machine. bicycle) to explore function and design. 3 Service Projects Service-learning projects are working with not-for-profit organizations in the local community to solve problems or help young people. 4 Design Projects These projects feature individual or team design projects as a significant part of the class. Students are required to design new approaches to problems. 5 Build Projects These projects feature individual or team build projects as a significant part of the class. Students are required to build something new (e.g. bridge, robot
authors developed an exploratory pilot interview focusing on students’identification and recognition of the application of course concepts into their senior designprojects. The pilot interview was qualitative, semi-structured, and open-ended in nature.2,3 Theinterview protocol is listed in table 4.In order to explore students’ ability to recognize and identify mechatronics, instrumentation, andexperimental design concepts without biasing their answers at the initiation of the interview, theprotocol followed a specified format. The first stage of the interview allowed the students toexplain their senior design project (i.e. their roles, problems faced, and stage in design). Thesecond stage of the interview engaged students in talk about concepts
Uncertainty, Project Management, Public Policy, Business Concepts, andSustainability. These new outcomes reiterate a number of identical skills proposed at The Summiton the Future of Civil Engineering and subsequently published by the American Society of CivilEngineers (ASCE) in 2007 2. The outcomes and skills go hand in hand with the vision for thefuture of professional licensure and the associated educational requirements. Led again by theASCE, ongoing public debate resulted in the issuance of Policy Statement 465 on October 5,2014 supporting the concept that an MS or its equivalent is required to practice civil engineeringat the professional level 3. This position has since been publicly supported by the NationalCouncil of Examiners in Engineering
the unique and complexchallenges that women face at home, at work, and in the classroom—both in general and in thecontext of traditionally male-dominated STEM disciplines. While this paper offers an overviewof the design and evaluation of this project, the primary focus is on the findings from our largelyqualitative dataset and their implications for facilitating supportive communities for graduatewomen in STEM. A separate paper3 is available for readers who are interested in lessons learnedfrom the design and implementation of this project, including sample assessment instruments andlogistical information to assist in replicating or adapting this project for other audiences.Background and MotivationThis project was developed in the context
research. Results also suggested that these Page 26.171.2improvements tended to be less significant when students’ interest in research or their projectwas lower and when faculty mentors did not modify projects to accommodate the skill level ofan undergraduate researcher.63,65To temper these claims, however, though undergraduate research appears to provide excellentgrowth in many cognitive abilities, it does not necessarily correspond directly with developmentof higher-order thinking skills.62 The adequate to significant gains in specific content knowledgereported do not always appear to accompany comparable gains in conceptual understanding
Paper ID #11199Evaluating the Pre-Professional Engineer: Exploring the Peer Review Pro-cessJoy M. Adams, University of Michigan Joy Adams is the Program Manager for the Multidisciplinary Design Program at the University of Michi- gan. In this role, she focuses on Corporate Sponsored Projects, Communications and Student Performance Appraisals. She has seven years of diverse professional Human Resources experience, including prior roles in Training & Development, Campus Recruiting and Talent Management/Leadership Development at various Fortune 500 firms.Mical D. DeGraaff, University of Michigan Mical DeGraaff is a
a specialty in building design and construction with over 10 years of industry experience on private and public projects and 2 years of teaching experience at the university level. Page 26.1019.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Intra (Sub)-Disciplinary Integration in Civil Engineering Education: An Approach to Integrate the Various Civil Engineering Sub-Disciplines with the Use of a Design Studio LabAbstractTypically, Civil Engineering education
teach and refine oral communicationskills of English language learners (ELL) at Skoltech, a Russian university. The objectivewas to develop disciplinary communication skills in English so that students could presenttheir engineering designs during a rapid prototyping project. A pre/post survey assessedchanges in self-efficacy as a measure of success in the instruction about, practice andperformance of oral presentations. The post-test survey showed a statistically significantincrease in self-efficacy for a majority of the students. Survey data combined with facultyobservation indicates that the communication pedagogy combined with practice waseffective in increasing self-efficacy and in facilitating and refining oral communication skillsfor the
