highlight best practices and solution pathways that are moreconsistent with how the material was presented in class.- Engage with the students’ metacognitive responses! Answer questions that they bring up, orcomment on the good realizations that they have. If they write about needing to improve in acertain way, ask them later how this effort is going, and if they need any ideas.[1] P. C. Wankat, “The Role of Homework,” ASEE Conf. Proc., 2001.[2] P. C. Wankat and F. S. Oreovicz, “Testing, homework, and grading,” in Teaching Engineering, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill College, 1993, pp. 213–234.[3] W. Li, R. M. Bennett, T. Olsen, and R. McCord, “Engage Engineering Students In Homework: Attribution of Low Completion and Suggestions for
Life History in a Social Science Perspective. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press, 1989.[20] D. J. Clandinin and F. M. Connelly, Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.[21] F. M. Connelly and D. J. Clandinin, Teachers as Curriculum Planners: Narratives of Experience. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1988.[22] J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, 2005.[23] P. B. Myers and K. D. Myers, Myers-Briggs Type Indicators. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc, 1998.[24] A. S. Denzer and K. E. Hedges, “From CAD to
positive academic experiences and retention in engineering,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 114, no. 23, pp. 5964–5969, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613117114.[7] G. Crisp and I. Cruz, “Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007,” Res. High. Educ., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 525–545, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2.[8] S. L. Fletcher, D. C. Newell, L. D. Newton, and M. R. Anderson-Rowland, “The wise summer bridge program: Assessing student attrition, retention, and program effectiveness,” in ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, 2001, pp. 10605–10611.[9] S. C. de Janasz and S. E. Sullivan, “Multiple mentoring in academe: Developing the professorial network,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol
Monica Cardella was serving at the National ScienceFoundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. References[1] R. Yin, Qualitative research from start to finish, 2 nd ed., New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 2016.[2] F. Marton, “Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us,” Instr. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 177–200, 1981.[3] M. F. Pang, “Two Faces of Variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 145–156, Jun. 2003.[4] F. Marton, “Phenomenography: A
Classroom to Increase Students’ Engagement and Interaction in a Mechanical Engineering Course on Machine Design," International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 19-34, 2017, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v7i4.7427.[6] E. Blair, C. Maharaj, and S. Primus, "Performance and perception in the flipped classroom," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1465-1482, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10639-015-9393-5.[7] C. Rotellar and J. Cain, "Research, Perspectives, and Recommendations on Implementing the Flipped Classroom," American journal of pharmaceutical education, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 34, 2016, doi: 10.5688/ajpe80234.[8] J. O'Flaherty and C. Phillips, "The use of flipped classrooms in higher
and engineering students teaching math and science through robotics,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 2005.[3] K. E. Bledsoe, R. Shieh, Y.-S. Park, and E. Gummer, “Role perceptions and role dynamics between graduate scientists and K-12 teachers in a school-university outreach project: Understudied constructs,” J. High. Educ. Outreach Engagem., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2004.[4] C. Gartland, “Student ambassadors: ‘Role-models’, learning practices and identities,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., 2015.[5] M. Portsmore, C. Rogers, and M. Pickering, “STOMP: Student Teacher Outreach Mentorship Program.” Proc. 2003 Annu. Conf. American Soc. Engineering Education, Nashville, TN, USA. https
productivity. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 923-954.12. Potter, H., Higgins, G. E., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2011). The influence of gender, race/ethnicity, and faculty perceptions on scholarly productivity in criminology/criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(1), 84-101.13. Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students' research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791-805.14. Lev, E. L., Kolassa, J., & Bakken, L. L. (2010). Faculty mentors’ and students’ perceptions of students’ research self-efficacy. Nurse Education Today, 30(2), 169-174.15. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., &
