AC 2011-1348: GLOBAL INTERESTS AND EXPERIENCE AMONG FIRST-YEAR CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTSAngela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt, PhD, PE, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Environmental, & Ar- chitectural Engineering at the University of Colorado - Boulder (CU). She is affiliated with the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Communities at CU. She has taught the first-year Introduction to Civil Engineering course 13 times, starting in 1997. She also teaches a senior capstone Environmental En- gineering Design course, which included international water and sanitation projects in 2001, 2002, 2006, and 2010. Her research interests include ceramic water
are well established but for a commodity like energy, widespreadadoption depends on delivering lower costs and matching loads both in time and location.These are extremely difficult performance goals for but the rewards for success are highwith a global market waiting eagerly.The rationale for making space to cover the path to technology maturity in an alreadyovercrowded curriculum is that it defines many future engineering jobs. The solar cells,batteries and fuel cells can be manufactured today but can they beat the internationalcompetition to deliver the tough commodity performance metrics? High-level roadmapsfor alternative energies have been formulated 1 but the goals remain stubbornly distant 2.That emphasizes the need to recruit and
thesummer camp.BackgroundThe Imperative of Early STEM EngagementThe landscape of modern education increasingly emphasizes STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics), reflecting its integral role in fostering innovation and addressingcontemporary challenges. However, a persistent issue within the engineering discipline is theinsufficient number of students, particularly from underrepresented groups, who express interestin pursuing engineering as both a college major and a career path [3]. This under-enrollmentphenomenon underscores the necessity of cultivating STEM interest at an early stage,particularly during K-12 education.Research underscores the pivotal role of middle school as a critical juncture where students'interests
of the46 following four areas: academic and career advising, high school preparation, engineering structure and47 curriculum, and faculty relations[9]. This paper focuses on faculty relations because, historically, 148 universities have relegated retention issues to staff and advisors. The importance of faculty influence on49 student retention is an under-researched and under-explored area. Specifically, faculty relations can be50 shaped through specific teaching practices instructors can use to increase student retention. Research51 supports the claim that student-professor relationships are vital in promoting the success of engineering52 students [10], [11]. One
disengagement from the instructorand course material. To increase student engagement and provide an enriched learningenvironment that combines practical experiences with theoretical knowledge, an alternativeapproach to a flipped classroom was explored. With a senior and graduate mix of 28 students,roles in the Flight Vehicle Performance (FVP) course were partially flipped, as students wereasked to take ownership of their learning through two main efforts. First, integration of theMerlin Flight Simulator early in the course built off of previous use to provide a practicalexposure to the course material, even before it was presented in class. Second, the students wererequired to prepare lectures that cumulatively covered around 25% of the core course
Paper ID #20874A competency-based flipped classroom for a first year hands-on engineeringdesign courseShankar Ramakrishnan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Shankar Ramakrishnan received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Arizona State University. He is part of the engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Currently he designs the curriculum for the freshman engineering program. He also designs and teaches engineering design courses in the first and sophomore years. His interests include active teaching methods and pedagogies for increased student
Paper ID #41385Work-In-Progress: Holistic, Multi-disciplinary Systems Approach to TeachingSustainable and Contextual Engineering Concepts for Undergraduate StudentsDr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern University Dr. Courtney Pfluger is an Associate Teaching Professor at Northeastern University. In 2011, began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program where she redesigned the curriculum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course with inclusion pedagogy practices
. • Start in the early fall so it is easier for teachers to integrate new plans into their curriculum. Many schools begin in August, so planning could be done at the end of previous year and/or summer • Clarify the process for accessing funds, encourage timely planning for funds, share sources for discounted equipment/supplies, and share ideas for how to use the funds (field trips, supplies, and demonstrations were most common this year) • Add a tutorial component to help students with school workAdditional areas for improvement were derived from volunteers’ comments: • Help teachers realize that part of their obligation in the program is to help the volunteers learn or hone their teaching skills; some
