Paper ID #13243Self-Directed Summer Design Experience Across Disciplines and the GlobeDr. Christopher Joseph Lombardo, Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Dr. Christopher Lombardo is an Assistant Director of Undergraduate Studies and Lecturer at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Dr. Lombardo received Bachelor of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering and Physics from the University of Maryland at College Park and a Master of Science and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in Electrical Engineering from the The University of Texas at Austin. Outside of the classroom, Dr. Lombardo
recognized andaccepted by codes and material specifications, and became an important element in the education Page 2.373.2of engineering students.During the next couple of decades, there were only minor additions to the field of analysistechniques and methods. Most of the emphasis was placed on how the material could be betterand more efficiently taught, how the content was to be formed into courses, and where it wouldappear in an undergraduate curriculum. However, one significant analysis technique did appearduring this time. This technique focused on the stiffness matrix and the realization that thecomputer could aid in the analysis of structural
to today’s basic undergraduate civilengineering programs, the outcomes prescribe significantly more technical and professionalpractice content. The 21st Century civil engineer must demonstrate:1. an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering. (ABET a) Commentary: A technical core of knowledge and breadth of coverage in mathematics, science and civil engineering topics is stressed in this outcome. Underlying the professional role of the civil engineer as the master integrator and technical leader are most of the following: mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, biology, chemistry, ecology
, and the Bibb County Public School System. The program has thefollowing goals: • establish annual summer math, science, and engineering day camps for girls and boys from the Central South neighborhood • develop curricula that can be tested in the camp by teachers and then be integrated into the public school curriculum • create tiered mentoring networks among the camp attendees, high school students, and college students that can be maintained throughout the school year • expose college math, science, and engineering students with a possible interest in teaching to the camp format and teachers from the public school system • expose the high school mentors to college math, science
Industrial Engineering and an Honors Bachelor in Me- chanical Engineering from the University of Toronto. She also has a Master of Applied Science in Collab- orative Program in Engineering Education. Her thesis investigated team level factors affecting innovation in multidisciplinary capstone design course. In addition to her research in engineering education, she has been involved as a teaching assistance with more than four engineering design courses from first year to fourth year.Prof. Chirag Variawa, University of Toronto Professor Chirag Variawa is Director of First-year Curriculum at the University of Toronto, Canada. He received his Doctorate in Industrial Engineering, focusing on Language Inclusivity in
connections as well.An equally important line of inquiry for the present study is the role of reflection in experientiallearning. The research context, Kettering University, a technically-focused university with asubstantial co-op requirement for graduation (six terms), offers an important experientiallearning component that can then be integrated with academics. But it is not enough for studentsto simply have experiences. Dewey, an important early proponent of experiential education,claimed, “We do not learn from experience… we learn from reflecting on experience”6 andGibbs, in an oft-quoted passage, echoes: It is not sufficient simply to have an experience in order to learn. Without reflecting upon this experience it may quickly be
changes necessary for improved learning. Most faculty membersare already overloaded with teaching, research and service responsibilities, so even if theybelieve assessment is a useful activity they will often resist it as much as possible to avoid theextra workload. The key to overcome this resistance is to 1) make assessment an integral part ofthe basic course design structure and 2) provide templates and standard procedures for thefaculty to follow.Providing standard assessment procedures does not take away from faculty creativity andinvolvement in the assessment and continuous improvement process, it just focuses it on themost important items. The key is to communicate clearly the important information that must becollected for program
funding is available, provides best chance of success. Students learn many skills not available in curriculum such as programmatic in writing proposals, cost estimates, planning and scheduling. Often much time in graduate school is wasted trying to figure out a project and executing setup of an experiment. Number one problem leading to delays in graduation.US Government agencies have identified betavoltaics as a disruptive technology that is neededand should be pursued, as evident in reports and solicitations. In October 2013, the DefenseScience Board (DSB) issued its report on Technology and Innovation Enablers in 2030. TheDSB technology report specifically addresses the use of radionuclide power to lighten thesoldiers
