addressing the“soft skills” that are often absent in the typical engineering curriculum. Respondents 1 and 2mention the ideas of project and time management as applicable skills gained from thecontest. Respondent 1, 2, and 3 all mention gaining practice in presenting their research toothers, through the proposal and the pitch. Respondents 3 and 5 talk about being able to developtheir ideas, both through iteration and through research. This aligns with our plan for the contesttimeline to be an entire semester, rather than a compressed hackathon. These students indicatethat researching and writing proposals is useful practice as a professional skill. Perhaps evenmore inspiring is that Hack Dibner seemed to spark true commitment and enjoyment in
them to an authentic and iterative engineering design activity helps studentsincrease their self-efficacy and confidence in relation to their design skills.This paper addresses the research gap in the Maker Movement literature about the impact thatthe integration of making activities into cornerstone design courses has on engineering students.The existing literature lacks studies that aim to determine specific impacts of maker education onstudents’ technical or soft skills [16]. This study follows fourth-year mechanical engineeringstudents in their capstone design course and explores the effects of different students’ learningexperiences on the outcome of their capstone design project. Students who took one or both ofthe courses discussed
content. Further, an increase inproficiency in multidisciplinary design teams was sought by immersing students in alternateproblem-solving strategies of their peers, while simultaneously encouraging the development ofteam interaction and other soft skills. The primary objective of DMTL is to provide students andinstructors with an effective technological and pedagogical framework for use during large groupinstructional sessions. In addition to the benefits to the learner, DMTL provides the instructorwith a dynamic view of the learning process, student conceptualizations of content, andchallenges associated with specific topics. This information allows the instructor to intervene andreiterate, elaborate, and reinforce concepts that require
history of electrical and computer engineering, the electronicsdevelopment cycle, professional ethics, multidisciplinary team environments, and commondevelopment tools used in industry. Students are expected to apply this and knowledge fromprerequisite and concurrent courses to completing their project.In our paper, we describe the course in detail, including examples of student projects. Studentoutcomes related to both technical and soft skills are assessed using student surveys and projectevaluation rubrics. We discuss these assessment results and highlight some successes andlimitations of the experiential 1st-year course.IntroductionThe traditional model for engineering undergraduate programs in the US is to have mostlyfoundational courses in
fit an ever-expanding body of knowledge intotraditional baccalaureate programs while program credit hours decline and there are justifieddemands to include more “soft skills training” within their already full programs. The civilengineering BOK concludes that the level of engineering knowledge needed by PEs to meet theever-expanding and complex needs of our changing society cannot be taught solely within afour-year civil engineering program (see Appendix A). The breadth and depth of curriculaneeded simply doesn’t fit!With the ever-expanding complexity of societal needs and the techniques needed to addressthem, it should be obvious that post-baccalaureate education is necessary for all licensedprofessional civil engineers. In engineering as in
emphasizes onacquiring soft skills besides the engineering concepts such as professional code of conduct,report writing, and team management. These skills are critical in todays emerging globaleconomies for a successful engineering career. With this in mind, the purpose of the course is toequip the students with technical and non-technical professional skills that could be implementedon engineering design problems, while working in a global team with different dynamics. For thestudents, to be successful in the course, they have to develop and sharpen skills in organization,time management, self-discipline, and technical writing, while working as a strong teammember.At the end of the school year, the capstone design course concludes with a one-day
2012, the Entrepreneurship Institute at Tecnológico de Monterrey launched a process tostudy and identify the skills and characteristics that we as an institution must help develop inour students so that they graduate with what we call a strong entrepreneurship spirit. Thisspirit will drive and enable students to launch new projects, programs and initiatives in theirown companies, in the organizations they work for and in their communities.The study identified specific soft skills and characteristics that will be developed in threephases. During the first three semesters of his undergraduate program, a student will increaseresiliency and self-confidence and develop a sense of purpose. Throughout semesters four tosix, the student will develop
based coursework adds to the students experience. Students who are involved in projects have the chance togain experience and develop their soft skills while actively engaged in hands on CivilEngineering learning. Projects can bring different learning styles into one place so that studentscan have the opportunity to learn the material to a depth that is difficult to attain in a typicalcourse. Students can develop their personal skills such as critical thinking, project managementskills, and improve self-confidence. Engineers in real world projects have to work in teams andtherefore a project based course help students to practice teamwork, and to develop effectivecommunication skills. These projects demand that the students communicate within
