c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25427 Extension in June 2016. She is also working towards obtaining her PhD in Industrial Engineering and PE licensure through the MS State Engineering Board. Her current research involves lean six sigma practices and applications, manufacturability, modeling and simulations, and virtual reality applications. She also participates in the teaching of workshops and classes including: Introduction to Engineering, Gage RnR, Minitab, and Statistical Process Control.Miss Safae El AmraniMs. Ginnie Shih En Hsu, Mississippi State University Ginnie Hsu is an Illustrator
Paper ID #29439Developing Changemaking Engineers – Year FiveDr. Susan M Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University in Materials Science and Electrical Engineering (EE) and the M.S. and Ph.D. in EE from Stanford University. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her research focuses on the study and promotion of diversity in engineering including student pathways and inclusive teaching. She is Co-Director of the National Effective Teaching Institute (NETI). Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation
-fluids topics in teaching and humanitarian engineering applications in research.Dr. Joseph B, Tipton Jr., Lipscomb University Dr. Joseph B. Tipton, Jr. is an associate professor and chair of mechanical engineering at Lipscomb University in Nashville, TN. He enjoys teaching blended courses that span the curriculum with a focus on thermo-fluid systems. His primary research interest is the application of numerical methods to solve unique problems in the cooling of structures under high heat loads. For several years, this has focused on the design and simulation of thermofluid effects in the cooling of fusion reactor components.Dr. Mark Philip McDonald, Lipscomb University Mark McDonald holds the BCE from Auburn
National Laboratory). He holds three USPTO patents (IP of Cisco Systems). In addition to a doctorate in Computer Science, Predrag Tosic holds three master’s degrees, two in math- ematical sciences and one in CS. Tosic has a considerable teaching and student research mentoring expe- rience. He has enjoyed working with students of a broad variety of ethnic, cultural and socio-economic backgrounds and at different types of academic institutions. He has been actively involved with IEEE – the Palouse Section and is currently President of the Section’s Computer Society. He is also an active member of ACM, ASEE and AMS.Dr. Julie Beeston, University of Idaho Dr. Julie Beeston has both a Master’s degree (from Carleton University
participation in engineering and providing international experiences and perspectives to undergraduate students.Dr. Andre Millard, University of Alabama at Birmingham PhD from Emory University in economic history Editor of the Thomas Edison papers publications include ”Edison and the Business of Innovation” (Johns Hopkins university press), ”America on Record: A His- tory of Recorded Sound (Cambridge) Historian of technology, technology & culture, American studies. teach at the University of Alabama at Birmingham c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Reclaiming General Education: History for EngineersAbstractUS institutions generally take a broad view of higher education
. C. & Mayer, R. E., e-Learning and the Science of Instruction, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016.9. Mager, R., Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction, 3rd Edition, Atlanta, GA: Center for Effective Performance, 1997.10. Marzano, R., Designing and teaching learning goals and objectives: classroom strategies that work, Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory, 2009.11. Davis, B.G., Tools for Teaching, 2nd Edition, San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.12. Ressler, S.J., Welch R.W., and Meyer, K.F., “Teaching Lessons Learned: Organizing and Delivering Classroom Instruction,” ASCE J. Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 130
current research projects deal with earthquake risk management technology in Mexico and the United States, environmental data justice in the US/Mexican borderlands, and the development and practice of engineering expertise.Leslie Light, Colorado School of Mines Leslie Light is an Associate Teaching Professor in the Engineering, Design, and Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines, and the Director of the Cornerstone Design@Mines program. She received a B.S. in General Engineering, Product Design from Stanford University and an MBA from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, specializing in Entrepreneurial Management. Prior to joining Mines she spent 20 years as a designer, project manager, and
Paper ID #26712Inspiring Young Children to Engage in Computational Thinking In and Outof School (Research to Practice)Dr. Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships among the attitudes
