. He is a Fellow of ASEE, was General Chair for FIE 2010 - the 40th Frontiers in Education Conference, and serves as the UVA Campus Representative. For the past nine years, Richards has brought Engineering Teaching Kits (ETKs) into middle school science and math classes through the Virginia Middle School Engineering Education Initiative. These ETKs introduce the engineering design approach to problem solving and teach key science and math concepts using guided inquiry.Elizabeth A. Parry, North Carolina State University Elizabeth Parry is an engineer and consultant in K-12 STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math- ematics) Curriculum and Professional Development and the Coordinator of K-20 STEM Partnership De
students, industry, and society as a whole? How Page 21.42.4can resources be synergistically integrated to support such an effort? What are the majorchallenges or barriers present that must be overcome in order to create such a system?In response to these questions, they present a concept map to explore how faculty educationaldevelopment could support and greatly enhance an entire system revolving around facultydevelopment in teaching and learning. Utilizing and reflecting upon the literature, major issuesconsidered that relate to the questions above include various roles in the higher educationengineering community; relationships between
engineering is an up-to-date issue and is a topic of internationaldiscussions. US, European and Asian researches suggested many innovative ideas that allowfor better international engineering interaction and students’ readiness for the open world [1],[3], [6], [8], [9]. For example corporate education presented by Herman Schneider more thana hundred years ago was successfully implemented as the option for students to gain secondlanguage proficiency and international job experience [3]. Page 26.425.2 Leading Russian universities also take part in the global integration process. Thenumber of international students is increasing from year to year
broad-based technicalknowledge and skills, with a specialization in an emerging technology, such as photonics,robotics & automation, instrumentation & control, biomedical equipment etc. The AAS degreecurriculum for preparing these techs typically includes a technical core of electronics, plus 3-4specialty courses in one of these emerging technologies. An example that has been tested andproven very successful is in Photonics.Indian River State College (FL) converted its EET program to the Photonics SystemsTechnology (PST) curriculum structure in 2008, including several other specialties such asrobotics, fiber optics communications, instrumentation & control, and biomedical equipment.This change reenergized IRSC’s rapidly declining
formation of anengineering identity is an area of increasing interest in engineering education research due to itslink to student retention, particularly for those underrepresented in the profession.In addition, industry demands that engineering graduates possess improved abilities tocommunicate in a variety of mediums and cross-culturally. Improved integration of writing intothe technical curriculum could serve as a concrete method to develop these critical skills andattributes while potentially improving student retention. Despite these numerous benefits andefforts to increase engineering writing through efforts like Writing Across the Curriculum, it seemsmost engineering programs do little to engage their students in meaningful writing. This
mechatronics courses because ituses an integrated approach using contemporary industrial motion control technology and multi-axis real world applications. Our goal is to make connections between separately taught subjectsof abstract control theory, kinematics, dynamics, electronics, programming and machine design inthe context of real world applications. Our instructional design includes active learningcomponents in the lectures and cooperative learning components for the lab modules. Table 1provides a brief listing of the curriculum modules that are under development. In the next sectionwe present details of one of the modules. Table 1. New modular curriculum Module Content 1
, and Mathematics(STEM) Ability Awareness program. This work in progress is part of a STEMGROW program [1]that is informed by a theory-to-practice model [2] and uses a funds of knowledge framework [3].The goal is to bring together students already studying STEM fields and learn more about howthey can serve as an an inspiration not only for future students with disabilities, but for all allstudents at EPCC, UTEP, in STEM-fields and beyond. Our work centers on our students’ self-efficacy development and growth pathways. Therefore, we ground our project in the Model of Co-Curricular Support (MCCS) [4], whereby it is posited that there exist four main areas in whichstudents become integrated and educationally engaged within the university. The MCCS
first is a web application thatsupports an NSF funded curriculum development project. The second is a channelsupported by the uPortal portal system that automates the department’s graduateadmissions process and is deployed on the university’s IT portal system. The third is anapplication that integrates a Course Management System, Blackboard, with an outcomesbased assessment tool, True Outcomes, to automate the importing of student information tobetter measure outcomes for ABET accreditation. The fourth project is a linguisticsanalysis tool that finds word usage patterns in media articles.1 IntroductionOne of the program characteristics that ABET expects in engineering and technologyprograms that it accredits is the inclusion of some type of
AC 1998-392: Molecules Moving through Monoliths: Is this Civil Engineering?Marilyn Barger, Hillsborough Community College Page 3.415.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 1998 Session 2615 Molecules Moving through Monoliths: Is this Civil Engineering? Marilyn Barger FAMU-FSU College of EngineeringAbstract There are three equal and extremely important attributes of all engineering scienceconcepts as presented in an ABET approved engineering curriculum. They are fundamental,immutable, and the essence
already and some best practices are in place; some are offering a minor inleadership development. Others have developed an Office of Leadership Programs to coordinatewith all academic programs to offer comprehensive leadership curriculum for all undergraduatestudents. One school is working with Student Affairs and other programs to offer co-curricularleadership opportunities, developing leadership skills with an emphasis on character, integrityand professionalism. A number of schools are developing institutes for engineering leadershipthat take a variety of forms. Some use student clubs and extra-curricular projects as methods ofdeveloping leadership skills.Many are seeking ways to foster opportunities to learn leadership integrated within
with the entry point of theprofession ie education.To begin with, the undergraduate curriculum needs somerestructuring.It must be linked to a stage of communal development to produce aprofessional who is socially conscious of his or her role.The argument for increased Page 2.346.4humanities studies in producing an all rounded professional is not new,disparatepeople such as Eric Ashby and Finniston in his report into Engineering education sawin the increase content of humanities as enhancing the engineering curriculum In1968 the UNESCO secretariat in its international perspective on engineeringeducation argued , . . ..In view of the engineers dual
course over time and are currently used in an initial review during brainstorming and ideationfollowed by a second review coinciding with concept selection to better orient the student teamsto the different uses of the patent review findings. Several teams have elected to build on thepatent review materials by completing the University’s IP disclosure forms for a later contract-graded portion of the course.Overall, the integration of patent review into the first-year design course has been smooth, withstudent teams often conducting rigorous reviews and meaningful analyses of their findings.These materials and assignments are seen as potentially helpful to engineering design classesacross the undergraduate curriculum, including first-year design
importance of linkingthe accreditation process with the planning process. Since 1972 NJIT has undertaken many self-study and master planning activities. These activities were integrated with other Universityplanning activities and led in 1990 to the creation of a self-study/planning steering committee.The committee, in turn, identified task forces for achieving continuity to the planning process.More than 120 NJIT people representing faculty, administration, staff, students, alumni, andexternal constituents were involved in the process. This integrated effort led to NJIT's firstUniversity level, five year strategic plan in 1992. Since then, integrated strategic planning hasbeen an embedded process within NJIT and has provided in a top down fashion
approach. Embedding AI literacy seamlessly into existing curricula requires aninterdisciplinary strategy that covers technological competencies and delves into AI's ethical andsocietal implications [4]. This approach underscores the critical role of educators, who mustreceive robust professional development in AI to guide their students effectively. Furthermore,collaborative curriculum development emerges as a critical theme, advocating for a participatoryprocess involving educators, policymakers, and AI experts. This collaborative effort aims to co-design AI educational programs that are both relevant and forward-looking, preparing studentsfor a future where AI is an integral part of various sectors.To have the participation of the stakeholders
students associate with computing fields. Existing programs provide littleinsight into professional software development careers such as system analyst, softwarearchitect, or system tester. The COOL (Computer Outreach Opportunities for Learning) projectis developing and refining an innovative secondary school software development curriculummodules pilot program. This program for secondary teachers is to provide students with a betterunderstanding of the software development field, to dispel misconceptions, and to increase thenumber and diversity of students continuing their studies in preparation for softwaredevelopment careers, both through recruitment and retention programs. The curriculum modelswill be integrated into secondary school
addition, engineers with better communication and teamworkskills are needed to ensure U.S. competitiveness in today’s global economy.In order to address this competency gap a team of faculty members (consisting of faculty fromboth ME and EE departments) started work in the late nineties to integrate Mechatronics-basedactivities at all levels of the undergraduate engineering curriculum at University of DetroitMercy. These included a new senior level technical elective in introductory mechatronics alongwith mechatronic activities in freshman design and in the introductory electrical engineeringcourse for non-EE majors. This effort has been very successful, and now mechatronics activitiestake place in many pre-college programs that the school
CollegeAbstractThe purpose of this project is the bridging between California State Polytechnic University,Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) Civil Engineering students and Pasadena City College (PCC)science students to enhance the curriculum at both institutions. While enhancing the curriculum,the project seeks to improve the retention of both Cal Poly Pomona and PCC students, and tofacilitate the transfer of PCC students to Cal Poly Pomona. Indirectly, the project promotesgraduate school opportunities and lifelong learning in an inter-institutional disciplinaryenvironment.One of the main ideas behind this project is the development of teams composed of both PCCstudents and Cal Poly Pomona students. These student teams work on the design of naturaltreatment systems
assist teachers with student engagement, helping them to be successful throughout the STEM pipeline. A few of these key areas include enhancing student’s spatial abilities (k-12 and higher education), integrating ser- vice learning into the classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using additive manufacturing.Dr. Charles D. Eggleton, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Dr. Charles Dionisio Eggleton is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the Uni- versity of Maryland Baltimore County. He has twenty-two years of experience teaching theoretical and laboratory courses in thermo-fluids to undergraduate students and was Department Chair from 2011 - 2017
. programming in a common integrated developmentWhy is instructor training so critical to safely and effectively environment [IDE] or cybersecurity network simulations forteaching pedagogy? We present these paradigms and discuss Information Technology courses.challenges associated with laboratory-based learning. Theseinclude equipment costs, upkeep and maintenance of equipment In the context of an ABET accredited curriculum, lab-and lab space availability. Increasing ways to mitigate these based instruction not only reinforces technical skills andchallenges often include a virtual and online environment. problem-solving abilities. Lab classes provide relevantFinally, we also share methods for the assessment
SPARCstation under the UNIX operating system, and using Quintec-Prolog,Quintec-Flex, and FORTRAN 77 as programming environment. The paper concludes with asummary and recommendations on future impact of artificial intelligence and EStechnologies on computer-aided engineering education.1. IntroductionComputers have been introduced as an element into the teaching environment for a long timenow. Until recently, computers have been used for relatively routine calculations such as:report writing, spreadsheets, drafting, and simple simulations. Very rarely are computers usedto help teach and visualize fundamental concepts, or to explore the alternative solutions of a 1design project . The integration of computers in higher education is still
(VRML) 2.0 file was generated from the Quest model. Students use the virtual reality model forcase studies in various classes in the curriculum.IntroductionThe Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Department at Wichita State University isdeveloping an integrated set of virtual reality models of a manufacturing line at Boeing Wichita.Researchers at WSU and Boeing will use these high fidelity models to identify and designimprovements to the line. They will also be used in a mega-case from which various line studiesare derived to vertically integrate the concepts across a manufacturing engineering curriculum,provide situated learning to our students and address many of the competency gaps identified bythe Society of Manufacturing Engineers
Paper ID #40655[GIFTS] Developing Data Literacy through the NAE Grand Challenges andMATLAB App DesignerDr. Dan Burleson, University of Houston Dr. Dan Burleson is an Instructional Associate Professor in the Cullen College of Engineering at the Uni- versity of Houston. He has been at the University of Houston since 2010 when he joined as a Graduate Research Assistant, completing his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering in August of 2015. Before com- ing to Houston, Texas, Dr. Burleson completed B.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Florida. He was a founding faculty for the the First Year Experience in Cullen
slide rule. [21]”Using this call as a mandate, the programs described in this paper have begun to look to thefuture as an opportunity. Having evolved, as Ruth Graham recently said about us [42], withcontinuous improvement as a part of our DNA, we must continually look inward to eliminatebarriers to access and portray outwardly to our future students the lived culture of inclusion,equity, and collaboration. Our focus on creative, innovative, open-ended problem solving mustcontinue to mature and produce graduates ready for tackling messy, complex problems throughsystems approaches integrating all disciplines. We see these challenges as achievable within ourprogram structures. More difficult is to overcome archaic curriculum approval systems
