career, he had a very successful corporate management career working in R&D at Lucent Technologies and as the Director of Global Technology Management at Qualcomm. He had initiated and managed software development for both the companies in India. Prof. Radhakrishnan holds Masters Degrees (M.Tech, M.S., M.B.A) and Sustainable Business Practices certification from University of California San Diego.Dr. Jodi Reeves, National University Dr. Jodi Reeves is an Associate Professor and Department Chair of Applied Engineering at National Uni- versity in San Diego, CA. She teaches courses in design engineering, engineering management, and data analytics. Prior to academia, she worked for almost ten years as a quality
professor in the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and the Director of Chemical Engineering Graduate Program. Dr. Ren received an Early Career Translational Research Award in Biomedical Engineering from the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation in 2009 and a NSF CAREER award in 2011. He was named the College Technology Educator of the Year by the Technology Alliance of Central New York in 2010. Dr. Ren is also a recipient of the Faculty Excellence Award from the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Syracuse University. Dr. Ren currently has 44 journal publications with over 2000 citations (h-index 24), 7 issued/pending patents and research supports from NSF, EPA, Wallace H. Coulter Foundation, Alfred
. Finally, at the end of thepresentation specific examples of biased actions were explicitly addressed. For example, thedean said that biased activities such as racist or sexist jokes were not tolerated in the College ofEngineering. Directly following the presentation, the CIVE 102 instructor indicated that sheliked the content and thought it was very relevant.Panel of Professional Engineers. Around mid-semester we hosted a panel of engineers in bothclasses. The panels informed students about engineering practice and hopefully provided somerole models to the students. In putting the panels together we attempted to represent at leastsome racial and gender diversity as well as diversity in engineering career paths within thepractical constraints
and supervisory careers in a variety of industries. The programcombines technical knowledge with communications skills and teamwork to provide theflexibility needed in today’s rapidly changing marketplace. Figure 1 depicts an as-is curriculummap of the selected Industrial Engineering Technology program. The selected programeducational objectives are: Demonstrate technical proficiency in the field Apply quantitative reasoning and critical thinking in solving technical problems Effectively communicate technical knowledge, ideas, and proposals to others, including upper management Lead project teams in successful completion of projects Have strong organizational and management skillsA brief description of some of
students improve their problem-solving approach?7. Do students feel more confident and efficacious in their engineering skills?8. Do students believe that they have a better understanding of what working engineers do?9. Are students more interested in, committed to, and positive about their studies and/or their future careers?Assessment instruments to address each question are being developed during both phases of theproject.Project statusThe project is currently in Phase I. A summary of project accomplishments to date follows.1. The heat transfer course was taught in spring 2014 using a traditional format. This will provide the control for the study.2. During the spring 2014 offering, detailed assessment data was collected on
cooperative education, or coop. At UC, students are required tocomplete four coop rotations during their academic career, starting with either the fall or springsemester of their sophomore year. Coop has been shown to improve both student performanceand retention.8-9In this paper, additional data will be presented on the impact of the first-year courses on studentretention from the first to second years. Additionally, the impact of the first-year courses onstudent performance on the first coop experience will be explored through analysis of employercoop surveys completed at the end of each student’s rotation. The results of the first cohort ofstudents to complete the required first-year courses under the semester system will be comparedto the
institutions that offer a technology-based curriculum are particularly reliant onadjunct faculty. Clearly adjunct faculty is highly valued in technology programs for its course –specific expertise and industry correlation. However this faculty is typically teaching as asupplement to a separate full time career and therefore does not have the resources available todevote to a protracted or confusing assessment routine.In order to compile a successful assessment report, a sustainable assessment program must beestablished that distills the complex requirements into components that can be easily andefficiently executed by its faculty. The reporting system must be sufficiently clear andunambiguous such that it becomes a part of the semester close-out
