-4.2 Other 0.3 0 -0.3Analysis of Survey DataStudent survey data demonstrate many positive impacts including changing student self-perception,self-efficacy, and career and educational plans. Faculty survey data indicate positive outcome rangingfrom improved ability to supervise and advise students in research, improved teaching skills andcredibility, and new research opportunities.Staff survey results indicate interest in working with the faculty and students from diverse backgroundsand no presence of bias. Staff indicate a variety of benefits from expanding their own research 17portfolios to learning about the ability of faculty
Connected Through Servant LeadershipAbstractServant-Leadership is a leadership paradigm that emphasizes power sharing in decision makingprocesses. It also encourages leaders to serve those they manage by propelling them toward highachievement while promoting their professional growth and self-efficacy. Servant-Leadership isalso being pioneered as a teaching pedagogy at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, anapproach that is unique because most academic institutions subscribe instead to the service-learning model. In conventional academic settings, instructors are the authority figures withcontrol over content, knowledge, assessment, and course outcomes. By contrast, servant-leadership places instructors at the bottom of an inverted power pyramid
Paper ID #9250Effects of Continuous Teacher Professional Development in Engineering onElementary TeachersDr. So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University So Yoon Yoon, Ph.D., is a post-doctoral research associate at Texas A&M University. She received her Ph.D. and M.S.Ed.in Educational Psychology with the specialties in Gifted Education and Research Methods & Measurement, respectively, from Purdue University. Her work centers on the development and validation of instruments, particularly useful for P-16 STEM education settings (e.g., the Revised PSVT:R, the Teaching Engineering Self-efficacy Scale [TESS], the extended
notconducive to deep learning or a quality product. Students get so good at this “team dance” thatthey are not aware of the important issues that they are avoiding11.Language, self-efficacy, and leadership rolesThe typical model that students have of an engineering leader is that of “the boss.” Students donot differentiate between leadership and management authority. This interpretation affects theirself-perception of their own leadership potential. The concept of leadership is one miss-generalized to all situations. Therefore; since the students cannot see themselves in powerfulpositions until well into the future, they have not considered their own personal skills andabilities (efficacy) in regards to leadership12, 13, 14.The necessary step in the
students’ agentic engagement, self-efficacy, growth mindset, and other related aspects. 1In recent years, there has been increasing attention paid to students’ epistemic beliefs and theirimpact on learning efficacy. Epistemic belief, which reflects students’ views on the nature ofknowledge and knowing, plays a crucial role in the cognitive, metacognitive, and affectivedimensions of students’ learning. Research has demonstrated that interventions targeting epistemicbeliefs can significantly enhance learning outcomes (Greene et al., 2018). Epistemic cognition -mostly measured in terms of belief (Greene et al., 2018) – is identified as the apex of
may be rooted in an individual’s personality. These includehaving a future-focus, a tendency to generate multiple problem solutions, a tendency to generateaction plans, self-confidence, optimism, persistence, and team-orientedness [2], [3]. Throughregular group interactions, ideation sessions, and active product development interlaced with thePBL courses of the available degree programs, the FLiTE program aims to inculcate a regularpractice of creativity, professional self-efficacy, and teaming skills among the students [1].In a practical sense, the FLiTE program seeks to give students the financial means to persisttoward their degrees while also developing the innovation and business acumen to launch theirown technology startup. Through
assessments such as ungrading are often seen as moreequitable.53 Students report the increased self-efficacy demonstrated when students feel empoweredto affect their own grade.54 This also explains the commonly used “inclusive assessment”terminology to describe many of these methods that essentially focus on student learning of specificoutcomes. Summary and ConclusionsThis review emphasizes the importance of considering how student achievement is assessed. Activelearning techniques and alternative assessment methods have been shown to improve outcomes forall students. Experiential learning comes in many forms and there are many options forimplementing active engagement into courses. Similarly, assessment methods that
problems thatmake them initially more doable; the modifications are then gradually removed aslearners gain more skills. The tool would, in addition, give students an opportunity forearly success in the material/energy balance class, leading to enhanced learning accordingto self-efficacy theory.13Unlike typical process simulation packages (HYSYS, ASPEN, PRO/II), in ChemProVthe development of the process flow diagram and the needed balance equations were leftentirely to the students and no numerical solution programming was provided. A numberof other educational software programs for material/energy balance classes have recentlyappeared, for example the offerings of Sapling Learning. These tend to be overlyprescriptive in the problem solving