skills (12.4%) and communication skills (13.2%) represents an increase fromprevious studies. Feedback from recruiters and employers demonstrates the importance ofembedding “soft skills,” like teamwork and communication, into the educational experiences ofstudents in order to prepare them for future demands.6Teamwork Skills Can Be Developed Through Collaborative Learning ExperiencesAlthough there are varying names and strategies, generally collaborative learning represents aninstructional method where students work together to accomplish structured tasks. Kaufman,Felder, and Fuller7 described five conditions that need to be met in the design of collaborativelearning experiences: “positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to
results in the last week of thesemester. While the last week is a relatively busy week, the students didn’t have enough time toprepare. Moreover, there was not enough time to give students feedback on their presentationskills. This can be improved next time by assigning the project early and allow more time for thepresentation preparation. If possible, two presentations can be assigned for the project and studentscan use the feedback on their first presentation to prepare for their second presentation. Technicalwriting and presentation are crucial soft skills that undergraduate engineering students areexpected to learn. Despite the relatively low rating, the project activities still helped the studentsimprove their writing and presentation skills
team has recently designed and piloted a training program that develops the professional soft-skills of graduate engineering students.Dr. Michael W. Keller, University of Tulsa Michael Keller is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at the university of tulsa. His research and teaching interests are in solid mechanics, both experimental and theoretical, and materials science. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 When the Master Becomes the Student: Advisor Development through Graduate AdvisingIntroductionWhat does it take to be an effective advisor to graduate students? Is the student the only one wholearns, grows and develops, or does the advisor
robotic kits.The robotic artifacts created by the students also help them present their work in front of a widebody of their peers in a confident and authoritative manner. Finally, this example shows that it ispossible to implement a competition-based learning approach within formal educational settingssuccessfully and provides guidelines for mitigating major pitfalls.The second case study provides an example of project-based approach towards integratingeducational robots in K-12 classrooms, where the robot was used to foster the development ofessential soft skills in the students. The robot provided cognitive mediation for students tounderstand mathematical concepts such as proportionality and rate of change through a geometryactivity. During
changes would be effected to improve the quality of projects done, enhance studentlearning, impart valuable technical and soft skills, and meet learning outcomes. Table 5: Triggers in the evolution of the Quality Assurance Process # Trigger/Issue Solution Prior to the year 2014/15, EEEN 4311 and linked the two courses to improve the quality 1 ASSE 4311 used to be offered as two and scope of the project and administer it over independent courses without any linkage; two consecutive semesters students would carry out one project for each course; projects were very simple due to short time Decided no more IP
7.96 n/a 7.43 9.87Table 2: A comparison of the Regents scores between the P-TECH cohorts and corresponding high school classes.Attendance and timeliness are soft skills that are often over looked, but are critical to employers.A review of P-TECH attendance data shows that while first marking period attendance is similarto that of the high school, the second quarter P-TECH students had 3-4% better attendance thanthe traditional high school. This not only trains for improved attendance, but we assume it alsosuggests that students are more motivated to come to school because they are enjoying theirlearning. Attendance Rates 100% 80
promoting recruitment/retention of members, promote a solid foundation for the chapter itself in terms of funding, chapter's presence and/or influence in the local community, and a unified membership. • Leadership Development: Activities geared towards developing leadership skills of members, ensuring a solid foundation of leaders within the executive board and the successful transition of officers. • Outreach & Community Service: Activities specifically promoting STEM awareness in the K12 community and/or supporting the local community. • Professional Development: Activities geared at the soft skills and/or technical skill breadth development of the members' current workforce competencies. • Student/Professional Chapter Interaction
Gordon13that the effectiveness of management seminars and "soft-skill" courses is questionable. Whetheror not seminars could or should have an impact on sustained general management capability wasnot evaluated and should be further evaluated in future research.The technical participants had a different attitude toward non-formal education that was wellsummarized by this comment: (1) "Seminars always influenced us. Technical seminars came into play time and again preparing you to do jobs. ...You can force the (seminar) selection by knowing somebody in the country is an expert and asking them to conduct a seminar to meet your specific needs. ..Technical seminars permitted you to do your job better. ...Those were the easiest