also share their plan for the future research.IntroductionThe primary goal of engineering programs is to prepare the engineering students for theirprofessional careers in the global setting 1. Ideally, the educators should teach in a well-managed,student-centered environment with reasonably structured framework. They should stressfundamental knowledge, equip the students with solid skills and expose them to cutting-edgetechnologies 2. It has been found that obtaining practical knowledge from college is morebeneficial to the students’ professional career than mastering any new technology 3. An effectivelearning environment should help the students enhance their ability to solve practical problems 2.Globalization of the engineering enterprise
Paper ID #12320Improving engineering student preparedness, persistence, and diversity throughconative understandingDr. Elizabeth A Adams, Chandler Gilbert Community College Residential Engineering Faculty at Chandler-Gilbert Community College.Claire Louise Antaya Dancz, Arizona State University Ph.D. Candidate in Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State UniversityProf. Amy E. Landis, Arizona State University Dr. Landis joined ASU in January 2012 as an Associate Professor in the School of Sustainable Engi- neering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the University of Pittsburgh, after
found in algebra and trigonometry classes [5].The secondary conclusion is supported by numerous papers, such as “Freshman-LevelMathematics in Engineering: A Review of the Literature in Engineering Education” [1] that says,“if students had further exposure to mathematics, then their mathematical weaknesses could beeliminated.”If these conclusions are accurate, then it stands to reason that there is a need for a curriculum tobe created that covers, in depth, basic algebraic and advanced mathematical concepts in concertwith topics that engineering students and experts think should be emphasized at the high schoollevel for those pursuing a career in a STEM field. In addition, research confirms that offeringanother mathematics class for high school
setsdeveloped while taking the research project course.Students participate in research for a variety of reasons, including the desire to become a scientistor to clarify, confirm, or refine their educational and career goals2. At The Ohio State University,participation in research is approximately 22.4% for undergraduate students3. According to the2012 US Census, 18.6% of students are continuing education in graduate schools4. STEMgraduate programs in the US have enrollments between 40%-70%+ international students5. Thisresearch course may train a generation of domestic students to attend graduate school and reducemany universities’ dependence on international applicants.This study was conducted under IRB exempt protocol # 2013E0570 in accordance with
students ex-pressed appreciation for how well-organized the instructor was and they indicated that the waythe course was organized made it easy to determine the important concepts.Using these findings from the focus group, a survey was developed and administered to bothclasses (CEE 3110 and CEE 3150). The survey explored the following questions: 1. Were the students in CEE 3110 more uncertain about their class grade than the compari- son group (CEE 3150)? 2. Were expectations for exams more clear for students in CEE 3110 as compared to the comparison group? 3. Did CEE 3110 students find the material to be more useful to their future career than stu- dents in the comparison group? (This question was included to assess the
andcompleted their ROVs in early March. The final competition was held in early March at a local indoor community pool.The event was meant to serve a variety of purposes: first to provide an opportunity forstudents to see how their ROV would perform in a real situation, second to further Page 26.97.3educate students about the academic and career opportunities that exist within STEM,and finally to provide a reward for the student’s hard work. Each competing group wasgiven a specific time to try and complete a set of underwater tasks. Students were givenpoints for completing tasks as well as a possible time bonus. Additionally competingteams were
test is appropriate since by conducting the project, thecourse intended to improve students’ reported performance on each of the 19 topics listedcompared to a typical TTU class. The results indicated that the course needs improvement inquestions 4, 8, and 10. However, significant progress has been made on questions 12, 13, 14, and15, which are the core deliverables of Quality Enhancement Program of the University.Students also provided some written feedback at the end of the course. The following are twosample feedbacks reported by the course students.Student 1: Overall I thought that this course was great insight on what we have to look forwardto in our future careers. Merging the technical fundamentals with business concepts, real
