products businesses. Schindel earned the BS and MS in Mathematics.Samuel N. Peffers, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Lieutenant Colonel Samuel Peffers is Professor of Military Science at the Rose-Hulman Institute of Tech- nology and a PhD student in Technology Management at Indiana State University.James H. Hanson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology James Hanson is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology where he has been teaching since 2002. Among the courses he teaches is the capstone design course where he has begun to introduce training on innovation to complement the systems approach to design. He has received several teaching and paper awards including the ASEE
Paper ID #44473The Graduate Student Role in Undergraduate Research Mentoring: A SystematicLiterature ReviewHayden Ross Asbill, Campbell UniversityMitchell Ann Letchworth, Campbell UniversityDr. Anastasia Marie Rynearson, Campbell University Anastasia Rynearson is an Assistant Professor at Campbell University. She received a PhD from Purdue University in Engineering Education and a B.S. and M.Eng. in Mechanical Engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology. Her teaching experience includes outreach activities at various age levels as well as a position as Assistant Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at
teaching practices.Dr. Emily Anna Dare, Florida International University Dr. Emily Dare is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at Florida International University. Pre- viously, she taught at Michigan Technological University from 2015-2018, where she is still an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences. Dr. Dare’s research interests are focused on K-12 STEM education. In particular, she is interested in supporting science teachers’ reform- based instruction while simultaneously understanding their beliefs. As science classrooms shift to more integrated STEM approaches, this is especially critical. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to
to learners with disabilities. She is supported by the Knight-Hennessy Scholarship and the RAISE Doctoral Fellowship.Trisha Kulkarni, Stanford UniversityDr. Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University Sheri D. Sheppard teaches both undergraduate and graduate design-related classes, conducts research on fracture mechanics and finite element analysis, and on how people become engineers. From 1999 to 2008, she was a Senior Scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, leading its engineering study. Sheppard has contributed to significant educational projects, including the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education and the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter
Green is an Instructor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Mississippi State409 University where she serves as Undergraduate Laboratory Coordinator and teaches lab courses and410 thermal fluids courses. She obtained her B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from411 Mississippi State University in 2017 and 2019, respectively and is a PhD candidate in Engineering412 Education. Her research is in the development and assessment of professional skills in engineering413 students, K-12 outreach, and hands-on learning.414415 Matthew Priddy416 Matthew W. Priddy is an Assistant Professor at Mississippi State University in the Department of417 Mechanical Engineering. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Georgia
Paper ID #27039Proven Professional Development Strategies: Data from an ENG ASAP Trans-fer Student ProgramDr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and
failure. His other research interests include experimental nuclear medical physics, laser-based medical physics research in cerebral metabolic pathways of oxygen, petro physics, and petroleum fluid character- ization of reservoirs.Dr. Devdas M. Pai, North Carolina A&T State University Devdas Pai teaches and conducts research on manufacturing processes and materials engineering. Pai has lead effective education outreach activities under the ERC initiatives and implemented several pre- college programs to motivate and better pre-URM students for STEM careers. He has won several service awards including the NC A&T State University Outstanding Teacher Award for College of Engineering, ASME Region IV Faculty Advisor
Collegesof Engineering and Science formed a committee to revise the curriculum to focus on improvingretention in the required core math and science courses. To also accommodate limits on the numberof credit hours, the committee also eliminated a two-semester introductory engineering course tofocus on the common computational and algorithmic thinking skills development needs of allmajors in a one-semester course (Cahill, Ogilvie, and Weichold, 2020).Consequently, the first-course in engineering for entering students became an introduction toprogramming where each week consists of one hour of lecture and three hours of programminglaboratory activities. A typical laboratory activity would comprise of students working in teams of
abstract to a scientific meeting” (𝑝 < 0.001,Pre 3.36 ± 0.81; Post 4.50 ± 0.92);“Write a first draft of a manuscript intended for publication by yourself” (𝑝 < 0.05,Pre 2.42 ±1.00; Post 3.56 ± 0.96); “Write using correct grammar” (𝑝 < 0.05,Pre 4.25 ± 0.45; Post4.80 ± 0.40); “Continue to revise a manuscript multiple times after receiving negative feedbackfrom your mentor or reviewers” (𝑝 < 0.001,Pre 3.58 ± 1.03; Post 4.60 ± 0.49); and “Writewith minimal help because your skills are strong enough" (𝑝 < 0.05,Pre 3.17 ± 1.03; Post4.00 ± 0.77)Lessons Learned: Due to faculty experience of online teaching during the pandemic, theprofessional development vine was highly impactful despite the transition online for summer2021. In future
2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Discipline of Engineering Education.” He has a pas- sion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Innovation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. Professor Imbrie’s expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and
industry is a key concern inengineering education.Compounding this preparedness problem is the COVID-19 pandemic, which prompted rapidchanges to the higher education system and caused significant disruptions to both teaching andlearning. During this period, most institutions shifted to emergency remote learning whichaffected both how academics taught and how students learned. Studies have shown that this shiftto online instruction disrupted in-person laboratory courses, causing engineering students to loseopportunities for hands-on learning [10]. Moreover, some instructors were faced with a need toremove content from their courses in order to adjust to lost instruction time [10]. These COVID-related challenges lead us to believe that the pandemic
to teach them how to compute their grade.Lastly, you must be prepared to change things if things don’t go as expected.References 1. Howitz, William J., Kate J. McKnelly, and Renée D. Link. "Developing and implementing a specifications grading system in an organic chemistry laboratory course." Journal of Chemical Education 98.2 (2020): 385-394. 2. J. Mendez, “Standards-Based Specifications Grading in a Hybrid Course,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Jun. 2018, p. 30982. doi: 10.18260/1-2--30982. 3. L. B. Nilson. Specifications Grading: Restoring Rigor, Motivating Students, and Saving Faculty Time. Stylus Publishing, LLC, 2015. 4. L. Craugh, “Adapted Mastery Grading for
, art and humanities, and raised interest among the worldwide press, including the Wall Street Journal and the BBC.Hiroyuki Ishizaki, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Japan Hiroyuki Ishizaki is a Visiting Professor at Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), a leading Japanese en- gineering school. His research interests include multidisciplinary teaching and learning, cross-cultural competence, collaborative online international (COIL), technopreneurship, and project/problem-based learning methods. As a Director of the Malaysia Office, he has been expatriated in Malaysia since 2014 and leading the internationalization of SIT and its partner universities throughout the Southeast Asian region. Under his initiatives
as the Mechatronics concentration coordinator in the Engineering Tech- nology department. Additionally, he is currently completing the final year of an EdD in Educational Leadership. Other research interests include Industry 4.0, regional workforce development, and gender disparities in the engineering fields.Alyssa Young, Austin Peay State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 From Grant to Graduates: The Development of a Regionally Unique Siemens Level 3 Mechatronics Engineering Technology ProgramAbstractAs the result of a Department of Defense (DoD) grant in 2017, training and laboratory equipmentwere procured, and a
Song (M’12–SM’14-F’23) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the Univer- sity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, in August 2012. He is currently a Tenured Associate Professor, the Director of NSF Center for Aviation Big Data An- alytics (Planning), and the Director of the Security and Optimization for Networked Globe Laboratory (SONG Lab, www.SONGLab.us), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, MD. Prior to joining UMBC, he was a Tenured Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL. He serves as an Associate Editor for IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2020-present), IEEE Transactions on Intelligent
Retention and Graduation,” Journal of STEM Education, vol. 19, no. 2, Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Engineering Education (LITEE), 2018.[9] N. Islam & Y. Zhou, “Improving Engineering Students’ College Math Readiness by MSEIP Summer Bridge Program,” Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Volume 5: Engineering Education. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. November 9–15, 2018. V005T07A026. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-88685[10] S. Parsons, T. Croft, & M. Harrison, “Does students’ confidence in their ability in mathematics matter?” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 28 no. 2, pp. 53
student outcomes.Chris Venters (Assistant Professor) Chris Venters is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering at East Carolina University in Greenville, North Carolina, USA. He teaches introductory courses in engineering design and mechanics and upper-level courses in fluid mechanics. He earned his Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech in 2014, and his research primarily focuses on conceptual understanding in engineering mechanics courses. He received his M.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Virginia Tech and his B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from North Carolina State University.Charles Edward Goodman © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
the outcome-based educational framework. She has also incorporated the Content, Assessment, Pedagogy (CAP) model to the development and redesign of courses, laboratories, and educational experiences implemented successfully in the course offerings at UPRM. Another research area includes the incorporation of Responsible well-being in faculty and students (undergraduate and graduate). Through an innovative research-based assessment plan, they determined the levels of moral development achieved by participants. In the past two years, Santiago has incorporated theories on social cognitive career choices and student attrition mitigation to investigate the effectiveness of institutional interventions in increasing the
Africa, Asia, and Central America to provide much needed educational content to entire classrooms using picoprojectors. In 2008, he established Class on a Chip, Inc. to commercialize an array of micro-experimental devices for use in engineering, physics, and MEMS classes. In 2014, he established a new class in the Whitacre College of Engineering, Technology Start-up Lab, which takes students through a process to develop their own technology projects for commercialization. Each summer, he teaches a class entitled Solar Energy, which includes a hands-on solar energy design project. Dr. Dallas has served as the principal investigator for two National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships in STEM (S-STEM) projects, a
mathematical competencies of the students, many instructors have noted howdifficult it can be to teach new concepts, and at times, to “un-teach” misconceptions that studentshave already formed on some of the fundamental topics [1]. Examples of mechanics experimentshave been reported to help with students understanding, motivation, and concept retention [2],[3], [4], and [5].An experimental platform to study the bending behavior of beams has been under developmentfor several years by the authors [6], [7], and [8]. Originally, a portable, beam-bending apparatuswas designed and fabricated that (a) could fix a variety of metallic and nonmetallic beamspecimens in a cantilever fashion, (b) could apply point loading and monitor beam tipdisplacement and