project guided byfunding opportunity announcements (FOAs) from federal agencies such as the National Institutesof Health (NIH) and/or the National Science Foundation (NSF) that possess a cardiovascularinfluence [13]. Students then pitch their project ideas to classmates and form multidisciplinarycollaborative teams that work together to find unique and innovative solutions to their chosenproblem. Not only are students able to enhance their problem-solving skills, they also developprofessional skills such as research, communication, team collaboration, and projectmanagement. ABET, an accreditation agency for engineering programs, lists the attainment ofthese skills under Criterion 3 for desired student outcomes which prepare graduates to
learning and online instruction, requires instructors to use a wide variety ofeducational techniques. Such methods include the use of both non-technology andtechnology-based activities, including group problem-solving, educational games, and virtualreality (VR). Research on educational games has increased steadily over the past two decades,and numerous studies have illustrated their benefits with respect to student learning [1]–[4]. Forexample, Squire and Barab found that simulation games helped students increase theirknowledge of history, politics, and geography [5]. Castronovo et al. found that educationalgames can support students to develop the metacognitive skills necessary to manage civilengineering projects [6]. One particular
interdisciplinary core of the first-year program introduces students to topics spanning thearts, humanities, engineering, and the social, natural, and computational sciences. The initialengineering focused course, Creating & Making, is focused on practicing skills in ideation,project scoping, project management, reporting, communicating, and other aspects of designmethodology. The course content is community driven and while nucleated with concreteexamples of course material from the instructors, allows the student body to explore and reflectupon the benefits and drawbacks of the provided examples and to organically investigatealternative approaches through their practice. In this approach, rather than outlining a discretesubset of material, the
project management; and 12) Life-long learning,where every one of them can be measured as introduced (I), developed (D), or applied (A) [6].The school of engineering currently requires the instructor of every course to map the courseoutline learning outcomes to the graduate attributes. This can be a one-to-one or many-to-one,but not many-to-many relationship. Also, every learning outcome is ideally evaluated in two ormore assessment items (e.g., quiz or exam questions, laboratory assignments) or other learningand teaching activities. Basically, evaluating students’ performance for a specific learningoutcome is used for measuring their achievement level for the corresponding graduate attribute.If, for a particular graduate attribute, a certain
Associate Engineering Research Center, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 1983-84. • Graduate Research Assistant, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 1978-84. • Hydraulics and Irrigation Designer and Researcher, Ministry of Irrigation, Cairo, Egypt, 1966-1977. (iii) Publications (related to the CASA project) 1. El-Hakim, O. “Colorado Alliance for Minority Participation”, presented at 2005 Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society of Engineering & Education (ASEE), Portland, OR Convention Center, June 12-15, 2005. 2. El-Hakim, O., et. al, “Challenge of Multi-Disciplinary K-12 Summer Content Institute”, presented at 2005 Annual
ofsoftware via video was also very difficult due to the low resolution. With the advent of enablingsoftware, delivery of this type of material via the internet became possible. At first, computersand computer projection equipment at the remote sites were used as a sort of electronicblackboard. Later, delivery was directly to individual desktops.In the Fall of 1999, a third site was established at Ingalls Shipbuilding in Pascagoula, MS (now, Page 12.554.3Northrop Grumman Ship Systems’ Ingalls Operations). At this point, the success of the programhad led to a taxing administrative load. The University did not yet have support services in placefor
evidence suggests that ethnic minorities and womenwork best when the material is organized so that students work in teams and have a high levelof hands-on experimentation and problem-solving. We developed our materials to maximizethese aspects since in our institution the “minority” constitutes the majority of our student body.This project created online lecture and laboratory materials for Tech 167—Control Systems, anupper division electronics course using Multisim and LabVIEW.The laboratory content of the course Tech 167 “Control Systems” has been revised. As a result,ten lab experiments were completed and pilot tested using Multisim, a computer simulationprogram. If the observations of the students who have tested these lab experiments in fall
