEE 1998 Annual Meeting, Session 3226.8. C. D. Knight, S. P. DeWeerth, " A Distance Learning Laboratory for Engineering Education," ASEE 1997 annual
. With a more diversestudent population, the project could be expanded to comparing source coding in differentlanguages.This is an extension of the Project 1. You have been introduced to the concept of block coding(encoding a sequence of symbols of an alphabet) as opposed to the encoding of single symbols.As discussed in the class, such encoding will provide for more accurate and efficient error detectionand correction after transmission through a channel.Project 1 dealt with single symbol Huffman Coding. Project 2 deals with Extended HuffmanCodes. For instance, for a source emitting two symbols A and B, the second order extensioninvolves coding messages AA, AB, BA and BB (22 in number). The third order extension involvesmessages such as AAA
KD T KD_gain KD_der vel_error (p/T) KP KP_gain Fig. 1. Simulink simulation block diagram of PDFF control system Fig. 2. Simulink (external mode) block diagram of open-loop motor plant system.(a) Input step of 205 pulses/T or 1 volt. (b) Encoder (MPG) output in pulses/T. Fig. 3
Friday Morning Session 1- Faculty The Implementation of Take Home Laboratories Using the NI myDAQ Hector A. Ochoa Electrical Engineering Department The University of Texas at Tyler AbstractEvery year, new technologies are been discovered, and they affect us in many different ways.They change the way we live, move, think, and learn. Kids these days are very familiar withcomputers, gaming consoles, the internet, and cell phones. For them, things like encyclopedias,chalk boards, and trigonometric tables are ancient history. That is the reason
feedback can only occur if weare working with the same definition.The following survey question is an example of one where the response provides concretestudent feedback. How did the demonstration help you understand the subject matter? a) Havinga chance to examine the demonstration clarified some things that I would probably not haveunderstood from the lecture alone. b) Having a chance to examine the demonstration showed methat I correctly understood the material about electric motors taught in class but didn’t help melearn anything new. c) The demo might be cool looking, but it didn’t help me understandanything about electric motors d) I honestly didn’t bother to look at it much.92. The Ascending SurveyI was first exposed to what I call an
predictive water quality and risk models constructed to be easy to use for operations workers and managers.Prof. Julie Libarkin Dr. Libarkin is a Professor of Geoscience Education at Michigan State University in the Department of Earth and Environment Sciences and CREATE for STEM Institute for Research on Science and Mathe- matics Education. Currently, her research focuses on cognition, assessment of student learning, validity and reliability in research, curriculum and visual design, and discipline-based education research.Dr. Joan B. Rose c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Interdisciplinary Instructional Institute
, M.E., Johnson, A.N. (2009). Dealing with slackers in college classroom work groups. College Student Journal, 43(2), part b, 592-598.14. Vasan, N.S.& DeFouw, D. (2005). Team learning in a medical gross anatomy course. Medical Education, 39: 524.15. Vasan, N.S., DeFouw, D.O. & Holland, B.K. (2008). Modified use of team-based learning for effective delivery of medical gross anatomy and embryology. Anatomical Sciences Education, 1(1), 3-9. 209 16. Litzinger, T.A., Lattuca, L.R., Hadgraft, R.G., & Newstetter, W.C. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education
hasalways been the development vehicle for our lab. The M6811EVB allows for convenientemulation of Port B and C Input and Output as well as control of the EPROM and theRAM memory map. The robot inputs are emulated at first using a signal generator andplug board inputs. Outputs are monitored on the oscilloscope and on an external dataanalyzer. Later, the emulator pod can be inserted in the 6811 processor socket of the Page 4.227.8EVB component of the robot. For these tests, the robot is mounted on a jack stand asshown in Figure 6. Figure 6 Stepper Robot on the jack stand.Here, the robot wheels are free to turn while the maze walls can be
Session 1526 Bridging Departmental Barriers in Search of a New Electronic Imaging Curriculum Michael A. Kriss Center for Electronic Imaging Systems University of RochesterAbstractIn the winter of 1998 six University of Rochester faculty members came together to develop anew, comprehensive undergraduate and first year graduate curriculum in Electronic Imaging.The faculty represented three autonomous departments: The Institute of Optics, the Electricaland Computer Engineering Department, and the Computer Science
State University, University ParkDr. Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Research Associate and Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a doctoral degree in educational psychology emphasizing applied measurement and testing. In her position, Sarah is responsible for developing instructional support programs for faculty, providing evaluation support for educational proposals and projects, and working with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.Dr. Steven B. Shooter, Bucknell
Session 1441 Electronic Theses and Dissertations at Virginia Tech: A Question of Access Larry A. Thompson Virginia TechAbstractSince January 1, 1997 graduate students at Virginia Tech have been required to submit theirtheses and dissertations in electronic format. These Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs)have been the subject of much discussion by faculty and students at Virginia Tech, as well as bya broader international community of publishers, scholars, and librarians. One of the questionsposed in these discussions is: "Compared with traditional paper format theses and
Semester Mean Problem Set Grade AY22-1 (n=269) 85.5% AY22-2 (n=158) 86.7% AY23-1 (n=219) 88.2% (Initial Submission)Figure 2 shows the distribution of grades for the initial submission of this problem set in AY23-1, in addition to self-reported data from students on time spent completing each of the twoportions of the assignment (the initial and revision submissions). Figure 2 Problem Set 3 Grade and Time Data, AY23-1The time data (the yellow and blue plots) displays an interesting trend. Students who received aninitial grade of a “B
practice, if observed, is likely desirable, since thedifficulty arises from students’ activation of retrieval processes. Because students are forced torecall previously-learned information without any contextual cues, their memory is strengthened.Current WorkAs part of NSF Award #1912253, we implemented spaced retrieval practice in Calculus I forengineering students at the University of Louisville’s J. B. Speed School of Engineering. Thethree-year grant is currently in its second year, the study having been implemented in Fall 2020.As a preliminary analysis on the data available for the ASEE timeframe, we asked the followingresearch question: RQ: Does spacing decrease performance on retrieval practice exercises in an engineering
Paper ID #29564WIP: Understanding Ambiguity in Engineering Problem SolvingMarah B. Berry, University of Florida Marah Berry is a PhD student at the University of Florida studying Environmental Engineering. Her re- search focuses on engineering problem solving. Her interest for problem solving began while she obtained her M.E. in Systems Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences and Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. His research interests are in
Paper ID #35039Incorporating Information Literacy in MET Design Project: Year 2ImplementationDr. Carmen Cioc, The University of Toledo Dr. Carmen Cioc is Associate Professor in the Engineering Technology Department, College of Engineer- ing, at the University of Toledo. She received her Master in Aerospace Engineering from The University Politehnica of Bucharest, her Master in Physics - Professional in Photovoltaics, and her Ph.D. in Engi- neering, in the field of thermal sciences, from The University of Toledo.Dr. Noela A. HaughtonProf. John B. Napp, The University of Toledo John has been the Engineering Librarian at
graduate student in the Department of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University and teaches in the General Engineering Program as part of the first-year engineering curricu- lum. His research interests include choice and decision making, especially relating to first-year engineer- ing students’ major selection. He earned his BS from Virginia Tech and his MS from The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, both in chemical engineering.Rebecca B. Spilka, Clemson University Rebecca B. Spilka is an undergraduate student in the Industrial Engineering department in the College of Engineering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. During her time at Clemson, she has completed a co-op assignment with
-fluids topics in teaching and humanitarian engineering applications in research.Dr. Joseph B, Tipton Jr., Lipscomb University Dr. Joseph B. Tipton, Jr. is an associate professor and chair of mechanical engineering at Lipscomb University in Nashville, TN. He enjoys teaching blended courses that span the curriculum with a focus on thermo-fluid systems. His primary research interest is the application of numerical methods to solve unique problems in the cooling of structures under high heat loads. For several years, this has focused on the design and simulation of thermofluid effects in the cooling of fusion reactor components.Dr. Mark Philip McDonald, Lipscomb University Mark McDonald holds the BCE from Auburn
Paper ID #21328Student Perceptions of Engineering Based Upon Board Game ParticipationAlexis Basantis, Rowan University Alexis graduated from Rowan University with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering and a minor in Bio- logical Sciences. While there, she dedicated her time to performing engineering outreach and research surrounding the gender gap in STEM. Currently, she is pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at Virginia Tech. Her research is centered around studying human factors and safety in transportation at the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute.Megan DiPietroantonioAmy B. Geary, Rowan UniversityMelanie V