/ethnicity, low-SES,immigrant identities (Verdin & Godwin, 2015).When encouraged by family, STEM FGS felt an obligation to attend college (Mobley &Brawner, 2019) and be a positive role model for younger siblings (Capannola & Johnson, 2022).What they lack in “college knowledge,” families of STEM FGS make up for in emotionalsupport (Martin et al., 2020). While STEM FGS are less likely to have engineering role models(Allaire, 2019), they also draw motivation from the work ethic modeled by family members topursuing engineering (Espinoza, 2013).STEM Financial DeterminantsThis category of literature is focused on how financial and career determinants impact thepersistence and graduation outcomes of STEM FGS. The escalating cost of higher
correlation with more traditional engineeringproblems versus the more challenging open-ended coursework. Student 3 portrays a markedlydifferent type with week 3 (site visit) closely aligning with Stolk’s type 1, week 5 (site visit)correlates to high internal motivation and high external regulation, week 7 (Zoom problemsession) is a classic style 1, week 9 (FE engineering economics problems) is type 4, week 11(ethics) is type 2 and week 13 (sensitivity project) is type 4. Unlike other students, this studentdid not complete the learning reflection.Freshman Level Introduction to Engineering Design SIMS and BNS ResponsesAs previously noted in the course comparison of SDI across the semester, Graph 1, the Freshmanlevel Introduction to Engineering Design
students defined UD beforeand after our intervention. To analyze the responses, we coded the open-ended definitions intobroad themes using an emergent coding strategy modeling after Wildman et al. [21].Ethics approval. The University of Washington Human Subjects Division determined that theactivity of human subjects research described in this manuscript qualified for exempt status (IRBID STUDY00001906).Descriptions of ActivitiesHere we present a summary and brief descriptions of example activities that include specificprompts, so instructors can try these activities in their own courses.Bioengineering Capstone Design. 1. Introduction to Accessibility, Disability, and UD Topics via Guest Lecture: A local expert in accessibility was invited
institution. Each implementation, taking theform of a variable length PD or camp, often but not necessarily occurring during the summer,may present content to teachers exclusively, students exclusively, or some combination ofteachers and students. In addition to the flexibility provided in the form and participants invited to the PDor camp, the program allows for wide ranges in offered curriculum. Some camps preparestudents for industry grade examinations, such as the Certified Ethical Hacker examinationfrom the EC-Council[25] while other camps choose to present more foundational cyberse-curity concepts [26]. This highlights the potential for vastly different content within thebroader grouping of GenCyber, ensuring that the needs of K-12 teachers
networked- model, the traditional analysis, laboratory, and design components would be deeply interrelated: engineering knowledge remains central but is configured to include both technical and contextual knowledge; competencies of practice, laboratory, and design experiences are integrated into the whole, as are professionalism and ethics.”With a continued focus on expanded access and curricular innovation, this decade of innovationlead to increased recognition of the program's successful curricular elements, yet for the facultyit served to only increase the recognition of the need for expanded innovation in both thedirection of upper division curriculum and the direction for expanding the active and application-based
of the Workplace Environments Network, and is currently Co-Chair of the Communication Network. She is a member of the National Communication Association and the American Society for Engineering Education.Kingsley A. Reeves (Associate Professor) Kingsley Reeves is an Associate Professor at the University of South Florida in the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering Department. His current research interests focus on the lean six sigma philosophy and applications of traditional industrial engineering methods to solve problems in the education service sector. He is also active in engineering education research with a focus on the formation of ethical engineers. Kingsley is also a current RIEF mentee.Elizabeth
student-centered approach to teaching and learning. [33].ITL aligns to guidelines provided by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)[34] to establish that students should be learning engineering in ways that look like the work engineers do([4], [35]). To meet ABET learning objectives and teaching through Inquiry, students work on teams toidentify, design, and solve complex problems and to create ways to test their ideas that meet specificneeds and constraints of health, culture, environment and economics, while communicating effectively todifferent stakeholders and exercising ethical and professional judgments. ABET learning objectives arerepresentative of Inquiry and not Transmission teaching ([4], [14]). Even
semester, a total of 26 students completed the first writingexercise and 24 completed the second. The exercises were administered during lab time under theobservation of the lab instructor and with the specific instruction not to use a calculator and tocomplete all work within the application. No technical issues arose during testing. As the workinvolved human subjects, approval of all ethical and experimental procedures and protocol wasgranted by the Institutional Review Board of Montana State University.Pre-Response Self-Rating Versus Post-Response Self-Rating Versus Post DLR ConfidenceAs noted previously, students rated their perceived ability to correctly answer the primary questionof the writing exercise after reading the question but before
