Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samson Pepe Goodrich, East Carolina University; Teresa Ryan, East Carolina University; Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina University; Patrick F. O'Malley, Benedictine College

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

significant writing demands tobolster the education about and policing of proper citations, plagiarism, and academic integrity ingeneral. These shifts in student responses for Scenarios 1 (Writing:verbatim, no citation) and 8(Figure: copy, no citation) may reflect effectiveness of the faculty efforts. Initial analysis offaculty responses for East Carolina University over the three years (Figure 4) include only onesignificant difference at the 95% CI for Scenario 16, though examination of the individualresponses reveals a single outlier that appears to be a likely response error, in that it isincongruent with that respondents’ other ratings. Smaller sample sizes for faculty responsescontribute to the lack of ascribing significance to these

Conference Session

IED Technical Session: Preparing Students for the Future

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rick Olson, University of San Diego; Andrés Esteban Acero, Universidad de los Andes

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Industrial Engineering

. Instead, a newseries of assignments asked students to reflect on their understanding of what it means to be achangemaking engineer, and to identify situations where the methods and models of ISYE 340could be used to effect positive change.Revising Lecture MaterialsTo meet the goals of the RED project, RED topics should be introduced into the course whilecontinuing to meet the primary course learning objectives. One way to achieve this is tointroduce common OR models by using RED contexts. For example, the characteristics of LPsmight be introduced using a two-variable example of growing corn or wheat with limitedresources of time, water and fertilizer. The scenario is easily understood but might seem quaintto U.S. students who envision large

Conference Session

Understanding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from Students' Perspectives

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susannah C. Davis, Oregon State University; Naeun Cheon, University of Washington; Elba Camila Moise, University of Washington; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References1. Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering, “Broadening participation in America’s STEM workforce: 2011–2012 biennial report to Congress,” National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, 2014. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/Full_2011- 2012_CEOSE_Report_to_Congress_Final_03-04-2014.pdf2. S. Hurtado, K. Eagan, and M. Chang, “Degrees of success: Bachelor’s degree completion rates among initial STEM majors,” Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA, 2010.3. M. Ong, C. Wright, L. Espinosa, and G. Orfield, “Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

3 4 Business risk assessment is the business manager’s responsibility 4 5 I like to learn about entrepreneurship comparison 6 Every time I fail a task, I reflect on why I failed so that I can learn how to do better in the future 6 7 I understand why a monopolistic market is usually not favorable to consumers 7 8 I consider how multiple changes affect each other 8 9 I am confident in leading a team to work on a project

Conference Session

Teacher Attitudes, Beliefs, & Self-efficacy

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rebekah J. Hammack, Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Program

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

well as the barriers theyperceive to doing so. Results indicated that most elementary teachers support the inclusion ofengineering within the science standards for elementary grades. Teachers describe lack ofpreservice and in-service training, lack of background knowledge, lack of materials, lack of timefor planning and implementing lessons, and lack of administrative support as barriers toimplementing engineering activities within their classrooms.*The views and opinions of the speaker expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect thoseof the U.S. Government or any agency thereof.Introduction The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) incorporated engineering practices intoK-12 science standards [1], and because NGSS calls for

Conference Session

Creating a Positive Environment for Learning

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel; Kevin C. Bower P.E., The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel; Ally Kindel Martin, The Citadel

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

teaching the first-year and many of thesophomore courses each year versus the most senior faculty 6 years ago. The improved teachingquality and training on developing rapport with students has an impact on improved retentionfrom first-year to sophomore year.Special Needs. The engineering leadership has developed a unique relationship with the directorof students with special needs. The faculty attending the mini-ExCEEd teaching workshopreceive pedagogical training to vary their teaching to meet the learning styles of students (activevs. reflective, sequential vs. global, sensory vs. intuitive, verbal vs. visual). When faculty ensureeach lesson allows a student to learn some content in a preferred style, it assists each student’slevel of

Conference Session

COED: Mechanical Engineering-related Topics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven F. Barrett, University of Wyoming; Tonia A. Dousay, University of Idaho; Tyler J. Kerr, University of Wyoming; Larry Schmidt, University of Wyoming; Brandon Seth Gellis, University of Wyoming; Jesse Ballard, University of Wyoming