requires, students come back to class inspired and driven tocomplete their studies. The graduate, thus, has acquired the necessary work readiness of skills,confidence, and self-efficacy to become a contributing member of the organization in a shortertimeframe [4]. This ease of transition into the career parallels the paradigm shift of employeeslooking beyond pay and wanting “learning opportunities, a sense of belonging and work-lifebalance” [5].Belonging is a fundamental human desire to be part of a group [6]. Studies have shown thatstudents with a higher sense of belonging to their university or major are more likely toovercome challenges and persist in their college studies [7-9]. Walton and Cohen [7] also foundthat a one-hour intervention to
discipline-based educational research, including design self-efficacy, project-based learning, critical reflection in ethics, and high-impact practices.Lauren Christopher, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Dr. Lauren Christopher attended Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she received her S. B. and S. M. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1982, specializing in digital signal processing and chip design. She worked at RCAˆa C™s David SaChristine Krull, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisEric W Adams, Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisShahrzad Ghadiri, Indiana University - Purdue University IndianapolisRichard Vernal Sullivan, Indiana University-Purdue University
self-efficacy, motivation, and the presence of mentors androle models can influence occupational and academic behavior, pursuits, and success forconstruction-education. Their research suggested that students with a person of influence havehigher self-efficacy and motivation toward successful performance in their constructioneducation [5]. While our study focuses on whether a Structural Engineer faculty member can bea mentor and/or role model for students, it does not determine if the faculty member is theprimary person of influence.There are multiple options on how to incorporate mentoring within the architecture, engineering,and construction (A/E/C) related majors. One mentoring model is the P5BL pedagogicalapproach which stands for Problem
group and others canceling team timealtogether. The second salient challenge was the occasional miscommunications between thefull-time staff coordinator and the graduate co-coordinator or between the graduateco-coordinator and program assistants. This manifested itself mainly through the formalevaluation of the camp, and the distribution of the post-camp survey to the participants. While allcamps were motivated by the same frameworks, only the in-person camp resulted in a complete(pre and post) set of survey results. Surveys were a compilation of the Engineering PersonalInterests Survey adapted from O*NET Mini Interests Profiler [8] to measure engineering interest,the Perceptions of Engineering Survey [7], and the Engineering Self-Efficacy
engineeringliterate students, and as argued by others [11]-[12], can be seamlessly integrated into thecurriculum to support young children’s learning development. Additionally, some prior researchsuggests that practicing and prospective educators may have difficulty planning, designing, andimplementing lessons and activities that develop and promote children’s HoM as engineers [12]-[13]. This may be due to several reasons such as lack of readiness to teach engineering [14], lowengineering self-efficacy and low teacher efficacy related to engineering pedagogical contentknowledge [15], lack of engineering pedagogical content knowledge [16], and misconceptionsregarding the field of engineering [17].Out-of-school learning environments may be an alternative
iterative or parallel prototyping strategy impacted students’ use ofCAD during a design competition in an introductory mechanical engineering course. The resultsin this paper build from prior work that investigated how the two prototyping approachesaffected competition performance, engineering design self-efficacy, solution space exploration,and design satisfaction [11], [12]. This paper specifically addresses how the prototypingstrategies impacted design complexity and CAD software feature use and is compared tocompetition performance. In this work, CAD features refer to the specific operations that adesigner specifies within the software space to create a model. The overarching aims of thisresearch are to understand how novice engineers are using
(considereda virtual design problem), greater solution divergence, and improved self-efficacy [10, 11].Notably, Dow et al. also investigated these effects for physical prototyping, but withinconclusive results [11]. The parallel prototyping strategy employed by Dow et al. shows somebenefits over an iterative strategy, but there is a lack of supporting empirical evidence. The workin this paper aims to provide evidence for the benefits and limitations of these two prototypingstrategies through an undergraduate engineering design project for physical products.Beyond an iterative or parallel approach, researchers have outlined other strategies for aneffective prototyping process. Menold et al. [28-30] developed “Prototype for X (PFX)”, aframework for