thesubject matter [33]. Disagreements regarding the coding or data analysis were addressed andresolved by consensus. This resulted in multiple iterations of the coding process with evolvingdialogue regarding the data to ensure that the analysis process maintained credibility andtrustworthiness in the substantive validation process [33]. We continually engaged in self-reflection and conversations regarding our positionality to reinforce ethical validation. Throughthese conversations, we evaluated how our positionality influenced our data analysis and tooksteps to ensure the participants' voices were centered in our minds.Table 3. Finalized list of codes organized based on the processes detailed in expectation statestheory. Theme
, no. 2, pp. 187–219, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x.[25] National Academy of Engineering, “Engineering the future,” Annual Report, 2004.[26] Engineers’ Council for Professional Development, “Canons of ethics for engineers,” New York, 1947.[27] M. Elshakry, “When science became western: Historiographical reflections,” Isis, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 98–109, 2010, doi: 10.1086/652691.[28] R. Eglash, M. Lachney, W. Babbitt, A. Bennett, M. Reinhardt, and J. Davis, “Decolonizing education with Anishinaabe arcs: Generative STEM as a path to Indigenous futurity,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1569–1593, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11423-019-09728-6.[29] R. Eglash, A. Bennett, C
, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01002.x.[27] J. L. Hess, J. Beever, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman, “Enhancing engineering students’ ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 82–102, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20249.[28] S. A. Kurtts and B. B. Levin, “Using Peer Coaching with Preservice Teachers to Develop Reflective Practice and Collegial Support,” Teach. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 297–310, Dec
[1] J. R. Dempsey, W. A. Davis, A. F. Crossfield, and W. C. Williams, “Program Management in Design and Development,” presented at the Third Annual Aerospace Reliability and Maintainability Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1964.[2] K. Yadav and R. Agrawal, “Ethical Hacking and Web Security: Approach Interpretation,” in 2022 Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS), Feb. 2022, pp. 1382–1384. doi: 10.1109/ICAIS53314.2022.9742736.[3] D. P. Crismond and R. S. Adams, “The Informed Design Teaching and Learning Matrix,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738–797, 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb01127.x.[4] G. M. Bodner and M. Orgill, Theoretical
secretary ofthe CE program and assumed the role of observer and assistant to oversee the recordings,logistics and provision of materials, as well as to take notes on participant input. We hosted threeseparate sessions, having each of the groups participating separately. Sessions that involvedGroups S and F were conducted face-to-face, while the Group A session was held via Zoom Ⓡ.For the face-to-face session, we provided coffee, biscuits and other food for the attendees. Inboth formats, participants were formally welcomed and then we introduced the dynamics andobjectives of the sessions. Then we proceed to ask them to read and sign the informed consentdocument as part of the ethical framework of the research, which included consent to have
information literacy and ethics instruction," in International Association of Scientific and Technological University Libraries (IATUL), Krakow, Poland, May 30-June 3 2004. [Online]. Available: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2004/papers/36/. [Online]. Available: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul/2004/papers/36/[37] N. Waters, E. Kasuto, and F. McNaughton, "Partnership between Engineering Libraries: Identifying Information Literacy Skills for a Successful Transition from Student to Professional," Science & technology libraries (New York, N.Y.), vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 124- 132, 2012, doi: 10.1080/0194262X.2012.648104.[38] C. T. Atwong and L. J. Heichman Taylor, "Integrating Information Literacy into
must acquire throughout their training. Problem-solving, communication, ethics,and critical and systemic thinking are examples of skills that allow the formation of aprofessional more suited to the job market [4], [6], [7]. In addition, classes based on thesedifferent approaches ensure a more significant relationship with the labor market and currentproblems, making the study more attractive and making the student visualize his actions in aprofessional future [8].However, this only occurs in some universities with engineering courses in developingcountries, such as Brazil [5], [9]. In these environments, teaching is traditional, using anexpository class with a blackboard and slide presentation [10]. Different authors approachthis problem as a
they gave 100% - and sometimes 110% - to everyproject that they work on. While these statements reflect positively on students’ work ethics, theydo little to clarify whether there was any meaningful connection between student work and theproject topic. Perhaps the most salient takeaway with regards to behavioral engagement issummarized by Melanie: “I might be more motivated if a project idea is cool, but that depends alot on how the project is presented.” In other words, the theming of the project may matter lessthan the project being presented in an interesting way.Affective EngagementThe matter of affective engagement is difficult to address based on the data presented. While itwas clear that some students felt passionate about the content