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

these efforts to be reflected in faculty and staff participation in the academic year ahead.• Ensuring print quality and overall quality control. 3D printers are the most popular technology housed in the space, and consequently are the machines used most often. As a result, regular maintenance is required to ensure acceptable print quality. In the first semester of operation few visitors knew how to use the software necessary to 3D print objects. Because of this, most 3D printing, including prints for visitors, was completed by staff members. This proved to be challenging for the six staff members for two reasons: 1) print preferences and personal settings varied considerably; and 2) the first printers were largely

Conference Session

Cognitive Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University; Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Cassandra J. Groen, Virginia Tech; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

positioned asone who generates new ideas and is described with verbs such as reflecting, integrating, and self-explaining. Actively engaged students are similar to constructively engaged students; however,they differ in that actively engaged students manipulate content material without generating newideas or concepts. Activities carried out by these students are often described by verbs such asrepeat, rehearse, and copy. Lastly, passively engaged students are instruction-oriented andreceive information through listening, reading and watching. Importantly, these modes ofengagement are not rigid categories used to describe students. Individuals may demonstrate arange of engagement modes and behaviors throughout their learning, and may engage

Conference Session

Sustainability in Civil Engineering

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Grant No.1635534. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] ASCE, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century: Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future, Second Edition. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2008.[2] P. A. Vesilind and A. S. Gunn, “Sustainable development and the ASCE Code of Ethics,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 72–74, 1998.[3] R. K. comments, “10 projections for the global population in 2050,” Pew Research Center, 03-Feb-2014. .[4] S. J. Davis, K. Caldeira, and H. D. Matthews, “Future CO2 Emissions and

Conference Session

Engaging Faculty Across Disciplines, Colleges, and Institutions

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J Novoselich P.E., U.S. Military Academy; Tom Weis, Rhode Island School of Design; Harry Howard Jones IV

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

experience.Assumptions: When asked to reflect on any underlying assumptions or perceptions the students may havebrought with them into the collaboration with the prompt, “what assumptions or perceptions didyou have about your counterparts prior to the experience?” Two themes emerged from thestudent responses: 1) No Assumptions and 2) Unhelpfulness (Table 4)Table 4: Summary of Assumption Themes Prompt: What assumptions or perceptions did you have about your counterparts prior to the experience? Assumption Themes Description A lack of awareness regarding counterparts prevented any No Assumptions preconceptions. The differences between the two groups of students

Conference Session

Studies in Engineering Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mo Hu, Virginia Tech; Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech; John S. Gero, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

), electroencephalogram (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI). fNIRS can be worn as a cap and the sources on the cap emit near-infrared light in thespectrum of 700-900nm into the cortex. Hemoglobin absorbs more light than water and othertissue in the brain. Increase in hemoglobin in the brain is associated with an increase in cognitiveactivity [24]. The light which is not absorbed is reflected back to the detectors on the cap. Thedifferent absorption spectra of oxy-hemoglobin and deoxy-hemoglobin make it possible todescribe activated brain regions and cognitive activities through the change in hemoglobinconcentration, or Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) response.fMRI similarly measures activity indirectly through changes in hemoglobin in

Conference Session

Design in the BME curriculum

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy E. Allen, University of Virginia; David Chen, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

key course-specificmetrics common to the evaluations in both the J-Term and spring versions of the course, and wehave summarized some representative student comments from each of the terms. Quantitativeresponses were based on a 5-point Likert response (5 = strongly agree, 3 = neutral, and 1 =strongly disagree) to the following statements: “I learned a great deal in this course,” and“Overall, this was a worthwhile course” (Table 3). Mean responses reflect a weighted averagebased upon the number of students assigning a specific score, and standard deviations werecalculated according to the same weights.Table 3: Summary of anonymous end-of-course feedback for each term (5-point Likert scale).Academic Percent com- Learned a great deal

Conference Session

Curriculum and Assessment II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xiannong Meng, Bucknell University; Jianming Deng, Jinling Institute of Technology and Southeast University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

eight schools, while they would be electives in most U.S. schools.Such is also the case for the compiler course. This reflects an emphasis on the engineering orapplication nature of the curriculum.6. Math, sciences, and engineering course requirementsWe follow a similar pattern to examine the math, sciences, and engineering course requirementfor the computer science programs in these eight schools. We first look at the math requirement.Table 4 lists math hours, as well as course count, credits, and total math hours required of theeight computer science programs. Table 4: Math requirement (semester hours) Tsinghua SJTU SEU PKU BUPT HIT USTC BUAA Calculus I

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 96–124, 2014.[19] R. R. Bailey, A. K. Swan, A. Coso, M. F. Creager, and H. T. Rowan-Kenyon, “The role of gender in student perceptions of leadership on interdisciplinary engineering teams,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–113, 2012.[20] E. A. Flynn, G. Savage, M. Penti, C. Brown, and S. Watke, “Gender and Modes of Collaboration in a Chemical Engineering Design Course,” J. Bus. Tech. Commun., 1991.[21] S. B. Berenson, K. M. Slaten, L. Williams, and C.-W. Ho, “Voices of women in a software engineering course: Reflections on collaboration,” J. Educ. Resour. Comput., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3–es, 2005.[22] K. Beddoes and G. Panther, “Gender and teamwork: An analysis of professors

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lessa Grunenfelder, University of Southern California

Tagged Divisions

Materials

planar density calculationDetermine the expected diffraction angle for the Check for understanding: Demonstratefirst order reflection of the (111) set of planes in understanding of diffraction calculations andcopper, and locate the corresponding peak in the ability to perform relevant calculationsdiffraction patternLab 4: Molecular weight of polymersStudents completed this lab as their first introduction to the ideas of number and weight averagemolecular weight, there was no preparatory lecture or video. Following the lab, the concepts wereapplied to real polymeric materials and expanded upon in lecture.Supplies • Bags of 100 paper clips • Scales • Worksheet describing number and weight average molecular weight

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emad W. Jassim, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Blake Everett Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

and major Design Stem development of required courses as seen in Figure 6.Freshmen starting in Fall 2011 were the first to see the Computer Aided Design, MechanicalDesign I, and Mechanical Design II (ME 170, ME 370 and ME 371, respectively) improvements.The freshmen starting in Fall 2014 were the first class to see an integrated hands-on designsequence in all four years since Design for Manufacturability (ME 270) was first introduced tosophomores in Fall 2015. It should be noted that the four-year retention does not includestudents who transferred to other majors, and students who took longer than four years tograduate. While many factors influence student retention, the increase in retention is nonethelesspositive and reflects one of the

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University; Catherine A. Scott, Stony Brook University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

physicallydemanding for both the students and him – he was lecturing for almost five hours twice a weekand the students were expected to pay attention for an inordinate amount of time, but given verylittle time to absorb the material and practice problem solving. While there were clear learningobstacles to overcome in the class, it was even more challenging for part-time students who wereeither working to support themselves financially or doing an internship. Consider the followingtwo anonymous comments from students of the Summer 2015 class, which are reflective of someof the difficulties faced by the students: 1. Less homework. It’s impossible to finish if you work and have other priorities in life. 2. The difficulty of the class. The home works were

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy; Jakob C. Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Christina Nicole Willis, University of Utah; Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

(SVE)experiences. The attendees self-organized into two tables. They were asked to “identify anddiscuss common challenges veteran and military students face” to address the followingquestions: • How can ASEE build early awareness of engineering technology, engineering technologist, and engineering pathways? • How can ASEE ensure academic recognition for prior military work experience? • How can ASEE provide seamless support from government agencies, academic institutions, and industry?Each participant silently reflected and wrote their ideas as they related to the prompts on stickynotes. At the end of the session, the session leaders reorganized the notes into initiativecategories, as applicable. As

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 5: Assessment

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timothy Ryan Duckett, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC; Matthew W. Liberatore, University of Toledo; Uchenna Asogwa, University of Toledo; Gale A. Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation; Amanda Portis Malefyt, Trine University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

]need to implement a rigorous system of evaluation of their pedagogical assessments through theuse of a measurement model that makes such demands on the data. To that end, theimplementation of Rasch measurement models will provide robust validation for the measures ofstudent learning outcomes, which in turn can improve course curricula by accurately targetingdomains and transferable skillsets critical to the development of this generation’s chemicalengineers.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gustavo B. Menezes, California State University, Los Angeles; Emily L. Allen, California State University, Los Angeles; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Eva Schiorring, StemEval; Paul S. Nerenberg, California State University, Los Angeles

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

in this material are those ofthe authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Thework was initiated through a STEM Collaborative grant awarded by the Leona M. and Harry B.Helmsley Charitable Trust. Development of the freshman engineering course was also supportedby the Boeing Company and by a STEM grant from the Office of Naval Research (ContractNumber N00014-15-1-2434). The authors are also grateful for support from the Provost’s Officefor the FYrE program, and to Professor Monika Kress of the Department of Physics andAstronomy at San José State University, who provided insight on her pre-physics coursedevelopment. Finally, the contributions of the entire FYrE faculty and staff team, notably DebbieWon

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Demetri Blackwood, Kettering University ; Diane L. Peters, Kettering University; Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

”. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 2010, p. 23.[17] S. Porter & P. Umbach, “College major choice: An analysis of person–environment fit”. Research in higher education, 47(4), 2006, pp. 429-449.[18] J. Holland, Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Psychological Assessment Resources, 1997.[19] K. Rask & J. Tiefenthaler, “The role of grade sensitivity in explaining the gender imbalance in undergraduate economics”. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 2008, pp. 676-687.[20] M. Anderson & J. Swazey, “Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview”. New directions for higher education, 1998(101), 3-13.[21] G. Malaney, “Why

Conference Session

Making, Hacking, and Extracurricular Design

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Petney, Rice 360 Institute for Global Health; Samuel Gonthako Ng'anjo, University of Malawi, The Polytechnic; Joseph Chikaphonya Phiri, University of Malawi, The Polytechnic; Matthew Wettergreen, Rice University; Ann Saterbak, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

14/15 ME 2/6 4/7(A) Prototyping tool usage: Department-specific tool use in EE projects increasedsignificantly from before-PIDS at 5.7 (SD 2.5) to after-PIDS at 9.6 (SD 2.6); t(9) = 3.63, p =0.003 (Figure 1). Department-specific tool use among ME projects experienced a small, butsignificant increase from 6.8 (SD 2.0) to 8.9, (SD 2.1); t(17) = 2.45, p = .012 (Figure 1). Figure 1. Tool usage among department-specific projects.Within EE, the increase in tool use reflects an increase in both the number of tools used by eachteam and the proficiency of tool use. All tools were used by a larger percentage of teams after thedesign studio; the largest gains were made among

Conference Session

Experiences in Manufacturing Engineering Education

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jason M. Weaver, Brigham Young University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

failure, and seek out growth opportunities.Similarly, Cutts, et. al18, conducted a study in their introductory programming course at theUniversity of Glasgow. Students in the course received one or more of three tools designed to be“mindset interventions,” i.e., to help students shift from a fixed to a growth mindset. The firsttool was a series of workshops taught by the tutors, guiding the students in reflecting on theirexperiences so far in the course and how they fit into a fixed or growth mindset. The second toolwas a handout listing resources, tools, and tips successful computing students frequently use toget unstuck. This handout would be referenced by the tutors whenever they helped a student,guiding them towards a recognition that they

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 3 – Course and Program Outcomes

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stu Turner, US Air Force Academy Systems Engineering; Kalyn Tung, United States Air Force Academy; Cory Cooper, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

@usafa.edu Lt Col Cory Cooper, Ph.D. cory.cooper@usafa.edu Capt Kalyn Tung, M.S. kalyn.tung@usafa.eduDisclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Air Force Academy, the Air Force, the Department ofDefense, or the U.S. Government. Distribution A. Approved for public release, USAFA-DF-2018-96:distribution unlimited.References[1] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2018-2019,” 2017. [Online]. Available:http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/E001-18-19-EAC-Criteria-11-29-17-FINAL_updated1218.pdf. [Accessed: Jan 18, 2018].[2] Scott, B., and J. Bartolomei. "US Air Force Academy Launches

