policy systems. Whilethe opportunities are unlimited, PSE is initially introduced with examples of greatest importanceto chemical engineering undergraduates, with course projects and enrichment readings providingextensions to other applications. The decision support methods we include in PSE are modeling (first principlesfundamental and data-based), simulation, process control, applied statistics, optimization,synthesis and design. These topics overlap with many existing courses in engineering,operations research and applied mathematics, so that much excellent teaching and learningmaterial is available. However, a great challenge exists in teaching them at the appropriateundergraduate level, linking to practical engineering applications
certificates on aircraft from Boeing 727’s to Piper PA-31. He has authored or co-authored twenty papers in the areas of aircraft testing, aircraft systems design, systems troubleshooting and project management.Craig A. Turner, East Tennessee State University CRAIG A. TURNER is an Assistant Professor of Strategic Management at East Tennessee State University. His areas of interest and research pertain to the effects of risk on decision-making and contextual determinants of entrepreneurial success and failure. He received his Ph.D. in Strategic Management from the University of Tennessee at Knoxville in 1999. His previous experience included 11 years at various positions involving financial and
a professionalnature in the practice of engineering that meets the six criteria that Diamond and Adam put forth.The definition should include the professional realm of engineering from project engineering, technicalprogram making, through technology policy making for the purposeful advancement of technologyrelevant to the creation / development / innovation of new, improved, or breakthrough technology in theform of products, processes, systems, operations, or organizational leadership infrastructure conducive toinnovation or other meaningful creative engineering works performed in the spirit and mission of theprofession of engineering for the advancement and betterment of human welfare.Thus, the professionally oriented faculty that we are
AC 2007-121: ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT AND THE PROFESSIONALSCIENCE MASTERS (PSM) PROGRAMWilliam Daughton, University of Missouri Dr. William Daughton is professor and chair of the Engineering Management and Systems Engineering department at the University of Missouri-Rolla. He has significant industrial management experience in the semiconductor industry and over 15 years of teaching experience.Benjamin Dow, University of Missouri Dr. Benjamin Dow is a Lecturer in the Engineering Management and Sytems Engineering Department at the University of Missouri-Rolla. He has considerable expertise in project management and holds a PMP from the Project Management Institute. He also has indsutry
found in various classrooms across thecampus: (1) seating and room layout, (2) boards and projection and (3) computers and videocapture. In addition to the survey data, comments were solicited and compiled for continuousimprovement.A total of 75 students, faculty and staff responded to the survey. Within the three categories ofinstructional technology, three survey questions were asked to determine: (1) which technologieswere used, (2) which technologies did individuals enjoy and (3) which technologies didindividuals feel would enhance learning?There were several conclusions resulting from the data analysis including differences betweenfaculty and student preferences. The most interesting result was the compelling relationshipbetween enjoyment
) degrees in in- dustrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His education and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development.Dr. Jay R Porter P.E., Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Program Director for the Electronics Program. He received the BS degree in electrical engineering (1987), the MS degree in physics (1989), and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering (1993) from Texas A&M University. His areas of interest in research and education include product development, analog/RF electronics
, assessment professionals would have to rely on other, less direct, sources for establishing objectives. Lack of SME time is a commonly documented problem both for assessment and instructional design personnel 22. • Lack of time in the work schedule to adequately get to know the new discipline area in depth. In addition to SME time, assessment personnel need to conduct literature reviews in order to more fully understand a discipline area and also to determine what, if any, existing assessment tools are available for potential modification and application towards the current project. In spite of the importance of this activity, it is often overlooked or minimalized due to time constraints. • Lack