experience.After assigned to a team, each student then evaluates his or her preferred communication style.The students then investigate how their teammates' styles differ from their own. The studentsalso learn techniques for tailoring their own communication style to fit the needs of others. Theprimary objective of the exercises is to enhance communication among teammates who arepreparing to complete a group design project over a six-month period. The paper brieflydescribes how the authors incorporated the communication styles exercises into the course. Anoutcome for the civil engineering program requires that our graduates demonstrate an ability tofunction on a multidisciplinary civil engineering team. Under this outcome, the program definesa performance
environment should develop student understanding of theseperspectives and bring these ideas back to the U.S. work environment. The U.S. economy isbased on innovation and new technologies both of which have felt the effects ofglobalization. A recent report indicates that the U.S. must commit to embracing the globaleconomy and train its workforce to be competitive in the global marketplace.[5] Manyengineering programs are including global components in their curriculum to face thischallenge. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) report Infusing Real WorldExperiences into Engineering Education [6] includes in its best practices multidisciplinaryteam-based projects, cultural awareness, and problem-solving.The importance of global education is
SESSION # 1526 DELOS Functional Modules for Teaching Mechatronics to non-EE Engineering Students Victor Giurgiutiu and Brian Mouzon Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, victorg@sc.eduABSTRACTThe Department of Mechanical Engineering of the University of South Carolina has embarkedupon a project to enhance the Mechatronics education of non-EE engineering students. NSFfunds the project with cost-share by the Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Collegeof Engineering and Information Technology. An essential
in project-based courses.Dr. Merredith D Portsmore, Tufts University Dr. Merredith Portsmore is the Associate Director for Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach (www.ceeo.tufts.edu). Merredith received all four of her degrees from Tufts (B.A. English, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, M.A. Education, PhD in Engineering Education). Her research interests focus on how children engage in designing and constructing solutions to engineering design problems and eval- uating students’ design artifacts. Her outreach work focuses on creating resources for K-12 educators to support engineering education in the classroom. She is also the founder of STOMP (stompnetwork.org), and LEGOengineering.com
Technology and Guest Professor at UTM University Technology Malaysia 2011-2013. President of SEFI 2009–2011 (European Society for Engineering Education). Founding Chair of the SEFI-working group on Engineering Education Research. During the last 20 years, Dr. Kolmos has re- searched the following areas, primarily within Engineering Education: development and evaluation of project based and problem based curriculum, change from traditional to project organized and problem based curriculum, development of transferable skills in PBL and project work, and methods for staff development. She is Associate Editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education and was Asso- ciated Editor for Journal of Engineering Education
Associate Technical Fellow currently assigned to support technology and inno- vation research at The Boeing Company. Michael is responsible for leading a team conducting engineer- ing education research projects that focus on improving the learning experience for students, incumbent engineers and technicians. His research encompasses, Sociotechnical Systems, Learning Curves, and Engineering Education Research. Additional responsibilities include providing business leadership for engineering technical and professional educational programs. This includes development of engineering programs (Certificates and Masters) in advanced aircraft construction, composites structures and prod- uct lifecycle management and digital
Paper ID #8570An Integrated Approach to Developing Technical Communication Skills inEngineering StudentsProf. Ronald S Harichandran, University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is the Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering at the University of New Haven. He leads the Project to Integrate Technical Communication Habits and implemented a similar program in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Michigan State University when he was the chair there. Dr. Harichandran received his BE in Civil Engineering from the University of Canterbury, New Zealand, and his MS and PhD from MIT. He was a faculty member
is given equal consideration with the issues of how our society haschanged as a result of the introduction of this form of communication.After these short exercises, the major project is undertaken, typically involving the design ofprototypes for a real community project. An example from one semester was the design ofstructures to aid farmers in the display and marketing of their products at the local farmers’market. The purpose of this project was to develop an expandable, collapsible, portable systemof display, shelter, attachment, layout, etc. that could display, carry, or protect the farmer’sproduce, fliers, etc. and could be secured to the site (walls, ground, cars, bodies, etc.). Here,through exercises in observation, students studied