Paper ID #14100Introducing Sustainability into the Civil Engineering CurriculumDr. Virginia Sisiopiku, University of Alabama, Birmingham Dr. Virginia P. Sisiopiku is an Associate Professor of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and the director of the Transportation program. She holds a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Aristotelian University in Greece, and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Her teaching and research focus on traffic operations and safety, sustainable transportation, and traffic
Award from the College of Engineering in 2014, Halliburton Excellent Young Professor in 2014, and the OSU Regents Research Award in 2014.Ms. Beverly DeVore-Wedding, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Bev DeVore-Wedding is a doctoral student in the College of Education and Human Sciences at the Uni- versity of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). In her second year, DeVore-Wedding works with Nebraska Indian Community Colleges (NICC) teaching chemistry, bringing community topics into the classroom for chem- istry content and laboratory connections, and coordinating the NSF grant between UNL NICC. DeVore- Wedding previously taught high school math and science for 28 years in northwestern Colorado in a rural setting. Research interests
Paper ID #15897Increasing Conceptual Understanding and Student Motivation in Undergrad-uate Dynamics Using Inquiry-Based Learning ActivitiesDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-2012 academic year he participated
Paper ID #22405Use of Mixed Reality Tools in Introductory Materials Science CoursesDr. Bilal Mansoor, Texas A&M University at Qatar Dr. Mansoor’s focus is on integrating technology driven smart devices into engineering education. His topics of interests include the use of smart clickers and virtual reality tools in teaching. His materials sci- ence research focuses on materials processing and developing fundamental structure-property-processing relationships of various lightweight materials.Mr. Mustapha Jamal Makki, Texas A&M University at Qatar Mustapha Makki is a research associate at Texas A&M University
Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, and as the Guest Editor of IEEE Trans. on Computer- Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems Special Issue on Design Quality and Design Closure: Present Issues and Future Trend”, 2005. He also served as the Guest Editor of the Microelectronics Journal on Quality Electronic Design, 2005. His research interests include VLSI circuit and system design, CAD methodology for VLSI design, and bioelectronics.Prof. Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University Branislav M. Notaros is Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Colorado State University, where he also is Director of Electromagnetics Laboratory. He received a Ph.D. in elec- trical
IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Symposium and the Purdue University 2018 recipient of School of Engineering Education Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching and the 2018 College of Engineering Exceptional Early Career Teaching Award.Dr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Brian Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Engineering Mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the
asdistinctness between engineering design thinking, on the one hand, and engineering model-basedreasoning, on the other hand. The 1990s witnessed the rise of a transformative wave to the engineeringcurricula, where the “engineering science” model became dominant in engineering curricula. In thismodel, the focus in the first two years of the curriculum is placed on the “engineering sciences,” or,alternatively, “analysis,” with the expectation that students would apply the learned scientific principles tosolve technical problems. However, a segregation problem between “design” and “analysis” started toemerge. The problem was caused not only by lack of appreciation for the complexities associated withdesign teaching and learning, but also by lack of
Institutional BackgroundCentral State University (CSU) is a public owned undergraduate Historical Black University(HBCU). CSU has recently received the 1890 Land Grant Institution designation and movingfrom a teaching emphasized institution towards a research based undergraduate institution. Tosmooth the transition, faculty at CSU are encouraged to carry out interdisciplinary undergraduateresearch activities to offer CSU students a distinctive research based college learning experience.These activities are also expected to further engage and prepare students for post-graduationeducation and career.Over the past ten years, CSU has experienced full time enrolled (FTE) student populationdecreased by 24% from 2,322 in 2011 to 1,761 in 2017, and then slowly
