An Integrated Research, Education/Training and Industry Practice Framework to Accelerate the Innovation in Biopharmaceuticals Manufacturing and Eliminate Drug Shortage Wei Xie, Jared Auclair, Jinxiang PeiAbstract: The biomanufacturing industry is growing rapidly and becoming one of the key driversof medicine and life science. Since biopharma manufacturing is based on living organisms, thereexists inherent uncertainty in raw material supply, production process, storage and delivery,which leads to highly volatile outcomes. Even though rich data are collected during drugdevelopment and production processes, industrial practitioners tend to lack knowledge on bigdata analytics, risk analysis, real-time control and
Session 1726 The Use of Complex, but Inexpensive, Thermo-Mechanical Processing to Illustrate a Range of Engineering Principles in an Integrated and Synergistic Manner Dan Walsh, Dave Gibbs California Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoAbstractThe events that occur in metallic materials heated to high temperatures in the dynamicprocessing environment associated with an arc or beam welding operation can be used toillustrate a broad range of fundamental scientific and engineering concepts in a holistic manner.Moreover, the process and resultant weld are
undergraduate educational program of study. An effective engineeringundergraduate curriculum needs to offer ample opportunities to obtain functional teamworkskills, develop personal interaction proficiencies, and demonstrate essential levels cognitivedevelopment in preparation to successfully serve as contributing members of productivemultidisciplinary teams. An ability for graduates to function on multidisciplinary teams isidentified by ABET as one of eleven student outcomes in the a-k list that engineering programsneed to adopt in preparing graduates to attain program educational objectives. Additionally, theAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Body of Knowledge (BOK) identifies nineprofessional outcomes, including teamwork, as a subset of 24
thatholds learning content for Software Engineering courses, and provides students, project teams,and instructors with advanced tools to create, share, and annotate both the learning content andan organizational structure for that content. Traditional course management systems, teamproject repositories, wikis, etc., usually fragment information into silos (that is, into distinctinformation storage locations which are not integrated). We seek a system to help integrate thefragmented information into a whole across the curriculum and the student’s academic careerand to improve student interaction with learning content and with each other in project teams
Student c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Quantifying self-guided repetition within an interactive textbook for a material and energy balances courseAbstractInteractive technology has quickly integrated into daily lives through handheld electronics and theInternet. Here, an interactive textbook replacement from zyBooks for a material and energybalances course has been used in recent years. While features of the interactive textbook werehighlighted previously, including animations replacing figures and question sets in lieu of largeblocks of text, student usage will be the focus of this contribution. Similarly, reading
Pursuing a Personalized Program to Prepare for an Academic Career at an Engineering Department without a Formal Teaching Curriculum Amaka Waturuocha1, Laura Ford1, Christi Patton Luks1 1 University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK, USAAbstractTypically, when applying to graduate school for doctoral programs, students are not 100%certain of the route their careers will take: industry, academia or both. Most times though, theylean more towards one of these options. In such a case the potential graduate student tailors theirapplications /interests to schools with the kind of curriculum that fits their particular needs. Oncein graduate school
cable. The students found it easy to program theLPC 1768 board using Mbed. The hands-on exercises included the programming of the boardto execute various operations including the LED control, the use of analog/digital input andoutput, Analog-to-digital conversion, motor control, use of different communication protocol,use of the LCD display unit etc.Class Project: Class project was an integral part of this class. In one year, class projectincluded the programming of BeagleBone platform along with the interface of selected sensorwith the SAM D21 and ATMEGA 2560 board. In the 3rd year, a real-world environmentalmeasurement system using selected sensors was developed by each team. Each team consistedof 3-4 people. The project involved agile
Paper ID #27349Relating Theater and Systems Engineering: Experiences of a Systems Engi-neer in Theater CoursesGiulia Palma, University of Alabama in Huntsville Giulia Palma is a PhD student at the university of Alabama in Huntsville in the systems engineering program. Some of Her research interests include analyzing case studies using storytelling metrics and developing methods to use theatre as a surrogate for complex systems.Dr. Bryan Mesmer, The University of Alabama in Huntsville Dr. Bryan Mesmer is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Engineering Management at the University
