NSF S-STEM Funded iAM Program: Lessons Learned Implementing a Collaborative STEM Workshop for Community College and University PartnersAbstractIn alignment with the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsProgram (S-STEM) [1], a Two-Year Community College, Nassau Community College (NCC) andfour-year university, Hofstra University (HU) are within a five-mile radius of each other and arecollaborating. The objective is to recruit academically talented low-income students through twopipelines, retain them through transparency of the hidden curriculum, and see them through tograduation in a STEM field from HU [2]. The Integrated and Achievement Mentoring (iAM)Program is a Track 3 (multi
%. Page 24.608.2This has led to the development and implementation of first-year engineering experiences, eitherthrough engineering specific courses or through integrated curricula, to provide context andsupport for the mathematics and science courses taken during the first year and to providestudents with engineering-related experience.7 Use of these strategies has been shown to improveretention of students in engineering fields.8 At the University of Cincinnati work is progressingto implement a variety of educational reforms to enhance the first-year engineering experiencefor students.University of Cincinnati switched from quarters to semesters in fall of 2013. The switch tosemesters provided an opportunity to make changes to the first year
AC 2010-2343: MARRYING MANUFACTURING PROGRAMS WITHBIOLOGICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING FIELDSArif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris UniversityJohn Mativo, The University of Georgia Page 15.854.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Marrying Manufacturing Programs with Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Fields and MoreIntroductionThis paper focuses on program and curriculum development in order to sustain and enhancemanufacturing engineering programs. The idea of emphasizing product design and developmentor integration of micro- or nano-manufacturing into manufacturing curriculum is attractive andimportant for the survival of the discipline. On
Science andTechnology, the IEEE Society on the Social Implications of Technology, and the Society forthe History of Technology in this area of knowledge which often takes place in schools out-side of engineering as for example the departments of philosophy in universities in theNetherlands. “A person who is technologically literate might have a knowledge of the systems of an automobile such as engine, power train, and brakes along with the basic principles underlying the functioning of these systems. This is knowledge of the product. Engineering literacy would include knowledge or ability to design, analyse or otherwise create the constituent components of the automobile.” “An integrated circuit is a technological device. A person who is
,if any, practical guidelines for effectively integrating simulation software into engineeringcurricula. The authors recently received funding from the Idaho State Board of Education toenhance two basic engineering science courses at the three colleges of engineering in Idaho. Thecenterpiece of the Internet-based project is Working ModelTM. Working ModelTM is a widelyused engineering mechanics simulation program marketed by Knowledge Revolution1. The primary goal of the project is to enhance statics and dynamics courses byincorporating design-based modules into the curriculum; therefore, we call the project Design-Based Engineering Education (DBEE). The DBEE modules are structured to provide studentownership through open-ended design
Session 1253 Session 1253 Faculty Collaboration and Course Coordination with Feeder Campuses using Information Technologies Dhushy Sathianathan, Carol Dwyer, Marsha King, Eric Spielvogel The Pennsylvania State UniversityABSTRACTWith a growing emphasis on vertical and horizontal integration of engineering curriculum thereis a growing need for strong coordination among the engineering courses. This coordination isnecessary for accreditation specially in courses that satisfy design requirements. Four
the humanities and social sciences with STEM education to create a unique learning experience for students.Cheryl A Bodnar (Associate Professor, Experiential Engineering Education) Dr. Cheryl Bodnar is an Associate Professor in the Experiential Engineering Education Department at Rowan University and is currently serving as the Provost’s Fellow for Student Success. Recently, the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Kern Family Foundation have funded her research. Her research interests relate to the incorporation of active learning techniques such as game-based learning in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested
Organizational Learning, Performance, and Change) Perseus Publishing, 2001.4. Carlson, L. and Sullivan, J., “Exploring Entrepreneurship through Product Development: A Hands-On Approach,” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002.5. Caswell, C. and Mendelson, M., “Integrated Product Development in the Classroom,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 1997.6. Daneshgari, P. and Nimmo IV, P. E., “Learning Based Product Development,” Proceedings of American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2002.7. Dennis, T. and Fulton, R., “Facilitating Distributed Collaborative Product Development in an Undergraduate Curriculum,” Proceedings