Conference Session

Social Dialogue on Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mayra S. Artiles , Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Stephanie G. Adams, Old Dominion University; Coletta E Johnson Bey, Old Dominion University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

a differentperspective of how a student’s URM identity could affect their progress towards degree completion. Finally,it provides institutions with recommendations on how to improve their support for students towards doctoraldegree completion. Acknowledgements This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 1723314. Anyopinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authorsand do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. References [1] M. Sana, “Immigrants and natives in US science and engineering occupations, 1994–2006,” Demography, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 801–820, 2010. [2] “Engage to Excel: Producing One

Conference Session

Career Decisions and Faculty Development

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Cheryl Carrico P.E., Virginia Tech; Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF. The authorsacknowledge the larger research study team including Amy Arnolds for her help with intercoderwork. We also thank our study participants and partner school liaisons.References[1] C. Amelink, and E. G. Creamer, “Gender differences in elements of the undergraduate experience that influence satisfaction with the engineering major and the intent to pursue engineering as a career,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 81-92, 2010.[2] S. Sheppard, S. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, K. Donaldson, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, M. Lande, and G. Toye, “Exploring the engineering student experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways

Conference Session

Two-year College Potpourri

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Zilouchian, Florida Atlantic University; Nancy Romance, Florida Atlantic University; Dana Hamadeh, Palm Beach State College; Annie Laurie Myers, Broward College; Michael Vitale, East Carolina University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

theadvantage of one of the largest and most diverse populations of learners in the state of Florida. TheBC and PBSC student populations reflect the socioeconomic and ethnic diversity of the SouthFlorida area, with a majority of the enrolled students hailing from minority backgrounds.The articulation program has intended to build a sustainable and growing pipeline of studentsenrolling in Computer Engineering and Computer Science majors. The implementation of theprogram has centered on student success. As we prepared the program, we asked, “What dostudents need to successfully decide/get into college?” In addition to the reducing the worryabout how they would pay for College, we recognized that students need support in terms ofmentoring and advising

Conference Session

Social Dialogue on Diversity and Inclusion

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nelson S. Pearson, University of Nevada, Reno; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

identified as Asian, Hispanic or White. As stated previously this may reflect thestudents’ willingness to participate in engineering’s culture, although at this time no conclusiveevidence, and presents a clear arena for future work.Out-degreeHaving established that social structure was receptive to diverse interactions, we tested to see if aparticular racial group was more socially active than their peers. The descriptive statistics (Table3) suggest that out-degree behavior is highly volatile (large standard deviations and range),positively skewed and extremely leptokurtic. KW testing (H(5) = 5.6179, p = .3452) concludesthat out-degree values are not dependent on the students’ racial/ ethnicity identification. Table 3: Descriptive statistics for

Conference Session

Division for Experimentation & Lab-oriented Studies Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Anderson, Montana Engineering Education Research Center; Tariq Akmal, Washington State University; Phillip Himmer, Montana State University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

preferred if the report was due before the exam, so we all get a chance to really think and analyze the process. The math would be good practice for the exam as well. The demonstration was confusing at first, but I feel like struggling my way through it really helped me understand the concepts. It was helpful to be required to solve these equations and calculate actual values. It was, however, do to inconsistent data, unhelpful to get values that were no reflective of reality. Yes, the hands on nature of directly seeing the effects of the energy balance helped me understand the equation visually and mentally. It helped me in setting up a problem to solve for the friction of the system. I believe I could have

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Postcard Session 1: Retention and Student Success Strategies

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elizabeth R. Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park; Kurubel Belay, University of Maryland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

student development and transfer into engineering.Participants were recruited from the 2013 to 2016 cohorts through a recruitment email explainingthe purpose of the study. Two focus groups of six participants each were conducted, lastingapproximately 75 minutes each. Focus group participants provided their consent for recordingthe session. Following an introduction, overview of the study, and completion of the IRB consentforms, the focus group facilitator engaged the students in a series of discussion questions andactivities, encouraging students to reflect on and share about their experiences in the FYSEprogram. After the sessions, the recordings were transcribed and reviewed by the researchers.Transcriptions and notes were then coded for