from Sharif University of Technology, and a B.S. degree in civil engineering from Tabriz University. Her research interests focus on mental health and wellness in engineering, retention of engi- neering students from underrepresented groups, engineering student interactions with peers and faculty, and system thinking and system analysis. Dr. Gholizadeh has also work experience as an educational data analyst and strategic planning project manager.Prof. Ed P Gatzke, University of South Carolina Ed Gatzke is currently the Faculty Principal for the Green Quad Living and Learning Center at the Uni- versity of South Carolina. For eight years he served as the faculty advisor for the USC Engineering and Computing Living and
examinedfour cohorts of students for three semesters: (a) fall 2018 sophomore students, (b) fall 2019sophomore students, (c) fall 2018 junior students, and (d) fall 2019 junior students. Thesophomore and junior students’ persistence was tracked over a period of three semesters— thusthe pre-COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall 2018 cohorts) did not have their education disrupted overthis time frame (fall 2018 to fall 2019) by COVID-19 while the COVID-19 cohorts (i.e., fall2019 cohorts) did have their education disrupted in spring 2020. Next, due to our large sample,we were able to break down and examine student persistence rate by student demographic groups(i.e., gender, financial need, first generation status, and race/ethnicity).Plan of Analysis We
Engineering Connect,was designed for the first-year students in an engineering department with the idea of increasingstudent success, engagement, and retention. The program was implemented into a CornerstoneEngineering Design course being offered for first-year students in the engineering department.The students were assigned to complete weekly reflections on the course Canvas space onmatters related to their learning and campus experiences as an engineering student. The inputsfrom these weekly reflections were analyzed by faculty each week and an engagement plan wasset in place with the students who were identified as needing help and guidance on courseworkand/or campus related matters. Also, the students having a successful week were
Paper ID #36943Teamwork Perception in Engineering Programs through the Lens of Genderand RaceDr. Raheleh Miralami, Mississippi State UniversityDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an assistant professor in the Building Construction Science program at Mississippi State University. His professional responsibilities include project planning and management as well as architectural design practice in private and public construction and engineering firms. He has taught in architecture and construction programs since 2006. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include simulation and serious games
goal should be to validate consumer needsand willingness to buy the product. Determining the demographic to which the product appeals tocan narrow down a target market and the features of the product that interest customers.Additionally, customer surveys, market analysis, and business plans are some important elementsfor success. How to conduct market research is especially vital. This article will focus onsuccessful market research methods, sample survey questions, survey samples, results, and ananalysis of productive innovations. New product designs developed by undergraduate studentsusing market research will also be summarized. In addition, this work teaches students to mastervarious skills, such as research, persistence, design
through a more planned approach in whichstudents support their decision making through argumentation.Our program of research helped teachers to see argumentation as a tool to promote criticalthinking in young people across disciplines and to provide teachers with ideas about how toimplement argumentation in their teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics,as well as lessons integrating coding into the other fields (which we refer to as integrativeSTEM). In this paper, we investigate how the existing Teacher Support for CollectiveArgumentation (TSCA) framework [7], which was developed for mathematics classrooms,applies to this interdisciplinary STEM context. We present examples of how an elementaryschool teacher implements
, 2011; Kopcha, 2012; Schwarz &Gwekwerere, 2007). Despite planned teacher training and the availability of instructionalmethodologies, participating instructors' experience indicates that the scope of simulationapplication may remain limited in some circumstances. As a result, certain elements affectinstructors' application in training and pedagogical techniques, which should be investigatedfurther. But, in this study, we developed an easy-portable-technology-friendly setup aiming to toovercome those limitations.Material testing and how a specimen responds to a tensile force are taught in the mechanicalengineering lab at University of Houston-Clear Lake (UHCL) by faculty who use the UniversalTesting Machine (UTM) equipment. The students
