of responses for each question. Results indicate that ASMTstudents have some similarities with their engineering counterparts, but place a stronger focus onrelationships and building connections. Students valued the use of group projects as a way tobuild community and noted the importance of classroom management to build community.IntroductionAcross the country, many biological and agricultural engineering departments are also home toagricultural systems management/technology (ASMT) programs. From a historical perspective,nearly all these ASMT programs have evolved from traditional agricultural mechanizationprograms. This evolution parallels how biological engineering programs evolved from traditionalagricultural engineering programs. We
-focused research methods course andsummer research experience on the self-efficacy and interest in STEM research and careers ofunderrepresented high school students (grades 9-11) in the Mathematics and Science EducationNetwork Pre-College Program (MSEN). The minority engineering program (MEP) at NorthCarolina State University partnered with MSEN to develop the course and summer experience.Both project components were designed to provide exposure to research methods, engineeringdesign principles and STEM careers and professionals. Undergraduate students in the MEP servedas mentors to the MSEN students throughout the research methods course and summer researchexperiences.It is widely accepted that the U.S. must produce more highly skilled
project are to: (1) increase first-year retention to 80%, (2)increase second year retention to 71%, and (3) increase the five-year graduation rate to 65%.ApproachTo accomplish the project goals, the FS2 program is divided into four initiatives (1) a summerintensive program, (2) a revised gateway course for engineering and CS majors, (3) affinityhousing, and (4) a peer and faculty mentor/tutoring program. The FS2 project elements havebeen piloted at large public institutions, and this project expands their application and assessestheir effectiveness within a smaller Liberal Arts college setting. The FS2 program initiatives areaimed at first-year students and support students’ adjustment to the challenges and rigors of ahigh quality academic
projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the Center for Lifelong STEM Education Research at OSU.Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University Michelle Bothwell is an Associate Professor of Bioengineering at Oregon State University. Her teaching and research bridge ethics, social justice and engineering with the aim of cultivating an inclusive and socially just engineering profession.Dr. Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University Dr. Montfort is an Assistant Professor in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engi- neering at Oregon State UniversityDr. Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington Professor of Learning Sciences & Human DevelopmentDr. Susannah C
-Progress: Constructing a prediction model of creativity and cognitive concept connections based on learning portfolioAbstractThe skills required of new employees by industry are increasingly interdisciplinaryand creativity-related because of a paradigm shift in target markets. Engineeringeducation should therefore focus on helping students develop their creativity andcritical thinking skills. A student’s level of creativity is usually evaluated byexamining his or her final projects. However, the language that students use indiscussions and interactions can be analyzed to determine their cognitive processesand thus their creativity. This study collected 1 year of records of discussions andinteractions on a Moodle learning platform among students
AC 2007-1495: EFFECTS OF THE TEAM-BASED APPROACH ON INDIVIDUALLEARNINGJason Pitts, Oklahoma State UniversityPatrick Teague, Oklahoma State UniversityAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State UniversityCharles Bunting, Oklahoma State UniversitySohum Sohoni, Oklahoma State University Page 12.588.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Effects of the Team-Based Approach on Individual Learning1.IntroductionThis study is a part of the ES21C project at Oklahoma State University. The goal of ES21C is toprepare OSU electrical engineering students to meet the challenges of engineering in the 21stcentury. The proposal for the ES21C project gives the following summary
AC 2008-1374: USING ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO REPOSITORIES AS ASTUDENT RESOURCE FOR MSE APPLICATIONSAaron Blicblau, Swinburne University of Technology "Aaron Blicblau graduated as materials engineer and worked in the manufacturing and steel industry for ten years. He then commenced lecturing at Swinburne University of Technology specialising in materials science and engineering to students ranging form first year to final year. . He has been involved in implementing novel teaching procedures to improve the learning aspects of students as well as his own teaching processes. Over the past few years he has adopted and implemented active learning measures including problem based and project based
