andapplication. Within the leadership category are courses on leading teams, interpersonal skills,global leadership, human capital management and organizational development and change.Business/Technology management courses are focused on quality and productivity in industryand technology, project management, technology in a global environment, ethics law and policyfor leaders, and, finance for non-financial managers. The application of the above referencededucational opportunities for learning and assimilation was a set of core courses in researchmethods, research and writing for business and industry, and, a culminating capstoneproject/paper.The overall program spans five contiguous semesters, fall, spring, summer, fall and spring. Eachof the primary
construction related students, at which theconstraints have been considered in a specific curriculum. In particular, the findings suggest thatboth undergraduate and graduate students believe that 3 design constraints have beenincorporated into the civil engineering program at a high level. These include: engineering codesand standards, manufacturability (constructability), and ethical considerations. In contrast, 3areas have been rated at a lower level. They include: social ramifications, political factors, andlegal issues.IntroductionOver the years there have been recommendations for employers and varioustechnical/professional organizations to revise the engineering curriculum to ensure that studentsare prepared for the professional practice of
– Humanities, 4 – Social Sciences, 10 –Sustainability, 11 – Contemporary Issues & History, 12 – Risk & Uncertainty, 17 – PublicPolicy, 18 – Business & Public Administration, 19 – Globalization, and 20 – Leadership. Inaddition, the committee identified Outcomes 5 – Material Science and 24 – Professional &Ethics as outcomes that may be challenging for programs to fully implement.The purpose of this paper is threefold: (1) provide an analysis of Northern Arizona University'scurrent undergraduate civil engineering curriculum with respect to the BOK2 with attentiongiven to the challenging outcomes; (2) propose a revised BOK2-orientated curriculum withinNorthern Arizona University's context; and (3) provide an analysis of that
measuring these skillssimultaneously has existed in the literature prior to the Engineering Professional SkillsAssessment (EPSA)5. Table 1.ABET Criterion 3 Professional Skills Student Learning Outcomes 3d Ability to Function on Multidisciplinary Teams 3f Understanding of Professional and Ethical Responsibility 3g Ability to Communicate Effectively 3h Understanding of the Impact of Engineering Solutions in Global, Economic, Environmental, and Cultural/Societal Contexts 3i Recognition of and Ability to Engage in Life-Long Learning 3j Knowledge of Contemporary IssuesThe major accomplishments of the four years of on-going research conducted college wide sincespring 2007 using the EPSA method at the program level for evaluating the efficacy of
recommended 4. (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology, 2001).In 2001 accreditation criteria under the criterion “outcome and assessment”, stated thatengineering-related programs must demonstrate that graduates have 5:“1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering-relatedapplied sciences,2. an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,3. an ability to formulate or design a system, process or program to meet desired needs;4. an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams,5. an ability to identify and solve engineering- related problems,6. an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,7. an ability to communicate effectively,8. the broad education
clearly indicate areas of concernStability Must not promote changes based upon isolated or non-representative resultsTrigger Must have a quantifiable mechanism which causes action to be takenDependent Must not be an “independent variable” that drives our curriculumVariableWe do not use the FE exam for every ABET outcome. The FE exam is our principal metric forABET criteria (a), (e), (f), (h), and (k) 5: a. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering e. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility h. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal
Focus on Tar Creek By Christi L. Patton The University of TulsaAbstract Tar Creek is #1 on the EPA cleanup list and it is located about 90 miles from theUniversity of Tulsa campus. While the legislators and residents debate what should bedone to clean up the area, freshman Chemical Engineering students research the historyof Tar Creek and use this as a starting point for lectures and lively discussion on safetyand ethics. Throughout the course students perform practice calculations that are basedon the information gleaned through research. During the last weeks of the semester thestudents participate in a research project that