theengineering curriculum in Dutch higher education: an exploratory study from the teaching staffperspective,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2013.[Online]. Available: DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2012.742866.[11] F. Trede, and C. McEwen, Developing a Critical Professional Identity. In: Practice-BasedEducation. Practice, Education, Work and Society, vol 6, Rotterdam:Sense Publishers, 2012.[12] J. Higgs, Professional and practice-based education at Charles Sturt University. 2e. TheEducation for Practice Institute, CSU, Sydney Olympic Park, 2011.[13] J.A. Smith, P. Flowers and M. Larking, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory,Method and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009.[14] Berelson
the integrity of student work and faculty instruction. Page 13.142.4In keeping with a tenet suitable for on-campus instruction, faculty work to assure a consistentand coherent technical framework for students. The university and individual faculty providestudents with technical support for hardware and software used in the course and the deliverysystem used off-campus. Consistency is sought in course-to-course implementations, wherechange is required efforts are made to minimize the impact on students.Delivery methods do not dictate course, curriculum or program content! The program facultymake all curricular decisions. At our institution
aircraft.However, as the number of commercial sUAS increases, this requirement for detailedairworthiness assurance and component tracking may change. In order to familiarize students inan Unmanned Aerial Systems major with this possible change, a junior level course wasstructured around tracking sUAS in a way which mirrored certified aircraft. The course focusedon integration on an off the shelf autopilot into a four pound 3d printed quadcopter. Student ingroups of two were required to fly ten missions in outdoor, real world conditions. At the start ofclass, students within the class, created a course specific preflight checklist. Before each flight,there students were required to follow this checklist. Also, each component on the quadcopterhad its own
along the skill subsets (a – k criteria), and presents them to the Page 22.1309.2accreditation agency for evaluation. A presentation such as this for accreditation evaluation canbe seen as circumstantial, inferential and relies heavily on the perception of evaluators. In orderto counter such perception-based evaluation, it can be proposed that because the performance ofstudents in each course is already quantified as an integral element of their education, suchquantification should, therefore, be carried over to the evaluation process of education itself.The element of intuitive evaluation in the program evaluation process cannot and should
Educational Management, 2018.[15] E. Ruayruay, K. Kirtikara, M. Nopharatana, K. Chomsuwan, and S. Suwannathep, "Work-Integrated Learning Competencies: A Case Study in a Food Engineering Practice School Program," International Journal of Instruction, vol. 13, pp. 707-720, 2020.[16] J. Xiao, "Successful and unsuccessful distance language learners: An ‘affective’perspective," Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, vol. 27, pp. 121-136, 2012.[17] Virtual Student Federal Service. (2022, May 5). VSFS - All Projects. Available: https://vsfs.state.gov/projects[18] L. Bosman, E. Dautz, R. Van Winkle, and G. Ricco, "Integrating Digital Ciuics into the Engineering Technology Classroom," Journal
utilizedthe technology via a hybrid learning approach. For example, in a 2012 Vanderbilt Universitygraduate level course on machine learning, students signed-up for and attended a traditionalresidency-based course per usual, but the course also integrated all or parts of existing MOOCs.Students in the course participated in a MOOC from Stanford University on Machine Learningwhile concurrently engaging in discussions during regular class time throughout the semester onthe Vanderbilt campus10. Leveraging MOOCs in such a traditional-online learning hybrid maybe a way to push pedagogical boundaries and enhance learning via a flipped classroom format,which similarly is an instructional approach that is receiving a great deal of attention. In additionto
impact of globalization.Teaching issues like cultural diversity to technical students can be a hard sell. It is not enough tosay that ABET requires it or that “Engineer 2020” desires it. We can provide lists of reasons whycertain organizations and task forces have come to see cultural understanding as an essential partof technical education. Still many technical students remain skeptical about the need to studytopics not directly related to their specializations in technology. The authors propose that thiskind of skepticism can be allayed in a classroom situation if students can be guided, through casestudies, to comprehend the connection between innovation and cultural understanding in a globaleconomy. There are two case studies, of dissimilar