2006-1882: ABET OUTCOME ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT THROUGHTHE CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE IN AN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMShantha Daniel, Iowa State University SHANTHA DANIEL is pursuing her doctoral degree in Industrial Engineering at Iowa State University. She has served as a graduate assistant in teaching as well as research including objective evaluation and outcome assessment.Devna Popejoy-Sheriff, Iowa State University DEVNA POPEJOY-SHERIFF is pursuing her master degree in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies with an emphasis in Student Affairs. She currently serves as the Academic Advisor for IE undergraduate students in IMSE Department.K. Jo Min, Iowa State University K. JO
research interests include control of nonlinear distributed parameter and sampled-data systems; modeling, simulation, animation, and real-time control (MoSART) of Flexible Autonomous Machines operating in an uncertain Environment (FAME); control of bio-economic systems, renewable resources, and sustainable development; and control of semiconductor, (hypersonic) aerospace, robotic, and low power electronic systems. Rodriguez has received the following honors: AT&T Bell Lab- oratories Fellowship; Boeing A.D. Welliver Fellowship; ASU Engineering Teaching Excellence Award; IEEE International Outstanding Advisor Award; White House Presidential Excellence Award for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Mentoring; and the
of New Mexico. In this capacity, he is responsible for overseeing curriculum and training development, teaching short courses, and coordinating the scheduling and registration of COSMIAC and NSF courses. Mr. Kief has a B.S. and M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of New Mexico. He has published and taught in the areas of digital and programmable logic, satellite design and in verification and validation of systems. He is also an IEEE senior member.Mr. Bassam H Matar, Chandler Gilbert Community College Mr. Bassam Matar is a ”fun and challenging” guy who clearly gets things done and loves his work. He is a 22-year veteran engineering faculty in the Maricopa Community College District. After 11 years of
Paper ID #8582Lesson in implementing sustainability courses into the engineering curricu-lumDr. Bradley A. Striebig, James Madison University Dr. Striebig is a founding faculty member and first full professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison University. Dr. Striebig is a founder and member of Water for Africa a 501c3 non-profit organization. Dr. Striebig came to the JMU School of from Gonzaga University where he developed the WATER program in cooperation with other faculty members. Dr. Striebig is also the former Head of the Environmental Technology Group at Penn State’s Applied Research Laboratory. In
Session 3692 The feminist engineering classroom: a vision for future educational innovations Alice L. Pawley The Delta Program for Research, Teaching and Learning University of Wisconsin-MadisonAbstractIn the quest for the gender equalization of the engineering profession, a variety of strategies arebeing developed and used in daily engineering education practice. Colleges and universities arerecruiting girls and women in increasing numbers into the so-called “engineering pipeline” byusing camps, special
Engineering Education Reform”, The Bridge, 28, 1998. 12. Wulf, W.A., “Diversity in Engineering”, The Bridge, 28, 1998. 13. Rosser, S.V., Teaching the Majority: Breaking the Gender Barrier in Science, mathematics, and Engineering, Columbia University, New York, 1995. 14. Campbell, J.R., C.M. Hombo and J. Mazzeo, NAEP 19999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance, 2000. 15. Burkham, D.T., V.E. Lee and B.A. Smerdon, “Gender and Science Learning Early in High School subject Matter and Laboratory Experiences”, American Educational Research Journal, 24, 297- 331, 1997. 16. Campbell, P.B. and K. Steinbrueck, Striving
course (ENES 101) at UMBC was revamped in 2001 and has itsorigins in work done by Dally and Zhang2, and in work the author did while teaching in theFreshman Engineering ECSEL3 program at the University of Maryland, College Park. ENES 101includes an overview of engineering and an introduction to various topics within engineering. Theemphasis of the revision of the course was to make it a project based inquiry experience. Thestudents must work in interdisciplinary teams to design, build, evaluate, test, and report (both aformal written report and oral presentation) on a specified product. ENES 101 is a three-creditfreshman engineering course which consists of two fifty-minute class sessions and a two-hourdiscussion session each week over a 16 week