independently in the following semester to complete therequirements of CIVE5500. As reported by the student, the team experience and only graduatingone semester beyond the student’s original graduation date proved to be very valuable for thestudent. This paper presents the methodology of how an off-track student can be integrated intoan existing capstone design group to provide the student with an intradisciplinary team designexperience.IntroductionThe Capstone Design experience in the Department of Civil Engineering at Wentworth Instituteof Technology in Boston, Massachusetts is a two-course sequence – CIVE4000 and CIVE5500.In the spring semester students are required to take CIVE4000 which is a 4-credit course with 1hour of lecture and six hours of
complements the culture of a particular university and program, will bethe strongest determinant of success. However, an audit of higher education engineeringcurricula conducted by the Sustainable Development Education convened by the UK Departmentof the Environment, Transport, and Regions in 1998, concluded that sustainable developmenteducation “is best integrated into the context of the specialism, and that different learningactivities and learning materials will be needed to deliver the sustainability learning agenda tostudents from the different branches of engineering” (cited in Perdan et al. 2000: 269).Complementing this perspective, in the late 1990s, the Chemical Engineering Department at theUniversity of Surrey in the UK embarked on an
thetopics of eleven of these periods. Specific learning outcomes are identified and an in-depthreview of one flex-period exercise is provided. Student feedback from two years of studentsurveys is presented. Administrative considerations such as faculty time requirements andcourse section sizes are also discussed.IntroductionThe Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at Villanova University beganoffering its required mechanics sequence in a new integrated format to sophomores beginningwith the Fall 2009 semester. As shown in Table 1, the classical sequence of coursework insubjects of Statics, Dynamics, Mechanics of Solids, Fluid Mechanics, and Civil EngineeringMaterials was replaced with a series of three four credit courses. An
around them; andthen later move to solving advanced models that describe how the world works. Based on recentadvances in microcontroller hardware, associated programming environments and manyexamples of integrating programming with hardware in the loop for upper classman engineering,the authors propose to alter the context in which programming is taught to engineering studentsat TTU. The course has been implemented as an initial programming experience based on ahardware-in-the-loop model, retaining the C or Matlab programming standard but using as aprogramming target a micro-controller (a computer designed to interface with the outside world)to interface to simple physical systems. This is intended to result in a programming experiencethat will
students see an engineering career as a viable option. Best practicessuggest that more effective efforts should be designed to (1) maintain and expand situationalinterest, and (2) integrate with individual and community values. Challenges to broadening participation in engineering are further complicated as researchindicates that factors such as outcome expectations are more important than interest alone in thecareer choices of underrepresented groups [3-6]. In particular, for Appalachian youth, pastresearch from members of our team showed that a desire for consistent local employment andaligning one’s future in accordance with family values and pressures were important factors incareer choice. [7-9]. Thus, for our target population which
time frames between ninety minutes5, 10-12 and one day1, 13.Regardless of the time frame, all authors cited here employ repetition as a tool to highlight thedifference between non-Lean production and Lean production. The shorter time frames allowfor just two or three rounds to be used as a basis of comparison. For example, the exercisedescribed by Billington6 uses three rounds (push, pull with lot size = 3, pull with single-pieceflow) to demonstrate to students how Lean can reduce work-in-process (WIP). An advantage formultiple sessions, though, is that it provides the students with time to reflect on the events of aprevious exercise and plan for the next. The added time permits a less-structured exercise, asstudents are able to develop their
University Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 claDr. Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering learning environments and supporting engineering students.Prof. Peter Bermel, Purdue University DR. PETER BERMEL is an assistant professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. His research focuses on improving the performance of
