. 179–188, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0398-3.[16] B. S. Stevens, K. D. Royal, K. Ferris, A. Taylor, and A. M. Snyder, “Effect of a mindfulness exercise on stress in veterinary students performing surgery,” Vet. Surg., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 360–366, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1111/vsu.13169.[17] K. O’Leary, S. O’Neill, and S. Dockray, “A systematic review of the effects of mindfulness interventions on cortisol,” Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 21, no. 9. SAGE Publications Ltd, pp. 2108–2121, 01-Sep-2016, doi: 10.1177/1359105315569095.[18] J. Mahfouz et al., “Ensuring College Student Success Through Mindfulness-Based Classes: Just Breathe,” Coll. Student Aff. J., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2018, doi
to possess the following knowledge, attitudes, or skills.(Code in parentheses indicates the related current ABET student outcomes) a) Ability to demonstrate an understanding of various concepts used in CIM (1, 4, 7) b) Ability to design and implement small automation projects using digital electronics devices, relays and PLCs (1, 2, 3, 5, 6) c) Ability to perform end-of-tool manipulation using robots (1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7) d) Ability to successfully program a CNC machine (1, 2, 3, 5, 6) e) Ability to successfully create a part using a rapid prototyping machine (1, 2, 3, 5, 6) f) Ability to develop criteria for the selection, justification, and implementation of selected CIM technologies (2
yeardemographics, highlighting the importance of freshman engagement. Some evidence supportsthe idea that specialized freshman courses help to retain students, especially when they are majorspecific [9]. At the institution where this study occurs, there is a freshman course for allengineering, but not specifically for the BME major. This could be one potential way to increaseoverall retention by engaging with the department and creating a sense of belonging. Although, itis unclear how this could affect retention of URMs and women.Factors Related to Academic PreparednessOf the 63 students who switched out of the major in the 2018 cohort, a little over half (n=37) didnot meet the B or better grade requirements in the EMP. One third (n=21) did meet all of
and develop their own will be integral to theirsuccess as a practicing engineer. Identifying how most first-year students understand intuition isthe first step in achieving this goal.ReferencesCorbin, J. C., Reyna, V. F., Weldon, R. B., & Brainerd, C. J. (2015). How reasoning, judgement, and decision making are colored by gist-based intuition: A fuzzy-trace theory approach. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 344-355.Cunningham, C. S., Martin, K. M., & Miskioglu, E. (2019, June), Work in Progress: Comparing Creativity and the Perception of Creativity of First-Year and Senior Engineering Students. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A Five-Stage
Force on Undergraduate Physics Programs (J-TUPP) report released,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 190–190, 2017. [4] C. Wieman and N. Holmes, “Measuring the impact of an instructional laboratory on the learning of introductory physics,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 972–978, 2015. [5] N. Holmes, J. Olsen, J. L. Thomas, and C. E. Wieman, “Value added or misattributed? A multi-institution study on the educational benefit of labs for reinforcing physics content,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 010129, 2017. [6] N. G. Holmes and C. E. Wieman, “Introductory physics labs: We can do better,” Physics Today, vol. 71, pp. 38–38, 2018. [7] D. Scherer, P. Dubois, and B
protocol (MrYsLab, n.d.) that allows a Python programrunning on a host computer to communicate with the Arduino over a USB virtual serial COMport. One reason to use Pymata is that its extensions to Firmata allowed us to have both rotaryencoder and servo motor functionality, which we needed, but which is not present in StandardFirmata. Doing so bought us time for evaluating an alternative microcontroller and also allowedus to continue to use the custom-designed Arduino shield that we had developed over theprevious eight years. Appendix B gives details of the custom shield (called the YouKnow board)used through the spring of 2019. We chose to use the open-source Anaconda distribution(https://www.anaconda.com/) of Python for our lab computers, and
. https://peer.asee.org/19354[15] K. L. Biasca & S. Hill, “Assessment of ABET Student Outcomes During Industrial Internships,”2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, June, 2011. https://peer.asee.org/17534[16] S. R. Hamilton, D. A. Saftner & C. M. Saviz, “Civil Engineering Program Criteria: A Snapshot of How Programs Meet the Criteria,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019. https://peer.asee.org/32507[17] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. M. Smyser & H. L. McManus, “Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomes and Student Perceptions,” 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019. https
, G. Sukhatme, G. J. Kim, and C. M. Park, “Haptic teleoperation of a mobile robot: A user study,” Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 345–365, 2005.[3] M. Darrah, K. Murphy, K. Speransky, and B. DeRoos, “Framework for K-12 education haptic applications,” in IEEE Haptics Symposium, 2014.