factors in retention.A second aspect of the transfer-strategic nature of this first technical course is academic. In thiscourse, students must integrate their previous learning from the electronics bridge courses thatwere taken at their AAS-level colleges. Besides being an inherent concept reinforcementvehicle, this course serves as the primary bridge from the electronics bridge and calculus coursesthat were taken at the AAS-EET level to the +2 BS-EET curriculum. Numerous EET studentshave told their instructors that in this course they realized that they were “in the right place,” thatthey could “handle” the academic rigors of a BS-EET program, and that they were committed tocompleting the program. Although anecdotal, such comments have been
. It is the combinationof these two movements, that prompted TAC to closely examine its current accreditation criteriaand practices. Some of the advantages and disadvantages of current TAC of ABET practices andproposed ideas for the future are presented in an earlier paper by Pagano [3]. For the present,TAC has chosen to maintain its course, and has resisted wide-scale adoption of the outcome-based philosophy. Conversely, TAC has fully supported the integration of continuingimprovement expectations into the criteria. To examine and possibly implement some of thesechanges, TAC convened a mid-year working session in February 1995. Some of the actions thatwere considered at this meeting resulted in the TAC criteria revisions which are the subject
degree. Students often fail to appreciate the importance oflinkages within and among courses and subjects, and instead view their undergraduate educationas a series of disjoint and unrelated courses.Making conceptual linkages and transferring knowledge from one context to another is aparticularly important skill for engineers1. Engineers routinely are required to reduce complexproblems to simpler ones that they can understand and analyze using well understood principlesand models. Additionally, learning new information is more effective and efficient if the newinformation is framed within a known context and in fact, deduced from an establishedknowledge base. Deliberate integration of the curriculum that includes topical linkages andconcept
Paper ID #29142Using an Education Ideas Forum to Foster Institutional InnovationStaring from the Grassroots LevelDr. Adeel Khalid, Kennesaw State University Adeel Khalid, Ph.D. Professor Industrial & Systems Engineering Office: 470-578-7241Dr. Tris Utschig, Kennesaw State University Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is Director for Scholarly Teaching in the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (CETL) and is Associate Professor of Nuclear Engineering at Kennesaw State University. For- merly, he was Assistant Director for CETL and the Office of Assessment at Georgia Tech, and prior to that was a tenured Associate
in the educational sector in both live and online environments as an adjunct instruc- tor in computer technology for Greenville Technical College and as a Career and Technology Education teacher. Kris earned a B.S. in Management from Clemson University, a Masters of Arts in Teaching in Business Education from the University of South Carolina, and an Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Educational Technology and online learning from the University of Florida. Her research interests include implementation of digital learning solutions in technical and vocational education, development of career pathways utilizing stackable certificates, educator professional develop- ment in communities of
education.Instructional laboratory work is an integral part of electrical engineering education. Overthe last century, electrical engineering educators gradually moved toward a balancebetween theoretical and lab skills, with more emphasis on theoretical (cognitive) skills.Electrical engineering technology educators reached a different balance, with increasedemphasis on lab (psychomotor) skills. In either case, the instructional lab plays animportant educational role.Doing the lab work, from the student point of view, is time consuming with less creditgiven (one credit hour for every three clock hour work.) Accordingly, the student aspiresfor a very efficient lab experience. What he goes through is some times a very lengthyand very exhaustive, marathon type
corresponding exchange program for medical doctors in training at HSS toattend the Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in a masters degree program.The main goal of the MD/MS Fellowship Program is to allow medical students or residents toparticipate in biomedical engineering curriculum. The program provides graduate levelengineering education for medical students or residents who wish to collaborate with biomedicalengineers but who do not wish to pursue an MD/PhD. To date, one resident in orthopaedicsurgery at the Hospital for Special Surgery has completed the program. He is back operating atthe hospital and collaborating effectively in mechanics research.SummaryGraduate education in biomedical engineering must include exposure to