a wider audience remotely. The coursestructure contains e-books, readings and online lectures along with these modules for students toplay with interactive VR experience12-13.3. Renewable Energy VR experienceRenewable energy such as solar energy provides heat, light and electricity. It is important forstudents to learn how to learn and manage this resources and add this to their lesson plan in theiracademic study plan. But at the same time, learning theory about such important issue is notenough. Students need to know how to choose materials, equipment, how to design them. VRprovides such opportunity to students to interact with real-life scenario to grasp complex conceptsand researchers have to test numerous scenarios without severe
Director of Qeexo Week 8 - 15 Term Project (& ML Contest) Providing technical seminar and remote Q&A ▪ Topic selection - presentation sessions by engineering staff of Qeexo in ▪ Hands-on project development technical areas such as SW Installation and ▪ Final presentation Issue Resolutions.Term Project Description(s)Class term projects requested students to search for and choose project topics which could applyembedded ML to solve the relevant engineering problem(s). Term projects included three mainparts: Part I – ML Project Planning/Framing, Part II – ML Project Implementation, and Part III –Report and Presentation. Along with the course schedule, the major project
whoidentified as non-male. This was spurred by a series of observations the SELs made duringevents, specifically related to comments from female-identifying students about their experienceas engineering students. Working with their faculty mentor, they decided the first step was tohear more from other students. This motivated the SELs to connect with the campus Office ofCivil Rights and Title IX compliance and form a focus group for individuals who identified asnon-male. The SELs took a leadership role in planning, organizing, and hosting the focus group.Office staff from the CRTC office supported the students as they developed the focus groupprotocol, created talking prompts, created the invitation, and conducted the focus group. It isimportant to
people to look beyond their self-interest, andinspires people to reach for the improbable. The effectiveness of vision, though, depends on boththis affective reaction and also perceived utility: affective reaction reflects the extent to whichfollowers would find the plan to be attractive, leading them to want to be affiliated with theorganization, and perceived utility reflects the extent to which followers believe a plan wouldlead to effective organizational change [5]. Regardless of the extent that feelings of affiliationincrease, the perceived utility will be stronger to the extent that followers see the vision as usefulnot only for the organization but for them personally, too. Because transformational leadershipboth articulates a vision and
concept to be presented to the students at least four times. Once when aconcept is introduced, once when the students apply it, once when the students’ results arediscussed, and once when reviewing for exams. The interactive atmosphere of the freshmenengineering class at Texas A&M University requires that the students play an active role indiscussing issues that they encountered when applying a particular concept.The flexible timeline that was adapted was critical. The initial schedule planned was for a seven-week period. Monitoring feedback from instructors, teaching assistants, peer teachers, and thestudents, the schedule was modified so that more time could be spent on instructor-identifiedissues. Balancing time to spend on a project is
concept to be presented to the students at least four times. Once when aconcept is introduced, once when the students apply it, once when the students’ results arediscussed, and once when reviewing for exams. The interactive atmosphere of the freshmenengineering class at Texas A&M University requires that the students play an active role indiscussing issues that they encountered when applying a particular concept.The flexible timeline that was adapted was critical. The initial schedule planned was for a seven-week period. Monitoring feedback from instructors, teaching assistants, peer teachers, and thestudents, the schedule was modified so that more time could be spent on instructor-identifiedissues. Balancing time to spend on a project is
reflectiveactivities such as discussions.ConclusionData collected by this study has provided our department with a valuable perspective on thelearning preferences of the undergraduate engineering student and faculty populations. While werealize that this was a small sample size, based on the data collected we can conclude from thisdata set that students and faculty exhibit a large variety of learning preferences. A statisticallysignificant difference in the learning preference distributions of faculty and BE students wasfound for the Active/Reflective scale. For the other scales, the populations exhibit similarpreference distributions. Future plans for this study include scaling this study to includeBiological Engineering students, Engineering Technology or
after working atDr. Jin Ho Jo Dr. Jin Jo is a Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, teaching in the Sustainable and Renew- able Energy program. Dr. Jo also leads the Sustainable Energy Consortium at the university. Dr. Jo is an honors graduate of Purdue University, where he earned a B.S. in Building Construction Management. He earned his M.S. in Urban Planning from Columbia University, where he investigated critical environmen- tal justice issues in New York City. His 2010 Ph.D. from Arizona State University was the nation’s first in sustainability. His research, which has been widely published, focuses on renewable energy systems and sustainable building strategies to reduce the negative