preparation and lack of encouragement10 in STEM subjects in graduate school alsocontributes to lack of women in STEM fields. This paper aims to study the factors mentionedabove and utilize the findings in providing support and guidance to women, at a particulargraduate school located at a large, Midwestern, Land Grant University. We hope our findingswill help guide women in graduate school to continue their education in the field of STEM andresult in the increase retention of women. Broader impact of this project is to recruit and supportmore women in STEM discipline in graduate school and increase diversity at the Universitycampus along with attracting funding from external resources for sustainability.NeedOne of the graduate school strategic plans
Air Force after 25 years and worked on advanced rocket engines, jet engines, and directed energy weapons. He was Program Manager for the first Lamilloy turbine, Branch Chief for world’s first cryogenic full-flow rocket cycle, Deputy Director for Propulsion Directorate developing next generation jet engines with three flow paths instead of turbofan’s two paths, and Faculty Advisor for ERAU Jet Dragster Project, Formula Research Club (March race car chassis), University Space Launch Initiative Club. He has a Ph.D. in aerospace engineering, University of Notre Dame, 1995, M.S. in aeronautics and sstronautics, University of Washington, 1989, (Oates Fellow), and a B.S. in aeronautical engineering, U.S. Air Force Academy
AC 2012-4226: EMPHASIZING CORE CALCULUS CONCEPTS USINGBIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS TO ENGAGE, MENTOR, AND RETAINSTEM STUDENTSDr. John D. DesJardins, Clemson University John DesJardins received his Ph.D. in bioengineering from Clemson University in Dec. 2006 and has worked for more than 15 years as a biomechanical research engineer. He has co-authored more than 150 peer-reviewed journal and conference publications in the areas of biomechanics, biomaterials tribology and mechanical testing, and is the director of the Laboratory of Orthopaedic Design and Engineering at Clemson University. He currently leads or participates in many multi-disciplinary research teams on projects funded through NASA, DoD, DoT, NSF, biomedical
The Minority Engineering Transfer and Articulation (META) Program: Building Stronger Pathways and Developing Student Achievement Ricardo B. Jacquez, Jeanne Garland, J. Phillip King, Michele Auzenne, Steven Peralta, and Hilario Rubio New Mexico State University/ Santa Fe Community College/ And Luna Community CollegeAbstractThe Minority Engineering Transfer and Articulation program (META) is a 36-month project thattook place between 2001 and 2004. The program is a cooperative effort between communitycolleges, New Mexico State University (NMSU), and
jointly. These concepts areinterrelated and will be discussed to expound on the concepts as they were developed in ourdiscussion.Co-authorship Entitlement – There is no entitlement to co-authorship just because someone ispart of the untenured team (UFAST in our case). Each paper, research project or grant proposalwould have an initiator or team of initiators. Others who want to participate would need tocommunicate what they can contribute to the project and the initiators had the full right tograciously refuse the offer of help. There are many reasons why help might be refused. Amongpersonal reasons is the potential participant; 1) does not know the subject well enough, 2) doesnot follow through on commitments, and 3) does not “play well with
four years (Project META - Math, Engineering, and TechnologyAward). The second grant is an Engineering Education Discretionary Grant (Project ACCESS)which is aimed at curriculum development, high school outreach, articulation agreements withsurrounding area universities, creation of web-based engineering courses, and infusion ofengineering curricula with state-of-the-art technology over a period of three years. Page 9.617.1Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Education After the first year of grant implementation, four elements
decision making process. As a result, they oftenexcel in developing student’s capability of “problem solving” for concept improvement and“decision making” for concept selection, respectively; while their practical effectiveness inaugmenting student’s skills of “questioning” for problem formulation and “reasoning” forconcept generation is often limited. Second, most of existing methods were not intended tosupport design as a structured social construction process, while in practice, projected-basedlearning is a common approach used in a great majority of design courses12. As a result, it is notunusual that a highly structured design method is often used by a team of student designers via acompletely ad-hoc manner.This paper aims to introduce two
. and Ph.D.degrees in Biomedical Engineering, a joint M.D./Ph.D. through the Wake Forest UniversitySchool of Medicine, and a joint D.V.M./Ph.D. through the Virginia-Maryland Regional Collegeof Veterinary Medicine. Given that students may take face to face classes on either campus orclasses via distance learning while residing on their home campus in either Blacksburg orWinston-Salem, new instructional technology solutions and infrastructure are required to supportthis initiative. A project team, consisting of members from Wake Forest and Virginia Tech, wasestablished to develop this innovative learning environment. A key feature of this learningenvironment is the ability for the professor to easily interact with students using multiple types