science, these foundations must be complemented by skills inprogramming, systems thinking and the ability to use relevant tools. Further, these new engineersmust possess a variety of ‘soft’ skills (i.e. interpersonal and communications skills) as well as agrasp of economics and business acumen.The need for changes in the approaches used to teach future engineers and instill the necessaryKnowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSA) is also emphasized. These KSAs are reflected in thedesired outcomes of STEM education outlined in recent versions of professional accreditationcriteria. For example, seven of the eleven current ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineeringand Technology) criteria for accrediting university engineering programs10 either state or
feedback over the course of the three-year design sequence. The junior designprofessor reported that “prior to this process, I viewed the teaching of such ‘soft skills assomewhat difficult and that the ability to master them was something that would come naturallyto the more ambitious students who were driven to succeed. I now feel that such skills cannot betaught effectively without some mechanism for self-reflection.”Currently, we are drawing up plans to integrate scaffolded oral communication assignments,beginning with sophomore design. To link the project to professional workplace readiness, thedesign faculty has continued the current practice of asking a panel of local engineers to evaluatethe students’ final presentations in the senior
improved understanding ofengineering processes. In work-related soft skills, students also returned with solid gains inskills: 93% reported significant improvement in their ability to function professionally in aunfamiliar environment, 69% gained in their ability to handle uncomfortable professional Page 24.777.15situations, and 38.1% made considerable progress in their ability to take the initiative to addressprofessional problems. Roughly one third of participants (35.3%) acquired more presentationskills in a professional setting, and 58.6% returned with substantially higher motivation to excelas an engineer. Students also made impressive gains
did themwithout question. However, several of them submitted written feedback suggesting ways tomake the icebreaking activities more relevant to the ETPP’s program goals. As a result of thisfeedback, we are designing new icebreaker activities that de-emphasize what some engineersrefer to as “soft skills” and instead focus on discussion of what kinds of activities constitute“teaching.”Positive reactions to materials that are heavily modified for engineers lead us to surmise that lackof customization could be one reason why engineering educators are sometimes labeled asresistant to educational reform activities. Engineering educators may be reacting to thelanguage, framing, and presentation style, rather than concepts and content
. Many students choose CS/SE for their major because they enjoy thetechnical aspects of the work. There is a common perception that “soft skills” such aswriting, speaking, and teaming are not needed and less critical and are acquiredautomatically (in a mysterious and unspecified way). If the students and faculty do notperceive something as being valuable they are less likely to invest time and effort into doingit well.5 StrategiesIn the first year, our project focused on developing and piloting assignments in at least sixdifferent courses and at eight different institutions. In this section we describe some of thestrategies that we have developed to address the challenges identified above. Specifically,we have identified four key strategies
Paper ID #8159”Doing Engineering in the School of Letters & Science: Adding a Manufac-turing Line Design Project to a Writing Program Class for Engineers”Mr. Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis Brad Henderson is a faculty in writing for the University Writing Program (UWP) at University of Cali- fornia, Davis. Henderson holds a B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Cal Poly State University SLO and a Masters in Professional Writing (MPW) from USC. Currently focusing his career on engineer- ing writing and soft-skill education, he has worked as an engineer and engineering educator for Parker
thempursue their personal goals. Rather than learning only about how a computer works, this teamused the opportunity to develop many of the “soft skills” or nuances of engineering. Theydeveloped teamwork skills, explored the tradeoffs of different design methods, found ways touse their engineering skills to help their fellow students, and learned how to conduct backgroundresearch on a topic that they had never seen before. Learning Team 2 experienced mixed success. The team struggled to find an identity thatcaptured the imagination and motivations of the members, but many of the members discoveredthat success in education is achieved more by effort rather than by ability. The team pursuedharder challenges as the semester progressed, despite an
Quarter-Century of Manufacturing Education”, ASEE AnnualMeeting, Louisville, KY, June 2010.6. Waldorf, D., Alptekin, S., Bjurman, R., “Plotting a Bright Future for Manufacturing Education: Results of aBrainstorming Session”, ASEE Annual Meeting, 2006. Page 25.1276.11Appendix A - Manufacturing Engineering Curriculum CommentsNote: Underlined text indicated items not addressed in the survey. • Project management and collaboration is important in today's environment. Soft skills will help one's career as much as technical education. • Focus on design and how it facilitates lean manufacturing. • I believe the portion of
articles have been written about teamwork and team development in engineering andengineering technology programs. In the ASEE Proceedings data base alone, since 1998, 67articles appear with the word “teamwork” in the title.Edmonson and Summers write about the Engineering Technology Department at the Universityof Dayton, “The ability to work on teams is a very important business skill. Some educators Page 25.1076.12choose to call it a “soft skill.” However, our Industrial Advisory Committee members and thebusinesses hiring our graduates choose to call it a “critical skill”.”15 They focus both on teamdynamics and individual characteristics using