responsibilities, if any, and their institutionalCarnegie profile3 are as follows:Professor and Associate DeanUndergraduate Instructional Program—Prof+A&S/HGC: Professions plus arts & sciences, highgraduate coexistence; Graduate Instructional Program—CompDoc/NMedVet: Comprehensivedoctoral (no medical/veterinary); and a Community Engagement—Outreach and PartnershipsCarnegie classification—category institution.ProfessorUndergraduate Instructional Program/Prof+A&S/HGC—Professions plus arts & sciences, highgraduate coexistence; Graduate Instructional Program—Doc/Prof: Doctoral, professionaldominant; and a Community Engagement—Curricular Engagement and Outreach andPartnerships Carnegie classification—category institution.ProfessorUndergraduate
Page 25.972.7References 1. Newmann, C., Lieberman, D., Engelberg, D., Flamholz A., Marchese, P., Tremberger, G., Cheung, T.,“LabVIEW Graphical Programming in an Introductory Engineering Physics Course”, ASEE Annual Conference 2006-394. 2. Hrynuk, J., Pennington, M., Illig, D., Dempsey, J., “Freshman Engineering: An Introductory Computer Course Teaching Matlab and Labview”, ASEE Annual Conference 2008-1408. 3. Akinwale, O., Kehinde, L., Ayodele, K., Jubril, A., Jonah, O., Ilori, S., Chen, X., “A LabVIEW-Based On- Line Robotic Arm for Students' Laboratory”, ASEE Annual Conference 2009-1179. 4. Lohani, V., Delgoshaei, P., Green, C.,” Integrating Labview And Real-Time Monitoring into Engineering
society.Results compared to the Arizona sampleAn independent samples t-test at a significance level of 0.05 was conducted to compare theINSPIRE sample to the Arizona sample previously reported in Yasar et al.’s paper 5. Therewas a significant difference in how the participants in the two studies rated the stereotypicalcharacteristics of engineers, t(165)= 3.58, p<0.01, d=0.70. The INSPIRE participants weremore likely to agree that typical engineers had people, writing and verbal skills. While theirresponses on the stereotypical characteristics of engineers showed significant differences,there were no significant differences in how the teachers in the two studies viewed theimportance and characteristics of engineering. In both studies, teachers’ rating
was a member of the research staff at M.I.T.'s Lincoln Laboratory. He then became a professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at M.I.T. In 1982, he joined Schlumberger Well Services where he worked on the application of 2-D spectral estimation to the processing of dispersive sonic waves, and the implementation of signal processing algorithms for dedicated high-speed array processors. He has been at Georgia Tech since 1987. Prof. McClellan is a Fellow of the IEEE and he received the ASSP Technical Achievement Award in 1987, and then the Signal Processing Society Award in 1996. Prof. McClellan is active in curriculum development for undergraduate education
butfundamentally to look for new more appropriate and captivating contents to present to the newplugged students. Besides all of the technical and pedagogic aspects it is necessary to think aboutthe psychological aspects of this great and passionate process of teaching. For the good or for theevil, there it is this new socioeconomic and political world of contrasts in which only theeducation can really change for better [05].Speaking about education for best, the professionals who leave the universities today leavealready with a stock of knowledge that is partly obsolete and s/he has to run fast to adapt to thenew job market. Is this the fault of the University? The answer is no, the University has beenserving the society for centuries and without
prototyping purposes. To ensure the structuralintegrity of the model as a whole, given the large weight of the ductwork, it was determined thatthe chimney would be supported with a wooden sub-frame. To support the chimney from lateralloads, guide wires were also used. Calculations were established to find the size of cablingneeded to support the structure based on estimated weight and average wind. Safetyconsiderations were double checked with the campus Safety Office prior to and duringconstruction.Turbine Design:The only moving parts of the Solar Chimney are the turbine assembly and power generationunit. In the prototype chimney an average air velocity of approximately 2 m/s was created in thechimney. The low wind velocity complicated the turbine
. S Magnet dropped from this position ∆t N Magnet position at S voltage maximum N To digital R oscilloscope ∆y S Magnet position at N voltage minimum 10ms/div Figure 4. Shaker flashlight generator test setup and resulting waveformThe students studied the voltage waveform and, with a little help, concluded that the peak andvalley must occur when the magnet is at specific locations within the coil. If these locationscould be