technological advances to achieve nationalobjectives. Analyses have shown that there may be a significant shortage in the entry-level science and engineering labor pool, and that scientific and technical fields could besignificantly affected. Demographic data show a future with proportionately fewer youngpeople and a work force comprised of growing numbers of minorities and theeconomically disadvantaged. These groups, which the economy must increasingly rely,have been historically underrepresented in science, engineering and related fields. Theadded dimension of a projected shortage of qualified science and mathematics instructorsat the pre-college and undergraduate levels could have serious consequences for thenation’s scientific and technological
Session 2238 Assessing Student Outcomes in an Engineering Design and Graphics Course Ronald E. Barr, Thomas J. Krueger, and Theodore A. Aanstoos Mechanical Engineering Department The University of Texas at AustinAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Texas at Austin has embarked onsystemic educational reform throughout the curriculum. Called PROCEED, for Project-CenteredEducation, this curriculum reform is an attempt to bring real-world projects into the classroomthat underscore the need to learn
Session _______ Computer Vision Research Teaching Modules for Community College Computer Science and Engineering Courses Dwight Egbert, George Bebis, and Dave Williams University of Nevada, Reno and Western Nevada Community CollegeAbstractThis paper describes computer vision teaching modules we have developed for use in severalcourses at the University of Nevada as part of a Combined Research and CurriculumDevelopment (CRCD) project, sponsored by NSF. Modules developed to date includeprogramming projects for CS1 and/or CS2 courses, an image compression module for anintroductory logic course, a digital
District of Columbia, Department of HumanServices. The pre-institute workshop was a direct result of feedback received from teachers whohad asked for more intensive instruction with computers. Resources for the workshop can befound at http://www.american.edu/IRVINE/ike. A follow-up to the institute was held onOctober 20, 2001. One goal of the follow-up was to provide participating teachers with anopportunity to frame a strategy for implementation of what they learned at the institute into theirown classes. A second goal was to assist teachers in the preparation of a framework fordissemination of information within their individual schools. In addition to the institute's leaders, project resource faculty were available throughout thecourse of
areawhere improvement could be made in college level education is to develop courses andtexts for students in the fields of environmental studies, business, law, economics, etc.2b. SchoolsIt is very important to teach K-12 students about the intimate relationship between solarenergy use and clean environment, because these children will eventually set the policiesthat will affect solar energy use. In order to educate school children, it is necessary toeducate and train the teachers and to develop appropriate educational materials. A largeamount of educational materials have been developed for school children in different partsof the world. These include lecture notes, experiments, project ideas, design competitions,etc. These materials are
, Civil Engineering,Chemical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Ethno-Botany. From 2009 until the onset ofthe covid-19 pandemic, a total of sixty-one US students participated in the Colombia basedprograms, with twenty in Cali at Uni Del Valle and forty-one in Cartagena at Uni Cartagena andUniversity of San Buenaventura Cartagena. The paper will cover the inception and developmentof both project sites, the different approaches to Global Engagement, the best practices,outcomes, program duplication, career outcomes of participants, and post covid-19 opportunities.Introduction - U.S. Students Studying AbroadThe integration of a Study Abroad/International Research internship at the undergraduate andgraduate level is increasingly being seen as a
, leading to loss of manufacturing competencies; or(3) a generational shift in incoming students’ prior experiences such that a familiarity withhands-on construction and basic tools cannot be assumed [2, 3]. As a result, mechanicalengineering undergraduate programs provide inadequate opportunities for students to develop themachining competencies that they may need in industry [4-6].The engineering education literature contains a variety of machining exercises for mechanicalengineering students. The MIT Stirling Engine Project [2], developed over 20 years ago andadapted by others [7], was designed to provide middle years students with experience in manualmill, lathe, and CNC mill operations, as well as stock hardware, fits, and tolerances