improving the student engagement. Another aimof the Project is to facilitate the participants’ learning during the process of the design andconstruction. Understanding by Design (UbD) described by Froyed et al as an increasinglypopular tool for educational planning that is a teaching method focused on a betterunderstanding of students throughout a design process 8.4. MethodologyTo appraise the potential benefits of the DAD Project, as an example of employment of full-scale physical models in civil engineering education, a ‘mixed method’ has been utilised. Toelaborate, mixed methods are defined as the third methodological approach following thequantitative and the qualitative methods. In a mixed method, data collection or analysis maybe done
mentors, who were critically involved in both the planningand execution of each of the following areas: BSC orientation, the development of onlinesupporting resources, Tech Friday workshops, tutoring, and the organization of a yearly STEMchallenge.It is important to note that all the events and services provided by BSC are run by the studentmentors. The faculty in charge of the program provide the resources needed and ensure that theprogram is producing valuable results. We, the BSC student mentors, plan the events, decide onTech Friday topics, manage the website and event registrations, develop activities for our STEMchallenge, and write all documents used in our activities, including this paper. We, the BSCmentors, will describe below the
were exposed to several personal development workshopsled by chemical engineering upperclassman, faculty members, and administrators. Topicsincluded (1) AIChE activities (e.g. the ChemE car team and attending conferences), (2) SAChE(the online safety training certification program offered by AIChE), (3) the DistinguishedCommunicators program offered at LSU, (4) STEM outreach opportunities, (5) planning forgraduate school, (6) an overview of electives and concentrations offered within the chemicalengineering department, (7) a time management course, and (8) how to give and receivefeedback. The students were allowed to pick and choose which workshops to attend during athree and a half hour block of time on the first day of the camp, effectively
-than-perfect score was giventhere typically existed a significant deficiency in the senior teams’ management strategies, whichcame up in freshmen student comments. Most all of the freshmen freeform comments have beenpositive. The most common problems freshmen have vocalized about their senior managers overthe years have been related to senior teams being unresponsive or resistant to involving thefreshmen in their projects in a meaningful way. To address this problem after the first year, wenow specifically assess the plans of senior teams’ for freshman workers in their proposal rubrics,before they are ever assigned freshman employees. This added scrutiny and accountability hasapparently improved senior planning and the freshman experiences on
Monitoring and advising. Their approach to achievethese objectives consists of five-step plan: 1) recruiting a substantial pool of high-achievingminority students with interests in math and science who are most likely to be retained in thescientific pipeline; 2) offering merit-based financial support; 3) providing an orientation programfor incoming freshmen; 4) recruiting the most active research faculty to work with the students(it takes a scientist to train a scientist); and 5) involving the students in scientific researchprojects as early as possible, so that they can be engaged through the excitement of discovery [3–5]. The similarities between the two programs suggest the importance of their objectives andapproach in the design and
. 5 • Estimate the convection coefficient for a real system using experimental values like temperature, material, and geometry. • Determine thermodynamic properties using measured experimental data (pressure, temperature, relative humidity, etc).Development objectives: • Employ proper citations and references in all formal written work. • Negotiate and resolve conflict independently within the group. • Discuss independent experimental plan and ideas with classmates and instructor.The thermodynamics laboratory oven modules were the first to be implemented and theexperiment designed was the focus of the existing assessment for the ovens. The laboratoryhandout was designed to facilitate the objectives in different ways
University began encouraging eportfolios across campus as part of its QualityEnhancement Plan. A description of eportfolios and its educational justification is given in thenext section. Thus, in support of the university’s plan, and with the hope and anticipation ofproviding a better learning experience for our students, we decided to replace the RF SystemsLaboratory technical memos with eportfolios as our method to develop the writing ability of thestudents.Supporting TheoryThe use of eportfolios in higher education has become increasingly common. Some estimates saythat more than 50% of college students in the United States have used eportfolios in somefashion [3]. While eportfolio use is common, the purposes for eportfolio implementation
