study investigated howstudents perceive the importance and utility of these experiences by exploring the ways inwhich students’ attitudes toward group work changed through experiences on technicalteams. For the purposes of this study, the terms “team” and “group” will be usedinterchangeably.ABET, the accreditation board for university programs in applied sciences, computing,engineering, and technology, identified communication skills and teaming as twoimportant qualities students should develop during their engineering education. It is nolonger enough for engineering students to graduate with technical skills and sufficientknowledge. They must have the skills and abilities necessary to communicate effectivelyand function adequately on
in it and I like it a lot. -I did not realize that we would be working in teams as much as we did. I think that this was a good experience because I had very little team experience in the past. -Programming, Sustainability, and that engineering not only consists of modern technology but engineering can also be applied to the most simplest things such as making something out of clay, a soda can, and bamboo sticks. -I didn’t expect to spend half a semester designing something from rope, cloth, and bottles. -I learned how an engineering design project is run. -I learned how important the engineering process is. The whole thing about teamwork and all the beginning steps to a successful design and construction of a
Paper ID #17699Managing Transformation to Crack Open Engineering EducationDr. Jennifer Karlin, University of Southern Maine Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of industrial engineering and held the Pietz professorship for entrepreneurship and economic development. She is now at the University of Southern Maine where she is a research professor of engineering and the curriculum specialist for the Maine Regulatory Training and Ethics Center.Dr. Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington Dr. Allendoerfer is a Research Scientist
undergraduate engineering students. Prior to Purdue, she received dual bachelor’s degrees in Industrial Engineering and Human Development and Family Studies from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her prior work experiences include product management, consulting, tutoring, marketing, and information technology.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co-leaders in 2013
Paper ID #31759Combining Strategies for Leadership Development of Engineering StudentsDr. Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus Nayda G. Santiago is professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering department, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) where she teaches the Capstone Course in Computer Engineer- ing. She received an BS in EE from the University of PR, Mayaguez in 1989, a MEng in EE from Cornell University in 1990, and a PhD in EE from Michigan State University in 2003. She leads the Southeast region of the Computing Alliance for Hispanic Serving Institutions (CAHSI). Dr
activities. His interests also include Design and Engineering, the human side of engineering, new ways of teaching engineering in particular Electromagnetism and other classes that are mathematically driven. His research and activities also include on avenues to connect Product Design and Engineering Education in a synergetic way.Dr. Phillip H Jones III, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Phillip H. Jones received his B.S. degree in 1999 and M.S. degree in 2002 in electrical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He received his Ph.D. degree in 2008 in computer engineer- ing from Washington University in St. Louis. Currently, he is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical
Paper ID #23750Redesigning the Calculus Curriculum for Engineering StudentsStacie Pisano, University of Virginia After receiving a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University, Stacie Pisano worked as an Electrical Engineer and Technical Manager at AT&T and Lucent Technologies Bell Labo- ratories for 16 years, designing and developing telecommunications equipment for the business market. After moving to Charlottesville, VA, she had the opportunity to teach Multivariable Calculus for UVA SEAS, and she was hooked. She has been teaching Applied Math from that point on and enjoying every
Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech, along with graduate certificates in Women’s and Gender Studies and Engineering Education. Dr. Beddoes serves as Deputy Editor of the journal Engineering Studies. Further information can be found on her website: www.sociologyofengineering.orgDr. Cheryl Llewellyn, University of Massachusetts Lowell c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Salary Negotiations and Gender in Engineering EducationIntroductionA gendered wage gap persists in academia whereby men are consistently paid more than women,even when factors such as discipline and productivity are controlled for [1]. For instance, in onestudy, women were found to earn 21
the changing global landscape.Bibliography[1] M. L. Tucker, N. L. Gullekson and J. McCambridge, "Assurance of learning in short-term, study abroad programs," Research in Higher Education Journal, 2011.[2] P. Chow and R. Bhandari, "Trends in Science and Technology Study Abroad," Meeting America's Global Education Challenge, 2009.[3] N. L. Shadowen, L. P. Chieffo and N. G. Guerra, "The Global Engagement Meaurement Scale (GEMS): A New Scale for Assessing the Impact of Education Abroad and Campus Internationalization," Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, pp. 231-246, 2015.[4] J. E. Olson and K. Lalley, "Evaluating a Short-Term, First Year Study Abroad Program for Business and Engineering Undergraduates
success course focus on MATLAB programming. The transfer successcourse has been taught for the last four years by the same faculty member who teaches the materialand energy balance course. This paper will describe the success course structure, content andassessment. In addition, the graduation and retention rates will be presented for transfer studentswho have and have not taken the success course.Introduction Engineering and computing professionals are an essential ingredient for securing ournation’s future economic success (1-4). The availability of a diverse, highly skilled, and well-educated technology workforce is a must for meeting workforce demands and for solving thecomplex social, environmental, health, and security challenges of