AC 2011-2041: INTEGRATING COMMUNICATION INSTRUCTION THROUGH-OUT COMPUTER SCIENCE AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING CURRIC-ULAJanet E. Burge, Miami University Janet Burge is an Assistant Professor in the Miami University Computer Science and Software Engineer- ing department. She received her Ph.D. in Computer Science from Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2005) and performed her undergraduate work at Michigan Technological University (1984). Her research in- terests include design rationale, software engineering, AI in design, and knowledge elicitation. She is a co-author (with Jack Carroll, Ray McCall,and Ivan Mistrik) of the book ”Rationale-Based Software En- gineering”. Dr. Burge is a recipient of a NSF CAREER Award for
2006-1384: METHODS FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF EDUCATIONALREFORM IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGThomas Harris, Vanderbilt University Thomas R. Harris is the Orrin Henry Ingram Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Chemical Engineering and Medicine at Vanderbilt University. He is currently Chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering. He received B.S. and M.S. degrees in chemical engineering from Texas A&M University and the Ph.D. degree from Tulane University in that field. He holds an M.D. degree from Vanderbilt University. His current interests focus on the development of learning science and learning technology for bioengineering. He is currently
: Transformation or assimilation?Purpose of the study and research questionsThe aim of this study is to examine how elementary school teachers translate what they learnedfrom using the Engineering is Elementary (EiE) curriculum. The research questions include thefollowing: 1) What are the teachers‟ first steps in developing engineering design-based sciencelessons? 2) What are the teachers‟ actual attempts at integrating the engineering design process?3) How can we characterize teachers‟ attempts? The context of this research study is auniversity-based initiative focused on creating an engineering literate society throughpreeminence in P-12 engineering education research and scholarship.Theoretical frameworkCentral to this study is the work of teachers
St. Louis where she works extensively with faculty to enhance active learning strategies to help create inclusive, engaging classrooms. Her research ranges from communication networks in mammals and birds to metacognition in student learning.Dr. Erin D Solomon, Washington University in St. Louis Erin Solomon, Ph.D., (Social Psychology) is currently a research scientist and project manager in the Center for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education at Washington University in St. Louis. Her work focuses on the collection and analysis of educational data to evaluate the impact of curricular changes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses. She also works to support STEM
, thereby moreeffectively integrating student education.1,2 The author further believes that such an approachcould be generalized to other non-design courses in the curriculum such as courses taken in the3d and 4th year (see Table 1) that would establish bridges to the capstone 5th year design. Alsobased on recommendations from students in Spring 2009 junior design who took NetworkTheory II with the term project in Spring 2008, as well as the better performance of thosestudents who chose a design project, the author decided that future projects would all be requiredto be design projects instead of also allowing research papers on special topics.The author plans to continue refining this approach as well as continue assessment while refiningthe
Manufacturing in an Introductory Materials Course Sarah E. Leach Purdue UniversityAbstractThe mechanical engineering technology curriculum includes formal courses in manufacturingprocesses, but manufacturing considerations should also be incorporated into courses intended toteach fundamental theoretical principles. Adding materials processing exposure in parallel withtheory has a number of benefits for students. These benefits include: helping students tounderstand how fundamental principles relate to processes and controls, giving them anappreciation for the scale and pace of manufacturing environments, increasing their awareness ofthe
mathematics and science courses.To address these issues, the Pre-Engineering Instructional and Outreach Program (PrE-IOP), acollaboration of the Newark College of Engineering and New Jersey Institute of Technology’s(NJIT) Center for Pre-College Programs, was created. This program seeks to increase the futurepool of qualified high-tech workers, including women and minorities. PrE-IOP consists of twocomponents:1. An instructional component that implements pre-engineering curriculum in middle and high school classes.2. An outreach component that consists of a comprehensive information campaign about the rewards of engineering and technology professions.One project of the outreach component is a series of teleconferences on the theme of “Building