significantly affected.Introduction and Background It is easy to say that the COVID-19 pandemic challenged teaching techniques andprocedures at traditional institutions of higher education, but quantifying these consequences ofCOVID is difficult, especially for engineering specialties. Did students perform better inengineering classes thanks to the responsiveness and availability of online instruction, or did theysuffer with the loss of laboratories and demonstrations in the standard classroom? Numerous researchers have grappled with this question, across many disciplines andaround the world. Fundamentally, it appears that COVID lockdown periods, especially thoseearly in the pandemic’s development (2020), increased the state of stress
Paper ID #38516Building Awareness of Inclusivity through Scalable Hands-On Activities.Dr. Margaret A. Hunter, Hofstra University Margaret Hunter,Ph.D., is an Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Engineering at Hofstra Univer- sity in the Fred DeMatteir School of Engineering and Appplied Science. She has been teaching in the Civil Engineering program for 25 years. Her educational research focuses on broadening the participation in enigineering. This has included both formal and informal learning activites in pre-college, developing a course framework to aid faculty at 2 year institutions to encourage participation by
://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016127.[12] D. H. Uttal et al., “The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 352–402, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0028446.[13] C. A. Supalo, “Teaching chemistry and other sciences to blind and low-vision students through hands-on learning experiences in high school science laboratories,” 2010. Accessed: Feb. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PhDT.......375S[14] T. Green, D. Kane, G. M. Timko, N. Shaheen, and W. Goodridge, “Spatial Language Used by Blind and Low-Vision High School Students During a Virtual Engineering Program,” presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference, Jun. 2022.[15] D. E. Kane, T. Green, N. L
that the output is not the most ideal solution, to isolate whichinput codes are needed to be corrected, and to iterate the investigation to fix the error. Twentystudents (ntext = 9, ngraphic = 11) from the laboratory component of a calculus-based introductoryphysics course consented to participate in this study. Four think-aloud interviews wereconducted to ensure that the questions were eliciting the desirable debugging practices understudy.Box 1Sample text-based debugging question. We write a code to plot the points (1.5, 2.5), (2.5, 4.5), (3.5, 7.2) and (4.6, 10.3), as follows: import matplotlib.pyplot as plt point1 = (1.5, 2.5) point2 = (2.5, 4.5) point3 = (3.5, 7.2) point4 = (4.6, 10.3) plt.plot(point1, point2, point3, point4
componentof the Urban STEM Collaboratory, providing priority consideration to students within the cohortfor STEM Ambassador positions. The program engages undergraduate students in paid positionssupporting STEM teaching and learning with local school districts and community organizations.Ambassadors develop strong leadership and communication skills and deeper connections totheir disciplines all while getting paid and making a positive impact in the community. Theprogram has been successful in creating connections and a sense of community for theAmbassadors that has led to positive outcomes in both academic and career pursuits. Theleadership team is now exploring opportunities to extend these successes with other populationswhere a strong sense of
professional identity with the student and helping them in ways that didnot violate the ethical principles of engineering and teaching. The results of this interaction werethat the student made it successfully through the semester and is finishing their program in goodstanding. The final takeaways from this experience are the use of empathic mentoring, being thechange that one wishes to be in engineering education, and taking extreme ownership of one’smentoring role to develop and guide their mentees.IntroductionEngineering as a discipline has had a reputation for having a difficult curriculum where manystudents do not succeed [1]–[7]. The most recent numbers regarding engineering retention ratesfor United States universities show that approximately
makerspaces also offer greatpotential in serving broader goals of education [36, 40-42], such as the critical goal ofaugmenting first-year engineering retention. Some institutions utilize makerspaces as a means tooffer training and/or teaching new skills and/or knowledge [43]. For quite some time now, manycolleges have provided makerspace-analogous functionalities, including assembly/testing areas,machine shops, Computer Aided Design laboratories, and/or classrooms. What universities oftenlack is the inclusion of all of these elements in one location [44]. For campuses that doimplement such centralized accommodations, the majority of these makerspaces are utilizedpredominantly for informal settings rather than as a required program course.However, in
effectiveness, and global competencies He helped establish the scholarly foundation for engineering education as an academic discipline through lead authorship of the landmark 2006 JEE special reports ”The National Engineering Education Research Colloquies” and ”The Research Agenda for the New Dis- cipline of Engineering Education.” He has a passion for designing state-of-the-art learning spaces. While at Purdue University, Imbrie co-led the creation of the First-Year Engineering Program’s Ideas to Inno- vation (i2i) Learning Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the
including first year composition, professional writing, and rhetoric. She has been collaborating with Professor Raenita Fenner on ways to improve student learning in Engineering for several years.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering learning environments and supporting engineering students.Dr. Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida Elliot P. Douglas is Professor of Environmental Engineering Sciences and Engineering Education, and Distinguished Teaching Scholar at the University of Florida. His research interests are in the areas of
Paper ID #37219Student Success in 4-D (SS4D): Toward a Holistic Understanding ofEngineering Student Success in Motivation, Curricular Attainment andExperiential Opportunities across Educational StagesSamantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is cur- rently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Andrea Gregg, Pennsylvania State