,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 965–1006, 2018, doi: 10.3102/0002831218763587.[27] B. N. Geisinger and D. R. Raman, “Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 914–925, 2013.[28] J. L. Moore III, “A Qualitative Investigation of African American Males’ Career Trajectory in Engineering: Implications for Teachers, School Counselors, and Parents,” Teach. Coll. Rec., vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 246–266, 2006.[29] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27–38
connection to engagement, given the lack of both control and choice.142.1.2 Competence Competence “is the belief that one has the ability to influence importantoutcomes.”12 It relates to the ability to master material and general self-efficacy. Assignmentsand activities should be challenging but achievable to promote a sense of competence. Clearinstructions and supportive, informative feedback both promote students’ sense of competence.132.1.3 Relatedness Relatedness is feeling meaningfully connected to others. Collaborativeassignments would seemingly support student perceptions of relatedness, but “communicationissues and disagreements” within small teams and “limited interaction with the wider class” canpotentially undermine relatedness.13 Of
towardsincreasing the number and diversity of engineering graduates by addressing the retentionproblem in the first two years of college. One of the strategies commonly employed in improvingundergraduate STEM education is providing students access to research experiences. There aremany studies documenting the benefits of research opportunities for undergraduate studentsincluding increased student engagement in their education, enhanced research and laboratoryskills, improved academic performance, increased student self-efficacy, and increasedunderstanding and interest for their discipline. These studies also show that early and multipleexposures to undergraduate research experiences offer the greatest benefit. However, a recentextensive study of Research
ourprogram. Moving forward, we aim to develop instruments or adapt published instruments thatmore objectively measure student self-efficacy toward design [19] for use in our program and,more generally, in the context of biomedical engineering education. Bandura proposes four mainsources of efficacy information: performance accomplishments, vicarious experience, verbalpersuasion, and physiological states [20]. We aim to contribute to an understanding of howstudent design confidence relates to such described mechanisms for changes in self-efficacy.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank the IUPUI Center for Teaching and Learning for their supportvia the Curriculum Enhancement Grant (CEG) and for moderating focus groups.References[1] J.E. Froyd
experience cannotbe required, but it is encouraged. SIIRE workshops focus on performing research and on how tocommunicate research. In addition, SIIRE supports students as they perform their graduatestudies, which often includes a thesis.Borrego et al. [20] apply social cognitive career theory to examine the underpinnings of whyengineering students choose graduate school. They developed constructs aligned with socialcognitive career theory such as self-efficacy, outcome expectations, supports, barriers and choiceactions. These constructs present a more holistic view of the many factors involved in makingthe choice to attend graduate school. For example, Borrego et al. [20] used self-efficacy torepresent “a person’s beliefs about their ability to
collectedduring the 2013-2014 school year are used to address the following research question: Does the‘You’re Hired!’ program lead to a change in student attitudes towards engineering? The impactof the ‘You’re Hired!’ program on students’ self-efficacy towards engineering skills/21st CenturySkills is also discussed as well as explaining the benefit to schools who choose to incorporatethis program. Additional details of the research project are available in Kristin Brevik’s M.S.thesis.[16]Research MethodologyTo research the effectiveness of the “You’re Hired!’ program at promoting positive attitudestowards engineering, pre- and post-surveys were used for summative evaluation of students’awareness and perceptions towards different aspects of
experience through a course activity and, during the semester of thestudy, through a short survey. 2Course Page 26.1374.7 Figure 1. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle framing of course activities.III. MethodsDuring the fall semester of 2014, a study was conducted in an introductory computing course fornon-computer science majors. The purpose of this study was to measure the relationship betweenthe skills learned using the simulated environment and those demonstrated on the final Excelexam. This examination also explored student confidence, comfort, and self-efficacy forapplying the skills taught in the stimulation to a real-world environment
increase diversityand inclusion, the researchers were motivated to conduct this study to improve the belonging ofengineering pre-major students in STEM classrooms and their intended majors. This researchexplores the effect of embedding small interventions designed to improve engineering pre-majorstudents’ sense of belonging and self-efficacy into traditionally taught Introduction to Engineeringand Introduction to Engineering Physics classes. In addition, this study investigates the effect ofthe interventions on different student groups (women, first generation, students of color or ethnicbackground, community college vs. technical college vs. university students, etc.). This study hasthe potential to benefit first-year engineering education