design and development process. There are also factors which influence thedesign and setup of an integrated model for online education. Assessing the types, quantities, andcapabilities of equipment, software, and teaching methodologies has become an issue whichmust be addressed at every turn in order to keep up with student demands for high qualityeducational programs and to maximize various delivery methodologies.The primary goals of an effective distance delivery protocol are designed to promote studentsuccess and to help faculty build the requisite skills needed to develop, deliver, and promote anoptimal learning environment. The College of Technology and Computer Science at EastCarolina University has embarked upon a multi-disciplinary
: Adapting and Implementing the SCALE-UP Approach in Statics, Dynamics, and Multivariate Calculus. He is also supported by an NSF Mathematics Education CCLI grant: Adapting K-8 Mathematics Curricular Materials for Pre-Service Teacher Education.Dorothy Moss, Clemson University Dot Moss is a lecturer in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Clemson University where she serves as Project Director of Math Out of the Box™, a K-5 curriculum and teacher professional development project. She has a BS from Bob Jones University, a Masters from Clemson University, and thirty hours above a Masters in Library Science. In addition to serving as one of the principal authors of Math Out of the Box
culture.At the same time, it is a great incentive for students enrolled in URI’s 5 year dual degree GermanIEP program, working towards a B.S. in an engineering discipline, and a B.A. in German.Students in this program spend their 4th year studying and interning abroad. The IEP has ademanding curriculum, and the annual study tour is one of its most effective tools to retain thesestudents who go the extra mile. It serves several purposes: firstly, it introduces students toGermany as an attractive site for science, technology and culture. Highlights of the study tour arevisits to German companies as a means of preparing students for their internships in the 4th year.At companies such as Bayer, BMW, Conti, Hilti, Lufthansa Technik, Siemens, or ZF
transfer have been conducted atKettering with open-ended CFD design synthesis and modeling projects, including industrysponsor participation. The thrust of this pilot program was improving the competitiveness of thestudents and their employers through virtual design and optimization. Kettering has alsodeveloped an elective course in applied CFD involving student research, as discussed by Navazand Henderson(2). Kettering has been implementing the integration of research experience in theundergraduate curriculum as called for by the National Science Foundation(3). In addition, theASEE’s “Green Report”(4) stressed the need for industry participation in the educational process
implications of those technologies for theworld? This paper addresses the concept of technological literacy for 21st centuryundergraduates and proposes an agenda for a new liberal arts curriculum which we call“Converging Technologies” which emphasizes both “technology” and “literacy.”I. Introduction It is high time to address and bridge the historical gulf between engineering and theliberal arts in higher education. Both engineering and liberal arts educators should not merelyview this as an interesting sideline, but rather as an educational imperative in order to introducestudents to the new interdisciplinary ideas that are changing the landscape of global society, andto “minimize the threat of terminal incompetence.”1 How long can we produce
6mentioned6. The other is in the area marked “T-shaped Education” in Figure 4. This will be thefocus of the remainder of this paper, and will be used as an example to convey the final of step ofthe intrapreneurship study process, which is to build intrapreneurship competency throughengineering educational opportunities. Potential challenges and obstacles to achieve this areidentifying what new and differentiated educational opportunities should be provided, how bestto integrate these into the engineering education experience without adversely affecting otherparts of the curriculum, and how to assess their effectiveness in developing the competenciesneeded for intrapreneurship. The ultimate measure of how effective this approach is will be inthe
Page 22.1235.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Relationship between Student Competitive Activities and the Entrepreneurial MindsetAbstractThis paper analyzes the effect of student competitive projects as part of their curricular activities.The goal of the analysis is to examine the relationship between these activities and the buildingof entrepreneurial mindset in engineering education. Student competitive projects have been andcontinue to be an integral part the engineering curriculum. Cross disciplinary and interdisciplinary teams are formed to compete in various competitions in our engineering programs.These projects include: Aero Design Competition