intervening with the groups’work to improve the quality of students’ interactions in collaborative problem solvingengineering classrooms.References[1] J. Roschelle and S. Teasley, "The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving", in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1995, pp. 69-96.[2] B. Barron, “When Smart Groups Fail,” Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 307–359, 2003.[3] C. Kaendler, M. Wiedmann, N. Rummel, and H. Spada, "Teacher Competencies for the Implementation of Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: a Framework and Research Review", Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 505-536, 2014. Available: 10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9.[4] R
Design Project, Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana.7. Bailey, B. M. W., Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design: Successful Implementation at a Regional Hispanic-Serving Institution, Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.8. Irwin, J. L., & Wanless, D., & Sanders, P., & Wagner, S. W., Engineering Technology Interdisciplinary Projects, Proceedings of the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas.9. Estes, A. C., & Nuttall, B., & Nelson, J., & McDonald, M. K., & Starzyk, G. F., Interdisciplinary Design – Forming and Evaluating Teams, Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &
provide recommendations for how to improve curricula so that engineeringstudents graduate with stronger skills in systems thinking and holistic design.References[1] C. L. Dym, “Learning engineering: Design, languages, and experiences,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 145–148, 1999.[2] E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. New York, NY: Springer, 2007.[3] L. M. Nicolai, “Viewpoint: An industry view of engineering design education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 7-13, 1998.[4] R. Stevens, A. Johri, and K. O’Connor, “Professional engineering work,” in Cambridge handbook of engineering education research, B
. Grinder, and R. J. Ross, “A paradigm shift! The internet, the web, browsers, Java, and the future of computer science education,” SIGCSE Bull. (Association Comput. Mach. Spec. Interes. Gr. Comput. Sci. Educ., 1998.[3] J. MIRO-JULIA, “Dangers of the Paradigm Shift.”[4] D. Veisz, E. Z. Namouz, S. Joshi, and J. D. Summers, “Computer-aided design versus sketching: An exploratory case study,” Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf. AIEDAM, 2012.[5] M. Karima, K. Sadhal, and T. McNeil, “From paper drawings to computer-aided design,” IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., no. 2, pp. 27–39, 1985.[6] M. Katajamaki, “Knowledge-Based CAD,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 277–287, 1991.[7] A. K. Goel, S. Vattam, B
able to: • Identify when an operation is closed (or which sets are not closed under an operation). An operation (*) is closed if given two elements a,b, of that set, the result of operating them, a*b, belongs to the set. Through given examples of certain sets in 𝑅𝑅 2 or in 𝑅𝑅 3 , in which the sum or the product for a scalar is not closed, it is sought that the student discover, among other things, why the bounded sets cannot be subspaces, and why zero has to be an element of every subspace. • Identify linearly independent sets (in 𝑅𝑅 2 and 𝑅𝑅 3 ), that is, those non-zero unitary sets of vectors, or those with two vectors that belong to non-parallel
program are listed. Items (a) though (h) are more or less similarto Electronics Engineering Technology (EET) program and there is no need to cover them here.However, items (j) and (k) will be explained in detail. 2Courses in REET program include:(a)- COMMUNICATION SKILLS(b)- HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES©- MATHEMATICS AND NATURAL SCIENCES(d)- PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT(e)-TECH CORE COURSES(f)- AUTOMATION AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS(g)- INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMMING(h)- APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT(i)- TECHNOLOGY CAREER PREPARATION(j)- SENIOR PROJECT(k)-SPECIALIZED COURSESIn the following, specialized courses in REET program will be addressed.REET 100 Alternative Energy Technologies with LabThis
within a short time window after the exam. A rapid grading process also helps students prioritize sections on the B exam attempt.The detailed steps above are consistent with the SMART Assessment model, which partlyenables this streamlined method. This process can be adapted for many different courses.However, if you need to change a few things to apply this strategy to your courses, note thatwhat happens in one step often influences the best way to perform other steps. In other words,there is moderately strong coupling among the steps.In addition to the advantages already mentioned, the combination of the rubric and this gradingapproach: sets clear expectations for performance, removing the partial credit tug of war that often