. 141-147, 2010.[3] D. Xu, & S.S. Jaggars, “The impact of online learning on students' course outcomes: Evidence from a large community and technical college system,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 37, no. 46-57, 2013.[4] L.L. Long, & J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers for underrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 211-218, 2016.[5] D. Lawton, N. Vye, J. Bransford, E. Sanders, M. Richey, D. French, & R. Stephens, “Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessments,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 244-287, 2012.[6] S. Badjou, & R. Dahmani, “Current status of online science and
. 13Litzinger, T., Van Meter, P., Firetto, C., Passmore, L., Masters, C., Turns, S., Gray, G., Costanzo, F., & Zappe, S. (2010). A Cognitive Study of Problem Solving in Statics. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 337–337.Lutz, B. D., Ironside, A. J., Hunsu, N., Groen, C. J., Brown, S. A., Adesope, O., & Simmons, D. R. (2018). Measuring Engineering Students’ In-Class Cognitive Engagement: Survey Development Informed by Contemporary Educational Theories. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://peer.asee.org/30795McCord, R. E., & Matusovich, H. M. (2019). Naturalistic observations of metacognition in engineering: Using observational methods to study metacognitive
talent at the crossroads,” National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine, Washington DC, 20115. W.B. Harvey, “American council on education (ace), minorities in higher education twenty- first annual status report (2003-2004),” American Council on Education, 1-100, 20056. P. Gurin, E.L. Dey, E.L. Hurtado, Gurin, P., “Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes,” Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330-366, 20027. P. Gurin, B.R.A. Nagda, G.E., “The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship,” Journal of Social Issues, 60(1), 17-34, 20048. A.L. Antonio, M.J. Chang, K. Hakuta, D.A. Kenny, S. Levin, & J.F. Milem, J. F. “Effects of racial
. Developing Shared Vision seeks to engage stakeholders in collectivelydeveloping new environmental features that encourage new teaching conceptions and/orpractices.Henderson et al.’s framework does not imply that all four change strategies are equally effective.In fact, Henderson identified two approaches - testing “best practice” curricular materials andmaking these materials available to other faculty and “top down” policy-making meant toinfluence instructional practices - as ineffective change strategies in STEM education(Henderson et al., 2011). Additionally, their review found that effective change strategies arethose that are aligned with or seek to change beliefs of the individuals involved, involve long-term interventions, and recognize
task of verifying the theoretical description of circuit performance is definitelyfound in the lower three Bloom’s levels. When the students were asked to predict the cause(s) fora given fault in the observed circuit behavior and then simulate as validation, they were workingin the upper three levels. Both of these tasks can also be done experimentally, but it may not bepossible to fully identify the cause of the fault using only one approach. Finally, the time andfrequency dependent data obtained for circuits using either method have similar formats and,thus, involve similar issues in doing them correctly. For example, triggering a scope (akadeciding when to start collecting data) and specifying time and voltage scales require verysimilar
process. In future, we plan to offer these as regularcourses in affiliation with local schools where a K-12 teacher can take the role of the instructor.Finally, one week for each course did not seem to be sufficient to expose participants to manyimportant concepts of either AI2 or OOP. Hence, running the two course over an entire semesteror two consecutive semesters might allow instructors to cover more programming concepts whichare required to solve problems in the real world.8. REFERENCES[1]. S. Kurkovsky, “Making computing attractive for non-majors: a course design,” Journal of Computer.Science Coll. Vol.22, No. 3, pp. 90-97, Jan 2007.[2]. A. Forte and M. Guzdial, M”otivation and nonmajors in computer science: identifying discreteaudiences for
based on something personally interesting to them. The associated research investigates how an interest-based, human-centered approach to engineering design in Makerspace learning environments can appeal to a broader group of students.Chanel: My work and research takes place in informal settings with high school aged students to elderly persons. Typically, people I am working with are underrepresented in the field of engineering or completely disconnected from engineering s a profession or identity. My research primary asks participants to reflect on their experiences and think systematically about changes they would like to see and problems they observe. In general, I attempt to make
Engineers Without Borders, Germany(Ingenieure ohne Grenzen e.V.).LiteratureAllen, Deborah E.; Donham, Richard S.; Bernhardt, Stephen A. (2011): Problem-BasedLearning. In: New Directions for Teaching and Learning (128), S. 21–29.Belu, R.; Chiou, R.; Ciocal L.; Tseng, B. (2016): Incorporating Sustainability Concepts andGreen Design into Engineering and Technology Curricula. In: Journal of Education andLearning 10 (2), S. 93–102.Boyle, C. (2004): Considerations on educating engineers in sustainability. In: InternationalJournal of Sustainability in Higher Education 5 (2), S. 147–155.Buys, Laurie; Miller, Evonne; Buckley, Mathew; Jolly, Lesley (2013): The “Engineerswithout Borders” Challenge: Does it engage Australian and New Zealand students
Paper ID #22785Citizen Scientists Engagement in Air Quality MeasurementsProf. Anthony Butterfield, University of Utah Anthony Butterfield is an Assistant Professor (Lecturing) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation.Katrina My Quyen Le, AMES High School
, Roland D, Mashaw, Lane H., and Northup Larry L., Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, 1997.2. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, June 2012. http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/eac-criteria-2012- 2013.pdf3. McKenzie, Larry J., Trevisan, Michael S., Davis, Denny C., and Beyerlein, Steven W., “Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study,” Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition., pp. 9.286.1 – 9.286.17, 20044. Kirschenman, M. D. & Brenner, B., “Civil engineering design as the central theme in civil engineering education curriculum,” Leadership and Management in
. 199-218, 2006.[5] C. Evans, "Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education," Review of Educational Research, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 70-120, 2013.[6] V. J. Shute, "Focus on Formative Feedback," Review of Educational Research, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 153-189, 2008.[7] J. Hattie and H. Timperley, "The Power of Feedback," Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 81-112, 2007.[8] M. A. Creasy, "Measuring the Dynamic in Learning," presented at the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[9] S. Narciss, "Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks," Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, vol. 3, pp. 125-144, 2008.[10] A. Blair
writing behavior, educators can support graduate students throughthe critical and necessary process of writing up their research in disciplinary discourse. In additionto better understanding writing, we also feel that this work has large implications for other real-time and time-resolved data in educational settings. References1. Leydens, J. A. Sociotechnical communication in engineering: an exploration and unveiling of common myths. Eng. Stud. 4, 1–9 (2012).2. Paretti, M. C. & McNair, L. D. Introduction to the Special Issue on Communication in Engineering Curricula : Mapping the Landscape. IEEE Trans. Prof. Commun. 51, 238– 241 (2008).3. Ross, P. M., Burgin, S., Aitchison, C
she teaches introductory design, materials science, and manufacturing-focused courses. Sarah’s research interests include aspects of project-based learning and enhancing 21st century skills in undergraduate engineering students.Dr. Louis Nadelson, Colorado Mesa University Louis S. Nadelson has a BS from Colorado State University, a BA from the Evergreen State College, a MEd from Western Washington University, and a PhD in educational psychology from UNLV. His scholarly interests include all areas of STEM teaching and learning, inservice and preservice teacher pro- fessional development, program evaluation, multidisciplinary research, and conceptual change. Nadelson uses his over 20 years of high school and college
Pervasive,” J. Sci. Pract. Comput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–69, 2007.[2] Q. Bui, “Will Your Job Be Done By A Machine?,” Planet Money - The Economy Explained, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/05/21/408234543/will-your-job-be-done-by-a- machine. [Accessed: 25-May-2015].[3] M. Weisser, “The Computer for the Twenty-First Century,” Sci. Am., vol. 3, no. 265, pp. 94–104, 1991.[4] S. Hambrusch, C. Hoffmann, J. T. Korb, M. Haugan, and A. L. Hosking, “A Multidisciplinary Approach Towards Computational Thinking for Science Majors,” ACM SIGCSE Bull., vol. 41, no. 1, p. 183, Mar. 2009.[5] P. B. Henderson, “Ubiquitous computational thinking,” Computer (Long. Beach. Calif)., vol. 42
,”in Flipping the College Classroom: Practical Advice from Faculty, B. Honeycutt, Ed. Madison,Wisconsin: Magna Publications, 2016, pp. 13-15, 42-45.[2] G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman and K. E. Cook, "Comparing the Effectiveness of an InvertedClassroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course," IEEETransactions on Education, vol. 56, (4), pp. 430-435, 2013.[3] J. Moffett, "Twelve tips for "flipping" the classroom," Medical Teacher, vol. 37, (4), pp. 331-336, 2015.[4] S. J. DeLozier and M. G. Rhodes, "Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas andRecommendations for Practice," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 29, (1), pp. 141-151,2017.[5] L. C. Hodges, "Making Our Teaching Efficient: Flipping the Classroom," The