, Texas was one of five majorityminority states11. These partnerships increase educational opportunities and support efforts toproduce engineers reflective of the community. This paper shares the challenges and successeslearned during the first three years of the program and the planned expansion to further recruit,retain, and graduate a more diverse engineering demographic through a pathway of co-enrollment and partnership with two-year institutions.II. Background of the PartnershipsThe Texas public education system includes 39 public universities, 50 public community collegedistricts with multiple campuses and 75 of the 409 designated Hispanic Serving Institutions(HSIs) in the United States (18.3%)12,13. From 2000 to 2015, the number of
Colorado State University and has approximately 16 years experience working for various R&D labs at Hewlett Packard and Intel Corporation.Mr. Michael Trenk, Montana State University Michael is a student at Montana State University currently pursuing his Masters degree in Computer Science. His interests include distributed systems, computer networks, software engineering and software development methodologies. He also enjoys exploring technologies and solutions for solving big data problems.Ms. MacKenzie O’Bleness, Montana State University MacKenzie O’Bleness is a Junior at Montana State University majoring in computer science and minoring in math and computer engineering. She plans to graduate in April, 2017. Ms
and materials center for the BLAST program, and assisted the teams in creatingparts for their designs.Please visit our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/theengineersway/) or contact us atlgr@virginia.edu to gain access to the complete lessons plans. A more complete article on TrashSliders is being prepared for publication.
Degree will be able to work in avariety of medical facilities from doctor's offices to hospitals2. Specifically, they will beresponsible for problem solving, data interpretation, complex troubleshooting, preparation ofspecifications, scheduling, planning, analysis, project management, and decision making.BET CurriculumDrexel’s Engineering Technology undergraduate bachelor’s program consists of 187.5 totalquarter credits3. BET curriculum is based on ET core courses supplemented with a combinationof courses in biology, human factors, medical terminology, codes and regulations, medicalinstrumentation, and healthcare administration courses specific to the BET concentration, shownin red. Courses BET 301, BET 302, BET 303, and BET 305 have been
believe is engaged in fraudulent or dishonest enterprise, unless such enterprise or activity is deemed consistent with applicable state or federal law.11. Engineers having knowledge of any alleged violation of this Code, following a period of 30 days during which the violation is not corrected, shall report thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant, also to public authorities, and cooperate with the proper authorities in furnishing such information or assistance as may be required.12. Engineers shall undertake assignments only when qualified by education or experience in the specific technical fields involved.13. Engineers shall not affix their signatures to plans or documents dealing with subject matter in
. In this phase, learners aretaken on a guided tour of a system; typically this means constructing a real-world analog fromdetailed plans and simple materials. It is important that a system is chosen where multipleconnections can be explored. For students and teachers in the Initiate Understanding phase, thefundamentals of the project are demonstrated and a foundation is established for future phases.In the Broaden Understanding phase of the u-Discovery model, learners are taken through anengineering design process in the context of a challenge related to the system they constructed inthe Initiate Understanding phase. Having worked through a detailed construction and analysisprocess for a system, the learners are now in a position to consider
5-year STEM strategic plan, community colleges are proposed to play a key role in recruiting and preparing future scientists and engineers, especially among students from traditionally underrepresented ethnic backgrounds. Through a grant from the Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSI) Education Grants Program, the STEM Center was established at a community college in Northern California. The STEM Center integrated all STEM student support services within STEM academic study. Through leveraging multiple grants, the STEM Center provides a set of comprehensive student support services, including study groups, tutoring, STEM-specific academic counseling and career exploration, and information on internships and scholarships. The
program.Engineering freshman were contacted by navigators throughout the semester to offer support, setup advising appointments, and speak with students who were struggling based on their mid-termgrades.Transition to College LifeAs we all know the transition to college life for many students can be difficult. The leadinstructor taught in a comprehensive and early college high school prior to working at theuniversity. The focus on testing mandated by the public education department has taken timeaway from the curriculum and from opportunities to work on transitional goals. High schoolcounselors and teachers are dealing with additional things, such as their school grade, teacherevaluations, etc. These added tasks take time away from planning and helping
