get experience writing a paper, making a poster, and presenting my work” “An in-depth understanding of research and graduate school opportunities” “I hope to learn how to operate the equipment used in analysis or material systems”The EnSURE program is marketed as an “internship in graduate school” so it is bothunsurprising and reassuring that nearly all responses to this question involved students’ desires togain research skills, disciplinary knowledge, and other experience that will assist them inreaching their academic and/or career goals.It is interesting that very few students (3% of total responses) indicated that they were hopingthat EnSURE would help them clarify their career path. Many other researchers 3,3,4,9,20–23
, Engineering Professions, Quantitative Analysis, Cluster Analysis,Graduate Education, Career Paths1 IntroductionOne often neglected aspect of engineering education is career education. Along with theaccumulation of disciplinary knowledge and skills, students also develop an identity as anengineer [34]—a sense of “who I want to become” and “what I want to do”. Career choice isarguably one of the most important decisions students make as they navigate through theirengineering education. However, senior engineering students are often found unsure about orstruggling with career decisions [34]-[36]. Moreover, while engineering schools endeavor todiversify their educational offerings to meet students’ needs of pursuing various careertrajectories
solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues.In this research, we define contextual competence as an engineer's ability to anticipate andunderstand the constraints and impacts of social, cultural, environmental, political, and othercontexts on engineering solutions.How can engineering programs best develop their students' ability to integrate context anddesign? This paper reports results from two national studies, funded by the National ScienceFoundation, which are exploring educational practices and outcomes at diverse institutions.Prototype to Production: Processes and Conditions for Preparing the Engineer of 2020 (P2P)surveyed faculty members, students, alumni
institutional policies (or lack thereof), professional and personal networks, interactionswith colleagues and students, and articulated (or not) expectations all combine to createparticular climates and experiences for faculty at institutions of higher education throughout theUnited States in 2020. Those show gendered and race-based patterns. Many of the activities thatare integral to the reputation and function of an organization are often performed by women andfaculty of color. These activities, especially administrative and curriculum-based ones, tend torequire time and expertise but are not typically rewarded in traditional academic promotionstructures [1, 33, 6, 34, 31, 35]. In fact, research indicates that women faculty overwhelminglyare tasked
, which is acomponent of job applications for faculty positions. The professional development facet of theprogram includes workshops for writing a CV or a Cover Letter and academic interviewing, attendingdiscipline specific conferences, presenting research, and interviewing faculty members to learn moreabout their career trajectory. The academic life facet includes workshops on the tenure and promotionprocess and student advising, as well as service involvement in the university. Participants alsocomplete a series of interviews of faculty, including administrators, to learn more about their careers.Overall, the program provides a large set of resources, support, and guidance through professionaldevelopment for graduate students who seek to be
Paper ID #21704The Influence of an Externship on BME Predoctoral Students’ Career Devel-opmentMs. Julia N. Savoy, University of Wisconsin-Madison Julia N. Savoy, M.S., is an Assistant Researcher in the Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. One aspect of her research examines the effects of professional development participation on the career pathways of doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and early-career faculty.Prof. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Engineering Foundation Endowed Faculty Fellow in
/presentation notes and faculty-student interaction. The A/CE3 staff and studentobserver collaborate to create a brief document summarizing major successes and weaknesses ofthe class; these are presented to and discussed with the faculty in a one hour post-observationmeeting. As a graduate student this whole cycle is an immersive learning experience where youtake part in classroom observation training, critically examine several lectures from newerfaculty members, hear from an expert providing feedback to the faculty, and you are also grantedthe opportunity to contribute your student perspective in this process.Focus Groups to Collect Student FeedbackAnother function that the A/CE3 can provide to faculty in the College of Engineering isconducting focus
college fall 2018, including anintroduction to productive teaming skills through a collaborative game; use of productarcheology to help student explore ways in which products are gendered or racialized;exploration of cognitive bias and how it manifests in our personal and professional lives; acritical history of engineering; and exploration of team roles and the importance ofunderstanding one’s own personality and inclinations when participating on a team. In addition,two members of this subgroup are participating in a parallel effort supported through an NSFRevolutionizing Engineering Departments award: a Professional Learning Community (PLC).PLCs are collegial groups that provide educators across disciplines facilitated opportunities
professional practice as well as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Ms. Allyson Jo Ironside, Oregon State University Ally Ironside is a recent graduate from LeTourneau University where she studied Water Resources in Civil Engineering. She is currently fusing her technical background with her passion for education in pursuing a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering while conducting research in Engineering Education at Oregon State University. Her research interests include the adoption of teaching best practices in engineering and the personal epistemology development students.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University Shane Brown is an associate professor and