A Gallery of CAD Generated Imagery: Pedagogical Reflections Michael P. Hennessey, Peter S. Rhode, and Allen C. Jaedike School of Engineering, University of St. Thomas 101 O’Shaughnessy Science Hall, 2115 Summit Avenue St. Paul, Minnesota 55105-1079 Email: mphennessey@stthomas.edu Abstract A gallery of imagery generated from many of the recent CAD (computer-aided-design, or graphics) projectsundertaken by St. Thomas undergraduates in mechanical engineering courses (Engineering Graphics in particular)are
1 Agricultural Engineering Education in Developing Countries S. Fernando, S. Bhushan and M. Naveen AbstractAgricultural Engineering or Biological (Systems) Engineering is still considered a fairly newprofession not only in developing countries but also in many of the developed countries. Althoughcivil, mechanical, chemical, electrical and industrial engineering are well established asengineering subdivisions, Agricultural and Biological Engineering is still not considered as adirect engineering discipline in many of the 162 developing countries in Asia
). Technology and design. Bangor,Northern Ireland, DoENI.11. Stein, S.J., McRobbie, C. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities forlearning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education,18, 35-49.12. Baker, D., Krause, S., Robinson-Kurpius, S., Roberts, C. & Yasar, S. (2004). BridgingEducation and Engineering: The role of design engineering technology in science education.Paper set presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in ScienceTeaching, Vancouver, Canada.13. Bussey, J., Dormondy, T. & Van Leewen, D. (2000). Some factors predicting the adoption oftechnology education in New Mexico Schools. Journal of Technology Education, 12, 4-17.14. Wright, T
Session 1150 Teaching Engineering Fundamentals with a Project-Based Learning Approach B. S. Sridhara Middle Tennessee State UniversityAbstract Recruiting and retaining students in the Engineering Technology area has been a majorchallenge to many of us in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies (ETIS)Department at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU). In the Fall of 2004 the authoroffered ET 1840 – Engineering Fundamentals and teaching this class was a lot of fun. Topicssuch as total quality, engineering design
were willing to continue applying concept mapping approach into other subjects even though the beginning works were sort of hard for them. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The work reported here was supported by grants from NSC-95-2516-S-276-008-MY3, the National Science Council in the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the principle investigator was Dr. Kuo-Hung Tseng. The authors also greatly appreciate the kind assistance of Dr. Page 14.1091.6 Wang-Long Li, Wen-Ping, Vicky and all those who made this paper possible
is a relatively new approach inAmerican universities, generally observed since the late 1980’s, though in other parts of theworld such as Europe, the first engineering degree has always required a minimum of five yearsof study and been considered equivalent to the MS degree.These BS/MS programs vary in their details at different academic institutions. For the most part,they offer the qualified student: 1) the possibility to earn their BS and MS degrees in less time than it would take to pursue both degrees separately, and 2) the opportunity to deepen and diversify their technical and professional skills, which will help make them more competitive and marketable in the global marketplace.As BS/MS programs grew more popular
second annual Biomimicry Symposium, Biomimicry Institute / San Diego Zoo, Oct 1 - 2.8. Eggermont, M., Khurshid,M., Lockwood, S., Caswell, D. " A First Year Engineering Affordable Housing Design Project", submitted to Canadian Journal of Urban Research9. Eggermont, M,. & Lockwood, S. (2009) “ Communicating Design: 750 First Year Engineering Students,A Writer-in-Residence and An Artist-in-Residence” Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 3:4, p1833-1874.10. Welliver, D., Khurshid,M., Eggermont, M. "Affordable Housing Design: A hands-on workshop for change-makers" Engage Youth, Oct 1, 2009, workshop.11. Eggermont, M., Zegarac, D. (U of C), Yen J., Helms, M. (Georgia Tech), Gould, C., Wong, C., Hastrich, C., Hinds
Authentic, Student-Centered Engineering Project on Student Motivation. 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2000.6. Rosentrater, K.A. Integrating Ethics, Design, and Service Learning in the Engineering Classroom, Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE IL/IN Sectional Conference, Peoria , Illinois, 2004.7. Madler, L., Genesis of an undergraduate research experience, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998.8. Gunn, Alastair S. and P. Aarne Vesilind. Hold Paramount: The Engineer's Responsibility to Society. Pacific Grove, CA : Thomson-Brooks/Cole, 2003. Page 15.1379.109. Betz, N.E. (1992). The
