engineering, construction of engineering identities, and faculty development.Dr. Marie C. Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of engineering education at Virginia Tech, where she co-directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communica- tion in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, and design education. She was awarded a CAREER grant from NSF to study expert teaching practices in capstone design courses nationwide, and is Co-PI on several NSF grants to explore identity and interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering design.Ms. Andrea M. Motto, Virginia Tech Andrea Motto is a Ph.D. student in social
book review, 48 journal articles, and 97 conference pa- pers. Moreover, he has mentored 82 high school students, more than 300 K-12 teachers, 22 undergraduate summer interns, and 11 undergraduate capstone-design teams, and graduated eight M.S. and four Ph.D. students.Dr. Magued G. Iskander P.E., Polytechnic Institute of New York University Magued Iskander is a professor and Graduate Adviser of the Civil Engineering Department at NYU- Poly. Iskander is a recipient of NSF CAREER award, Chi Epsilon (civil engineering honor society), Metropolitan District James M. Robbins Excellence in Teaching Award, Polytechnic’s Distinguished Teacher Award, and NYU-Poly’s Jacobs Excellence in Education Award (twice). Iskander’s
working knowledge of technology, and technology and careers” (Ritz16, 2011).“In the broadest sense, technology is the process by which humans modify nature to meet theirneeds and wants” (Young, Cole, & Denton22, 2003). But over time this has led to a type oftechnological paradox. That is, as Pearson and Young14 (2002) noted, as technology has becomemore important and critical to our daily lives, it has actually disappeared from our sight andbecame mostly invisible. Then adding to the dilemma “there is a lack of research on studentconceptions about the nature of technology,” (DiGironimo2, 2011). As a result “adults andchildren alike have a poor understanding of the essential characteristics of technology, how itinfluences society, and how
effective in assistingwith “extending classroom information to beyond the end of the class, and assist[ing] students insetting up a network of business social network to help them in their professional careers.”There were also several who took a much more neutral approach and expressed uncertaintyregarding the effectiveness of Web 2.0/SNT such as one faculty member who responded sayingthey were “Not quite sure. Still trying to figure it out”.DiscussionWhile faculty perceptions of Web 2.0/SNT use within the classroom were more positive thanstudents’, there is still a divide between those who advocate and those who oppose SNT’s use inthe classroom resulting in overall neutral Likert scale scores for SNT’s effectiveness. Thequalitative research
scientific inquiry to support engineering education. For instance, instead of scaffoldingstudents’ asking inquiry questions, WISEngineering aims to support students to define problems,including specifications and constraints6.Engineering as a K-12 subject Engineering draws upon and can enrich the study of both science and mathematics at K-12 levels. The National Research Council (NRC) and National Academy of Engineering (NAE)recommend including engineering education in K-12 because it supports mathematics andscience and can increase students’ career interest in engineering or related fields7. Engineeringhas been used as a vehicle to teach rigorous mathematical8 and scientific9 concepts to students.The NRC’s Framework for K-12 Science
deploys airfoils parallel to the rotational axis in such a way that, unlike other windmills, it rotates around a ring frame, leaving the central portion open for other uses. This enables VayuWind to extract wind power using existing structures such as commercial buildings and skywalks with minimal noise pollution.Dr. Timothy J. Kriewall, Kern Family Foundation Timothy J. Kriewall leads the Kern Entrepreneurship Education Network (KEEN) Program at the Kern Family Foundation located in Waukesha, Wis. Prior to this role, he served as President of Wisconsin Lutheran College in Milwaukee, a position he held for five years. He began his career at Bell Telephone Laboratories where, with a colleague, he helped develop one of
improve student learning and in turn positively impact student retention, timeto graduation, and future success in their respective careers. Fields, especially in the sciencesand engineering, are growing and maturing fed by improved tools for communication andresearch. The ever changing landscape of technology within and outside of the classroom and itsimpact on student culture makes the challenge of discovery a dynamic one. However, discoveryalone may not be the greatest challenge. Finding an effective new pedagogy with a proven recordof advances in student efficacy and efficiency while challenging may be easier than establishingwidespread adoption of such methods in academia.The resistance to a change in pedagogy is both institutional and
. This second semester ‘programming’ course had not fullymade the connection between software written to solve a practical problem and how it might be used todrive hardware/devices in a visible experiential way. As a result, students were skeptical, expressing adisconnect with real-world and career applications. This weak cause-and-effect association at timesresulted in a somewhat uninterested learning population. It became apparent that students did not deeplyunderstand the importance of writing code in relation to engineering problem solving. We as instructorssaw an opportunity to take a role in bridging this gap.Challenge #2: Resources. A further challenge relates to resources: How can we demonstrate the value ofprogramming and problem
- dergraduate Education at the National Science Foundation. She recently held a 2010-2011 AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellowship at the National Science Foundation. Borrego’s engineering education research awards include PECASE, CAREER, and two outstanding publication awards from the American Educational Research Association for her journal articles. Her research interests include engineering fac- ulty development, specifically how faculty members decide to apply the results of educational research, and interdisciplinary graduate education in STEM. She is an editorial board member for Journal of Engi- neering Education and chair of the American Society for Engineering Education’s Educational Research and Methods
. For the purpose of this paper, results from the pre- and post-survey that measuredteachers’ beliefs about integrating engineering into their classrooms are reported. Additionally,preliminary data from academic year classroom observations are reported.Two known instruments 13,14 were adapted to create a pre- and post-evaluation survey to measure Page 25.1137.5the fellows’ goals for the program, their attitudes toward teaching and engineering, self-efficacyfor teaching and STEM knowledge, knowledge of STEM careers, and STEM professional’simpact on society. Pre-surveys were collected online prior to the start of the summer
determine the dotproduct of two vectors or the ability to compute the partial derivative of a function with respectto one variable. Regardless of how these concepts and skills are ranked, they form the building Page 25.1160.2blocks of the language of a discipline: they smooth introduction, facilitate deeper understandingand provide anchor points for extension in to unfamiliar or new territory. An incomplete understanding in any of one of these concepts or skills at an early stage ina student’s education can lead to a cascade of failures or difficulties that resonate throughouttheir academic career. Students who experience major gaps in their
classrooms.Mr. William F. McKenna, University of Texas, Austin Bill McKenna received his master’s of mathematics from the University of North Texas about 10 years ago, and, after a brief career in acoustical test enclosures, he is working towards a doctorate in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. McKenna’s current research focuses on high school engineering students. In this work, he strives to connect student participation in authentic discourse prac- tices, student understandings of the content under study and the process of effective communication, and the products they are designing. He is also pursuing the relationships between professional engineering practices and the ecology of high school
career.” was frustrated with, though, was to nothing with me outside of my lack of punctuality. Classes would apartment.” Page 25.1198.8 “Another thing I greatly treasure is start late, the buses would come my experience with big city life. late, friends would meet you later “Although a study abroadRio de Janeiro is a very large city than was planned, and so forth. It experience may delay graduationand the life there was much was quite a challenge getting used or will result in higher course loadsdifferent than any area I
BAEnglish NA Gabriel M Mech. Eng. BSME Math Teacher in New Jersey High School Evan M Elec. Eng. BSEE Accepted into Research Program at Siemens Co. Rebecca F Civil Eng. BS Civ.E. TBD Kimberly F Mech. Eng. BSME TBD Nicole F Comp. Eng. BSComp.E. TBD In conclusion, it is our contention that the results of this presentation will have broader implications for undergraduate underrepresented minority engineering programs to have formal support systems in place. In addition to the contributions to research in the fields of engineering education, social cognitive psychology, career development, and
include these skills into engineering solutions throughout theircourse. This method of using assignments throughout the curriculum allowed faculty tounderstand how students were building their competence throughout their collegiate careers toobtain the final desired level of performance 12.B. Depth of CE ProgramsThere is also motivation to ensure students are obtaining more depth on key topics, particularly Page 25.1217.4engineering design. One university implemented a converging–diverging model of design for asophomore –level course on engineering design and technical writing. This course initially useda semester long design project, but
ofWisconsin-Milwaukee (EWB@UWM) that sustainable international development work is aprocess that requires long-range thought. The majority of engineering students who travel todeveloping countries with groups like EWB do so for a limited time period of an average of twoweeks, one to two times during their entire college career. Many assessments of sustainabledevelopment projects completed by groups comprised of these types of students are sometimescategorized as being unbeneficial because of their inherent short-term view. Often anengineering professor or professional mentor serves as the cornerstone of the group to preventthis inconsistency. In the case of this student chapter of EWB, mentors are in the form ofstudents who have traveled more than
AC 2012-4767: SYNERGISTIC LEARNING AND INQUIRY THROUGHCHARACTERIZING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY: ANINTERNSHIP-BASED BENCHMARKING PROCESS FOR SUSTAINABIL-ITY INNOVATIONSDr. Annie R. Pearce, Virginia Tech Dr. Annie Pearce is an Associate Professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction at Virginia Tech specializing in sustainable facilities and infrastructure systems. Throughout her career, Pearce has worked with practitioners in both public and private sectors to implement sustainability as part of building plan- ning, design, construction, and operations. As a LEED-accredited Professional, Pearce brings the latest in green building methods, technologies, and best practices to the classroom. Her specific
acombination program.The description of the MS in Technological Systems Management in Stony Brook falls into thecategory of technological management: Managing modern technologies calls upon a synthesis of tools drawn from many areas: science and engineering, computers and information, economics and regulation, psychology and community values, design and assessment. The Master’s Degree in Technological Systems Management provides professionals in all fields and people planning such careers with state-of-the-art concepts, analytical tools, and practical skills for managing specific technological systems and improving their performance.However, the two core courses involve elements of ISE and of systems theory. The
Wichita State University. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees from Oklahoma State University. In his 38-year teaching career, he has taught a wide range of industrial engineering courses and currently directs the department’s capstone design experience. His research interests are in systems engineering, decision analysis, and engineering education. Page 25.1263.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Team Decision Skills Development with MBTI © Step IIAbstractAs part of an Engineer as Leader course, students learn to dynamically take leadership
American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationteam also introduced the students and faculty to many aspects of group dynamics, a relatively newexperience for the team members.2. Group DynamicsDealing with group dynamics helps students to polish their “soft skills,” which are vitally importantin today’s business world. Soft skills, including oral, written, and interpersonal communications, areoften the most important skills that a person must possess in order to advance one’s career. Workingin large groups as a part of the undergraduate curriculum provides students with a chance to honetheir people skills, which generally occurs only
to a Rewarding Career, Discovery Press: Burbank California, p. 11.Polya, G., (1973) How to Solve It, Second Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Wales, C. E., (1972a) “Guided Design: Why & How You Should Use It,” Engineering Education, 62, (8).Wales, C.E., and Stager, R.A., (1972b). “The Design of an Educational System,” Engineering Education, 62 (5).Wales, C. E., (1979) “Does How You Teach Make a Difference?” Engineering Education, 69 (5), 81-85.Wales, C. E., Nardi, A.H.,Stager, R.A., (1986) Professional Decision-Making, Center for Guided Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.Wales, C. E., Nardi, A.H., Stager, R. A., (1987) Thinking Skills: Making a Choice, Center for Guided Design, West Virginia
Toolboxes inMATLAB to implement our measurement and control functions.In fact, we are now convinced that there are good reasons to choose MATLAB in conjunctionwith the HTT&TL to teach programming concepts, and we are considering this interface for usein the modules at Boston University as well. MATLAB is a widely-used engineering tool that Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 6.936.3 Copyright ©2001, American Society for Engineering Educationstudents can make use of throughout their careers. For many, or even most, one-time analysistasks, MATLAB
departments, while thedelivery of systems and control theory has been the strength of electrical engineeringdepartments. This comment is based on anecdotal (hence debatable) evidence and certainly thereare exceptions. What is clear, however, is that to prepare students for productive careers insystems and controls, engineering courses must address the issue of integrating the theory withrelevant design issues, including modeling, implementation, complexity, and cost. As always,we must remain cognizant of the fact that every student should design control systems upon afirm foundation of mathematics and systems theory. So in the end it is a question of balance.We believe that the control system analysis and design approach adopted by the authors in
projects; nationally - normed subject content examinations; alumni surveys that document professional accomplishments and career development activities; employer surveys; placement data of graduates. The institution must have and enforce policies for the acceptance of transfer students and for the validation of credit courses taken elsewhere. The institution must also have and enforce procedures to assure that all students meet all program requirements. Criterion 8. Program Criteria Each program must satisfy applicable Program Criteria. Program Criteria provide the specificity needed for interpretation of the basic level criteria as applicable to a given discipline. Requirements stipulated in each Program Criteria
Investigator for the project "Visions for EmbeddedSystems Laboratories" sponsored by the National Science Foundation Combined Research-CurriculumDevelopment Program. She served as the Director of the undergraduate program in Computer Engineering. Dr.Rover received an NSF Career Program award in 1996. Page 6.1042.9 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Appendix I—ABET’s Level of Implementation Form 3Each evaluator completes this form at the conclusion of the visit. Each
curricula • To develop team skills through the use of collaborative, learning-based assignments • To introduce students to various problems (areas of interest) within the agricultural engineering and technology field • To experience hands-on laboratories related to the AE and AST options • To increase involvement in professional societies and student branch • To introduce technical writing skills during the first year of study • To make the first-year composition courses more meaningful to the students • To establish career development/job preparation • To receive academic guidance related to curriculum issuesThese general and specific ABE LC objectives were designed to help our department meet thefollowing college and
Education Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 1998.36. Mourtros, N. “Portfolio Assessment in Aerodynamics,” Frontiers in Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997.37. LaRose, G. “Documenting your course with course portfolios,” http://www.math.lsa.umich.edu/%7Eglarose/courseinfo/portfolios/page00.html.38. Stanford Learning Laboratory “Learning Careers,” http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/hlc/index.html.RICHARD L. UPCHURCHRichard L. Upchurch is a Professor of Computer and Information Science at the University of MassachusettsDartmouth. He is currently working with the assessment team of the College of Engineering, under the auspices ofthe NSF-sponsored Foundation Coalition, in developing software support for assessment and reporting. He and Dr.Sims
faculty must setstandards and also provide encouragement and advice on problems. The faculty alsoneeds to act as a consultant, help set direction and sometimes make decisions as a leader.The faculty must use their expertise to define and limit the project scope so that studentsuccess is a challenging but reachable goal.The final principle that provides the framework for the senior projects at LSSU is theintegration of soft, or non-technical, skills into the projects. It is the belief of the facultythat a graduate’s successful career will be determined as much or more by their soft skillsas their technical skills. The projects do require that students use their technical skills,but these are not seen as the focal point. Soft skills such as
, there have been many complaintsinternationally about students’ deficiencies in basic mathematics 3. Whilst McHenry hasnoted with respect to the quantitative understanding, that “It is clear that this need for aworkforce able to think quantitatively is much more of a challenge to school mathematics,science and engineering than the nurturing of the best students toward careers inmathematics, science and engineering” 17. Maybe these approaches need not be mutuallyexclusive. A major challenge for today’s education systems are to be able to effectively servea broad cross-section of student needs in the areas of mathematics, science, and technology.McHenry has also noted with respect to the lack of quality mathematics education reachingthe broad mid
Session 2255 On Developing Integrated Systems Architecture and Systems Engineering Courses at RIT Wayne W. Walter, Paul H. Stiebitz Rochester Institute of TechnologyIntroductionThe Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, theUniversity of Detroit Mercy and the Naval Post Graduate School have joined with industryleaders to create a two-year product development program at the Master’s Degree level for mid-career technical managers. Using a common curriculum framework, each member of theconsortium, named the Educational