of graduate studies impacting practicing professionals, project management issues,and job search issues.1. IntroductionIt can be said that, from many aspects, the best time for an engineering student to obtaintheir Ph.D. is after a period of working in industry. By the time one completes five toseven years of higher education, students can be “burned out” and otherwise not ready forthe rigor of a Doctoral Degree. By breaking at this point and working in industry for afew years, students can obtain a better understanding of the practice of engineering thancan be obtained from the classroom and co-operative (co-op) or internship experience.Furthermore, they can better understand exactly what area of engineering they wish topursue in their
academia. After teachingclasses the traditional way, class lectures augmented with textbook homework, a program wasdeveloped to engage students in model building activities that encouraged creativity, promotedownership in student learning, linked physical behavior to mathematical expressions, andhopefully better prepares students for engineering practice.1Students in the college begin hands-on learning during their freshman year and this served as theimpetus to link kinesthetic learning with lower level and upper level engineering courses.Students often list a junior level class as their favorite class because it incorporates modelbuilding projects into the curriculum. Students are often eager to work on these projects and aretypically proud to
, areanalyzed. These industries are then dissected in order to determine potential opportunities fornew business or new lines of business. Once the opportunity is identified, the question of whattechnology may be required to enable this technology is determined. The content-driven lectureson strategy, marketing, financing and innovation are illustrated using video clips and case studiesdrawn from entrepreneurial and corporate examples. The hands-on experience focuses onhomeworks, a team-based project in a technology space selected after a student competition, anda presentation to business developers. It is our observation that the main challenge for thestudents is to be able to reassess/modify their original technology-based solution to one informedby
registered professional engineer with APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta). Prior to her career at MacEwan, Shelley worked in industry as a research engineer and a consulting engineer for several years.Dr. Jeffrey A Davis P.Eng., Grant MacEwan University Dr. Davis’ research focuses on pedagogical topics such as student engagement, active learning, and cognitive development. Projects he is currently working on include ”Development of a risk assessment model for the retention of students”, ”Development of Student Assessment Software”, and ”Improving Student Engagement through Active Learning”. American c
participants to acclimate to their research projects before the programstart.Throughout this work, participants were able to gain or further develop skills in some of thefollowing areas: Ethical Hacking, Data Science, Intrusion Detection Systems, Linux, MachineLearning, Networking, and Python, as well as interact with a designated smart device and testingenvironment. In the first summer, participants were assigned a smart glucose meter and taskedwith 1) exploiting the potential threats associated with installing smart devices onto unsecurednetwork configurations via address resolution protocol (ARP) poisoning, and 2) exploring socialengineering tactics through cloning the device user application. Additionally, in the followingsummer, participants
and design faculty would benefit greatly from a gooddose of creative design as practiced by our colleagues in the Arts. The paper will provideevidence of how two aspects of “creativity” are missing from most engineering students. IntroductionWith some exceptions, engineering design as we know it today is a relatively recentmanifestation of the evolutionary development of the current highly science-basedengineering curriculum. In many ways today’s engineering technology programs mirrorthe pre-1950’s engineering programs and today’s engineering programs appear, in somerespects, to be programs in applied physics. So how did we get to this point?The myth is that the Manhatten Project, one of the most
. The immediate and continuedsuccess of students involved in this two course sequence is described, as they put their lab skillsto work in the lab, at home, and on individual research projects. The evolution and expansion oflaboratory instrumentation is described and the assessment of this laboratory sequence isdiscussed.Introduction to Experimental MethodsIn the aerospace engineering curriculum at many universities, laboratory exercises are eitherincluded as an integral part of various classes, or separated into a sequence of courses taught inthe upper division. Previously at Mississippi State University, laboratory courses were offeredonly in the senior year, with one course being a lecture/lab class introducing experimentalmethods, and the
demonstration, the depth of understanding of materials is measured.The assessment rubric is shown in Table 3. Table 3. Assessment Rubric Assessment PointsObjective 5Design Input 5Design Output 5Design Verification 10Design Validation 10Conclusions 15References 5RSLogix500 Project Report 25RSLogix500.rss File 10Uniqueness Demonstration 10 Total 100The format of a report of the laboratory project design