communities of practice, classroom discourse, and intercultural communication for engineers.Prof. Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Matthew West is an Associate Professor in the Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Prior to joining Illinois he was on the faculties of the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at Stanford University and the Department of Mathematics at the University of California, Davis. Prof. West holds a Ph.D. in Control and Dynamical Systems from the California Institute of Technology and a B.Sc. in Pure and Applied Mathematics from the University of Western Australia. His research is in the field of scientific
National Academies panels: Survivability and Lethality Analysis, Army Research Laboratory (ARL) Au- tonomous Systems. Dr. Rodriguez received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1990. Personal Web site: http://aar.faculty.asu.edu/Ms. Anita Grierson Ms. Grierson holds Masters degree in Mechanical Engineering and Business Administration. She has served as Director of the METS Center for Motivated Engineering Transfer Students at Arizona State University for five years. Page 26.1169.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
the type of nurturing environment, providing background knowledge and motivation for students to engage in deeper thinking [6]. The results of the study can also be replicated in other engineering domains, adopting real-life problems from other areas.Acknowledgment We would like to thank Taiwan’s Ministry of Science and Technology, under grantnumber NSC101-2120-S-006-002.References [1] C.L. Cheng, “Evaluating water conservation measures for Green Building in Taiwan,” Build. Environ., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 369-379, 2003. [2] H.W. Wang and G.M. Kondolf, Upstream Sediment-Control Dams: Five Decades of Experience in the Rapidly Eroding Dahan River Basin, Taiwan.,” J. Am. Water Resour. As., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 735-747, 2013. [3
behalf. He is a steering committee member for the International Conference on Wear of Materials and an executive committee member of the Mechanical Engineering Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE). He serves as their delegate on the ASEE diversity committee. Prof. Sundararajan has been recognized for his accomplishments with the Young Engineering Faculty Research Award and Early Achievement in Teaching Award at Iowa State University. He received his B.E. degree in Mechanical Engineering from The Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (India) followed by M.S. and PhD degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. c
examples in the classroom improves studentinvolvement and enhances the learning experience. In that regard, the electrical engineeringcurriculum has used simulations to assist student learning for more than two decades. A strongargument for the use of circuit simulators in the classroom can be found in [3], where the authorsargue the superiority of the ‘learn by doing” approach to teaching circuit analysis. A more recentexample of this teaching paradigm can be found in [4] where circuit simulation software iscombined with Mathcad to permit student interactive experimentation.Incorporation of projects into lecture classes provides an added mechanism to align thecurriculum with the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET
Paper ID #25892Architectural Engineering Starts with Design from Day 1Mr. Richard Hanson Mui, University of WaterlooMs. Soo Jung Woo, University of WaterlooMr. Spencer Arbuckle, University of WaterlooDr. Rania Al-Hammoud P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Al-Hammoud is a Faculty lecturer (Graduate Attributes) in the department of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Waterloo. Dr. Al-Hammoud has a passion for teaching where she con- tinuously seeks new technologies to involve students in their learning process. She is actively involved in the Ideas Clinic, a major experiential learning initiative at the
the Chair of a suc- cessful new Aerospace Technology degree program. Prior to Academia he was an engineering manager at Alstom Gas Turbines in the U.K and a consulting engineer for both Rolls Royce and BMW. He now resides in Connecticut and is a licensed professional engineer and a licensed U.S Coast Guard Captain. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Bilge Pumps as Introductory Mechanical Engineering Design ProjectsStudents in the Mechanical Engineering program at United States Coast Guard Academy taketheir first major course during their Spring Semester, Sophomore Year. Introduction toMechanical Engineering Design includes a design project which requires the students to
established that attracting and retaining more first-generation students, women,underrepresented ethnic minorities and those with socio-economic need in the engineeringworkforce will augment innovation, creativity, and global competitiveness. A diverse workforce[14] will result in enhanced scientific and technological products, services, and solutions thatwill be better designed and represent all users. Fostering diversity driven creativity requires acollective effort with a cross-section of social institutions to open a multiplicity of pathways forstudents to enter, retain and persist in engineering degree pathways. Therefore, the pilot allianceseeks to address the ways in which school districts, community colleges, and a university canadapt their
for this is that students may carry the belief that writing is notimportant in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields. Anothersimilar reason could be that the required university composition course was focused onelements of writing that may not have been perceived as relevant in STEM fields. Often it isindustry partners that drive the need to improve student writing and address changes in thewriting curriculum for engineering courses. One way to explore and improve the writing needsof engineers is through genre theory and/or genre analysis.Genre Theory and Genre Analysis Genre, according to Miller (1984, 2014), is something that defines the context forwhich a piece of writing is written. Thus a genre’s