. D.candidate in the Environmental Science and Engineering program provide two perspectives onthe challenges and outcomes of this effort. This paper is of interest to faculty members involvedin the integration of sustainable design concepts into the curriculum. The contest provided acooperative learning experience for both students and faculty, and consequently, madesignificant contributions to the student’s engineering education.BackgroundUTEP initiated green engineering and science efforts in 1997. UTEP joined forces with VirginiaTech (VT) to submit a proposal to a large energy corporation for the development of a studentand faculty exchange that would initiate a greening program in the Colleges of Engineering andScience at UTEP. UTEP would build on
Three elective junior courses, (e.g. PH 382U, BI 372U and ECE 383U,) from a single cluster, (e.g. Science & Liberal Arts or Design Thinking/Innovation/Entrepreneurship,) which includes courses from multiple departments, grouped around a single theme. An integrating two-quarter senior capstone experience, including some form of community service. (In engineering, this requirement is satisfied by the traditional capstone design project, performed in groups with participation and supervision by local industry. A future goal is the introduction of nanotechnology capstone projects which will integrate non-STE “graduates” of the nanotechnology courses into some of these industrial projects.)The four
Capstone course elements in detail, such as customized design for an activity(e.g. Business Case Presentation), or for other assignments (e.g. Decision Making Report), andexplore its capability of designing a complete course; then, use this AI-designed course as aprototype to develop other courses in the METM program. From trial and error, this research canproduce effective prompt templates to share with various stakeholders involved incourse/curriculum design. Looking ahead, the authors see the formation of a learning communitythat shares reusable prompts library and best practices of use cases and design experience, thus,gradually and gracefully embracing generative AI applications into the educational field for bothlearners and instructors
Paper ID #11568Development and Implementation of a Pathway Assessment Model for theASPIRE ProgramDr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel Carnasciali is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the Tagliatela College of Engineering, University of New Haven, CT. She obtained her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2008. She received her Bachelors of Engineering from MIT in 2000. Her research focuses on the nontraditional engineering student – understanding their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into
serving a large and diverse constituency with limitedresources.IntroductionProject-based “capstone” design has become an integral component of the undergraduateengineering experience. Howe and Wilbarger1 surveyed over 400 programs in the 2005 NationalSurvey of Engineering Capstone Design Courses, a follow-up to a comprehensive surveyconducted by Todd in 19942. Last year’s ASEE conference contained a number of papers oncapstone design programs3-9, with many of them focusing on assessment practices and lessonslearned. Important benefits associated with collaborative design projects include: innovativeproblem solving, improved handling of complexity and ambiguity, enhanced communicationsskills and self-confidence, and improvements in team building
cultures needs to be accomplished via a two way street. In the technical college (CIT) we have embraced a broad focus on humanities. Our engineering students in their undergraduate education must take a minimum of eight humanity based courses, three of which must form a depth sequence of which at least one course in this sequence must be taken at an advanced level. These are not math, computing or technical business courses, but true humanity offerings. The belief is that a balanced curriculum provides the best education for our engineers. The reverse flow of having humanities students study technical courses is not as widelypracticed. Part of the hesitation for humanities students coming into technical course is therequirement
; students have the ability to programtheir robots to perform complex tasks, both in the classroom and on competition fields. Theability to effectively teach generalizable CS skills, while simultaneously offering ways to helpdiversify the students that enter these fields, makes Educational Robotics a significantcontributor to the integration of computational thinking into schools and the ‘Computer Sciencefor All’ movement.Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread global disruption to in-personlearning, affecting nearly all students worldwide6. Hands-on learning experiences weresuspended, which was a foundational portion of most robotic STEM curriculum, including thecurriculum used by the VEX educational robotics line. Remote learning
Session 2392 Tech Prep Student Activities at a Post Secondary Institution D. Owen, R. Aubrey, J. Beasley Purdue University Programs-Anderson Abstract National focus is turning toward keeping the American work force competitive in a global market. The transition of high school students into a university educational environment looms as a major issue in staying competitive. Tech Prep initiatives typically modify high school curriculum to meet certain state standards and