learning styles to class design can create opportunities for suchimprovements. Learning styles reflect that different individuals have preferred ways tolearn. Because of its promise to improve learning effectiveness, it was ranked by JamesStice as one of the eight key educational innovations in the last thirty years.1 Asynchronous web-based learning modules are intended for self-paced use. Thesemodules can provide an opportunity to apply pedagogical concepts to individualizedstudent learning. In particular, these modules can be specifically designed to appeal tostudents with specific learning styles. This tailoring is an advantage to instructors thathave preferred teaching styles and that have difficulty modifying their methods to facilitatethe
seminar that we hope may be used as a foundation for a mandatory (or at least credited)course for senior-level undergraduates.While many American universities have at least two writing requirements in their engineeringcurricula, such as freshman composition and technical writing, Canadian universities typicallyrequire only one technical writing course, often given in the first year of the engineeringcurriculum1. The Canadian engineering curriculum tends to be based on the more traditional,technical-based style of teaching. This is partly due to the traditional emphasis on science andengineering in this field, and partly due to the fact that few English Departments in Canadianuniversities include Rhetoric and Composition in their curriculum.2 As a
students. To effectively teachthese conceptual ideas, we need to instruct the students with a variety of teaching styles andtools. One set of tools that enhance theoretical models is visual demonstrations. Providingvisual demonstrations along with the theoretical models creates an environment for improvedstudent understanding. The present paper presents a collection of models, props and toys that arecurrently being utilized in a Mechanics of Materials class to demonstrate the main principles ofthe course. Topics supported by the visual aids and discussed herein include, but are not limitedto: bending, torsion, shear center, shear flow, shear developed from transverse loading, normalstress, compression and tension, Saint-Venant’s Principle
AC 2011-2443: INCORPORATING ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO MECHAN-ICAL ENGINEERING AUTOMOTIVE COURSES: TWO CASE STUDIESGregory W. Davis, Kettering University Dr. Gregory W. Davis is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University, formerly known as GMI Engineering & Management Institute. Acting in this capacity, he teaches courses in the Auto- motive and Thermal Science disciplines. He also serves a Director of the Advanced Engine Research Laboratory, where he conducts research in alternative fuels and engines. Currently, Greg serves as the faculty advisor for one of the largest Student Chapters of the Society of Automotive Engineers(SAE) and the Clean Snowmobile Challenge Project. Greg is also active on
AC 2012-3723: TOYS ’N MORE: STEM STUDENTS INTRODUCED TOONE OR MORE INTERVENTION STRATEGIESProf. Janice M. Margle P.E., Pennsylvania State University, Abington Janice M. Margle, Associate Professor of Engineering at Penn State, Abington, received her M.Sc. and B.Sc. degrees in mechanical engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. She is Co-PI and Project Manager of the NSF-Sponsored Toys’n MORE grant and currently teaches introductory thermodynamics and introductory engineering design courses. She is active in promoting activities to increase the number of women and minorities in engineering. She is a licensed Professional Engineer and has worked for IBM, the Navy, NASA, PPL, and private industry.Dr
will award its first graduate degree in 2001to students working at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. The program is unusual in that itdeveloped from within the aerospace engineering faculty with full faculty support. Severalimportant lessons and pitfalls in the program development and in obtaining accreditation aredescribed in the paper. Foremost among these are issues of faculty ownership of educationalmaterials, faculty training requirements for the distance learning environment at the graduatelevel, course scheduling so that the students can graduate in two years, integrating the web intolecture and laboratory courses, and funding negotiations with the administration. The paperconcludes with a few strong recommendations for other
to teach in a particular course structure andresources for laboratories, are examples of factors which demand fewer staff-student contacthours and less practical (hands-on) learning experiences. On the other hand: (a) the continuousexpansion of the content to be covered (with a soaring number of new topics and techniquesbrought into the curriculum); (b) the flexibility of the curriculum and options to be madeavailable to students and (c) also a more student-centered approach being recommended in highereducation requiring more staff time and more physical resources to run courses. Coursedevelopers are consequently responsible for designing a structure which takes account of bothsets of pressures. They are also urged to change the pedagogical