giving feedback onengineering design.Training for university educators, and in particular teaching assistants (TAs), often focus onintroductory topics - teaching responsibilities and grading (homework and exam). More advanced,yet still introductory, training topics include knowing students, lecturing techniques, leadingdiscussions, classroom management, creating optimal learning environments, academic integrity,class planning, and instructor evaluations9,10. To achieve reform, like improving feedback ondesign, more in-depth training, or rather professional development (PD), for educators isnecessary. Such PD must provide opportunities for instructors and TAs to provide input and feelvalued in the research and reform effort11. Instances where TA
ofASTM International. Through collaboration, plans had expanded from the initial idea ofpresentations by the two graduate students, to a workshop that would include two sessions - onesession for the faculty and students representing the campus community and one session forrepresentatives from national standards organizations.Workshop DevelopmentDue to the scope of the workshop, the key to its success was to gauge faculty interest early andensure their cooperation for such an event. Throughout many meetings representing all School ofEngineering departments, the faculty expressed enthusiasm for the workshop concept,contributed ideas on planning the event and had recommended organizations of interest to them.With the faculty help, it was decided
. Students 1. Students 1. Students 1. Students 1. Students 2. University 2. University 2. University affiliates affiliates affiliates 3. Outsiders Equipment Advanced Moderate Moderate Basic Advanced IP Depends Depends Depends No No Classes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Organizing Yes No Yes No Yes events Plans to Yes No
10 Materials 7 Other Engineers 12Methodological limitationsOur first methodological limitation emerged from our decision to use a convenience sample [13].While this sampling strategy allowed us to pilot the survey in an efficient manner withsupportive industry partners, it prevents us from generalizing our findings to the full populationof North American engineers. Our second methodological limitation was a consequence of oursmall sample size. We had initially planned to use inferential statistics to analyze our data, butthe data points feeding into our scales failed to meet the assumptions of normality andheterogeneity
for Undergraduate Studies in the Bagley College of Engi- neering at Mississippi State University. His background is in biomedical engineering and he has been a big proponent of self-directed learning and active learning in his classes and was the first person to intro- duce problem-based learning in the department of agricultural and biological engineering at MSU. James is also the Adjunct Director for training and instruction in the professional services department at ABET. In this role, Warnock oversees the development, planning, production and implementation of the ABET Program Assessment Workshops, IDEAL and the assessment webinar series. He also directs activities related to the workshop facilitator training
into the themes of “connecting with others” and “being overwhelmed” at the mid-point.) I want to change things back home and I want to change things back home and worry I worry I will not be able to. My worries will not be able to. Some worries are still are general rather than specific. general, but others express concrete hopes, fears, and plans. I worry about my English proficiency. (Not mentioned in mid-point feedback.)Table 3. Perceptions and motivations transitioning towards self-authorship as a method oftransfer Workshop start
times, so opportunities to discuss teaching concerns and plans with colleagues can be essential to building a professional attitude toward teaching.Implications for faculty developmentFrom its inception, faculty development at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching(CELT) has focused on promoting the best research-based teaching practices, but as Felder et al.(2011) pointed out in their review of engineering teaching and learning centers, there are otherimportant elements to consider when planning faculty development activities.[22] Those elementsrange from offering individualized consulting services to presenting teaching workshops togroups of faculty
project proposal, students were asked to document evidence of the plan they haddeveloped for their final coaster via concise descriptions, annotated sketches/graphics, roughlayouts in NoLimits, and notes they had made during the first half of the semester. At aminimum, they were expected to provide: • A list of major roller coaster features and the order of their arrangement. • A sketch or graphic showing the geometric layout of the major features. • Reasoning behind early design choices such as what makes the designed coaster unique, exciting, and attractive and why the particular layout was chosen.In the preliminary calculations, students were expected to present calculations for their out-and-back test track involving hills