; they’re developingideas, philosophies, and theories about the nature of learning and learning environments.”1 Ellisand Andam9 present strategies for an integrative approach to teaching AI in the K-12environment. A key finding of their research is that integrating AI and philosophy of the mindcan appeal to a broader audience and result in high student interest and achievement. In thispaper we build upon Ellis and Andam’s work by presenting a conceptual framework that usesphilosophy of the mind to organize how students learn about AI. Our approach acknowledgesthat intelligence is a complex issue involving philosophical concerns that must be addressed inorder to develop intelligent machines.Using philosophy to organize AI content significantly
for assisting teachers with performing engineering education and communicating robotics concepts to students spanning the K-12 through university age range.Ashley Russell, CEEO Page 22.859.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Improving STEM Learning through Accessible RoboBooksAbstractIn this study the researchers conducted an inclusive and iterative design protocol in orderto develop an accessible, interactive engineering curriculum delivery tool and promoteequitable learning opportunities for students with learning and cognitive disabilities. Thesoftware interface is utilized
of women in engineering programs.30In contrast, this research builds upon work calling for a greater understanding of the gender “in”and “of” engineering.31 It “bends the silos” (of individual academic disciplines) by utilizingtheories, concepts, and methods from various disciplines to show that being successful in theengineering disciplines involves more than just mastering curriculum and technical competencies.It also involves learning how to be an active part of a learning community and negotiating one’spersonal psychosocial identity as one’s “engineering identity” is also being developed.The purpose of this study is to ask distinctive questions in order to gain greater understanding ofthe importance of the individual and how they develop
with computational simulation in the classroom, we extendpractices in curriculum development to propose an integration method that will assist faculty ineffectively incorporating research-grade simulations into their existing courses.IntroductionNanotechnology is a rapidly growing area of research1, therefore training students to understandatomic level principles and have the skills necessary to work in nanotechnology-related projectsis critical in all fields of engineering and part of a multidisciplinary engineering education2. Yet,the growing body of research related to nanotechnology education has consistently found thatstudents struggle with concepts at the nano-scale3–6. Simulation tools developed for research canprovide deep insight into
in the awareness of programoutcomes and their importance in the curriculum. Many students see them as overly generalizedstatements that have no bearing on the concepts they need to pass a given course. Thus,dissemination of the notion and value of program outcomes is a major hurdle for the faculty.This paper suggests that engaging students at the freshman level in the departmental programoutcomes is one strategy to foster a climate of their acceptance in later courses. Examples offreshman class assignments and projects that address specific program outcomes in a MechanicalEngineering department are presented.IntroductionIn the mid-1990’s, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) developeda new set of criteria for
. Sprinsky, W. H. 2002, ”Integrating Instruction in Geographic Information Systems with a Civil EngineeringTechnology Curriculum”, Geospatial World 20025. Sprinsky, W. H. 2002, Transformation of Survey Coordinates, Another Look at an Old Problem. Journal ofSurveying Engineering, ASCE. Page 11.1210.21
internal team leadership needed toresolve common behaviors within dysfunctional teams. While no new theoretical results onteamwork are presented, the authors have focused instead on applying their experience asmanagers of teams in major corporations and institutions of higher education to explore what aneffective teaming curriculum might include and to develop related assessment tools. This paperoutlines a strategy for integrating deliberate teaming instruction into senior-level engineeringcapstone or project courses. The curriculum focuses on building team leadership skills andtechniques for addressing challenges such as planning and execution, social loafing, andprocrastination. Models for assessing students‟ teaming skills and for providing
AC 2007-1244: DEVELOPMENT OF A NANOTECHNOLOGY CURRICULUM ATOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is author of the text Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics, which includes an integrated, menu driven computer program ThermoSolver. He is interested in integrating technology into effective education practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards