used to produce the product and presenting the outcome.”They defined PbBL as where “students are confronted with an open-ended, ill-structured,authentic (real-world) problem and work in teams to identify learning needs and develop a viablesolution, with instructors acting as facilitators rather than primary sources of information.” Thekey difference between PjBL and PbBL is “the emphasis on project-based learning is onapplying or integrating knowledge while that in problem-based learning is on acquiring it.”Felder (2004) noted students typically work in small self-directed teams to solve problems inPbBL.The benefits of PjBL and PbBL are well-documented. A meta-analysis of 35 studies found astatistically significant effect that PbBL improved
, J.S. (2014) Data First: building scientific reasoning in AP chemistry via the concept development approach, J. Chem Ed., http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ed500027gAlice Chow, Rice University Alice Chow is an Associate Director for Research and Grants for the Rice University Office of STEM Engagement. She conducts research in K-12 STEM education on topics such as impact of teacher profes- sional development programs on student achievement and attitudes.Dr. Carrie Obenland, Rice University Dr. Obenland is the Assistant Director for Outreach and Research at the Rice Office of STEM Engage- ment. She as her PhD in Chemistry from Rice University, as well as her Masters. Her graduate work was focused on chemical
Paper ID #9967Assessing sustainability knowledge: a framework of conceptsDr. Alice L Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alice L. Pawley is an associate professor in the School of Engineering Education with affiliations with the Women’s Studies Program and Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in chemical engineering (with distinction) from McGill University, and an M.S. and a Ph.D. in industrial and systems engineering with a Ph.D. minor in women’s studies from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education
proposals, securing funding, supervising graduates, designing andconducting research, analysis and dissemination of results, etc.) is a full time job. So, too, is teaching.Planning lessons, selecting meaningful activities, finding ways to engage students with the material,finding ways to engage students with each other, creating an atmosphere in which learning can occur,dealing with the myriad of problems that undoubtedly happen when working with students, assessingstudent outcomes, developing curriculum are all time-consuming endeavors. Given current demands ontheir time, is it little wonder that few take kindly to accusations that they are not producing enough?This question becomes particularly pressing when taking into consideration the
governed by unknown oscillatory plant dynamics. Further, the paddlepositioning suffers from substantial steady-state error, making it difficult to hit the ball. The goalof the game is to design a control system that compensates for the unwieldy paddle dynamics andrestores normal functionality of the game. Using this game, students approach learningobjectives in an enjoyable way that promotes knowledge transfer. While we have yet toimplement this game in the classroom, the goal is to integrate the game throughout the durationof a semester as a series of interactive projects that we outline in this paper. This will form thebasis of a media comparison study assessing student outcomes in a traditional control systemscourse vs. a GBL
an academic curriculum. Each level can be compared relatively to a traditional educationsystem. Four levels are maintained to hierarchically structure the contents. The breakdownstructure is organized into modules, lessons, objectives, and frames as illustrated in Figure 3.1.Each project is categorized into modules, where each module is dedicated to only one topic.Each module consists of several individual lessons, and then each lesson is subdivided intoobjectives, which is the basic learning block. Page 7.723.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
IR in recent years. McCown18 contrastedhis experience in teaching an IR course in which students develop a search engine from scratch Page 25.1216.3with the one in which students revise code in an existing search engine. Each of the twoapproaches has its pros and cons, developing a search engine from scratch gives students agreater understanding of what is behind the scene in a search engine but the end-product may beless polished, while revising existing search engine code may accomplish more functionality butstudents would have to overcome some steep learning curve. Zhu and Tang33 proposed amodule-based integration of IR topics into
thesis that has followed the research cited in [4, 5], theparticipating graduate student is an experienced shipbuilding cost analyst. He has found, Page 3.466.6as have other research participants, that modeling a project activity network underuncertainty greatly improves oneÕs understanding of engineering project cost and schedulebehaviors. We are currently investigating extending this learning experience to a graduate-level course. However, the curriculum development issues are formidable. Acknowledgments The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the National Institute ofStandards and Technology