that gamification of education provides both intrinsic and extrinsicmotivation is outlined. In this source, it’s further outlined that this type of gamification seems “to fosterhigher order thinking such as planning and reasoning”. Hence, badging fits well into our stated goals.This type of learning is only amplified by the feedback loop a badge system invites. Students all begintheir college experience with different backgrounds and levels of learning in written and oralcommunication. The badge feedback loop is designed to bring students to a solid integration of thecommunication skills at a developing or foundational level as outlined in the AAC&U VALUE rubrics,which provided the framework for our University’s Core Curriculum. The switch
student performance and theirperceptions about the course redesign will be presented. A list of lessons learned was identified.The preliminary results are promising and we are planning to implement the redesignedmethodology to other engineering fundamental mechanics courses.IntroductionStatics is a sophomore-level course covering topics including equilibrium of force systems;analysis of trusses, frames and machines; centroid; and moment of inertia of areas. Statics servesas a prerequisite for many subsequent courses including dynamics, mechanics of materials, etc.Statics poses special challenge to engineering students because it is often the first engineeringscience course they take. Moreover, students who have trouble with Statics often perform
Paper ID #11266Design for Aging with BIM and Game Engine IntegrationDr. Wei Wu, California State University, Fresno Wei Wu, PhD, LEED AP, CM-BIM, A.M.ASCE, is an Assistant Professor of the Construction Manage- ment Program in Lyles College of Engineering at California State University, Fresno. He received the Bachelor of Engineering in Civil Engineering with a focus on Built Environment from Hunan University in China, the Master of Science in Environmental Change and Management at University of Oxford in the UK, and the Doctor of Philosophy in Design, Construction and Planning at University of Florida. He is an associate
in which co-designers are empowered to make real and substantial design decisions. Research in this area hasaddressed the cooperative process of design and development of expertise, while includingstudents in pedagogical planning processes. In particular, studies have found that students areable to play an important role as co-designers and the end products are better designed to meettheir personal needs and expectations [12].In our research, Participatory Design Approach was selected to redesign our instructional systemusing CPBL, since we believe that by engaging the target learners in the design process, we canshape a curriculum that better fits the learning characteristics of our students, and to promote“locality, diversity, involvement
engineering as a base forsustainability and competitiveness is growing. In fact, over 90 % of global company CEOs viewsustainability as imperative for their companies’ success in the future7, and small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs) are often forced to educate their personnel8. Page 26.572.2This paper presents the development of a new energy engineering profile that constitutes aboutone third of the curriculum of a 5 year Master’s program in Industrial engineering andmanagement at Linköping University, Sweden. During planning of the program, it was decidedto investigate and take into account the industry needs today and in the future. The aim was
engineering students with an outreachmission to middle and high schools. The development mission is to enrich the communicationand leadership skills of engineering undergraduates through academic programs. The outreachmission is to attract a diverse population of middle and high school students into engineering. Inshort, the Engineering Ambassador Network places the right messenger (engineeringundergraduates with advanced presentation skills) with the right message (messages aboutengineering from Changing the Conversation [4]) in front of middle and high school students. This paper describes progress on the expansion of the Network during 2014 and plans forcontinued expansion in 2015. Support for this work has come from a grant by the
Engineering Education (ASEE)among others. In this study, a personal leadership profile instrument was tested that enablesstudents to compare their personalized engineering leadership score with data obtained from aprior study (N=753)1. This establishes a baseline of leadership skills in comparison to one’speers. This paper describes the development of a personalized leadership profile for students thatwould aid them in creating their own leadership plan by comparing their responses with thebaseline. The leadership profile helps to identify areas for improvement and providesrecommendations of relevant courses as a step towards improving upon them. Studentsempowered with the results of their profile could make informed decisions about future