(ICT) for learning and knowledge sharing, with a focus on cognition in informal environments. He also examine the role of ICT in support- ing distributed work among globally dispersed workers and in furthering social development in emerging economies. He received the U.S. National Science Foundation’s Early Career Award in 2009. He is co-editor of the Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research (CHEER) published by Cam- bridge University Press, New York, NY. Dr. Johri earned his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design at Stanford University and a B.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at Delhi College of Engineering.Dr. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University, West LafayetteKrishna Madhavan, Purdue University
Paper ID #12096Differences in Ethical Decision making between experts and novices: A Com-parative StudyMs. Madhumitha Ramachandran, University of Oklahoma Madhumitha Ramachandran received her Bachelor of Technology in Bioengineering in May 2012 from SASTRA University, India. She is currently a M.S. candidate in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at The University of Oklahoma. Madhumitha is always excited about school and looks to other motivated students to share her learning with them. Looking forward for a career in academia, she developed an interest for engineering education. Her recent research on
26.595.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Emerging Technology in the Construction Industry: Perceptions from Construction Industry ProfessionalsabstractAlthough historically the construction industry has been a slow adopter of technology, in recentyears the technology available to increase productivity and thus profit margins has seen rapidadoption and advancement. As these advances have taken hold the need for students to beexposed to this technology, to better prepare them for their careers has arisen. Projectmanagement, estimating and building information modeling (BIM) technologies are nowcommonly found in construction higher education. However, as technology in the
training our professionalsbetter to address the needs of BIM practices in the construction industry. There is a need for acertificate program that provides the required skillset to produce career ready professionals toenable BIM practices in the construction industry. The study findings would be of interest toBIM experts, construction professionals, and faculty involved with BIM education. Page 26.596.3Introduction Building Information Modeling (BIM) is commonly defined as the creation of a model tosupport the exchange of various types of information to multiple users involved in the design,delivery, and operation of a building through a
, interconnects and inte- gration techniques using MEMS and other advanced fabrication processes, RF fluidics, and high speed material’s characterization. She has authored or co-authored over 85 professional journals and conference publications and 4 book chapters. Dr. Franklin was the recipient of the 1998 Presidential Career Award for Scientists and Engineers by the National Science Foundation. She is an active member of the MTT-S society in the technical area of passives, packaging, integration and microwave education and is currently an Associate Editor of the IEEE Microwave Wireless Components Letters.Dr. Jeff Frolik, University of VermontDr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is a Principal
, professionalism, dynamism, agility, resilience, flexibility, and Page 26.631.4capacity for lifelong learning (pp. 54-56). The emphasis on these attributes reflects anassumption that engineers of the future will no longer be able to rely solely on a core body ofexpertise throughout their careers. Perhaps more importantly, it reflects a desire to see engineersand engineering exercise appropriate influence for the public good and to attract talentedstudents to a profession that both pays well and provides personal fulfillment.Engineering leadership programs as they are portrayed through their websites appear focus oncurricula, requirements, and the benefits
and after the course understanding of the need and value of the“software and systems engineering education project.” The students are asked to answer, withyes/no/not sure type of answers, two questions using their current understanding of the necessaryintegration process of engineering hardware and software and the perceived benefits of thisintegration in relation to their future careers, as follows: • The initiative to integrate Software Project Management and Engineering Project Management will help/helped me better understand the overall project management process as it applies to today’s high-tech integrated hardware and software systems. • As a computer engineering (hardware) graduate student, the exposure to the
students improvetheir writing while still covering normal course content. Needless to say, students struggle withtrying to meet standards they have yet to be taught or had the opportunity to practice. The writingguide is meant to help alleviate this problem by offering consistent guidance for studentsbeginning at the freshman year and continuing throughout the degree program.Simply providing the students with the writing guide, however, will most likely not be enough todrastically improve their communication skills. Faculty must also demonstrate to students theimportance of developing these skills as they relate to a successful career in engineering.6 Socalled “soft skills” such as communication, teamwork, information seeking and