Environment for Real Time Systems LaboratoriesAbstractThe goal of this project was to build a superior environment for a real time system laboratorythat would allow users to run Windows and Linux embedded application development toolsconcurrently on a single computer. These requirements were dictated by real-time systemapplications which are increasingly being implemented on asymmetric dual-core processorsrunning different operating systems. A real time systems laboratory curriculum based on dual-core architectures has been presented in this forum in the past.2 It was designed for a seniorelective course in real time systems at the University of Texas at Tyler that combines lecturesalong with an integrated lab. The students are required to have at
undergraduate program with little designexperience in between.In recent years, as conceptions of engineering design thinking have broadened and become morecomplex [3], the capstone-cornerstone curriculum model has been shown to be inadequate [12].Consequently, there are now programs that are taking an integrated design approach wheredesign experiences are incorporated throughout the curriculum [13], [14]. This gives students amore holistic engineering design experience, allows time for design thinking to develop, andexposes students to various design scenarios. For example, the biomedical engineeringdepartment at the University of Wisconsin-Madison requires that students enroll in six semestersof design courses. Students work in teams to solve a real
most impactful time toenergize students about careers in STEM is in K-12 settings. To emphasize and spotlight the importance ofbuildings on humans, along with providing an interactive learning experience for potential future STEMstudents, a five-day summer camp focused on multi-disciplinary building design was held at (insertuniversity name). The camp curriculum included hands-on, design-oriented projects from severaldisciplines: architecture, mechanical, structural, construction, sustainability, acoustics, and lighting. Inaddition, tours of several buildings on campus were conducted along with after-hours relaxation time forcampers. The implementation of activities and the well-designed hands-on projects not only increased thestudents
develop an attachment to the engineering department space, to be a showcase for theprogram, and to provide a 24/7 informal learning space when not being used by classes.Assessment of the space shows that it is pleasant and well-liked by both students and faculty andis working well for teaching a range of classes.At Michigan State University, a more comprehensive approach to first-year engineering wasestablished in 2008 which integrated cornerstone courses, an engineering living-learningresidence hall, computer labs, and a project work space.11,12,13 Similar to NortheasternUniversity, Michigan State’s enrollment is comparable in size (about 700+ first-year engineeringstudents each fall). Researchers discovered that engineering students living in
Session 1368 Combining Laboratory Innovation and a Design Experience into Tools for Mechanics Jennifer Kadlowec, Frank Brown, Aditya Chaubal, Joe Plitz, Michael Resciniti, Paris von Lockette, Eric Constans, Beena Sukumaran, Douglas Cleary Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028AbstractHands-on laboratories and the engineering design process are valuable experiences by which toenhance undergraduate engineering education. This paper discusses the integration of an NSFsponsored Course, Curriculum and Laboratory Innovation project, the
andmidterm exams, an in-depth statistical analysis is carried out to examine if there exist significantdifferences in the performances of students. This would provide an idea of the weak and strongareas of the course curriculum as well as identify possible factors for any differences that exist inthe performances. This is done with the use of analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical tests. This paper is organized as follows: Section II contains the back- ground and related literaturereview for the research. Specifically, it gives an analysis of previous work done on studentenrollment and forecasting using time series analysis models, comparison of the conventional timeseries models with the neural network counterpart as well as shallow versus deep
courses. This course and project were both created with the goal ofproviding our underclassmen undergraduates with an integrated experience of the design andmanufacturing process in order to better prepare them for their capstone project courses. Ourresearch explores students’ conceptions of and ideas associated with design and design formanufacturing guidelines. We therefore ask the following question: ‘what are students’conceptions of learning design and manufacturing principles in the context of working on anintegrated design and manufacturing project?’Course StructureOur undergraduate program, like many others, contains courses in design, manufacturing andcomputer-aided design (CAD) and concludes with a yearlong capstone project. A required