Session 1526 Using Real-Time Sensors in the Engineering Classroom: The Ongoing Development of an Engineering Education Experiment Matthew W. Ohland and Elizabeth A. Stephan General Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634AbstractClemson’s NSF-sponsored EXPerimental Engineering in Real-Time (EXPERT) project isinvestigating the effect of using real-time sensors on student learning through graphicalrepresentations of various physical concepts and to facilitate learning the concept itself. Thispaper will address the development and adaptation of the experiment as a model for otherengineering
,courses, and materials to teach students professional responsibility in engineering. 3 Someof the approaches, naturally, and effectively, involve case studies.In 1989, the National Institute for Engineering Ethics (NIEE)4 and the National Society ofProfessional Engineers (NSPE) developed a case study titled "Gilbane Gold"5.. Producedas a video by Great Projects Film Company of New York, “Gilbane Gold” has been usedextensively in the classroom and by professional organizations. 6 “Gilbane Gold” portraysan engineer in a corporation who faces a technical problem with ethical and legalimplications. Synopsis: Gilbane Gold (Source: Gilbane Gold Discussion Guide) Gilbane Gold is the name given to dried sludge from the Gilbane
evaluation process as on-campus faculty.The College has used some web-based instruction but considers that instructionalmethodology still experimental; thus more than 90% of the instruction is in the traditionalclassroom and laboratory format.The Senior Project, a capstone experience, is designed by the Senior Project Team: thestudent, a student mentor, a faculty member, and the Head of the Technology ExtensionDivision. The mentor is an engineer or senior technician with the company who helps thestudent identify a project that will not only demonstrate the skills gained from the degreeprogram but will solve an existing engineering or manufacturing problem at thecompany. The faculty member is the instructor-of-record who oversees the
ofmechanical and electrical structures.In this paper I will describe how a meaningful laboratory sequence for undergraduate students inthe Electrical Engineering Technology program has been laid out. It is intended for use in lowerlevel freshman and sophomore undergraduate courses. These levels of projects are differentfrom the laboratory curriculum for upperclassmen because of the age, maturity and experienceof the students. Page 5.584.1Therefore, these projects and the laboratory curriculum, should also be an introduction toelectrical devices. It should be motivational, as well as instructional. In this beginning stage oftheir educational process
officers. Otherutility companies may have dedicated staff to help industrial and commercial customers throughtheir sales department. Your project will have greater success if you can find a partner who has astrong interest in the well-being of area industry and has already allocated some resources forthat cause.Next, find out what the potential partners try to accomplish through their outreach efforts.Determine how you can support your partners’ effort while spending minimum resources.For example, universities already have classrooms, instructional media, and a faculty withexpertise needed by the area industry. Do not discourage yourself if some departments in yourinstitution already provide consulting to area industry. Focus on what you can
to overcome some of difficulties inherent inthe construction of the system. Finally managers must understand how flexiblebudgeting processes and cost accounting systems are connected.Capital management needsFirst any manager must understand the basics of discounted cash flow and projectappraisal techniques, how to value cash flows and how to deal with issues such asestablishing a time horizon, selecting an interest rate and including depreciation andtaxes. These are fundamental topics in capital budgeting. Beyond these fundamentals,however, there are other very important topics which managers must understand. Forexample, changes in working capital required by the project. They also need to
engineeringmanagement but its graduate degrees include a Masters in Engineering Management, a Master’sof Science in Engineering Management, and a Doctor of Philosophy in EngineeringManagement. The department has traditionally taught the undergraduate course in engineeringeconomy as a service course for the college. The four-course minor grew from this course.The courses in the minor are key skills for an engineering manager or an engineer working in ahigh technology, project-driven environment. These courses, while not prerequisites for ODU’sgraduate programs in engineering management (with the exception of a courses in statisticalconcepts), provide a firm foundation for graduate study in engineering management. The coursesin the minor are taught by a mix of