as improved attitudes towards STEM areas and the building of confidence in conducting research 37. These instruments have been developed by an external evaluator and will be collected by PI.A summative evaluation will be conducted with the following instruments:• Career aspiration and design self-efficacy survey for undergraduate students: These surveys (modified, tested, and validated by Dr. Johannes Strobel) will be used to assess the long-term Page 26.670.5 impact of the curricula on student interest in bioengineering, and the impact on their career choices, and self-confidence in their engineering expertise.5
of the four pillars of manufacturingknowledge model. The gap analysis is used to identify opportunities of improvement andsuggest changes to course descriptions and possible courses to add to selected IndustrialEngineering Technology curriculum. The suggested improvements are used to create a revisedcurriculum map and a plan to implement the recommendations. Page 26.956.4Results and DiscussionThe selected Industrial Engineering Technology program has both major and support courses toprepare graduates for technical and supervisory careers in a variety of industries. The programcombines technical knowledge with communications skills and teamwork
projects in collaboration with more than 35 sponsoring Page 26.957.2organizations. Her academic background is in civil engineering, but she teaches engineering design across disciplines in the capstone design course, in keeping with Smith’s general engineering degree (B.S. in Engineering Science). She followed a primarily academic pathway in her career (M.Eng., Ph.D., postdoc, faculty), joining Smith without having worked in industry. As a result, she has developed her applied engineering skills across disciplines during her time at Smith through involvement in the numerous capstone design projects, interaction with liaisons from
Paper ID #13608Integrated Construction Laboratory - Lessons LearnedDr. John Tingerthal, Northern Arizona University John Tingerthal joined the Construction Management faculty at Northern Arizona University in 2007. His engineering career spans a variety of design and forensic engineering experiences. He spent the first eight years of his career performing structural consulting engineering in Chicago. He earned his Doctorate in Education and is currently the Associate Chair of the Civil Engineering, Construction Management and Environmental Engineering Department. His academic interests lie in the field of discipline-based
, electromagnetic compatibility and engineering education. During his career Dr. Belu published ten book chapters, several papers in referred journals and in conference proceedings in his ar- eas of the research interests. He has also been PI or Co-PI for various research projects United States and abroad in power systems analysis and protection, load and energy demand forecasting, renewable energy, microgrids, wave and turbulence, radar and remote sensing, instrumentation, atmosphere physics, electromagnetic compatibility, and engineering education. Page 26.1009.1 c American Society for
Validation Development Action Plan Figure 1: Approach Page 26.1022.3ScopeEgoless behavior is a mindset. The earlier this mindset is developed, the better it is. Younger minds aremore malleable and have full careers ahead of them. Carver, et al. argue that before running an empiricalstudy at a software company, it is useful to carry out a pilot study with students in an academic setting17.Therefore, we defined our scope of research to a batch of 86 junior software engineering students of
and facilities, theseprograms consume a significant amount of institutional resources for relative small groups ofstudents (SELECT typically have fewer than 20 members). The impact on recruitingengineering students from under-represented populations (URP) potentially extends to issueswith future career opportunities as well. (We use URP to refer to both female students andstudents from racial/ethnic minority populations.) Industry sponsors willingly pay for theprivilege of recruiting graduates from these teams, apparently because they believe that SELECToffer educational and professional advantages. The question of whether URP students have equalopportunity to participate in SELECT is therefore also one of whether URP students receiveequal
. Ben has taught, presented, and published at numerous academic conferences, Maker Faires, hackerspaces, universities, and other informal learning spaces on building and teaching emerging technology to children and incorporating it into learning spaces of all shapes and sizes.Brendan C. O’Connell, Smith College Libraries Brendan O’Connell is Instructional Technology Librarian at Smith College Libraries, Northampton, Mas- sachusetts.Mr. Brian Huang, Sparkfun Electronics Brian Huang is an Education Engineer for SparkFun Electronics, a cutting edge open-source hardware and electronics education company. Brian started his career in engineering with wireless transport tech- nologies for ADC Telecommunications in