University of South Florida. Their support is greatly appreciated.References1. Chang, Y.-H. I., and Miller, C. L., “PLM curriculum development: using an industry-sponsored project to teach manufacturing simulation in a multidisciplinary environment,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 171-177.2. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Learning by doing”, Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 37(4), 2003, pp. 282- 283.3. Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Brodeur, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., and Nasr, R., “Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class,” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.4. Impelluso, T. and Metoyer-Guidry, T., “Virtual reality and learning by design: Tools
© 1991 pp. 662-6646. Palmer M. A., Wnek G. E., Hudson J. B.: New Approaches for an Introductory Materials Science Course; ASEE Materials Division 1998 Conference7. Pollio H.: What Students Think about and Do in College Lecture Classes; Teaching-Learning Issues (53) University of Tennessee Learning Research Center, ©1984 [Referenced from Holou et al: First-Year Integrated Curricula: Design, Alternatives and Examples; Journal of Engineering Education, ©1999 pp. 435-48]8. Eastlake C. N.: Tell Me -I’ll Forget, Show Me - I’ll Remember, Involve Me - I’ll Understand; Proceedings ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, Washington DC, ©1986, pg. 420.9. Bloom B. S. and Krathwohl D. R.: Taxonomy of Educational
Paper ID #22133The Role of Internet of Things (IoT) and Big Data as a Road Map for SmartManagement Systems: Case Studies Across IndustriesDr. Mousumi Roy, University of Connecticut Dr. Roy earned her Doctoral degree from Columbia University, NY, MS from The Cooper Union, NY, and BS from Jadavpur University, India. She is currently teaching courses in Management and Engineering for Manufacturing (MEM) program at the University of Connecticut, as an Assistant Professor in Residence. She is involved in solving manufacturing problems for different companies in Connecticut as a part of the course curriculum. Her research
theintroduction of analytical concepts within an engineering research and design problem. Thispaper describes how the sodium borohydride hydrolysis reaction was integrated into the projectto answer specific design questions and how the students developed a series of experimentalprocedures to achieve basic understanding of the reaction mechanism in order to affect hydrogenproduction specifically under various operating parameters. From a student perspective, theexperimental study of the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride in the presence of acids and polymermixtures demonstrates key aspects of energy, hydrogen, and energy storage potential of boron-containing chemical compounds.Investigating the Reaction’s Hydrogen Generation RateThe reaction that the
instrument designed to measuretheir perceived effectiveness of Scaffolding, Interactivity, and Reflectivity components of thecourse by using the SIRA scales.20 Lastly, in Phase 3 we used correlation analysis to compare therelationships between ethical reasoning development and the SIRA scale responses for bothmodes of participation.Figure 1 provides an overview of these research phases and the analysis methods that we utilizedwithin each. While Phases 1 and 2 do not inform one another, we integrated the data collectedthroughout these phases in Phase 3. Figure 1: Depiction of the multiphase research process of this studyIntervention/Course OverviewThe intervention used in this study began with training students to understand the
academia, and over 12 years of industrial experience, primarily in the American automotive industry, Dr. Alsayyed has a passion for innovation in education, teaching, research, and training. Integration of academia and industry goals and activities are paramount to Dr. Alsayyed. Sensing the industry needs and preparing future engineers to meet those needs and challenges is an important dimension of Dr. Alsayyed’s ac- tivities. Dr. Alsayyed has published more than forty articles in peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings. He has seven granted patents. Dr. Alsayyed’s research interests are in the areas of advanced manufacturing, additive manufacturing, design optimization, quality & reliability, engineering
being able to talk with the UNI students about their current engineeringprojects as well as their aspirations for future careers has introduced me to completely amazing andinnovative ideas. It makes me excited to see what I will do and become in the future as an aerospaceengineer. I also hope to be involved in international projects.”“In the beginning I wondered where we were going with the programming on MBlock (what kind ofproject/what the programming could do) but the SGDs tied it all together. Overall, there were not anyquestions I felt I couldn't ask within this program. The integration of students from the UNI made us PennState students establish a comfort level within the local City, and within the engineering program. Also,the