failure, FalconSAT-1 represented an academicsuccess for the program as cadets participated from “cradle to grave” in a real-worldmission with an all too real-world outcome. Cadets designed and built FalconSAT-1’spayload and subsystems, and they were integral in the mission operations from devisingoperations plans to participating in the launch campaign. Cadets also manned theAcademy’s ground station during overhead passes of a satellite not operating undernominal conditions. Cadets involved with trouble-shooting the anomalies soon afterdeployment certainly gained deep insight into system functions and operations.Table 1 summarizes the various milestones in the Academy’s Small Satellite programthus far. The current project, FalconSAT-2, is the
. IntroductionThe curriculum of the EET program covers a broad based educational experience emphasizingpractical, hands-on laboratory work, closely coordinated with theoretical classroom discussion.Students receive a solid foundation of coursework in electric circuits, digital electronics,solid-state electronics, communications, power and electrical machinery.The EET program has developed a PEOs assessment process to fulfill ABET accreditationrequirements. It is an outcome based assessment in which the PEOs should meet the need of theprogram constituents. PEOs describe the attributes that we desire our graduates to possess three tofive years after graduation. According to ABET’s definition of PEOs, “Program EducationalObjectives are broad statement that
solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU. Page 24.410.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development and Implementation of Interactive Virtual Laboratories to Help Students Learn Threshold Concepts in Thermodynamics
practices associated with the NGSS and CCSS-Math have not been widely adoptedand recognized as part of what K-12 students need to learn and how K-12 teachers need to teach.Thus, it is likely that the lack of exposure and engagement with core STEM practice standards aspart of the curriculum combined with constrained teacher preparation have left many educatorswithout models, motivation, and knowledge of how to teach STEM content aligned to thepractice standards. Regardless, the practice standards provides authenticity and a pathway toincreasing K-12 student knowledge of how STEM related research, projects, and process takeplace in the workplace, and the post-secondary STEM education community plays an importantrole in promoting and supporting core
Dora Renaud currently serves as the Senior Director of Academic Programs and Professional Develop- ment of the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE). Dora oversees the development and management of grants, scholarships, professional development, and National Programs that address the needs of SHPE members. For over a decade Dora has been an adjunct faculty with the American College of Education, impacting educators across the world by developing curriculum and teaching masters and doctoral level courses in education administration, curriculum and instruction, and bilingual education. Prior to working for SHPE, she was a public school administrator serving campuses with over 1,500 students. Dora also
interest in teaching students about AI ethics, little is known how toteach or incorporate ethics related issues in AI curriculum. The traditional approach of teachingethics as an isolated part in undergraduate computer science courses has failed to translate intoexperiences outside the classroom and left students unprepared for the current and future work intechnology [7], [8]. Educators agreed that to prepare students to create ethical designs, ethicseducation needs to be embedded across the curriculum and engage students in practicing ethicaldecisions during the building of technologies. Yet there are still many debates about how to bestaccomplish the goals of ethics education, and the ways that different programs teach ethics arefar from
cover the overall field of engineering.Further, Crash Course: Engineering was effectively an extension of the project into the next fieldto cover, after having previously covered other subjects like chemistry, ecology, and literature; thebest practices utilized in producing these engineering videos were thus based on previous effortswithin Crash Course, and not based on work conducted by other researchers. The previous studies,on the other hand, will be most impactful moving forward in guiding future analyses of CrashCourse: Engineering videos in formal and informal learning environments, by means ofshowcasing how videos can best be integrated into classrooms or tutoring. Work-to-date with the Crash Course: Engineering videos has
, University of Connecticut Davis Chacon Hurtado, Ph.D., is an assistant research professor at UConn. He co-directs the Engineering for Human Rights Initiative, which is a collaboration between UConn’s Office of the Vice Provost for Research, the School of Engineering, and the Human Rights Institute, to promote and advance interdisci- plinary research in engineering with a clear focus on societal outcomes. Davis is working with a number of faculty on campus to develop research and curriculum at the intersection of human rights and engi- neering, such as the one discussed herein. Davis completed his Ph.D. in Transportation and Infrastructure Systems at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, in 2018. His research