ManagementSystem (CMS), this work describes the research process used to measure our capability toprovide an online version of this training. Mid-career professionals interested in completingcertification requirements without having to attend on-campus classes represent a new programtarget. The program will continue to conform to our curriculum requirements ensuring thequality of any on-line MIET courses.The paper will address the development of this new delivery method. The curriculum will bedesigned to operate in an interactive web-based environment for submission of coursework;concept diagrams, drawings, reports, and assorted forms. Class discussions, conferencing,forums and real-time project reviews will utilize current “chat-room” technology and
incorporates their new amorphous silicon modules which Page 14.210.2promise lower losses of performance in higher temperatures when compared to conventionalsolar modules. Seeing it as a great opportunity for an additional clinic project, Dr. Rowan alongwith his graduate student and four undergraduates added the project to their list of objectives.The first semester included the design and installation of the system including data collection forfuture analysis. In the fall 2008 semester, part of a clinic project entailed the analysis of thecollected data to give an insight into the operational efficiency of the new module type versustwo existing
%. Page 14.498.3Survey ResultsSurvey Question 6 – “The following types of assignments help me learn more in online classes.”In response to survey question 6, students were requested to select as many options as applied totheir situation from the following list of types of assignments; Individual Topic Papers, TeamTopic Papers, Hands-on Activities, Interactive Individual Projects, Team Projects, ReadingAssignments, and Other. Participants’ top-ranked choice was Hands-on Activities, which wasselected 77 times or 65.8% of the time. Interactive Individual Projects fell second with 69 timesor a 59% selection rate. Reading Assignments were selected 56 times (47.9%). Individual TopicPapers were selected 54 times (46.2%), while Team Projects were
paperprovides details of laboratory exercises and a senior project that is implemented using both softcore and hard core processors on three different FPGA boards. Advantages and disadvantages ofeach of these implementations will also be presented. The paper will also detail the challengesinvolved in using continually-evolving embedded processing tools and the efforts made to reducetheir learning times.IntroductionThe Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) requires providing studentswith a significant hands-on design experience. Graduating electrical engineering students shouldhave the ability to design, test, and verify the correctness of operation of systems, subsystems,and components for real-time application.The aggressive
Advisor/Project Manager for the Strengthening Higher Education Program (SHEP) which is a World Bank funded program for supporting the Ministry of Higher Education and six major public universities in Afghanistan. His experience has been primarily in the area of social development. He holds an MA in Post-war Recovery studies from the University of York, UK. Page 14.884.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Modernizing Engineering Education at Herat University A Partnership between University of Hartford and
Session 1626 Integrating Wind Engineering Research to Curriculum Through Multimedia Partha P. Sarkar, Kishor C. Mehta, James R. McDonald, Ernst W. Kiesling Texas Tech University ABSTRACTA courseware development project, which aims to transfer the research results to curriculum through themultimedia technology in the multi-disciplinary area of wind cngineenng, is discussed in this article. Thiscourseware, containing four modules, is designed to supplement certain senior
students and they conduct virtually all of ourresearch in the three designated thrust areas of our NSF-funded research program and in the manyindependently-funded research projects that cluster around the CBE. In a few cases the most effective ofthese teams have become so integrated that students from either science or engineering have chosen a pair ofcoadvisors for their theses and these advisory teams are typically composed of faculty from Microbiology andfrom Chemical or Civil Engineering. Page 1.22.2 {tixi$~ 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘O.+,yyy’j
presented the material through a traditional lecturing medium, andthe second section of the course presented the material through several hands-on exercises andteam projects as described in this paper. The second section contained ninety eight students andwas the authors first time to offer the course. These sections also provide excellent cohort groupsto track through the early years of the ME program and measure the impact of each teach style.As a one credit course, the content and breadth of ME101 is severely limited by the low studentcontact hours. It may be difficult to determine the true impact of the course on student retentiondue to the range of motives of why students leave the ME program. However, the optimal impactand outcome from the
