Conference Session

New Trends in Graduate Engineering Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daphene Koch, Purdue University; Orczyk Joseph, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

College of Technology(CoT) at Purdue University grew from a craft-oriented, non-degree program that was initiated in1946 to re-train the returning GI's. The nature of this program slowly shifted from post-war, non-academic teaching of construction craft skills to academic teaching of drafting and surveyingskills through the 1950s.6 It now is considered one of the leading programs for producingconstruction managers educated with a Bachelor of Science (BS) degree. It was first accreditedby the American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) in 1976 and has passed allaccreditation visits since that date. With the undergraduate degree being the basis for thedepartment, graduate course have been introduced since the 1990’s to follow the needs of

Conference Session

Developing Young MINDS in Engineering: Part I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Kobus, Hillsborough Community College; Cesar Guerrero, University of South Florida; Miguel Labrador, University of South Florida; Rafael Perez, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

learned. We found that thepersonalized advising service is crucial for the success of the program and identified specificadjustments that community college instructor and students need to make when they come to a four-year university.1. IntroductionIn recent years, alarming national statistics and trends have shown declining graduate andundergraduate enrollment, graduation rates, and participation of minority groups in Science andEngineering (S&E) fields, and in Computer Science in particular. According to NSF’s Scienceand Engineering indicators 2006, underrepresented minorities did not enroll in or completecollege at the same rate as Caucasians. In 2003, the percentage of African-Americans andHispanics who completed a bachelor’s or higher

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Osama Ettouney; Don L. Byrkett

class (simulation,production planning and scheduling), we were not able to integrate all of these in the project. Finally, four,the students worked as teams. Each team member had different skills, some were strong with computers,some were strong in working with clients, some were more creative, and some were better at building theprototypes. Altogether, the final product was better when the combined skills were used. So the students notonly learned to integrate computers into the design process, but they learned to integrate personal skills.References[1] R.M. Thacker, A New CIMS Model, A Blueprint for the Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Enterprise l SME Publications (1989).[2] S. Alptekin, and C. O. Benjamin, “Integrating CAE/CAD/CAM

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Dr. John W. Nazemetz; Dr. John B. Solie; Dr. David R. Thompson

the concepts and procedures used in engineering design and then exposing them to the entire designprocess by requiring student teams to conceptualize, develop, analyze, document (CAD drawings and report),and test a prototype physical device which is to solve a specific problem under time and cost constraints. Thiscourse, which provides students with an early, hands-on, thorough design experience, provides a venue forassessing the impact of an early design experience on students.Background The convergence of several independent events in the early 1990’s led to the development of anexpanded course in Engineering Design and Drafting. These events included a College decision to move tocentralized computer facilities to replace and expand those

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Pieter A. Voss; James M. Tien; Anil K. Goyal

., “Risk Analysis in Capital Investment,“ in Risk and Uncertainty: Non-Deterministic DecisionMaking, Fleischer, G. A. (editor), American Institute of Industrial Engineers, Engineering EconomyMonograph Series No. 2, 1975.[8] Lavelle, J. P., “Facts Aren’t Always What They Seem,” The Engineering Economist, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp.193-196, 1994.[9] Moore, R., Interval Analysis, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1966.[10] Park, C. S., Contemporary Engineering Economics, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1993.[11] Shaalan, H. E., Broadwater, R. P., Fabrycky, W., and Lee, R. E., “The Application of Interval Analysis toEconomic Decision Evaluation of Electric Energy Systems,” The Engineering Economist, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp.209-234, 1994.[12

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

R. Rinker; J. Peterson; H. Hess; Richard Wall; Kathy Belknap

. Coeur d'Alene Moscow Boise Idaho Falls Figure 1. Location of the Idaho CampusesMotivation In the mid-1980's, industry in the Boise area began exploring options for more local engineeringeducation. The status quo at the time resembled an efficient, coordinated junior college model. BSUdelivered the courses that are normally included in the first two years of an engineering degree. Studentsthen transferred to UI in Moscow for the final two years of a bachelor's degree. Close coordination ofcourses and requirements made this transition smooth for the students. The cost to the taxpayers wasdefinitely less than for a

Conference Session

New Learning Paradigms II

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Alan Hansen, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, E., and Wright, B. (1991). Nine principles of good practice for assessing student learning.Washington DC: American Association of Higher Education. Available athttp://www.facet.iupui.edu/resources/AAHE%20Principles.pdf . Accessed 1 February 2009.
2National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century.Washington DC: National Academies Press, pp. 51, 55.
3Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., and Sullivan, W. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the futureof the field. San Francisco, CA: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
4National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to thenew century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
5Redish, E

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Education: Crossdisciplinary Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge delosRios-Hurtado, Texas Tech; David Wyrick, Texas Tech

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

already started the process to implement Page 14.653.11the Graduate Certificate in Technology Entrepreneurship at Texas Tech University. We hope tohave this certificate fully implemented by the fall semester of 2010.References1. Texas Tech University, Office of Official Publications. (2007). Undergraduate and Graduate TTU Catalog 2007- 08.2. Drucker, P.R. (1985). “Innovation and entrepreneurship” New York: Harper & Row.3. Solomon, G.T., S. Duffy and A. Tarabishy (2002). “The state of entrepreneurship education in the United States: A nationwide survey and analysis”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, (1

Conference Session

ASCE Policy 465: Raising the Bar

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Ressler, United States Military Academy; Jeffrey Russell

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

professional practice. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Distinguished Member of ASCE.Jeffrey S. Russell, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Jeffrey S. Russell is a Professor and Chair in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Wisconsin. He received his BS degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Cincinnati and his MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University and is a registered professional engineer in Wisconsin. He is a co-founder of the Construction Engineering and Management program at UW-Madison. In the last 20 years, he has advised over 100 graduate students including 26 Ph.D. students. He has been a principal or co

Conference Session

Retention Tools and Programs

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Veenstra, Engineering education consultant; Gary D. Herrin, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

. and J. Wyckoff. (1988). ―Effective Advising: Identifying Students Most Likely to Persist and Succeed inEngineering,‖ Engineering Education, Dec. 1988, 178-182.10. Besterfield-Sacre, M., C.J. Atman, and L.J. Shuman. (1997). ―Characteristics of Freshman Engineering Students:Models for Determining Student Attrition in Engineering.‖ Journal of Engineering Education, 86, No. 2:139-149.11. Leuwerke, W.C., S. Robbins, R. Sawyer, and M. Howland. (2004). ―Predicting Engineering Major Status fromMathematics Achievement and Interest Congruence.‖ Journal of Career Assessment, 12, No. 2: 135-149.12. Smith, K. A., S.D. Sheppard, D.W. Johnson, and R.T. Johnson. (2005). ―Pedagogies of Engagement: ClassroomBased Practices.‖ Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Projects and Problems in First-Year Courses

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mehrube Mehrubeoglu, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 20004.9. S. Miertschin, D. Benhaddou, C. Willis and F. Attarzadeh, “Using Interactive Concept Maps to Enhance Learning and Thinking Skills,”Proc. 2007 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, T2B6, South Padre Island, Texas, March 2007.10. V. Roth, E. Goldstein and G. Marcus, Peer-Led Team Learning, A Handbook for Team Leaders: The Page 14.44.12 Workshop Project, Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2001.11. D. K. Gosser, M. S. Cracolice, J. A. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. S. Strozak, and P. Varma-Nelson, Peer- Led Team Learning, A Guidebook: The Workshop Project, Upper Saddle River

Conference Session

Factors Affecting Student Performance

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abel Fernandez, University of the Pacific; Camilla Saviz, University of the Pacific; Jeff Burmeister, University of the Pacific

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Camilla M. Saviz, Ph.D., P.E., holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an MBA from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from U.C. Davis. She is currently an associate professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. Dr. Saviz' research interests include measurement and modeling of hydrodynamics, water quality, and sediment transport in surface water systems. She has also served as co-principal investigator on several studies to develop and implement strategies to enhance the quality of engineering education.Jeff Burmeister, University of the Pacific Jeffrey S

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Curricula

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Oerther, University of Cincinnati; Cathy Maltbie, University of Cincinnati; Baikun Li, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg; Jin Li, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Amy Pruden, Colorado State University; Peter Stroot, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

review, discussion and labs. readings, discussions and labs class presentation, and labs. discussions and labs.University of Cincinnati, Daniel B. OertherUC is a comprehensive, research-extensive institution offering doctoral degrees from thirteencolleges. The program of Environmental Engineering and Science (EE&S) within theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering is one of the strongest programs at UC witha compliment of twelve faculty and research expenditures above $4M per year. Because of thetremendous strength of the EE&S program, the PI was afforded the opportunity to develop a newand highly experimental

Conference Session

Novel BME Courses and Course Adaptations

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Conrad Zapanta, Pennsylvania State University; Keefe Manning, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

than 6.0. Thehighest scores were for effectiveness in demonstrating the significance of the subject matter, andthe overall quality of instructor(s). The lowest scores were for adequacy of the physical facilitiesand the instructional resources.For Spring of 2005, the undergraduates rated all nine areas higher than 6.0. The undergraduatesgave the highest scores to the effectiveness in demonstrating significance of the subject matterand the instructor’s interest in whether or not the students understood the course content. Theundergraduates gave the lowest scores for clarity of instructor’s interpretation of abstract ideasand adequacy of physical facilities. The graduate students rated eight out of nine areas higherthan 6.0. The graduate students

Conference Session

Computer ET Curriculum

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Honchell, Purdue University; Gregory Palmier, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

by undergraduatesrequires ease of understanding so that design alternatives of computer systems can beapplied.In a paper describing the evolution of computer performance evaluation since the 1960’s,benchmarking was described as the only technique to receive consistent use as aperformance evaluation tool [5]/ Research emphasized the increasing importance ofperformance evaluation by the establishment of the ACM in 1971. The ACM recognizeda need for understanding the relationship between computer system models and the tollsuseful for performance evaluation. More research shows that most undergraduateengineering programs spend significant time on implementing complex hardware andsoftware designs, but do not utilize performance modeling as a tool

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley Racicot, Washington State University; Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

/ir/library/pdf/erm0452.pdf7. Olds, B., Moskal, B., & Miller, R. (2005). Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1) 13-26.8. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001), Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.9. Sahney, S., Banwet, D.K., & Karunes, S. (2004). Conceptualizing Total Quality Management in Higher Education. TQM Magazine, 16(2) 145-159.10. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford Press

Conference Session

Design for Manufacture and Industry

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Semke, University of North Dakota; Richard Schultz, University of North Dakota; James Albrecht, Imation Corp.; Jason Moses, Imation Corp.; Peter Ridl, Imation Corp.

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Faculty Advisor(s): Name(s) Partners: UND Department(s), Company Project Title Description: One- or two-sentence description. BLOCK Problems to Solve (Why work on this project?): 1. Problem/ Benefit #1 DIAGRAM 2. Problem/ Benefit #2

Conference Session

Questions of Identity

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Jordan, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

. Page 11.142.2Introduction to Virtue EthicsVirtue ethics is not a new concept. Most people regard it as something that was initiallydeveloped (as far as the Western world is concerned) by Aristotle more than 2300 years ago.Many ethical approaches concentrate on how to make good decisions when faced with difficultsituations. Aristotle’s approach was to emphasize virtuous living. A good person will makegood decisions, so what is important is to become a good person. In the 1200’s ThomasAquinas integrated this philosophy with a Christian perspective on the world. Aquinas’perspective was to dominate Western philosophical thinking for hundreds of years. For much ofthe 20th century virtue ethics was not commonly taught as a viable option by most

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Methods and Practice

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University; Mark C Johnson, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

steps. All five teams passedthe qualification procedure and entered the final competition. Every team was encouragedto post the latest program (executable without the source code) on their web site in thefifteenth week so that the other teams could test and improve. The final competition washeld on the last day of the fifteenth week. The sixteenth week was used for the students toanalyze their competition results and to finish the final reports. Page 11.1223.7 player 1 player 2 spectator(s) network game serverFigure 2: Two

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

La Verne Abe Harris, Arizona State University; Rajeswari Sundararajan, Arizona State University; David Machado-Aranda, Northwestern University Medical School; David A. Dean, Northwestern University Medical School

injected into the trachea, which was exposed through a small incision in the neck, and allowed to distribute throughout the lungs by holding the animal upright. • The chest was wetted with 70% ethanol and within 30-60 s of DNA delivery. • Electrodes were placed on either side of the chest and the animal

Conference Session

Incorporating Projects into the Curriculum

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanzhong (Shawn) Duan, South Dakota State University; Li Qian, South Dakota State University; Teresa Hall, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

11.1433.12Bibliography1. Amirouche, F. M. L. (1992). Computational Methods for Multibody Dynamics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.2. Anderson, K. S. and Critchley, J. H. (2003). Improved order-N performance algorithm for the simulation ofconstraint multi-rigid-body systems,” Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp.185 – 212.3. Anderson, K.S. and Duan, S. Z. (2000). Highly Parallelizable Low Order Dynamics Algorithm for ComplexMulti-Rigid-Body Systems. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. Vol. 23, No. 2, March-April, 2000,pp. 355-364.4. Barrott, J. L. (2001). Why Should Case Studies be Integrated into the Engineering Technology Curriculum.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Programs for High School Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Christie, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

11.3% of theengineering undergraduate degrees. These same race/ethnic groups are projected to make up Page 11.369.4 333.9% of the U.S. population graduating from high school in 2014. Engineering degreesawarded to women have followed a similar trajectory-growth through the 1990’s with apercentage peak in 2000 at 20.6% of the total. In 2003, women represented 20.1% of thebaccalaureates awarded in engineering (Society of Women Engineers). According to Science (Culotta 1993), a publication of the American Association for theAdvancement of Science

Conference Session

Faculty Involvement in International Engineering Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jongwon Kim, Seoul National University; Dong Mok Kim, Seoul National University; Stefano Consiglio, Technical University of Berlin; Semih Severengiz, Technical University of Berlin; Guenther Seliger, Technical University of Berlin; Lalit Patil, University of Michigan; Debasish Dutta, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

International

are drawbacks inthis model too. Students often seek advice from the local faculty, and communicate it to theirteam members. This may lead to conflicting views as described earlier, although the chances ofsuch occurrence are low. More importantly, although the instructors grade GPD projects andteams jointly, the “local” instructor determines the final grade for each student at his/herinstitution. The instructor has a much deeper knowledge about the teams and the project works/he has supervised. It is difficult for the “local” instructor to understand the subtle decisionsmade by a team s/he did not supervise. Currently, the “local” instructor follows the progress ofhis “local” students independent of their teams by interacting frequently with

Conference Session

Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camille George, University of St. Thomas; Elise Amel, University of St. Thomas; Karl Mueller, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

Wisconsin-Madison No. RED-9452971).6. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., & Dietz, E.J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering studentperformance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 3-17.7. Isaacs, B., & Tempei, P. (2001). Student projects that celebrate engineering: A path to diversity in the profession.ASEE/IEEE Proceedings- Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, S1F/1-4. Reno, NV.8. Williams, R. (2003). Education for the profession formerly known as engineering. The Chronicle of HigherEducation, 49, B12-13.9. Ettema, R. (2000). A drift in the curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education andPractice, 126, 21-26.10. Beder, S. (1999). Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Methods and Practice

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Durant, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

presentation that counts for 5% of thecourse grade. In this presentation, they summarize the goals and context diagram beforepresenting a few functional and non-functional requirements, with an emphasis on how therequirements can be traced back to use cases, goals, etc.In an effort to increase the actual and apparent objectivity of the evaluation of the presentation,and to let students know, very specifically, how they will be evaluated, a group presentationrubric was developed [Appendix A]. This rubric was created by modifying one that the authordeveloped for senior design presentations and which has been in use for nearly two years. Threerequirements-specific sections were added: Use Case(s), Functional and Non-functionalRequirements, and Postmortem

Conference Session

Course-based Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doug Abbott, MT Tech of the U of MT; Lance Edwards, MT Tech of the U of MT; John Evans, MT Tech of the U of MT; Leo Heath, MT Tech of the U of MT; Mike Johnson, MT Tech of the U of MT; Timothy Kober, MT Tech of the U of MT; Mary North-Abbott, MT Tech of the U of MT; Roger Oldenkamp, MT Tech of the U of MT

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

abachelor’s degree program titled “Technology and Business Development,” which the framerspurposely designed as entrepreneurial type program that matched the role and scope of theuniversity as well as a program that did not directly compete with the business administrationprograms offered at the neighboring state funded campuses. The business department wasn’tparticularly fond of the name of the new business program and in the late 1990’s the opportunitypresented itself to change the business offerings at the school and Montana Tech started the newcentury by offering a bachelors program in Business and Information Technology with threeoptions including Business Information Systems, Management, and Entrepreneurship.Historically, the entrepreneurship

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. V. Sudhakar, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Tadeusz Majewski, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Luis Maus, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla

the theoretical relation between the amplitude and frequency is A / x st = 1 / (1 − s 2 ) 2 + ( 2εs ) 2 s=Ω/ωo, (4)where Ω is the frequency of excitation, ωo is the natural frequency of the system, and ε -damping ratio. Page 11.767.4The theoretical characteristic can be compared with the diagram from the experiment. Byknowing the amplitude of resonance then the damping ratio of the system can be calculatedfrom ε=2xst/Ares. With two laboratory stands students can learn about systems with 1DOF, their free andforced vibrations, and what properties the systems with 1DOF have; natural frequency,damping

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Techniques in Mechanics

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso; Arunkumar Pennathur; Elsa Villa, University of Texas-El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 7(3 and 4), 271-312.7. Schwartz, D.L., Lin, X., Brophy, S. and Bransford, J.D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: volume II (Ed. Reigelut, C.M.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, p182-213.8. Linn, M.C., Songer, N.B. and Eylon, B.S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In Handbook of Educational Psychology (Eds. Calfee, R.C. and Berliner, D.C.), Riverside, NJ: Macmillan, p438-490.9. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Constituent Committee Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Novoselich P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Janice Leshay Hall, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Keith A. Landry, Georgia Southern University; Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Anthony W Dean, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

Related Careers," National Science Foundation, Washington D.C., 2013.[5] J. Arminio, T. K. Grabosky and J. Lang, Student Veterans and Service Members in Higher Education, New York: Routledge, 2015.[6] S. M. Lord, K. A. Kramer and R. T. Olson, "Work in Progress- Conecting Veterans to Customized Engineering Educaiton ath the University of San Diego," in 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington D. C., 2010.[7] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner and S. M. Lord, "Understanding the Military Veteran's Human Resource Needs - Transition from Military Service to the Engineering Profession," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , New Orleans, LA, 2016.[8] K. A

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandy L. Furterer, University of Datyon

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

ComputerSociety.Bonwell, Charles C.; Eison, James A., Active Learning: Creating Excitement in theClassroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. RIEJAN1992Carroll, J.M, and Rosson, M.B., Case studies as minimalist information. IEEE Transactions,Professional Communications, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 297-310.Cudney, E., and Furterer, S., Design for Six Sigma in Product and Service Development:Applications and Case Studies, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012.Cudney, E., Furterer, S., and Dietrich, D., Lean Systems: Applications and Case Studies inManufacturing. Service, and Healthcare, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013.Engelman, K., Cizik, A., Ellerbeck E., Women's Satisfaction with Their MammographyExperience: Results of a Qualitative Study, Women & Health, Vol. 42(4