centered on applying anengineering design process and fostering effective teamwork behaviors. While the study revealedgains in technology and communication self-efficacy ratings among students, there was a declinein engineering self-efficacy, highlighting the need for further guidance to bridge the gap betweengameplay and academic content. Despite some challenges, the study recognized the potential ofvideo games to enhance student engagement and understanding of engineering principles,particularly regarding rapid iteration and practical application of the design process. Additionally,qualitative feedback underscored students' enthusiasm for the game but emphasized theimportance of clear connections between gameplay and learning objectives. Overall
, taskpersistence, and performance measures 5 ,7. Self-efficacy, one’s belief about one’s capacity toperform given behaviors, is central in the prediction of educational and occupational choices.Additionally, student self-perceptions have proven to be better predictors of academicperformance than objective measures of ability 2. Confident individuals, who expect to succeed,perform and persist at high levels. Thus, the existence of comparatively low levels of confidencein so many competent women is then, indeed, a matter of significant concern..Socialized gender differences have had significant implications for women in technical fields.Certainly the different cultural styles of women and men contribute to this challenge. Generally,women value group
-efficacy in tutoring engineering and engineeringtechnology students [14]. The results showed WATTS had a positive impact on tutors, andsubsequent research has supported this with statistically significant data demonstrating itspositive impact on peer tutor self-efficacy and application of knowledge transfer skills [15].During this iteration of the research, the student lab reports also had noticeable improvements,and the team received a STEM Education Innovation & Research Institute at IUPUI seed grant todetermine if this impact could be replicated at other institutions.The data supported the idea that WATTS impacts student writing and could be replicated. Toassess additional data and obtain a robust data set to measure the impacts of WATTS
byvarious psychological and educational factors. According to Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy,individuals who believe in their capacity to succeed in a given domain demonstrate higher levels ofmotivation, persistence, and resilience (Bandura, 1977). In the context of construction education, themore confident students feel about their mastery of sustainable materials and methods, the moreinclined they will be to advocate for and implement these approaches in professional settings (Bhati& Sethy, 2022). Constructivist learning theories also underscore how students actively build theirunderstanding of sustainability through direct experiences, peer collaboration, and reflection (Arik &Yilmaz, 2020). Integrating these theoretical insights into
). It is interesting tonote that this correlates to participating teachers’ students having an average score in the “MeetsExpectations” category while the comparison group fell in the “Approaches Expectations”category as defined by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). This report will provide a practicalgroundwork for crafting cross-curricular professional development opportunities that lead toincreased teacher self-efficacy and student achievement on standardized mathematicsassessments.IntroductionMathematics courses have been described as a gatekeeper for student achievement for decades[1]. Although some contest that performance in these courses is merely an indicator of studentsuccess and not a contributing factor, many studies point to the
. Thesample size prevents confirmation that the distributions are normal, an assumption for the t test.The reason the questionable result is presented here is because it is the only composite that maybe significantly different post program. There are many factors that could have contributed to theincrease; the professional development experience could be one of those factors. Analyses fromfuture summer programs may confirm or weaken this finding.The STEBI-A instrument measures personal science teaching self-efficacy (PSTE) and scienceteaching outcome expectancy (STOE) for in-service science teachers. The instrument wasdeveloped based on Bandura’s theory of social learning.36 The theory posits that people aremotivated to perform an action if the
have introduced a new course:Online Project-Based Engineering Experimentation. The course is project-based and designed tooperate in both a blended format, online with classroom labs, and fully online.Recently the topic of project-based learning for first-year college experiences delineated how toincorporate project-based learning (PBL) into the classroom and curriculum [2]. Limiting thefield to engineering still involves numerous investigators. The work of Fini et. al. has quantifiedmuch of the PBL assessments in terms of self-efficacy, teamwork, and communication skills inthe civil engineering environment [3]. The work of Han et. al. on Hispanic students showed thatPBL had a significant impact on students who were not at risk, albeit the