traditional theoretical and experimental components of the course(s). In a previous paper we proposed an approach to introducing computational physics in the undergraduate curriculum by blending computation and experimentation in the Modern Physics course and laboratory with materials that discuss contemporary physics subjects (quantum dots, LASERs, superconductivity, etc). In this paper we report on the homework problems and laboratories that have been developed as part of this project and the successes and challenges in implementing these materials, and we point to future work to be done in this area.In 2011, the American Association of Physics Teachers approved a “Statement
engineering collegemembers responsible for the creation and development of an engineering program that fits thenew demands3. It is necessary to:• create a balanced program that integrates technical skills and professional practices;• provide professional development and opportunities that enable faculty to teach effectively in an integrated curriculum;• implement an integrated curriculum that meets diverse student populations;• develop a rigorous assessment program that balances indirect and direct measures;• establish and maintain an active research community with a research agenda that completes a feedback loop to strengthen engineering.It is generally agreed that the engineers that universities train gain tremendous
the sectionheading, as appropriate.Project ApproachA summary of participating institutional metrics can be found in [6]. Briefly, the schools rangefrom small, private military institutes (1700 students on campus) to large private universities(15,000 students on campus).1. Content Delivery (Accessibility, Communication, Equivalency, Course Simplification)Intro to Engineering courses are continually evolving. Prior to the pandemic, the FYE team atDrexel University (DU, a large private university with 500 FYE students) was completelyredesigning their Intro to Engineering course in preparation for the Fall 2020 semester. The teamdeveloped an initial curriculum that was designed for virtual instruction, with up to 95% ofassignments converted to a
Mechatronics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1996. [2] A. Birk, “What is robotics? an interdisciplinary field is getting even more diverse,” IEEE robotics & automation magazine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 94–95, 2011. [3] S. E. Lyshevski, “Mechatronic curriculum–retrospect and prospect,” Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195–205, 2002. [4] D. G. Alciatore and M. B. Histand, “Integrating mechatronics into a mechanical engineering curriculum,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 35–38, 2001. [5] R. Manseur, “Development of an undergraduate robotics course,” in Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change, vol. 2. IEEE, 1997, pp. 610–612. [6] T.-R. Hsu
processing concepts by building a slow, stable circuiton a breadboard, and scaling to higher frequencies on paper, once the concept is understood. Butthis model is difficult to apply even to the most basic power conversion circuits; while signalprocessing functions are often available as discrete components, most modern power circuits arehighly integrated out of necessity. While it is possible to base a lab exercise on an off-the-shelfmonolithic power converter, much of the operation is hidden, and quality oscilloscopes andcurrent probes are out of reach for many schools. This paper presents the development of severalhands-on lab exercises in power electronics that are designed to provide hands-on, intuitiveexperience with concepts such as thermal
engineering skills of K-12 learners.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue Univer- sity and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 classrooms. Specific research interests include design metacognition among learners of all ages; the knowledge base for teaching K-12 STEM through engi- neering; the relationships among the attitudes, beliefs, motivation, cognitive skills, and engineering skills of K-16 engineering learners; and teaching engineering. American c
ProgramThe curriculum introduced teachers to the connections between mathematics and engineeringused to solve challenges in Modeling and Virtual Design and Earthquake Engineering Design.Participants could enroll in one or both components. Each component consisted of an intensive3-day, 10 hours per day, learning environment that provided participants with hands-onexperiences in engineering laboratories featuring state of the art technology and opportunities towork with the engineers using the technology in their work and study. Each session wasdeveloped to increase content knowledge as well as model pedagogical strategies appropriate forclassroom instruction.The two components were scheduled twice during the summer to provide the greatestopportunity