by completing a carefully planned sequence of laboratory exercises and hands-oninvolvement with manufacturing processes” [6]. The facilities the proposed lab course would betaught are recommended to include a manufacturing laboratory with student-use desktop CNCmachines and a computer lab with PCs installed with Autodesk Fusion 360. Fusion 360 is cloud-based, 5-axis capable CAM software that is common in the private sector and educationally free-to-use, which makes it a natural choice to teach a computer-aided manufacturing course. Based onFigure 1. Pocket NC V2 5-axis desktop CNC Mill (left) and simulated toolpaths for a part generated in Fusion 360(right).the current market, the Pocket NC V2 (Figure 1) stands out as a suitable CNC model
than students in introductory courses, and students in upper level courses ratetheir knowledge of cybersecurity higher than students in introductory courses. Students in allcourses agree that cybersecurity topics are important to learn. These are encouraging results. Students appear to gain cybersecurity knowledge, and understand the importance of learningabout cybersecurity. We plan to have students who are now in the introductory courses take thesurvey again to determine if their scores increase. We also plan to introduce course content earlyin the curriculum to address the apparent gaps in knowledge about software vulnerabilities andthe use of VPNs.References[1] Bassett, G., Hylender, D., Langlois, P., Pinto, A., & Widup, S., “Data
weeksafterwards. At the current time, we are helping the other student find a relevant internship.At the conclusion of the summer internship, we solicit feedback from both the employers and thestudents to help assess the program. For the 2023 SASI program, we plan to work with Miami’sCareer Services to market the SASI program directly to companies interviewing on campus andincorporate it into their hiring plans. Our goal for 2023 is to have 30 sponsored students in theworkshop. 5Proceedings of the 2022 ASEE North Central Section ConferenceCopyright ©2022, American Society for Engineering EducationTable I. Three-week schedule of material covered during the
30 years of industrial experience, most of the students simply did not graspthe concepts sufficiently to do well in the course. The final grade distribution was bifurcated with five of14 students getting an overall average of 88% or better while five got an average of 75% or less, and onewithdrew before the mid-term exam.After the experience of teaching ENGR 207, the author concluded that the majority of today’s generationof students do not respond well to the methods that were used in Engineering classrooms in the 1980swhen he was a student. However, with little time to make modifications in his planned approach for the5 Ibid.6 Ibid.7 Ibid.8 Jones, D.R.H., and M. F. Ashby, Engineering Materials 1, 5th edition, Butterworth-Heinemann
including more voices fromAfrican American students in engineering at PWIs as we expand beyond this pilot study. Also,these findings are not necessarily limited to Black and African American students at PWIs;future studies could expand on our findings to explore other minoritized populations atinstitutions that were not designed with them in mind. A second limitation of this study is the fact that the results are preliminary and call forfurther study that aims to explore the cultures cultivated in different engineering programs atPWIs and how African American students navigate them. We plan to collect and analyze furtherdata to identify how students use their navigational capital to achieve this aim. Finally, this study looks at the
. According to the U.S. Bureau Labor Statistics (2017), that nationalaverage of STEM related occupations was $87,500 which is nearly double the average nationalwage of non-STEM occupations. The national commitment to promoting STEM excellence isevidenced by the State-Federal STEM Education Summit that was hosted last summer. The STEMEducation Summit convened a wide range of STEM leaders from all 50 states, five territories, andseveral tribes. The goal of the summit was to outline and develop a national STEM education planthat “will to help inform the development of the upcoming Federal 5-Year STEM EducationStrategic Plan” (p.3). To help support the initiative to enhance STEM education, the prioritizationof improving STEM education U.S. Department of
further[from list of chapters covered]?” was examined for weeks 1 through 14 over the semester.Baseline Survey First Week of Classes. A survey was conducted the first week of the semesterto establish a baseline of students’ attitudes and background in Chemistry. The survey had themreflect on their background and why they were planning to take the course, what subjects theyfound important and interesting, how they felt about chemistry and what benefits the courseprovided to them after hundreds of hours of time invested in learning the material.Sample. This analysis focused on all engineering majors: chemical, biomedical, mechanical,electrical, civil, engineering physics, software engineering, engineering management andcomputer engineering. The
Hammarby Sjöstadsverk 2015 wastewater treatment Royal Institute of Technology Ocean farming research 2015, 2017 (KTH) research presentations Fossil-free bus fleets Automation in manufacturing Forest products engineering Biofuels and bioplastics Sustainable urban planning Urban Food Production Rosendal’s Garden 2017, 2019 Integrated forestry and wood and Iggesund paperboard/Holmen Group 2017, 2019 paper production Large scale extractive processes Kiruna Iron Ore Mine 2019 Climate change impacts on