philosophy.After all, the so-called soft sciences have no findings which are certain, but rathercompeting sets of assertions that arise from one or another set of values.This paper argues that engineering in general is not entitled to the degree of certaintytypically associated with it. This point is illustrated by analyzing eight topical areas ofengineering design, showing the limits of certainty in each case. Further, a case is madethat the recognition of this inherent uncertainty should be acknowledged and taught inengineering ethics classes. In the first instance, understanding the limits of knowledge inengineering is a useful antidote to a riskier approach which might tend to ignoreunknowns. Secondly, it would seem that an objective assessment of
, laboratory skills andprofessional practice issues. The CEE faculty reviewed the list and, in some instances, suggestedadditional items. The final list was circulated to the CEE faculty and each individual was askedto prioritize every item on the list as to whether that item, relative to the new course, was (1)appropriate and important, (2) appropriate, but not essential, or (3) inappropriate. The results ofthe survey provided much of the rationale for developing the course syllabus.Professional practice issues constituted one set of items on the list that were deemed appropriateand important by virtually all members of the CEE faculty. The issues included such diversetopics as engineering ethics, career development, group dynamics, leadership issues
EJE's relevance in addressing sustainability and social equity. By promotinginclusive pedagogical approaches and continuous reflection, we aim to equip students with theskills to design ethical engineering solutions. Through collective efforts, we aspire to contributeto a more sustainable and equitable future, fostering understanding and action in EnvironmentalJustice Education.Key words: Environmental Justice, Equity, Engineering Education IntroductionThe purpose of this Work in Progress research paper and ECSJ-DEED joint technical session isto highlight the crucial role of Environmental Justice Education (EJE) in bridging the gapbetween educators and students, particularly in the context of engineering
proposing an engineering solution. The process starts withexposing the students to clinical settings where they have an opportunity to make observationwith an end goal of identifying an unmet need and presenting it to a group of external panel forits significance. This not only helps enhance their critical thinking and communication skills, butalso exposes them to the components of creativity, innovation ethics and ethical decision-making, global awareness, self-directed research, and life-long learning. These are some of themost important entrepreneurial skill sets needed in the workforce along with technical aptitude.Student evaluations and informal interviews with the students have revealed successfulimplementation of this strategy.I
also taught Professional Practices in Engineering and Engineering in the Humanistic Context which are courses focused on exploring a wide range of leadership, management & ethical issues confronting engineers and engineering students on a day-to-day basis. Prof. Falcone is a registered professional engineer, a founding diplomat in the American Academy of Water Resources Engineers, a retired Captain of the U.S. Navy, a former William C. Foster fellow at the U.S. Department of State and a consultant for the U.S. Department of State in the field of International Arms Control. In 2017, he was awarded the EDUCATOR OF THE YEAR Award from the American Society of Civil Engineers, Philadelphia Section.Gayle F Doyle
consistent with criteria set forth by EngineersAustralia and ABET for engineering degree programs. Both organizations encourage arealistic understanding of professional practice, including project management and ethics, andrequire students to be able to work in multi-disciplinary groups and communicate effectively.Although universities have the entire duration of the degree program to meet theserequirements, students benefit greatly from early exposure. The purpose of this study was todiscuss best practices for introductory courses that focus on professional engineering skillsand practice. Through internet-based research, information was gathered about 82 courses atuniversities in Australia, the United States, Canada, and Great Britain. Courses that
therequirements for ABET, and would not impose unreasonable levels of additional work on thefaculty. Ultimately, this approach led to a successful outcome for all programs in their firstevaluation under EC2000.ABET-related assessment process were instrumental in identifying needed changes in many ofthe individual programs and also one major issue that cut across departments, which was theneed for more ethics related experience in the curriculum. This need was addressed through acollaborative effort between the Leonhard Center and the Doug & Julie Rock Ethics Institute inthe College of the Liberal Arts. The initial work of this partnership was stimulated byphilanthropic gifts from an Engineering alumnus whose daughter graduated from the College ofthe