cases, and these provide theoretical and practical background in conducting experiments.References1. I. M. Abdel-Qader, B. J. Bazuin, Real-Time Digital Signal Processing in the Undergraduate Curriculum, IEEETransactions on Education, vol.46, no.1, February, 20032. D. Jacoby and R. Saint-Nom, Nice experiences teaching SP in Argentina, Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,IEEE International Conference on acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2689-2692 vol.5, 20013. J. P. Frantz, H. Choi, R. Baraniuk, DSP Education at Rice University,4. S. Gallardo, F. Barrero, S. L. Toral, M. J. Durán, eDSPlab: A remote-accessed instrumentation laboratory for digitalsignal processors training based on the Internet, IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2006
meta-analysis to test a causal model. Communication Education, 55(1), 21-31.2. Cleveland-Innes, M. F. & Emes, C. (2005). Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal, 42(2), 241-262.3. Cotten, S. R. & Wilson, B. (2006). Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education, 51, 487-519.4. Etten, S. V., Pressley, M, McInerney, D. M., & Liem, A. D. (2008). College seniors’ theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812-828.5. Furlich, S. A. & Dwyer, J. F. (2007). Student motivation and instructor immediacy in community college mathematics classes. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 55-70.6. Halawah, I
Session 1793 Work in Progress: Development, Implementation and Evaluation of a Learning Object for Teaching Control Systems Malgorzata S. Zywno and M. F. (Frankie) Stewart Ryerson UniversityAbstractThis paper reports on a work in progress in developing an interactive Control Systems learningobject. The objective of the work is to enhance active learning and visualization, and to providestudents with improved formative feedback and review of the learned concepts despitechallenges of increased class sizes. The module is developed within a framework of the Co-operative
(Cartesian form) (12) Page 9.957.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education S 1 = S1 e j θ (polar form) (13) where: j = − 1 * and e is the transcendental number 2.71828…10The scalar magnitude (S1) of the (polar form) complex power is known as the apparent power11and is:† S1 = S1 = P1 + jQ1 = VrmsIrms (14
. Student Group 1 Week 2 Ot h er 13 .3 3 % More h an d s on act iv it ies 40.00% Ch an g e Not h in g 46.67 % Figure 1 – Student Feedback from Week 2Based upon the feedback results, it was decided that the course material should berevised. The complex math was replaced with a history of the development of RPtechnologies and an overview of modern rapid prototyping technologies. The lectureportion of the workshop was streamlined and shortened to make room for moreactivities. In the third week, the teachers were given the opportunity
Session 2468 Use of Simplified FEA to Enhance Visualization in Mechanics Paul S. Steif, Edward Gallagher Carnegie Mellon UniversityIntroduction and BackgroundMany recommendations have arisen from national reports1,2 which noted the increasingneed to improve undergraduate education in engineering. A central suggestion is that“Institutions of higher education should provide diverse opportunities for allundergraduates to study science, mathematics, engineering, and technology as practicedby scientists and engineers, and as early in their academic careers as possible”3. This isalso recognized
Women in a social and behavioral sciencecourse, taught by an engineering technology instructor, is one such small step.Bibliography1 AWSEM Gender Equity. (1997). Facts in Brief, 2 Mervis, J. (2000). Diversity: Easier said than done. Science, 289 (5478), 378-79.3 U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Statistical Abstract of the United States, Washington: Author.4 Kozen, D. & Zweben, S. (March 1998). 1996-97 CRA Taulbee Survey: Undergrad Enrollments Keep Booming, Grad Enrollments Holding their Own, 5 Workman, J. K. (2001). Development of a K-12 Summer Program to Promote Women in Engineering and Technology. Conference Proceedings. Washington DC: American Society for Engineering Education.6 Jacobs, J. A. (1999). The Sex
Session 1654 Lessons Learned and Best Practices in Multidisciplinary Teamwork and Teaching of a Small Product Realization Course Robert S. Weissbach, Jana G. Goodrich, Ralph M. Ford Penn State Erie, The Behrend CollegeIntroductionThe Small Product Realization course has been offered for two semesters (Spring 2003 & Fall2003) at Penn State Erie, The Behrend College. The course is 3 credits, meeting for 50 minutes3 times a week. In addition to the scheduled class periods, the students spend one weekend at thebeginning of the semester attending a seminar at an off-campus location. This weekend
