(NAE) and its 2007 publicationRising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter EconomicFuture [1] in which they urged a focus on developing, recruiting, and retaining engineers. Datasupporting this demand is documented in the National Science Foundation’s publication, Scienceand Engineering Indicators 2012 [2], using Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2002 to 2018 thatproject job openings from growth and needs replacement, which will top 160,000.There is an evermore urgent need for our higher education sector to graduate engineers whopossess the knowledge, skills, and abilities to respond to a 21st-century world with its technical,social, and ethical complexities. Indeed, engineers’ abilities to meet these needs
results on Likert-scale and multiple choice questions areanalyzed and discussed.IntroductionSustainability is an important topic to everyone. Its relevance is acute to engineers who aredirectly involved in enabling the built environment. Accordingly, the well-known ABETengineering accreditation criteria1 requires engineering graduates should be able to “design asystem, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability.” Engineering educators have been making every effort to educate the futureengineers in sustainability and to prepare them with solid knowledge to deal with thesustainability challenges2-6. The
. Adams, “Cross-disciplinary practice in engineering contexts,” 17th Int. Conf. Eng. Des., no. August, 2009.[27] V. Kumar, 101 Design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Wiley, 2012.[28] Flash-Integro, “VSDC Free Video Editor.” www.CNET.com.[29] D. Kilgore, C. J. Atman, K. Yasuhara, T. J. Barker, and A. Morozov, “Considering Context : A Study of First-Year,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 321–334, 2007.[30] D. H. Jonassen and Y. H. Cho, “Fostering Argumentation While Solving Engineering Ethics Problems,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 680–702, Oct. 2011.[31] N. Genco, K. Holtta-Otto, and C. C. Seepersad, “An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation
of the work conducted. RIPSleverages opportunities offered by other summer research experience programs at KSU,including the NSF-funded REUs, as well as the Summer Undergraduate Research OpportunityProgram. SUROP coordinates a series of academic enrichment and social activities for allsummer research students, including seminars on topics such as graduate school application andresearch ethics. The Federally-funded McNair Scholars program at K-State also provides peerinteractions, enrichment, research experience, and graduate school preparation.Veterans’ programs. The KS-LSAMP project includes a specific emphasis on recruiting andretaining veterans at all partner institutions. Located near Fort Riley, KSU is a designatedmilitary-friendly
satisfactory or not. However, whether in engineeringapplications or in the teaching and learning process, the state vector carries far more importantinformation. The state vector contains all the internal variables based on which the output andfuture evolution of the system are determined. As a reminder, the state vector should includeboth academic dimensions (student preparation, work ethic, achievement level, etc.) andaffective dimensions (student emotional state, physical challenges or disabilities, participation inathletics, etc.). The latter are often a mystery to the instructor (particularly in large classes), butinsights into these domains can often give the instructor valuable insight into how to best help astudent move towards his or her
accordingly. In addition, engineers should possess the ability forlifelong learning, understand engineering ethics, and generally apply sustainable approach forpast and present action7, 8,18, 19, 32, 33. Storytelling Based Learning offers a way to approach andcreatively manage the long list of skill-sets required for effective engineering education. We suggest Storytelling Based Learning as a type of disciplinary knowledge creation.There are several levels, categories, and taxonomies of knowledge that vary from learningsyntactical knowledge to semantic understanding and to pragmatic approach where disciplinaryknowledge can be applied to new situations where knowledge boundaries are spanned acrossdifferent disciplines assuring a holistic view
By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where interdisciplinary students learn about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder Jacquelyn Sullivan is founding co-director of the General Engineering Plus degree program in the Uni- versity of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. The newly-launched, design- based, ”design-your-own” flexible GE+ engineering degree was initially created as the ”home” for CU Teach Engineering, a
cheat, Monitor on Psychology, June 2011, p. 54. American Psychological Association,Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/06/cheat.aspx [18] Anderman, E.M. & Murdock, T.B. (2007). Psychology of Academic Cheating, Elsevier. [19] Rettinger, D.A. & Jordan, A.E. (2005). The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: ANatural Experiment, Ethics and Behavior, 15(2), pp. 107-129.[20] Martin, M.W., (2013). Implementing Active Learning Principles in an Engineering Technology FluidMechanics Course, Proceedings of the 2013 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &Exposition, Paper 6134. [21] Lang, H.R. & McBeath A., (1992). Fundamental Principles and Practices of Teaching: A Practical
group learning and social networking, characterized by collaboration and sharing of content. This causes an ethical challenge for universities, which under certain circumstances view collaboration as cheating and uncited content sharing as plagiarism (p. 167).Higher education as a provider of services is predominantly driven in belief and practice. “Thatis, the university through its faculty determines the curriculum, the content, the instructionalmethods, the study materials, and the class schedule. Digital natives tend to be consumer driven,preferring to choose if not the curriculum and content they wish to study, then the instructional
” 3. “Things are not always what they seem” (An exploration of perception and learning). 4. “Meaning. True of False; Real or Imagined”. (An exploration of constructivism and realism) 5. “From Perception to Self Perception and a Little Management En-Route”. (About what people bring to their work and what organizations bring to them and the affect of structures on those relationships). 6. “Sharing Problems. Living in Communities 7. “Thinking about making a Good Engineer Possible”. 8. “Aspiration in Engineering Ethics” 9. “Preparing for the future: Individuals and Organizations”. 10. “Changing Us: Changing Society”. 11. “Journey’s End: A New beginning?Exhibit 2. The 11 Journeys. Each exploration occupied between
pursue a solution.Leader Inspires other individuals and facilitates achieving a key result or a group of[new name] aligned results. Builds an environment to make others effective at working together. Empowers others to deliver against the common goal. Envisions an end goal and influences others to rally together towards the goal.User Empathetic Understands the feelings, thoughts or experiences of another person/group. Is ethical and humble regarding customer or stakeholder needs. Knows what is important to the stakeholder audience and/or customer. Investigates the full innovation life cycle - not just the inception and initial
. Envisions an end goal and influences others to rally together towards the goal.User Empathetic Understands the feelings, thoughts or experiences of another person/group. Is ethical and humble regarding customer or stakeholder needs. Knows what is important to the stakeholder audience and/or customer. Investigates the full innovation life cycle - not just the inception and initial implementation.Visionary Has ideas about what could/should happen or be done in the future based on an understanding of user needs. Able to see how a solution to a current problem can be fully implemented in the future. Sees strategic long term value of idea to
benefits.Future studies could focus on the instructors’ point of view of the role of smartphones inclassrooms and how instructors perceive the influences of smartphones on students’ learning andperformances to determine why many instructors are banning the use of smartphones inclassrooms.References[1] Brown, D. G., Burg, J. J., & Dominick, J. L.; A strategic plan for ubiquitous laptop computing, Communications of the ACM, 41, pp. 26-35, 1998.[2] Brown D.G., & Petitto, K. R.; The status of ubiquitous computing, Educase Week, 38, pp. 25-33, 2003.[3] Melerdiercks, K.; The dark side of the laptop university, Journal of Ethics, 14, pp. 9-11, 2005.[4] Young, J. R.; The fight for classroom attention: professor vs laptop
has a mental health problem.4. Rubric developmentThe concept for the Correction Action Rubric for Problematic behaviors is based on the Faculty911 Guide [15] published by the Dean of Students and the Counseling and Wellness Center(CWC) and a faculty and the aforementioned staff development program titled “Working withdisruptive students” presented by the Associate Director of Crisis Emergency Services at theNew Faculty orientation every year. The premise is that faculty have an advantage point of beingan important resource because they are knowledgeable of students and their particulardevelopmental stage; aware of the stressors that students encounter; serve as representatives ofthe institutional ethic of care; knowledgeable of the campus
respon- sible for funds as PI or Co-PI from 52 separate proposals totaling almost $6,500,000. Courses taught include undergraduate finite elements, thermodynamics, fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and engineering economics and ethics, and graduate finite elements, numerical methods, thermodynamics, statistical me- chanics, plasma fundamentals and gas dynamics.Bradley Davidson, University of Denver Dr. Bradley Davidson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering and director of the Human Dynamics Laboratory at the University of Denver and Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. He holds a BS in civil engineering from Tennessee Tech, an MS in engineering mechanics
faculty and TA professional development in the College of Engineering, conducts rigorous engineering education research, and promotes the growth of engineering education both locally at UM and nationally. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include evaluating methods to improve teaching, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national presence in engineer- ing education; she is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Education, and past chair of the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE.Mr. Jeremy M. Goodman, Franklin W. Olin
choice now, becomes optional in fall 2015) 2. Electric Machinery (i.e. this course) 3. Power Generation, Operation and Control 4. Power Distribution Systems Engineering and Smart Grids 5. Construction and Cost of Electrical Supply 6. Introduction to Thermodynamics 7. Introduction to Nuclear Engineering 8. Power Electronics (a graduate course open to seniors)The ABET outcomes to be addressed in this course include: a. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering b. Ability to design and construct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data e. Ability to identify, formulate and solve engineering problems f. Understanding of professional and ethical
, such as through first-year introduction to engineeringcourses or through required design “cornerstone” subjects throughout the undergraduatecurriculums across the US. This is partly driven by the requirements that ABET sets forengineering degrees. ABET Criteria 3 (a) through (k) include design explicitly, especially Page 26.1362.2through criteria (c) and (e). The ABET criteria also implicitly include design throughrequirements for teamwork, ethics, social context, and other broad considerations. Another driving factor to include engineering design in freshman courses is to increase student interest inengineering, improve retention, and improve
. How does student interaction with a simulation transition the students to the application of skills in the real world?2. What skills can students identify and connect between the simulation and a real-world application?II. Literature ReviewSimulations in the Classroom“The pedagogical value of the hands-on experience that a laboratory provides is ubiquitouslyendorsed by educators,”7 (p. 541). However, true hands-on activities may not exist or beavailable for all type of industries, such as within health care and core engineering sciences fieldsdue to cost, access, or ethical obligations. For these fields where direct hands-on experience isnot available, simulations can offer many benefits over learning environments that provide
● researching and● writing business letters ● reading/evaluating literature referencing● making presentations ● basic communication theory ● writing● writing reports ● Gantt Charts abstracts/summaries ● pitching your projectEngineering Professionalism - This laboratory allows students to explore applications of ethicsand systems of moral principles and environmental stewardship in engineering practice● Ethics in Engineering ● FE and PE registration ● history of engineering The SLOs were further subdivided into core competencies (a sample of competencies is provided in Table 1), which
problems; Synthesize and transfer knowledge across disciplinary boundaries; Comprehend factors inherent in complex problems; Apply integrative thinking to problem-solving in ethically and socially responsible ways; Recognize varied perspectives; Gain comfort with complexity and uncertainty; Think critically, communicate effectively, and work collaboratively; and Become flexible thinkers.In this institutional context, we have developed an interdisciplinary course (ProgrammingNarratives: Computer Animated Storytelling [PN]) designed to help non-computer systems majorstudents develop computational thinking skills through computer programming combined withEnglish writing skills to satisfy the college requirement of an
was developed, students used a pyrheliometer to measure thesun’s irradiance and correlate it to the calorimeter power readings. The final analysis includedan uncertainty analysis which incorporated both biased and random uncertainty contributions.5.3 Outcome C: An Ability to Design a System, Component, or Process to Meet Desired Needs Within Realistic Constraints Such as Economic, Environmental, Social, Political, Ethical, and Health and Safety22Student participants in the solar furnace project developed an ability to design a system to meetdesired needs within realistic constraints. Three examples will be used to illustrate this point.First, the overall budget for the solar furnace was 500 thousand dollars and this budget
due to work ethic/learning style differences. Almost half described the activity asgood or great. Most of those expressed how much the activity helped them learn, however almostall students viewed it as a presentation with presentation skills. The final comment suggestsredefining the approach to move away from a presentation style to a discussion format. This willbe attempted in Spring 2014. Multiple students expressed the desire to have more student-ledexamples, which is also being implemented in Spring 2014. In general, it appears the studentsput more effort into truly learning the material with this activity than with homework. Thedownside is that they only put this effort into one problem during the entire semester.Conclusions
’ grades, work ethic, teamwork, attitudes,etc. in the respective courses.Lessons LearnedMany of the lessons learned about the class related to the material presented and betterconnection to Pre-Calculus. Although the material from the Studying Engineering6 book wasdiscussed throughout the semester, there were many times the students were disconnected fromthe concepts and felt it did not apply to them. To try and remedy this issue, the class structurewill allow the students to take more control of the activities while also learning about positionsthey may hold in a student club. An example is that a group of students would be on a socialcommittee. This group would then be in charge of any social activities involving the ENGR 204class, such as
. 1312-23.16 Rayne, K., T. Martin, S. Brophy, N.J. Kemp, J.D. Hart, and K.R. Diller. 2006. The development ofadaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2): 165-173.17 Cordray, D. S., T. R. Harris, and S. Klein, 2009, “A Research Synthesis of the Effectiveness,Replicability, and Generality of the VaNTH Challenge-based Instructional Modules inBioengineering,” J. Eng. Education, Vol. 98, pp. 335-348.18 Roselli, R.J. and S.P. Brophy, 2006, Effectiveness of challenge-based instruction in biomechanics.Journal of Engineering Education 95 (4): 311-324.19 Prince, M. J. and M. Vigeant, 2006, “Using Inquiry-based Activities to Promote Understanding of CriticalEngineering Concepts,” ASEE Annual
Problem.3. Wals, A., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. (2014). Convergence Between Science and Environmental Education. Science, 344, pp. 583-584.4. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, 6, pp. 203–218.5. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Beng Lee, C. (2006). Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 92 (2), pp. 139-151.6. Seager, T., Selinger, E., & Wiek, A. (2012). Sustainable Engineering Science for Resolving Wicked Problems. Journal of Agricultural Environmental Ethics
scientific assertions require supporting 4.69 4.56 -0.13 evidence. I have the ability to analyze data and other information. 4.56 4.56 0.00 I understand science. 4.44 4.44 0.00 I have learned about ethical conduct in my field. 4.25 4.44 0.19 I have learned laboratory techniques. 4.00 4.13 0.13 I have an ability to read and understand primary literature. 4.50 4.38 -0.13 I have skill in how to give an effective oral presentation. 4.19 4.44 0.25 I have skill
better bandage for an application of their choice. Each groupof students defined the need/problem, designed a solution, pitched their solution to potentialinvestors, purchased materials from a supply store, tested their prototype, and demonstrated theirprototype. At the end of the activity, it was revealed that the supply store had charged each groupdifferent prices for materials to simulate different allocation of resources. The students engagedin discussion of the technical aspects of their designs as well as the financial, ethical, and societalconsiderations that must be considered when designing solutions in global health.Central Dogma of BiologyThis module introduced basic principles of genetics and the mechanisms of DNA replication
. Eachwinter the Pathway Scholars were included in the required book club reading that supportsdeveloping a strong work ethic, leadership and overall success. The selections were,EntreLeadership by Dave Ramsey, QBQ! The Question behind the Question by John Miller, andIt Worked for Me by Colin Powell, and roundtable discussions were held during the first seminarof the spring semester.The Pathway Scholars were also incorporated into the formalized College Peer Mentor Trainingprogram that was held in two, five-hour sessions. This training covered a variety of topics andactivities to prepare them as mentor to incoming students and develop leadership.Advising Meetings & CommunicationsThe Pathway Scholars were required to meet with a staff member from
248 4.13 0.00 Thinking Cognition, Systems 247 3.47 247 4.10 0.00 thinking, and Thinking mental Critical Thinking 248 3.43 248 4.16 0.00 Creative 247 3.40 247 4.23 0.00 Thinking Innovation 248 3.46 248 4.14 0.00 Professionalism 244 3.50 244 4.09 0.00 Ethics & 245 3.44 245 3.99 0.00