2 1 1 and a Software Algorithm B 5 4 2 Designed a Website Designed Custom Hardware C 4 3 2 and a Software Algorithm Designed a Software Algorithm D 4 4 2 for Off-the-Shelf Hardware
Questions Procedural Questions (Exam 1 Week 1) (Exam 1 Week 1) A Female Conceptual (C) 100% 0% B Female Procedural/ 50% 100% Calculation (P) C Female All Clear (AC) 100% 100% D Male Conceptual (C) 100% 33% E Male Procedural/ 50% 100% Calculation (P) F Male All Clear (AC) 100% 33%Summary and ConclusionsIn
down.Figures 3 (a) and (b) are two hand-sketches of the “Smart Timer”. Figure 3 (a) is the first designhand-sketch which is a rectangular timer that has a sliding bar. The motor in this design comeson top and sweeps the bar left and right. After discussing the design features (rectangular blockand sliding bar), students realized that a circular frame with a clock hand will make their designeasier to implement. Figure 3 (b) shows the hand-sketched new design.A servo motor was used to set the clock hand’s position (1 or 2 minutes) and counted down whencommanded with Alexa. Both positioning and counting down codes were uploaded to theArduino UNO – the main control unit. Additionally, NodeMCU was used to wirelessly sendcommands from the smartphone to
on timeliness, effort and completeness for up to 60% credit. An additional 10% will be earned for accurate initial attempts. A problem missing any sections (see Appendix A), appropriate diagrams, or a good faith effort at the solution in the required homework format, even with a correct answer, may receive no credit. • Each solution attempt must follow the format, including a figure and an answer. • All problems in a homework set must be uploaded in a single PDF document. PDFs may be created using personal scanners, smartphone scanning apps or the document scanners at the library. • The first page must be a complete initial attempt coversheet (Appendix B).2. Self-Assessment: The student will self-assess their
Teaching, Manuscript in Review (2020).[8] H. A. Kobulnicky, D. A. Dale, “A Community Mentoring Model for STEM Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 45, iss. 6, pp. 17-23, 2016.[9] A. Min, J. Ashcorft, J. Monroy, V. Wolf, C. Lee, J. Horton, R. Ehrmann, B. Rodriguez, “Making it RAIN: Using Remotely Accessible Instruments in nanotechnology to Enhance High School Science Courses,” Frontiers in Education Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 74-87, 2019.[10] J. Ashcroft, W. Klingerman, B. Rodriguez, “Using Remotely Accessible Microscopy in the Elementary Classroom,” Frontiers in Education Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 137-148, 2018. [11] B. Rodriguez, V. Jaramillo, V. Wolf, E
: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1709093/citations#citations.[2] Sørensen, B. (2013). Fuel cells: Optimism gone – Hard work still there. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(18), 7578–7582. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.028[3] T. Tronstad, H. Høgmoen Åstrand, G. Petra Haugom and L. Langfeldt, STUDY ON THE USE OF FUEL CELLS IN SHIPPING. EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency, 2019.[4] Fuel Cell Applications for Marine Vessels, 1st ed. Ballard, 2019.[5] R. O'Hayre, Fuel Cell Fundamentals. (Third ed.) Wiley, 2016.[6] E. L. V. Eriksson and E. M. Gray, "Optimization and integration of hybrid renewable energy hydrogen fuel cell energy systems – A critical review," Appl. Energy, vol. 202, pp. 348-364, 2017.[7] Ahmad Baroutaji
anonymous or used a personal gmail address to sign in.Considering students who used the system at least once, a linear regression found a statisticallysignificant effect (p < 0.04, n=231) where minutes-viewed predicted the student’s course totalscore: Students who watched at least 2000 minutes (equivalent to 40 lectures, each 50 minutes)were predicted to increase their course total by 2.4 absolute points on a 100-point scale, i.e.approximately one letter grade improvement (e.g. B to B+). This linear regression is illustrated infig. 2 (upper line).ClassTranscribe was used in a supplemental manner, and many students were capable ofachieving high scores without it (for example, review the prevalence of high scores near theupper-left area of
taking the frustum off the container and pouring the water in the container into ameasuring cup. (a) (b) Figure 1. Ceramic pot filter with frustum shape set up for solid body rotation. Figure 2. Geometry for the frustum with solid body rotation.Solid Body Rotation Without FiltrationBased on the geometry shown in Figure 2, the volume of water inside the frustum withoutrotation can be expressed as V = πh0 (R02 + R0 R + R2 )/3 (1)where h0 (m) is the initial height of the water in the frustum, R0 (m) is the radius at the initialheight, and R = 0.0984 (m) is the radius at the bottom of the frustum. The