inattitudes and motivation across cohorts, and deployed end-of-term surveys in each participatingcourse to track within-subject variation across course contexts.Fall 2019 was designated as the control group, in which assessment instruments were developedand deployed, but no direct effort by project personnel was invested in developing orimplementing new instructional strategies. Fall 2020 was intended to be the first treatment cohort.Although many of the original research and intervention plans were disrupted by COVID-19,project personnel instead invested resources into facilitating and improving (primarily) remoteinstruction. The same survey and assessment instruments were still deployed in Fall 2020,offering a unique opportunity to study student
’ Interest in Transportation EngineeringAbstractThe National Summer Transportation Institute (NSTI) was a week-long summer residentialprogram supported by the Federal Highway Administration, the state’s Department ofTransportation, and a college of engineering in a large university. The program engagedparticipants in transportation engineering topics with opportunities to interact with engineerswho plan and maintain transportation systems. 125 students entering grades 10-12 spent oneweek living at the university campus. Students participated in tours of transportation-related sitesnot normally accessible to the public including traffic management centers, airports, and activeconstruction sites. Students also engaged with faculty and toured campus
summer camp time can be in the middle of summer and may disruptthe summer schedule for the whole family. In addition, in the summer, faculty and high-school teachers have their own summer agenda. All of this needs to be discussed andprepared to find the best time for summer camp.ScheduleThe schedule of the summer camp should be planned carefully, especially in the case ofvirtual education. The aim is to keep the student focused on his activities, to make thepresentation clear and complete enough to make it clear and adaptable for all students.Type of studentsOur goal in this summer camp is to focus on minorities and women, as well as low-incomefamilies. At the moment, we are focusing on high school. The involvement of middle schoolstudents was
, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives.A question pertinent to any engineering educator is, “Where, when and how do we satisfy thisoutcome?” As an example of this, Sangelkar et al [2] surveyed faculty in their mechanicalengineering program to identify teaming experiences throughout their curriculum. They found anumber of courses with collaborative learning experiences, projects staffed by multiple students,and some degree of instruction in teaming, but conclude that the teaming experience in acurriculum can contain significant gaps.One of the challenges of teamworking is finding the time to provide instructor guidance withinthe scheduled classroom time. Some of the key issues to be addressed in teaming instruction arenoted in [3] and [4
and the extent to which they view themselves as a “STEM person”. Slightly modified version of the Chemistry Motivation Questionnaire (Glynn & Koballa, 2005), which includes 30 items that measure the following six student factors: Intrinsic Motivation, Extrinsic Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Self-Determination, Goal-Orientation, Anxiety-Related Motivation. The Sense of Belongingness scale [8], which is part of the National Survey of Student Engagement, used by Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA and the Center for Post-Secondary Research and Planning at Indiana University. This instrument operationalizes "belongingness" in a number of different contexts, including
redesigned in collaboration with socialwork, nursing, accounting, and hospitality management. In addition, partner discipline facultyhave implemented materials in their own courses and conversations have progressed about moreextensive collaborations to be implemented in the partner discipline courses.At Humboldt State University, a new consortium member, plans are in place to use materialsfrom Augsburg University in three sections of Calculus I, one section of Trigonometry, andpossibly three sections of Biocalculus. Findings from their fishbowl activity, where they receivedinput from Environmental Resources, Engineering, and Physics colleagues, are informing thechanges planned for the Trigonometry and Calculus courses.At LaGuardia Community College
6 learningoutcomes and good gains in 8 learning outcomes (see Table 1).Unsurprisingly, student learning during the pandemic was measurably lower than pre-pandemic.Five learning outcomes were significantly lower for the students enrolled in 2020 than for thoseenrolled in 2019: how ideas from this class relate to other classes; drawing appropriate FBDs forgiven systems; interest in taking or planning to take additional engineering classes; confidencethat you can do statics work; and comfort level in working with complex ideas (see Table 2).To further assess the extent to which these significant differences can be attributed to differencesbetween the two courses, we modeled each learning outcome. The timing of when students wereenrolled in the