Higher Education, TIAA Institute, April 2016. https://www.tiaainstitute.org/public/pdf/taking_the_measure_of_faculty_diversity.pdf. Accessed Feb. 11, 2017.[5] M. J. Finkelstein, V. M. Conley, J. H. Schuster. (2016). The Faculty Factor: Reassessing the American Academy in a Turbulent Era, Johns Hopkins University Press.[6] M. A. Mason, N. H. Wolfinger and M. Goulden. (2013). Do Babies Matter?: Gender and Family in the Ivory Tower. Rutgers University Press.[7] E. A. Cech and M. Blair-Loy. (2014) Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers. Work Occupations 41(1):86–110.[8] S. Damaske, E. H. Ecklund, A. E. Lincoln & V. J. White. (2014). Male scientists’ competing devotions to work and family
2003.Colbeck, C.L., Campbell, S.E. and Bjorklund, S.A. 2000. Grouping in the dark: What collegestudents learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71 (1): 60-83.Felder, R. M., G. N. Felder and E. J. Dietz. 1998. A Longitudinal Study of Engineering StudentPerformance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students. Journal ofEngineering Education, 87 (4): 469-480.Felder, R. M., and L. K. Silverman. 1988. Learning and teaching styles in engineeringeducation. Engineering education, 78 (7): 674-681.Froyd, J.E. and M.W. Ohland. 2005. Integrated Engineering Curricula. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 94 (1): 147-164.Graham, T., S. Rowlands, S. Jennings, and J. English. 1999. Towards whole-class inter- activeteaching
Press.2. Pryor, J. H. and Reedy, E. J., 2009, “Trends in Business Interest Among U.S. College Students: An Early Exploration of Data Available from the Cooperative Institutional Research Program,” Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.3. Yang, A., 2014, Smart People Should Build Things. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.4. Boyd, N. G. and Vozikis, G. S., 1994, “The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, pp. 63-77.5. McGrath, R. G., 2000, The Entrepreneurial Mindset: Strategies for Continuously Creating Opportunity in an Age of Uncertainty. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.6. Condoor, S. and McQuilling, M., 2009, “Incorporating an
. Figure 3. IDEAS StagesAfter the proposal is approved, the groups start working in a literature review to develop a betterunderstanding about their research topic. The students then produce an abstract (Figure 3 b),which is submitted online by the deadline, to be peer reviewed by the course’s teachingassistants. The groups prepare their physical model(s) and experimental set-up (Figure 3 c) to betested according to their experiment design (Figure 3d). Once the laboratory results, handcalculations, and simulations are completed, the groups write and submit a paper according to theprovided template and guidelines (Figure 3f). The students also create a poster (examples areprovided) which is presented at the showcase along with the model(s), video(s
Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Professor and Chair of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University where he teaches courses in synthetic and biological polymers, materials selection, and fracture mechanics. He has conducted educational research in the areas of ethical decision making, reflection and innovative pedagogies for the past 19 years. He serves as Associate Editor of the journal Advances in Engineering Education. He has served as division chair for the Community Engagement Division and Materials Division of ASEE. Dr. Harding was invited to deliver a workshop on Ethics in the Engineering Curricula at the 2009 NSF Engineering Awardees Conference and to
., the Business ModelCanvas (Osterwalder & Pigneur, 2010)) in university settings and, as a quick internet search willreveal, the increasing number of unique canvases that are being developed to address specificneeds/contexts. At their most fundamental level, a canvas is a one-page visual frameworkmodeling the critical elements of a real-world system. The elements chosen are those that thecanvas’ creator(s) have deemed essential in order to design, add value or make changes to asystem out in the world. Visually, a canvas is often divided into segments, with each segmentcorresponding to one of the elements that should be considered. Based on this structure and ourexperience using canvases in educational settings, a canvas can • Focus a
supported coursewith an A or a B and is recommended for the position by their instructor. Many of these coursesare freshman-level mathematics and chemistry courses, as well as some sophomore-levelengineering courses. PAL leaders attend class for the section(s) they support so they are aware ofthe current material being discussed. This also allows them to build rapport with the instructor aswell as the students enrolled in the section(s) they support. Leaders then hold two 80 minutesessions each week. During sessions, leaders facilitate collaborative activities and studentdiscussions related to course topics as well as provide a safe place to ask questions and makemistakes along the way. We intentionally hire undergraduate students, rather than