No.DUE 1525831).References[1] U. National Academy of Engineering, The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. National Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[2] G. Clough, "Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century," National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, 2005.[3] A. S. o. C. E. B. o. K. Committee, "Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century: Preparing the civil engineer for the future," 2008: ASCE.[4] O. S. Board, E. National Academies of Sciences, and Medicine, Environmental Engineering for the 21st Century: Addressing Grand Challenges. National Academies Press, 2019.[5] W. Oakes, "EWB-USA and EPICS: Academic Credit
Behavior, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 172- 180, 1978.[9] G. E. Smith, "The effectiveness of a career guidance class: An organizational comparison," Journal of College Student Personnel, vol. 22, pp. 120-124, 1981.[10] M. E. Ware, "Evaluating a career development course: A two-year study," Teaching of Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 67-71, 1981.[11] D. S. Carver and D. W. Smart, "The effects of a career and self-exploration course for undecided freshmen," Journal of College Student Personnel, vol. 26, pp. 37-43, 1985.[12] B. Folsom, The effect of a career development course on college student outcomes (Published doctoral dissertation)., Florida State University, USA., 2000.[13] B. F. French, The influence of a career exploration course on new
additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? a. How are pedagogical risk taking and other teaching related outcomes (e.g., self- efficacy in instruction) influenced by participation in an additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? b. How do additional outcomes (e.g., sense of belonging to academic community, job satisfaction, etc.) among individual instructors arise from participating in an additive innovation cycle focused on pedagogy? c. How are these outcomes associated with particular phases of the additive innovation cycle?Data SourcesA cohort of 15 non-tenure track instructors were engaged in a professional development programbased on
, B. M. Wallen, and J. A. Starke, “An Environmental Engineering Sequence: Deliberately Addressing and Evaluating Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge (presentation & 6-page paper),” presented at the 2017 Mid-Atlantic Section Fall Conference, 2017.[3] S. Dexter, E. Buchanan, K. Dins, K. R. Fleischmann, and K. Miller, “Characterizing the Need for Graduate Ethics Education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 153–158, doi: 10.1145/2445196.2445245.[4] A. R. Bielefeldt and N. E. Canney, “Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time,” Sci Eng Ethics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1535–1551, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s11948-015
and procedures for handling assessments.References [1] ABET | ABET accreditation. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/. [2] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020 | ABET, en-US. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/. [3] N. E. Adams, “Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives,” Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 152–153, Jul. 2015, issn: 1536-5050. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010. [4] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, 1st ed. Longman, 1956. [5] C. C. Bonwell and J. A. Eison, Active
analysis will only include data from three of the fourinstitutions being studied in the larger project.MeasuresThe two main outcome variables in the analyses presented here are (a) students’ reenrollment inthe subsequent semester, persistence and (b) cumulative Grade Point Average, GPA. Both ofthese measures are obtained from the institutional analysis office or enrollment managementoffice at each of the three participating institutions.The survey operationalizes the concepts of engineering identity, sense of belonging andcommitment to field by asking students how much they agree with a series of statements(developed and validated in previous research), which we then used to develop indices. Allvariables are calculated by taking the mean across
://www.myersbriggs.org/[5] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). (2001). Engineering Criteria2000 Third Edition: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States.Baltimore: ABET.[6] National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions ofengineering in the new century. Washington, D. C.: The National Academies Press.[7] National Research Council (NRC). (2006). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing andemploying America for a brighter economic future. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.[8] Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and practice. E-Content Generic Vendor. 1999.[9] Crumpton-Young, L., McCauley-Bush, P., Rabelo, L., Meza, K., Ferreras, A., Rodriguez, B.,and Kelarestani, M