introduce topics such as thehistory of technological innovations, profiles of important innovators, engineering and socialjustice, and engineering ethics. The instructor framed the discussions around societal and culturalintersections with engineering, providing an opportunity for in-class discussion of issues thatstudents find important to engineering. For example, one of the authors of this paper uses lecturetime to discuss how different engineering disciplines evolved over time. Historic and non-western examples were used to highlight elements of engineering that expand students’conception of the profession, while local examples drew students into issues that might directlyimpact their own lives. The course also highlighted the contributions of
briefdescription of the course and the assessment strategy are discussed. Collaborative engineering educationresearch efforts and assessment of the fall 2015 data are ongoing and results will be included in the finalpresentation.2. Workshop Summary2.1 Experiences from First-Year Courses Topics One of the goals of the workshop was to share experiences from college-wide first year engineeringcourses at Virginia Tech. First-year engineering courses are required of all engineering freshman (~1,500/ year) at Virginia Tech with the purpose of introducing engineering students to the profession, datacollection and analysis, mathematical modeling, problem-solving, software tools, design, professionalpractices, communication, teamwork, ethics and the diversity
Knowledge 3 across specific contexts 2. Understanding and directing Self-Learner 3 oneself as a learner 3. Becoming a reflexive, RAR Learner 3 accountable, and rationale learner 4. Identifying and discerning Ethics & one’s own and others’ ethics and 3 Perspectives perspectives 5. Developing a professional Digital
for both groups.Statistics: Significance tests were conducted using student t-tests with a one tail algorithm. Table 2. Skills and abilities assessed via Post Experience Survey 1 2 3 4 5 Skills and abilities No → Moderate → Extremely Impact Impact large impact 1. Coping with conflict 2. Applying math and formulas 3. Applying creativity 4. Understanding ethics 5. Leadership ability 6. Solving problems independently 7. Appreciating other cultures
engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a
pursued byengineers to gain visibility, achieve relevance, and influence the public. The profession ofnursing offers three advantages as compared to the profession of engineering in terms ofeffective public engagement, including: 1) trust (i.e., Gallop shows nursing as the “most trusted”profession for 15 years running); 2) gender bias (i.e., the profession of nursing is primarilycomposed of females, which the engineering profession claims is an important target audiencefor marketing efforts); and 3) professionalism (i.e., the canons of ethics for nurses emphasize theimportance of the patient – and hence the value of the individual – while the canon of ethics forengineers emphasize the importance of the nameless “public” – and hence looses the
“ademonstrated capacity to think critically, communicate clearly, and solve complex problems ismore important than [a candidate’s] undergraduate major.” More than 90% of those surveyedsaid that it is important that those they hire demonstrate ethical judgment and integrity;intercultural skills; and the capacity for continued new learning. Other motivators come fromsources such as Academically Adrift [1] and Creating Innovators [5] whose focus is on the needfor demonstrated learning on college campuses [1] and the need to create learning environmentsto foster collaboration and creativity, allowing for and embracing “failure” [5]. Nearly 40 faculty were selected through an application process to participate in whatwould eventually become the
. 3.33%) required a discrete course ineither team building or leadership.12 Although a semantic distinction exists within course titles, wemaintain that civil engineering project management course content can include leadership elements ofteam development and effective communication; it can even explore the economic, environmental,social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability of a project design andits impact in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.The paper offers a rubric for identifying the presence of leadership-related course content in anengineering class, tests this rubric, and reports the observed nature and extent of extant leadership withintraditional introductory civil
step into questions of how we transition from a very abstract,linear, literate type of medium to the medium that we are dealing with today, which isinteractive, multimedia, and multisensory. For example, how is the message of multimediadifferent that the message of a printed book? The course was also developed to highlightmulticultural diversity in order to help satisfy the core curriculum and ethics requirements ofmany engineering majors. This component of the course directs student focus and inquiry intotimely issues such as: • How do diversity, science, and technology interrelate; • How do gender, science, and technology interrelate; and • How do science, technology, and creativity interrelate? The second course