contact angle of carbonized electro-spun nanocomposite fibers with variousnanoparticles inclusion.3.3 Training of Engineering Students Sustainability of engineering education will be the drawing force for the technologicaldevelopment not only in Midwest, but also in the U.S.A. Nanotechnology is one of the leadingtechnology in number of different industries, including transpiration, energy, medicine, defense,electronics and other manufacturing industries, and this technology can address some of the majorconcerns in global water issues. Department of Mechanical Engineering at WSU has nearly 500undergraduate and 120 graduate students, and a big portion of these students considersustainability research projects on environmental issues. During
. Page 12.731.102. J.D. Enderle. “ABET Criteria 2000 and Biomedical Engineering; Some Initial Evaluator Impressions.” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.3. 2007-2008 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs. Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET), Baltimore, MD, Oct. 28, 2006. Available: http://www.abet.org.4. L. Shuman, M.E. Besterfield-Sacre, H. Wolfe, C.J. Atman, J. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M.Olds, G.M. Rogers. “Matching Assessment Methods to Outcomes: Definitions and Research Questions.” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.5. David Meyer. “Strategies for Assessing Course-Specific
2006-1906: TESTING THE “ART” OF ENGINEERING ECONOMICDECISION-MAKINGJoseph Hartman, Lehigh University JOSEPH C. HARTMAN is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Lehigh University, holds the George Kledaras Endowed Chair, and serves as Department Chair. He received his Ph.D. (1996) and M.S. (1994) in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and B.S. in General Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1992). His research interests are in economic decisions analysis and dynamic programming. He is an active member of ASEE, IIE, and INFORMS and currently serves as Editor of The Engineering Economist
, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE).Glen DePalma, Purdue University Glen DePalma is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Statistics at Purdue University.Ms. Pouneh Eftekhari Page 23.520.1
Session 1360 ESTABLISHING AND ASSESSING EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES FOR ENGINEERING PROGRAMS Nashwan Younis Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department of Engineering Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne Fort Wayne, IN 46805-1499AbstractChanges are often very difficult. The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) has changed the criteria for accrediting engineering programs. This paper describes theprocess for developing and assessing an engineering
undergraduate curriculum. Two specific criteria of the Accreditation Boardfor Engineering and Technology (ABET) such as the ability to formulate problems, andknowledge of contemporary issues, rely on a student’s ability to locate and synthesizeinformation in its various formats. Developing information literacy skills will allowstudents to exert more control over the structuring of their own learning within andbeyond the classroom. This discourse begins by examining some of the tangible and marketable benefitsof information literate engineering students. This is followed by an examination of asuccessful collaboration between an engineering faculty and a librarian in the instructionof undergraduate and graduate students in becoming more
AC 2012-4402: IMPROVEMENTS IN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS COURSESIN CHEMICAL ENGINEERINGDr. Joshua A. Enszer, University of Maryland Baltimore County Joshua Enszer is a full-time lecturer in chemical engineering at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control and modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic port- folios as a means for assessment and professional development, implementation of computational tools across the chemical engineering curriculum, and game-based
filled by instructors from other faculties who do notcontribute to the engineering program. By integrating a communications instructor into afirst year program, and specifying three distinct but complementary roles for saidinstructor, S____ School of Engineering has created an atypical, but beneficial position,one that ensures a high quality of instruction for students and a stronger, more focusededucational team.Bibliography1. Universities surveyed include University of Toronto, University of Alberta, University of Western Ontario, University of Waterloo, University of British Columbia, MIT, California Institute of Technology, Texas A&M, Michigan State and others.2. Wikoff, K., Friauf, J., Tran, H., Reyer, S., Petersen, O
suggests thatas much as half a course could be devoted to these topics as core material included in everycomputer engineering program. An expedient way in which this can be done is to require a 3-hour core course in "Embedded Systems and Real Time Programming" as part of the computerengineering curriculum.Hughes and Nelson1 define computer engineering as the following: "Computer engineering embodies the science and the technology of design, construction, implementation and maintenance of the hardware and the software components of modern computing systems and computer-controlled equipment. Computer engineers are solidly grounded in the theories and principles of computing, mathematics and engineering, and apply these theoretical
. Page 9.1414.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographical InformationKevin Dahm in an Assistant Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He received his B.S. fromWorcester Polytechnic Institute in 1992 and his Ph.D. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1998. Hiscurrent primary teaching interest is integrating process simulation throughout the chemical engineering curriculum,and he received the 2003 Joseph J. Martin Award for work in this area.Ravi P. Ramachandran is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering atRowan University
preparing students for a future of rapid technological changeand globalization.The major goals of this project are to answer four specific research questions: • RQ1: What factors contribute to students’ motivation to pursue engineering? • RQ2: How do motivational attributes correlate to learning and cognition in engineering, especially problem-solving and knowledge transfer? • RQ3: How do motivational attributes change over time as knowledge, experience and skills in one’s field develop? • RQ4: What relationship, if any, do the particular aspects of bioengineering (BioE) and mechanical engineering (ME) have to motivation, learning and cognition in those