support to departments or institutions wanting to develop their teachingmethods or curriculum. The amount of money is half of the amount that the department itselfspends on the project. All the reports on the projects can now be seen online, which is an attempt tospread new pedagogical ideas.The IPN publishes a pedagogical magazine called the IPN-nyt, which is distributed to allengineering teaching staff in Denmark.The IPN is involved in domestic cross-institutional and international networks dealing withpedagogy, and last year IPN was strongly involved in organizing the SEFI-2001 conference inCopenhagen. The European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) is the European engineeringeducational organisation especially focused on discussions
more sustainable electric toothbrush (with lessenvironmental burden), and culturally and economically appropriate coffee-maker re-design forthe Japanese kitchen were included as projects.Assessment:Following the implementation of the modifications in the classroom setting, using parts of theE2020 national student survey (developed as part of a separate NSF project #0550608) alongwith some course specific questions, assessment of the introductory design course occurred inthe spring 2010 semester. The assessment tool asked the students to evaluate the emphasis andimpact that all their engineering courses have had on the following: • ethical issues, • professional skills, • systems thinking, • life long learning
Dean for Academic Affairs within the College of Engineering.He is an ASEE member, and participates in the Electrical and Computer Engineering, Energy Conversion and Conservation, Computers in Education, and Educational Research and Methods divisions. He is the Past Chair of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Division.Dr. John E. BeardDr. Carl L. Anderson, Michigan Technological University Carl L. Anderson is a professor in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department and Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Programs in the College of Engineering at Michigan Tech- nological University. He is the Principal Investigator for the Department of Energy project: An Inter- disciplinary Program for
static equilibrium concepts as applied to trusses andother rigid bodies.The key assessment of the outcomes of the two intervention methods is the students’performance on the exams and on the final learning experiences, which is a final project. Eachquestion on the exams addresses a particular student learning outcome (SLO) and is based on theassigned class work and home work problems.The first intervention involved randomly asking students to present their group projects whichwere completed incrementally during the entire term. This intervention method has a goal ofmonitoring the quality of the final project which is a consolidation of work performed indifferent phases. The project scope has been similar in each term the course is taught. Each
HE 11 Page 6.741.1 defines the current location as position 11 and records it in the memory. • Command MA is to move the robot to a distance from a defined position. In the following: PD 5, 0, 0, 30, 0, 0 MA 1, 5 the first line defines Position 5, which is a dummy position, and the second line moves the robot to a point whose incremental distance to a predefined Position 1 is the coordinates of Position 5 in the first line.Students were able to use the commands in small exercise assignments. However, mostly incourse projects, they only used the command MO (move) to teach-and
will learn theessentials of solid modeling using the full version of SDRC’s I-DEAS Master Series and will beable to purchase the Student Edition for about $100 from the bookstore. The student edition canexchange part and assembly data through the use of universal files and FTP.Solid modeling techniques such as wireframe, extruding,revolving, sweeping and lofting are essential elements of theproposed course. Course projects (see imbedded pictures) have been developed to reinforce the materials describe during the lecture. The Master Series software also has the ability to
the other methodologies where it made sense to do so. A QFD teamwas formed and included representatives from IME Department Industrial Advisory Council andthe College of Engineering. The team met regularly for five quarters to work through the QFDprocess and present findings. ABET assessment updates were on the Industrial Advisory CouncilAgenda and discussed at department meetings. QFD practitioners will notice that a modifiedversion of QFD was used to simplify the process. Not all rating and ranking algorithms wereemployed.The project was divided up into phases:Phase I - The Voice of the Customer - The IME Department recognized a number ofconstituencies or “customers” that need to be considered in all curriculum, scheduling, andprogram
can designintelligently by focusing on the most beneficial way to minimize risk.By applying risk assessment concepts to processes and products, the engineer can: • Quantify the environmental impacts of specific chemical on people and ecosystems. • Prioritize chemicals that need to be minimized or eliminated. • Optimize design to avoid or reduce environmental impacts. • Design greener products and processes.This presentation will highlight techniques to include green engineering in the chemicalengineering curriculum. This may be through stand-alone courses, concepts in core courses suchas thermodynamics or engineering economics, design projects, and as part of the assessmentrequirements for ABET Criteria 2000.Environmental CoursesMost