the ASEE and has earned several awards for excellence in teaching.Dr. Scott E. Grasman, Missouri University of Science & TechnologyDr. Ivan G. Guardiola, Missouri University of Science & Technology Page 22.628.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Enhancing Undergraduate Engineering Education of Lean Methods using Simulation Learning Modules within a Virtual EnvironmentAbstractThis paper highlights the use of an integrated user-centered virtual learning environment throughextensible simulation learning modules that is
. This course has been developed and is taught by faculty from bothdepartments. The course includes the use of discrete components and FieldProgrammable Gate Arrays (FPGA). A set of custom hardware components have beendeveloped that can be interfaced to an FPGA and a microcontroller. Instructional videoshelp students prepare for laboratory exercises and the course concludes with a finaldesign-build project.The overall goal of this project is to teach students how to work in multi-disciplinaryteams and to make it easier for students to switch between AS and AAS programs. ACapstone Design course is being developed where small teams comprised of PrecisionMachining, Engineering Science, and Computer Technology students will solve asemester long
. Page 24.636.3Virtual Facility and Tutor SystemBased on the development of 3D Virtual Facility, the authors have conducted an experiment toexplore if the use of operating the RP simulator is performing as good as the use ofimplementing the real FDM 3000 machine. The experiment reveals that students who have usedthe RP simulator perform not as good as students who have an instructor in the laboratory,particularly in the comprehensive exam and the calibration operation31. Consequently, theauthors would like to conduct further investigation to learn about (1) If integration of VF andTutor System (TS) can achieve similar performance as a real instructor in the classroom;and (2) What components should be incorporated in the TS to enhance
workethic, while at the same time take on the social identity of a first year university student.Strategies such as the ones discussed in this paper (online and onsite orientation, and facilitatedstudy groups), and the need for these strategies has been promoted through research on the firstyear experience. Braxton and McLendon1 note that social integration and subsequent institutionalcommitment are empirically reliable sources of influence on college student departure, and theyspecifically note that advising, communication with students, the development of socialenvironments, techniques of collaborative learning & active learning, and student orientationprograms all have an impact on student retention. These methods are key components of
Computer Aided Design & Graphics by teaching students with hands-on type of educational practices and laboratory exercises in the area of FMS. A MiniCIM 3.2 Amatrol has been selected as the equipment to teach FMS. This equipment is used to modify the curriculum and nine courses and labs in the IET department to enhance the students’ learning. The FMS project serves also as a starting point to accomplish a six-year development plan of the Manufacturing Laboratory in the IET department. The goal is to complete a fully Computer Integrated Manufacturing system in six years. The strategy used is aligning students’ class projects and/or students’ senior projects with the goals of the Manufacturing Laboratory. These class projects
managing civilinfrastructure in the 21st century. Students must learn to integrate this traditional civilengineering knowledge base with an understanding of deterioration science, economics, finance,decision and management theory, maintenance management, and public policy. This paperdescribes efforts to address this gap in civil engineering education. The authors began with asingle course at Carnegie Mellon University and have modified the original material in differentways to serve the needs at other institutions.IntroductionOver the past twenty years, civil infrastructure has received considerable attention in the popularpress as bridges collapse or are closed, underground pipes burst, and trains derail. However,gradual deterioration has a more
)According to, Humanitarian Engineering (HE) as a discipline was founded in 2003, when theWilliam and Flora Hewlett Foundation funded the creation of a minor program at ColoradoSchool of Mines (CSM).27 Muñoz describes the new discipline as “a wave that’s passingthrough the world among young people that are bent on trying to improve the lives of humans onthe planet in a sustainable way.”28Though Munoz describes humanitarian engineering as a discipline and established it as a fullprogram at the School of Mines, this paper showcases the integration of humanitarianengineering an existing engineering course/curriculum.27 The argument is made that wherehaving humanitarian engineering as a program may be challenging due to time and resourceconstraints
Disciplines: 1 electronics, 2 computers, 3 programming, 4 mechanics, 5 control, 6 systems design, 7 robotics laboratory,8 team-work practice Fig. 2. Progress in disciplinesAccording to Fig. 2, all groups achieved progress in every discipline. This result indicates thatrobot contest designs introduced all groups to an integrated view of engineering science subjects.The levels of progress given by K-12 students for most of the disciplines are between"considerable" and "extensive". This fact indicates that robotics projects are within schoolstudents’ powers and can provide them with broad technical backgrounds. The highest progressis reported
with regard to academic integrity [5]. The importance of establishing clear guidelines onthe acceptable use of ChatGPT in courses is crucial [6].The exploration of faculty and student perceptions of ChatGPT at TAMU is an extension andenrichment of the ongoing academic debates in this area. This section reviews key papers andliterature that provide a foundational understanding of the context, challenges, and opportunitiespresented by GAI in educational settings.These works collectively provide a multi-faceted view of the challenges and opportunities presented Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX
Engineering.Dr. Debarati Basu, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Debarati Basu is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Fundamentals Department in the College of Engineering at the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University at the Daytona Beach campus. She earned her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech (VT). She received her bachelor’s and masters in Computer Science and Engineering. Her research is at the intersection of Engineering Education (EE) and Computing Education Research (CER) to advance personalized learning, specifically within the context of online learning and engagement, educational technologies, curriculum design which includes innovative and equitable pedagogical approaches, and support
(MSU) is entering its fourth yearof a five-year project to transform its environmental engineering undergraduate program withsupport from a National Science Foundation Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer ScienceDepartments (RED) grant. The project team’s intent is to move away from a topic-focusedundergraduate engineering curriculum model, in which technical content is siloed into individualcourses, and few connections are made to broader social and environmental contexts or toprofessional practice. In its place, faculty are developing an integrated project-based curriculumthat intentionally builds students’ competencies in engineering and sustainability in a connectedmanner throughout their program of study.The project team comprises all
a majority of the students,(interestingly, an identical number of students cited each one). These are: 1. honesty and integrity, and 2. safety and concern for the public welfare.Under the first universal, descriptions of this value varied widely in emphasis. Somestudents emphasized the importance of delivering a product according to specifications,not falsifying test data, and other considerations that insure that the customer really doesreceive the product advertised and expected. Others focused more on the submission onone’s own work. These students were more concerned about plagiarism and the stealingand copying of proprietary designs. Among all listing this concern, a slightly largernumber cited the “no lies” aspect mentioned
Session 1347 Neural Network Adaptive Autotuner Alireza Rahrooh, Bahman Motlagh University of Central Florida Abstract It is critical that modern control theory techniques be integrated into assignments which involvethe application of basic concepts in engineering technology to prepare students for the nextmillennium. The adaptive neural network discussed in this paper can be viewed as an appropriate useof these modern techniques in engineering technology curriculum. Adaptive tuning of PID controllergains in case of
Schomaker is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Professional Practice and Experiential Learning (ProPEL) at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati Ohio. Professor Schomaker holds a Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction with a focus on Instructional Design and Technology and has been teaching in higher education since 1999. Professor Schomaker has been advising cooperative education students since 2008 and currently advises Civil Engineering co-op students at the University of Cincinnati. Professor Schomaker is an official site reviewer for the Accreditation Council for Cooperative Education. In addition Maureen is Co- Chair of ProPEL’s Program Assessment Committee and a member of the Curriculum
these aggressive goals through aninnovative combination of a traditional physics curriculum, an industry-like work environmentshared by physics students in this program, and a commercialization course sequence centered ona Physics Department’s research strengths (at the University of Arkansas, it will be based onresearch in high performance microelectronic-photonic materials, devices, and systems). Theintegration of these three educational components will result in a next-generation Physics graduatewith the skills currently lacking from traditional Physics departmental programs.a) Integrating traditional physics education with a business framework.Technology proficiency will not be sufficient to assure that future scientists and engineers