Paper ID #39496Are All ’EBIPs’ Created Equal? An Exploration of Engineering FacultyAdoption of Nine Evidence-Based Instructional PracticesDr. Amy L Brooks, Oregon State University Dr. Amy Brooks is a Postdoctoral Scholar at the Oregon State University School of Civil and Construction Engineering and member of the Beyond Professional Identity lab at Harding University. Her current research is using interpretative phenomenological analysis to understand well-being and experiences with professional shame among engineering faculty. She is also part of a research team investigating context- specific affordances and barriers
an excellent tool for engineering educationresearcher, particularly young faculty”, and “typically, yeah, no, new students aren’t thinking ofgrants”. However, P1 indicated that she is very interested in the grant proposals because she hascareer interests in National Science Foundation. “It is from NSF, and I have career interests inthat area.” “It tells me what NSF is cataloging.” Therefore we identified a role iKNEER couldplay in the researchers’ professional career beyond research.Theme 2.4 Researchers’ decision on research directions are made in a broad contextiKNEER only plays a very small role in the researchers’ whole decision-making processes, theresearchers’ decisions on whether to pursue certain topics are made in a much broader
as exploring students’ conceptions of diversity and its importance within engineering fields.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of
Full-time PhD student in curriculum and pedagogy program at OISE and first OISE student as classical voice musician at the Faculty of Music. Her research focuses on governance, curriculum policy and leadership. Currently, she is the Graduate Research Assistant of SSHRC Creating equitable structures in early secondary school mathematics project and researcher at Encore Lab. She is Co-President at the Canadian Committee of Graduate Students in Education of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education. She serves as President at CTL Students’ Association and Graduate Student Member at OISE Council & Research Committee. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A Trio-Ethnography
Paper ID #26824SciComm: An Oral Communication Professional Development Program forSTEM Graduate StudentsDr. Amy M. Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Assistant Director of Graduate Education for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate student recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in
Page 22.132.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Academic Preparation in a Co-op Program as a Career Enhancement Tool for International Engineering Graduates in CanadaCo-operative education programs in North America have their origins in engineering schools,beginning with the University of Cincinnati in 1906, and in Canada, at the University ofWaterloo in 1957. Today, Canada provides one of the most widely developed co-op models inthe world, with over 80,000 co-op students enrolled in 83 Canadian institutions in 2009[1]. A co-operative education program is defined here to include one or more paid work terms that post-secondary students fulfill as part of their studies. Participating in
major choice to one of future possibilities and connection tocareer. This shift may support future identity work in other subfields of computing, as well as inother elements of computing education, such as graduate study. As computer science seeks todiversify, the act of becoming in computing will be an important avenue of investigation, and theconnections students make to specific careers in the field may support identity development thatmoves beyond the role of student towards future professional identities.KEYWORDSCommunity of Practice, Career Identification, Learning Contexts1 IntroductionComputer Science and computing career identity are concepts in the computer scienceeducational research field that have seen growth in the last
AC 2010-839: INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY: A RESEARCH METHOD TOINVESTIGATE THE WORK-LIFE EXPERIENCES OF WOMEN FACULTYMEMBERS IN STEM DISCIPLINESDina Banerjee, Purdue University Dina Banerjee is a post-doctoral researcher in the Research in Feminist Engineering (RIFE) group. Her primary responsibility is the study of the career-related experiences of the women and minority faculty members of the STEM disciplines of Purdue University. She graduated with her PhD from Purdue University in May, 2009. After her admission in Purdue University in 2002, she graduated with her third Masters with sociology major in 2004. Her areas of specialization are gender, work and occupation; development and social change
studentprogress. Additionally, this paper is meant to catalyze conversation among graduate students,undergraduate students, advising faculty members, and administrators about the specifics of the pathwayto a PhD. The elements of the PhD process that are highlighted with the analogy presented at the specialsession are the interpretation of the facilitators. Our interpretation might not resonate with every PhDstudent or every reader, but discussing the differences and shortcomings of the analogy will still initiatemore detailed conversations about the PhD process and the implications of the differences between ourinterpretations and that of others.FrameworkTo help guide their exploration, participants were provided an overview of identity-trajectory
on two broad areas: achievement/retention in STEM and comprehension of illus- trated scientific textDr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering edu- cation research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research.Dale RobbennoltAnne Hart, University of Tennessee, Memphis ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Exploring the Landscape of Stressors Experienced by Doctoral Engineering
different groups (such as race or gender) and the resulting psychological re-sponses. ICT identifies key conditions that enable positive contact between members of differentraces and genders in a group. For this exploratory analysis, we included all participants in the larger study who identifiedas African American and female; all were full-time undergraduate students enrolled in an engi-neering course with a team project. The nine participants represent a range of years in school andengineering majors. Data collection followed a three-interview sequence and included questionsabout participants’ background, their team project, and their reflections on the teaming experi-ence, respectively. In this paper, we present our initial exploration of