coursestudents will take in the subsequent fall semester. In the design component, students are exposed to the computerscience and engineering programs offered at UTEP through related projects that provide a challenging andinformative glimpse into each aspect of engineering. SEEE students are first introduced to the cooperative learning paradigm during the first morning session.In that session, they work through exercises which distinguish the differences between individual, competitive, andcooperative learningc. An integral part of this initial activity is the “name game” where students are moved intogroups and asked to learn the names of the group members. This “name game” is the first step in developingcommunity among the group members
, material properties and testing, and materials performance in various engineeringapplications. Students often view this course as a collection of abstract concepts that are difficultto understand and apply to engineering problems and design. This contributes to the challenge tomaintain a high level of interest, enthusiasm and information retention among the students.Introducing Web based virtual laboratories in this course as proposed in this project, can addressthis challenge. The main objective of the VTTL is to introduce students to the testing techniquesrequired to evaluate certain mechanical properties of materials such as the elastic modulus, yieldstrength, ductility and toughness.The following sections present a brief background on the
Distribution Department in 1989 and has served as the Program Director of the Electronics and Telecommunications Programs and as the Associate Department Head for Operations. He received his BS degree in electrical engineering (1975) from California State University, Sacramento, and his MS (1980) and DE (1983) degrees in industrial engineering from Texas A&M University. His education and research interests include project management, innovation and entrepreneurship, and embedded product/system development.Jay Porter, Texas A&M University Jay R. Porter joined the Department of Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution at Texas A&M University in 1998 and is currently the Program
, Charlottesville, VA 2 Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 3 University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 4 University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 5 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HIABSTRACT – In Fall 2007, a coalition of four universities was awarded an NSF CCLI grant tosupport the development of a curriculum with the goal of cultivating systems thinking in students.Systems thinking, as defined in this project, is the ability to envision architectures of complex-engineered systems and the principles that underlie them. The
Human MotionAbstractAssessing abnormal movement resulting from poor health is essential for monitoring patients’health status and quality of life. In this paper, we describe a capstone senior design project thatuses wearable wireless sensors to measure and collect signals with information about the motionof a person in need of medical care. A triaxial body-fixed accelerometer is used to record humanmotion. Sampled data are transmitted using an IEEE 802.15.4 wireless transceiver to a datalogger and passed to a PC. The analysis of the recorded data facilitates possible characterizationof human motion. The implemented system allows for inexpensive and unobtrusive monitoringduring normal daily activities at home or in a nursing home environment.1
(LEE-IUPUI) and leading the effort for development of a regional campus Healthcare based Lean Six Sigma initiative.Lash Mapa, Purdue University-Calumet LASH MAPA , Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Industrial Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet. Professor Mapa spent 10 years in industry as a Chemical Engineer, Project Manager, Process Control Manager, QA Manager, Engineering Manager and Customer Service Original Equipment Manager with major European and U.S. companies. He is a member of the American Society of Quality and has trained industry personnel in Statistical Process Control, Problem Solving, Project Management and Enhancing productivity of manufacturing personnel
platform, Jamerson is building anintegrated curriculum using engineering as the primary tool to connect the different requiredsubjects taught in every elementary school. Since all engineering is multidiscipline in nature, itprovides a wonderful vehicle to integrated different subjects. Although Jamerson’s engineeringfocused curriculum uses science, mathematics, economics, social science, history, language, andcommunication to get a project completed, it has an additional value to the school. Workingwithin the engineering design process not only allows teachers to focus on the subject matterknowledge and skills but also on the development of a platform to foster the higher lever skills ofsynthesizing, analyzing, and comparing data. In this