conducted by Balgopal, two teachers werehired through these networks who created an integrated STEM curriculum combined withgeometry with construction principles. The reform was driven by professional satisfaction, andwillingness to take risks and these factors empowered these teachers to pursue and sustain theefforts of reforms (Balgopal, 2020). However, the extent to which this influence appears varies because of the demographiccharacteristics of study participants and the structure of the education sector in the country. Thereexists a gap in the previously published research studies regarding longitudinal studies to find thelong-term impacts of automation, robots, and coding clubs on deciding careers in STEM fields.(Tran, 2018). Thus, to
Tech.Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University Dr. Jan DeWaters is an Associate Professor in the Institute for STEM Education with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering at Clarkson University, and teaches classes in both areas. Her research focuses on developing and assessing effective, inclusive teaching and learning in a variety of settings. An environmental engineer by training, Dr. DeWaters’ work typically integrates environmental topics such as energy and climate into STEM settings.Lucas Adams, Clarkson University Current Senior at Clarkson University in Potsdam, NY majoring in Applied Mathematics and Statistics ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024
this project, directly orindirectly during the past three academic years, such as remote operated latch system or micro-piezo-electric mixing pump. Overall the courses related to prototyping and manufacturing weremostly impacted and therefore creating the experiential framework for students to be able toundertake more challenging topics. However, the experiential and knowledge scaffolding wascreated by the lower level core curriculum courses in the area of measurement, instrumentationand quality control. Since our curricula is primarily based on integrated experiential learningpresented in a hybrid format – seamless combination of lecture and laboratory activity, where thetheoretical preparation is supported and enhanced by experimental
meaningful change in Region’s classroom practicestoday (dominated by traditional lecture-based methods) must be mandated and supported by theuniversity administration. What is necessary to create a change, is for the department or college,to have a comprehensive and integrated set of components: clearly articulated expectations,opportunities for faculty to learn about new pedagogies, and an equitable reward system.Introduction“To teach is to engage students in learning.” This quote, from Education for Judgment byChristenson et al, (1) captures the meaning of the art and practice of pedagogies of engagement.The theme advocated here is that student involvement is an essential aspect of meaningfullearning. Also, engaging students in learning is
radio or television • CD-ROM, in which the student interacts with computer content stored on a CD- ROM • PocketPC/Mobile Learning where the student accesses course content stored on a mobile device or through a wireless server • Integrated distance learning, the integration of live, in-group instruction or interaction with a distance learning curriculum • Online tutoringMost faculty who have listened to any discussion on distance education have heard thewords synchronous and asynchronous. Synchronous deals with students observing theclass in real time and asynchronous deals with students observing the class after it occurs,is processed, and posted for viewing.Synchronous technologies25 such as: • Web-based
and Technology(ABET) [7] and provides a continuumfor engineering and technology education in the K-16 system. Development and effectiveimplementation of “Technology Education” curricula based on these standards at theelementary, middle, and high school levels in concert with science and mathematicseducation and their respective standards [8-10] will complete the K-12 STEM educationframework for the new millennium, with appropriate interfaces to higher education inengineering and technology fields in colleges and universities. “Science Education” and “Mathematics Education” have been an integral part of a broadbased school curriculum for all students. “Technology education”, however has beenprimarily associated with “vocational technology” and
(Table 4).Table 4: Classroom and enrichment teacher expertise, taken verbatim from a presentation slidepresented to all pilot year teachers during PD Classroom Teacher’s Expertise Enrichment Teacher’s Expertise • Science Curriculum • Science & Engineering Concepts • Work with ALL Students • EiE Resource in School to ALL Teachers • Differentiation (Advocate of the program) • Teaching Across the • Possible Classroom Support – Co-Planning & Co- Curriculum (Integration) Teaching Model • Higher Level Questioning/Critical Thinking • Provide