, the School’s Mission is to:Ø Ensure that the education process is directed toward the development of the whole person.Ø Help create economic and industrial growth for the good of the individual and society.Ø Conduct scholarly activity with a concern for the ethical and moral implications. Page 7.135.2 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationThe Vision for the School is to be a Christian leader in mathematics, science, and engineeringeducation in South Texas and other areas deemed appropriate by
; keeping a lab journal; and ethical issues are covered.Each experiment is allocated two weeks, which consists of ten hours formally scheduled in thelab, but the lab is open and available to students at any time during business hours forindependent work. All experiments run simultaneously and groups rotate experiments after twoweeks. After the first three experiments, each student prepares a formal written report on someaspect of one of the experiments in the format of an article in a letters journal. The instructorchooses precisely which experiment and what aspect of it in such a way that each student writesa unique paper. They also prepare an oral presentation of their work such as they would give at aprofessional conference.Before beginning each
benefit of and meaning behind research is first clearly communicatedand emphasized to researchers as they conduct their work. According to the NSF, broader impacts are the “potential (for your research) to benefitsociety and contribute to the achievement of desired society outcomes,”. Some examples ofsocietal outcomes include public engagement, education, inclusion, societal wellbeing, nationalsecurity, strengthened infrastructure, and economic competitiveness, among others. The Ethical,Legal, & Societal Implications (ELSI), of an engineering research project refers to the analysis ofthe societal implications of novel and emerging research and associated or resultingtechnological advancements (Ogbogu & Ahmed, 2022). Engineering
, sharingideas and working in a group, designing a project to suit others, the importance of total groupinvolvement, the ability to communicate with team members, and the recognition of roles withinthe group.Concerning the objective that engineering students will learn to team effectively with middle-school teachers, they became more bothered on a series of items measuring teaming during thewinter quarter and less bothered during the spring quarter. The spring quarter improvement wasstatistically significant.Integrating Service Learning into an Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceCurriculumAs part of new curriculum guidelines to incorporate social and ethical implications of computertechnology into the required curriculum, a Technology and
(text by C.F. Smith), while threeclasses were devoted to policy analysis and policy writing (i.e. identifying audience, selectionand evaluation of alternatives, presentation of ideas – text by C.V. Patton and D.S. Sawicki).Two additional classes were spent looking at decision making and public policy for engineers Page 15.1172.4and technologists with a focus on how economics, risk, and environmental issues play a role(text by P.W. Hamlett), while one class period was spent on ethics and how to performenvironmental risk assessments. The final three class periods were devoted to presentations by content experts in fields ofinterest to
. Rubrics for outcome assessment of student’s ability tounderstand ethical responsibility and resolve ethical dilemmas are proposed for the engineeringcontext18-20. Some recent work21 also addresses the assessment of global awareness skills,particularly in engineering education. Student portfolios have been used to record and assesscreative thinking skills22. A number of the diagnostic tools and surveys measure students’perceptions of their skills and/or their confidence in using these skills, and not the actualattainment of the relevant learning outcomes. Therefore, they are often perceived by faculty asnot having the same rigor and objectivity associated with more traditional assessment tools, suchas examination results.One major problem with
mycorrhizaas a simile of these invisible connections. Mycorrhiza is a symbiotic association betweenfungi and plants that cycles nutrients to improve the whole ecosystem. The Mycorrhizaframework aims to raise awareness of the effects of engineering education and work,incorporate social and environmental justice in engineering education, and move closer tohelping people freely and fully develop in a sustainable world. I. IntroductionIt is essential for people and the Ecosystem that we raise awareness of our engineeringimpact. Demanding for people to take action, Singer [1] presented an ethical decisionwhere we would see a child drowning. Most people would do their best to come up with asolution to help the child. Engineering with visible results or