to return. The different meanings culturesassign to emotion inform varied responses to beginning entrepreneurial work in and beyond thevirtual classroom [40].Student stories in our study revealed little pleasurable engagement in the virtual classroom.Regardless of the excitement and hope for happier times with an in-person classroom, studentstories predict an adjustment period: “Everyone is shy and nervous about meeting each otherafter the pandemic. Many are still wearing masks.” Similar to recovery from post-traumaticstress disorder (PTSD), the uncertainties associated with the pandemic makes integrating atrauma into one’s identity difficult [41]. Thus, students and faculty working together in classesand on innovative projects, may need
in teaching an IC Engineclass to undergraduate students is the lack of computational tools that enhance and improve thelearning process of students. With the widespread availability of multi-media software andhardware tools, development and integration of web-based tools to the undergraduate curriculumbecomes essential. This paper discusses the development of a web-based IC Engine Simulator(WICES) to be used in an undergraduate IC Engine class. The simulator is written in Javalanguage for easy use and portability. The simulator can be used to predict performance of ICengines using gasoline, diesel, methane, and hydrogen as fuels. Physical models for heat release,friction, heat transfer, and pollutant emissions were included in the simulator
–PolarityManagement2and Creative Problem Solving3 – have been adopted in combination with BlueOcean Strategy.In the remainder of the paper, we describe each of the three tools (Blue Ocean Strategy, PolarityManagement and Creative Problem Solving) in more detail. Additionally, we describe theprocess that our College used to combine the tools in an integrated strategic planning process andthe approach that our College used to implement this strategic planning process through thecareful formation of teams and the support provided to these teams.2. The Tools: Blue Ocean Strategy, Polarity Management and Creative Problem SolvingBlue Ocean Strategy1A primary goal of the Blue Ocean Strategy is to identify and createuncontested market spaces—industries and offerings
engineering procedures at the Naval Sea Systems Command. He proceededfrom NAVSEA to the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, CA, where in December 1992 he received an MS inAeronautical Engineering from the Space Systems Engineering Curriculum. In March 1993, he was assigned to theCruise Missile Weapon Systems Program as the Installation and Integration Manager for the Tomahawk WeaponControl System. In December of 1994 he was detailed to the Joint Program Office for Unmanned Aerial Vehiclesas the Shipboard Integration Manager. During this time, LCDR Myre worked with many UAV’s and the TacticalControl System Program. He has instructed in the Aerospace Engineering Department at USNA for the past twoyears. He holds a PE in mechanical engineering in the
ethics and effects of students’ useof solution manuals on their performance during exams [1-6]. One study surveyed the facultyand students in a large mechanical engineering department to seek their perspectives on theethics and the educational values of employing solution manuals in solving textbook homeworkassignments. Many instructors had ethical concerns regarding the students’ use of solutionmanuals, while many students did not consider the use of solution manuals as scholasticdishonesty [1]. Few studies have shown that the use of solution manual has an adverse effect onstudents’ learning [2-4]. Other studies have suggested few new strategies for assigninghomework problems [5, 6].The authors of this paper have been teaching engineering
of a body of leadershipliterature that relates leadership performance to an ability to be accurately self-aware ofleadership capabilities25-26. Engineering leadership programs are also noting the importance ofincorporating self-awareness into program curriculum or training programs27-28. In a study todetermine behavioral frameworks for highly effective technical executives in NASA, self-awareness emerged as an integral part of the relational competency category29. The importanceof self-awareness demonstrated in these studies is evidence of the need to ensure leadershipdevelopment interventions intended to build self-awareness are incorporated into engineeringleadership development programs26. Further, effective interventions should include
aselection of articles published during the period of 2011 to 2021 by the flagship journal inEER—Journal of Engineering Education. We used three frameworks to guide our exploration:(1) employing a methodological taxonomy (Malmi, et al., 2018) to code the research componentsin ESEO-focused studies; (2) relying on areas of inquiry and paradigms embedded within studentdevelopment theories in higher education to help understand the theoretical groundings of someof these studies; and (3) utilizing an integrative student development theory—Bronfenbrenner’s(1979, 1993) ecological systems theory—to map out the contextual and individual factors instudent experiences. In the sections to follow, we will first provide an overview of two bodies of