buildingstudents’ abilities to document their work, consider the ethical implications of their work, bereflective practitioners, and enact effective team behaviors. A complete set of learningobjectives was provided to students to use as a reference to guide their learning andreflection. Examples of learning objectives relevant to this study are shown in Table 2. Foreach learning objective, a description of proficiency was provided.Standards-based grading was employed across all elements of the course, meaning studentperformance on assignments was assessed using the learning objectives as items in criterion-referenced rubrics [24]. A five-point scale (i.e., Proficient (100%), Developing (80%),Emerging (50%), Insufficient Evidence (1%-5%) and No Attempt (0
technical skills, economic feasibility, ethical and environmentalconsiderations, and user needs. In the same train of thought, it is unclear whether it is theinstructional strategies or the tools that support students’ understanding of HCD and how thesetools enhanced their perspectives of the roles of engineers in society. The closest study foundaround engineering design, human-centered design, and instructional strategies was a studyconducted by Villanueva and colleagues [18] where they showed that active learning activitiesconnected to service learning in engineering design resulted in higher engagement of students tothe classroom activities. This body of work on ideation and prototyping tools serves as anexploration of these elements within an
interpersonal skills in engineering contexts. 8. Ability and desire to lay a foundation for continued learning beyond the baccalaureate degree. 9. Awareness of professional issues in engineering practice, including ethical responsibility, safety, the creative enterprise, and loyalty and commitment to the profession. 10. Awareness of contemporary issues in engineering practice, including economic, social, political, and environmental issues and global impact. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn an effort to see how the ME354M course was achieving
academic success,is only connected with specific outcomes, i.e., scores/performance in a task. For a well-roundedand ethical education, an individual must identify with what they are learning, see the value intheir learning outcomes and acquire significant knowledge. From the perspective of an educator,self-efficacy is a critical construct that helps students progress through the curriculum by passingprerequisite courses, while self-concept drives the student forward towards achievement of agreater goal of graduating as an engineer.Table 2 consists of the variables condensed from table 1, but re-categorized into which constructthis review has deemed as appropriate. It should be noted that table 1 had two columns based oninterpretations in
/sunday/the- asian-advantage.html[2] D. E. Naphan-Kingery, M. Miles, A. Brockman, R. McKane, P. Botchway, and E. McGee, “Investigation of an equity ethic in engineering and computing doctoral students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 337–354, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20284.[3] National Science Board, “The State of US Science and Engineering 2022,” National Science Foundation, Alexandria, VA, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/indicators[4] L. D. Patton and S. Bondi, “Nice white men or social justice allies?: using critical race theory to examine how white male faculty and administrators engage in ally work,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 488–514
use of student-centered teaching practices [7].Another factor that appears to be distinctive in the context of Canadian engineering schools andpostsecondary education in general is the increase of teaching-stream faculty members within theacademic workforce over the past two decades. Unlike the United States, where nearly 70 percent of faculty members have teaching as their primary responsibility [8], the full-time,continuing faculty appointment with the primary responsibilities limited to teaching-relatedactivities was introduced in the early 2000s to research-intensive Canadian universities, out ofeducational, ethical, and pragmatic considerations [9, 10]. These teaching-stream facultymembers are known for having a positive impact on the
weapons systems that battle against other teams of students. TheBotsIQ competition is commonly referred to as “battle bots,” because the students build robotsthat fight to destroy each other. The competition is held on a geographically local level withwinners advancing to the nationwide competition hosted by the National Robotics League.To ensure the survey was conducted in an ethical manner, all authors of this paper completed theCollaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) as required by Robert Morris University’sInstitutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB then reviewed and approved the survey as outlined inAppendix 1 before it was sent to the BotsIQ program instructors along with the consent formgiven in Appendix 2. Those who received
of software design through the implementation and debugging of student-written programs; (4) introduction to engineering majors, career exploration, engineering practice within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, ethical, health and safety, and sustainability. Physics: This is the second course in the first-year engineering experience and has Intro as a pre-requisite. Many of the experiments involve rely on Python code to interact with sensors and actuators. Therefore, a solid foundation in the skills from Intro is necessary.From the population of position-of-stress participants, a stratified sampling technique was usedto choose interview candidates in three categories of decreasing