Engineering Education, Vol. 11, pp. 75-82, 2003.4. Ngo, C. C. and Lai, F. C., “Web-Based Thermodynamics Tables Wizard,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 10, pp. 137-143, 2002.5. Young, D. F., Munson, B. E., and Okiishi, T. H., A Brief Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001.6. Homsy, G. M., Aref, H., Breuer, K. S., Hochgreb, S., Koseff, J. R., Munson, B. R., Powell, K. G., Robertson, C. R., and Thoroddsen, S. T., Multi-Media Fluid Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 2000.7. Liggett, J. A. and Caughey, D. A., Fluid Mechanics: An Interactive Text, American Society of Civil Engineers Press, 1998.8. Perlin, M., Schultz, W. W., Smith, M. K., and Foss, J. F
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationlike an “S”. They then examine the area in the middle of the “S” with a magnifying glass. Thenew employee then repeats this exercise with a smaller-sized metal paper clip and records theobservations and differences between the two sizes. What is demonstrated here is elasticdeformation – a type of deformation in which the object returns to its original shape after theforces have been removed. This type of deformation is unique in the realm of mechanicalbehavior because all materials undergo elastic deformation. The new employee is also asked inthe new-hire document to address the following specific questions related to elastic deformationin their memorandum to
, American Society for Engineering Education”The data were first used to monitor daily assessment. SPC control charts were created andmonitored to determine if classroom instruction was “in-control”. The quality characteristicspreviously selected were monitored daily. An X-bar/S chart was created based on the samplesize and type of data. A control chart was created for each of the questions and monitored forany “out of control” points on the chart based on the Western Electric rules. A sample X-bar/Schart for question Q2.3 is displayed in Figure 5. Xbar-S Chart of Q2.3 9
, which he showed his Introduction to Engineering Fundamentals class. Thestudents, excited about simulating what the original NASA moonbuggy teamaccomplished in the 1960’s (and eager to do something outside of the everyday classlecture), agreed with their professor that this would be a great opportunity.Project responsibilitiesThe creation of a moonbuggy is a multi-dimensional task that allows the students tocomplete the cost analysis, design the product, fabricate almost everything from withinthe laboratory, and communicate with industry for advice. In MTSU’s case, if a specificpart cannot be created within the laboratory, the student may contact a particular industryto do it at their facility1. Although the students are responsible for more
. Page 24.437.7Bibliography1. Micceri T, Wajeeh E. The Influence of Geographical Location and Application to Multiple Institutions on Recruitment. BPA-IR technical report, USF, Tampa, FL. Available on the WWW (http://isis. fastmail. usf. edu/surveys/Studies/). 1998.2. Price IF, Matzdorf F, Smith L, Agahi H. The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities. 2003;21(10):212-222.3. Rocca SJ, Washburn SG. Factors influencing college choice on high school and transfer matriculants into a college of agriculture. NACTA Journal. 2005;49(1):32-38.4. Briggs S. An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher
and other STEM majors. The research questions were: 1) Do teachers believe that they can influence their students’ choices of undergraduate major? 2) If teachers believe they can have such influence over their students what is/are the mechanism(s) of this influence? 3) To what extent do high school seniors intending to study engineering in college report that teachers’ instruction or advising influenced their choice of major?Method This research comprised two sample populations: 1) in-service teachers participating insummer professional development programs (including RET), and 2) high school seniors fromaround the country who planned on attending college within a year of graduation. During
support of thisproject (Award ID 1138235).References1. Mukhopadhyay, S.M. Nanoscale Multi-functional Materials: Science & Applications, Wiley, 2011.2. Roco, M.C. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13, 427-445.3. Kim, J. Y.; Voznyy, O.; Zhitomirsky, D.; and Sargent,E.H. 25th Anniversary Article: Colloidal Quantum Dot Materials and Devices: A Quarter-Century of Advances, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4986–50104. Gao, X.; Cui, Y.; Levenson, R.M.; Chung, L.W.K.; Nie, S. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots, Nature Biotechnology. 2004, 22(8), 969-9765. Jones, A.; Verlinden, N.; Quimby, R. Optical properties of quantum dots: An undergraduate Physics Laboratory, http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042607