Paper ID #9520I Should Not be Expected to Teach English!...ButMr. Craig J. Gunn, Michigan State University Craig Gunn is the Director of the Communication Program in the Department of Mechanical Engineer- ing at Michigan State University. He integrates communication skill activity into all courses within the mechanical Engineering program. He is editor of the CEED Newsbriefs and has co-authored numerous textbooks, including - Engineering Your Future.Mr. Pavel M. Polunin, Michigan State University Pavel Polunin is a Ph.D. student in Mechanical Engineering Department at Michigan State University. He obtained his M.S. in
Paper ID #17443Using Engineering Design Teaching Portfolios to Gauge Design Teacher Per-formance and Infer Design Pedagogical Content KnowledgeDr. David Crismond, City College of the City University of New York David P. Crismond is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at City College, City University of New York, 138th St. & Convent Ave. NAC 6/207b, New York, NY 10031; dcrismond@ccny.cuny.edu. His research interests relate to engineering design cognition and instruction, and helping teachers build their own design pedagogical content knowledge and do integrated STEM instruction using design chal- lenges
. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles. 5. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program's discipline. 6. Identify and analyze user needs and to take them into account in the selection, creation, integration, evaluation, and administration of computing-based systems.The following Student Outcomes have been adopted for the mechanical engineering program andare exactly the Student Outcomes recommended by ABET EAC. 1. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics. 2. An ability to apply the
Water Level Forecasting along the Texas Coast: Interdisciplinary Research with Undergraduates. G. Beate Zimmer, Philippe E. Tissot, Jeremy S. Flores, Zack Bowles, Alexey L. Sadovski, Carl Steidley. Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX 78412.Abstract:While pure mathematics makes it sometimes difficult to involve undergraduates who have notyet completed the higher level math courses in research projects, research in applied mathematicsis generally more accessible to these students. We present an example of an integrated researchenvironment including faculty, research professionals and students which has facilitated theproductive
Paper ID #29553Information-seeking behavior among first-year engineering students andthe impacts of pedagogical interventionDr. George James Lamont, University of Waterloo George Lamont teaches Communications in the Engineering Profession at the University of Waterloo. George specializes in developing engineering-communications curricula with authentic, discipline-specific materials in partnership with engineering firms and clients.Dr. Kari D. Weaver, University of Waterloo Kari D. Weaver holds a B.A. from Indiana University, an M.L.I.S. from the University of Rhode Island, and an Ed.D. in Curriculum and Instruction
. Page 8.814.5 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education The ALN tutorial modules were used in a graduate/senior-level elective electricalengineering course (EE326 - Fiber and Integrated Optics) at the University of Missouri –Rolla.2 A common perception exists that engineers are sequential learners. Howeverthese students had a wide range of learning style scores and a slight majority were globallearners. Most students had scores that were mildly global or sequential. As shown inFigure 1, the distribution on the sequential/global scale follows the normal distribution.This was not an expected outcome since
profession • Promoting capacity building and contributing to the socio-economic development of lesser developed communities • Acting with integrity, transparency and respect in dealing with members and non- membersThe IFEES Assembly approved the Strategic Plan4, which determined that • IFEES will work in close cooperation with national regional organizations from around the globe to influence public policy at the local, national and international levels in support of engineering education, while striving for operational excellence (including IFEES sustainability) and development of its members. • The IFEES Vision is to foster and enhance the capabilities of an active global community of stakeholders
in otherprogram areas where they are not as well integrated into the curriculum or required forcertification. To fill these gaps, this research focuses on credit-bearing community collegetechnology internships. Credit-bearing internships are highly structured WBL experiencesoffered by community colleges as a component of degree completion. Internships are designedto meet educational requirements established by the community college and are supervised by afaculty member in a credit-bearing course. They may be required for graduation or be anelective, be paid or unpaid, and typically mandate that students have earned enough creditstowards the degree and a high enough GPA to participate. We focus on credit-bearinginternships since non-credit