reliability, risk assessment, systems modeling, and probabilistic methods with social science approaches. She is a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship and a 2023-2024 Mavis Future Faculty Fellow. She is a member of the NIST Center of Excellence for Community Resilience and collaborates with engineers, economists, social scientists, and planners on the development of tools to support community resilience decision-making. She has been recognized for her research at multiple international conferences with a Student Best Paper Award at ICOSSAR 2021/2022 and CERRA Student Recognition Award at ICASP 2023.Prof. Eun Jeong Cha, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Eun Jeong Cha is an associate professor in the
design intent from the organizers for the competition tobe accessible to students at every stage of their college career, whereby there are portions of thecompetition that are simple enough to be completed by a team competing for the first time, withsuccessive tasks of increasing difficulty that will challenge even the most experienced students.Implementation of Robotics Competition at CSULAThe Robosub team at CSULA was founded in 2016, providing a multidisciplinary platform forstudents of all majors and backgrounds to participate in the creation of an autonomous submarinerobot for the annual Robosub competition. Students gain various technical and soft skills, as wellas form lasting relationships with other team members and faculty advisors
, FSAE, and Duke Engineers for International Development.Dr. Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Duke University Karis Boyd-Sinkler, PhD is the Director of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion and Adjunct Assistant Pro- fessor at Duke University’s Pratt School of Engineering. She plays a key role in providing strategies to strengthen Pratt’s efforts to create and sustain an equitable environment for all members of the Pratt Com- munity including students, staff, faculty, and alumni. She has over 7 years of experience leading multiple mentoring, outreach, and professional development programs focused on the recruitment and retention of engineering students at all levels, especially students from Black and Hispanic/Latino populations. Dr
. The questionnaire data we collected agreed with thosefindings and showed that parental support for students’ career choice increased slightly, but notsignificantly, as students moved from high school through college (Table 1). As a key source ofcareer advice, parents of high school and college women gave general advice and supportedcareer exploration.In a qualitative study about family influences on vocational exploration and career decision-making16, it was found that most of those interviewed felt that their parents and siblings had apositive influence. For those high school women who had the ability and interest in an IT career,at least one parent or sibling specifically encouraged IT as a career. We did find, however, thatwhen a family
in engineering, competency development, and understanding the experiences of traditionally marginalized engineering students (e.g., Latinx, international students, Indigenous students) from an asset-based perspective. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that traditionally marginalized students bring into the field and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tools to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching
during the summer. All the students in both programs came into contact with faculty members and were encouraged to take business cards so that they would have a contact person if they chose to enroll in an engineering discipline at the hosting university. By accumulating these contact people, the students were able to form their own network within the university. The facilitators also discussed the importance of recruiting the students into engineering by informing them of the opportunities in the various engineering fields. By conducting tours of different research facilities, the students were introduced to multidisciplinary engineering as well as real life applications of the lessons they had been learning during the week. One
Page 22.1340.4Thomas, personal communication, December 14, 2010). Planning is already in process to boostthese numbers for the 2011 Midwest region meeting at Arkansas Tech in Russelville and the2012 meeting at the Missouri University of Science & Technology in Rolla.Beyond student chapters, SCC, and region meetings, ASEE has continued to promote studentinvolvement in engineering education through the creation of the “Bring-A-Student” program,which allows students to attend the ASEE Annual Conference without an ASEE membership.Engineering education departments at institutions such as Virginia Tech have organizedworkshops to provide opportunities for graduate and post-doctoral students to explore positionsin academia. In addition, faculty
results from individuals’ own values, interests, and preferences for a particular 4career path as well as their pre-existing skills.26 Building occupational knowledge refers to thetangible facts that an individual may have about an occupational position. Such knowledgeresults from personal research, actual exposure to a career path, and training opportunities.Research shows that student veterans are most concerned about finding a job after graduationand thus want to major in fields that will assist this goal.27 Greater understanding of SVEs’career intentions and decisions could boost the graduation rate of student veterans, a trend thathas improved in recent years, according to the Million Records
graduate students become faculty members, their thoughts about the role of education anddesign of learning environments will significantly impact students’ quality of education and thecaliber of practicing engineers in the future. Thus, a study was conducted to determine andanalyze graduate students’ philosophies of education to provide insights into the instructionalpractices that will soon dominate engineering education. Students enrolled in graduate programsat the Georgia Institute of Technology within a variety of engineering and non-engineeringdisciplines were recruited to participate. Students completed an amended, online version of theEducational Philosophy Inventory, which is a theoretically-grounded instrument that allows
, the objectives of the study were to identity factors that can be designed into a learn-ing environment in order to elevate learning to high levels. Page 11.12.32. Description of the studyThe research methodology was a case study involving a four-day faculty development workshopheld at the University of Idaho from May 31 to June 3, 2005. The workshop was attended byapproximately 32 faculty members and 3 graduate students. Participants came from three re-gional schools: University of Idaho, Washington State University, and Lewis-Clark State Col-lege. Participants represented a variety of disciplines and included administrators and