portfolios by a faculty/industry committee 4 Session Number 1896 Mechanical engineering faculty at Stanford developed an innovative peer-review methodin which professors volunteer to be reviewed by their colleagues 5. The professor being reviewedfirst writes a reflective memo on the process he or she used to plan and deliver the course. Next,colleagues interview two groups of students from the professor’s course. And finally, thecolleague reviewers write a summary memo based on information in the reflective memo andstudent interviews. Focus groups were formed of participants from over a two-year period. Thefaculty especially liked the reflective memo and many now write
strategies charter for their class project reflection on team building activity • Short reflection/assessment• Short reflection/assessment • Short reflection/assessment Proceedings of the 2024 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference West Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX Copyright 2024, American Society for Engineering Education 4 Implementation PlanThe UNITES teamwork skill development project was launched to enhance our undergraduatecurriculum in the mechanical engineering
student-centered techniques into their lectures is common in faculty, the additional timecommitment is a typical barrier. This work describes a pilot program called the “Interactive LearningCollaborative” that supports trained teaching assistants (TAs) in designing and implementing interactiveactivities and retrospective post-assessments in lectures, in partnership with faculty. The objectives of thepilot were to 1) provide engineering TAs opportunities to practice activity design and implementation, 2)improve students’ comprehension of the material through peer interaction and reflection in lectures, andin doing so, 3) demonstrate to faculty these pedagogies and their positive impact on student perception.In the fall of 2021, TAs met with a
not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.
a humanistic approach to educating students. This humanistic approachacknowledges the importance of the affective side of teaching and learning. Engineering, whichshares many of the highly technical, decision-making aspects of nursing, could benefit from thisapproach for engineering education.Our ProgramOur team developed a Community of Practice (CoP) informed by a humanistic-educative caringframework, grounded in Caring Science, where the curriculum is about the process and intent tolearn coming from the interactions and transactions between faculty and learners. Thisframework embraces openness, human discovery, and deep reflection [4]. It also includesawareness of how learning works and co-creating meaningful learning experiences that
increase in heat-related death, damage to land, plants, andanimals, a rise in life-threatening infectious diseases “such as dengue, malaria, vibriosis, andWest Nile virus” [1], peril to water security, sanitation, and food production, harm to livelihoodsand economic loss. Preparing the next generation of Environmental Professionals to tacklethese and additional challenges is daunting. This paper shares some preliminary reflections onsix short workshops to humanize care, commitment, skill, and responsibility for the heavy liftinginvolved in facing the effects of climate change. The workshops introduce graduate students tothe concept and practice of transdisciplinarity, weaving together topics from interculturalcompetence, community-engaged practice
key classes during the first-year and senior year for students, while being aimed atindividual work during the middle two years of study.This awards program targets eight values the engineering program seeks to develop in eachstudent: Community, Professionalism, Ownership, Relevance, Resilience, Ethics, Excellence,and Service. These values are introduced to students with discussion and reflection during thefirst year of study, as well as being prominently displayed in the academic building mostassociated with engineering. Awards are given in the spring semester. Students are nominated byothers including peers, faculty and staff, and representatives from local industry with the processvarying by which year of study the awards are for. In the
they most wish to explore and workshop presenters will facilitate three interactive activities to enable attendees to reflect directly about their classroom experiences. 3. Discussion + Wrap-up – 20 minutes a. Participants will come back together as one larger group with time allotted for sharing out from the three individual activities. Presenters will lead a short summative activity to highlight ‘take-home’ messages/ideas. b. Presenters will provide a list of useful resources which will be amended to include input from this discussion
language.Dr. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Michelle Soledad, Ph.D. is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research and service interests include teaching and learning experiences in fundamental engineering courses, faculty development and support initiatives – including programs for the future engineering professoriate, and leveraging institutional data to support reflective teaching practices. She has degrees in Electrical Engineering (B.S., M.Eng.) from the Ateneo de Davao University in Davao City, Philippines, where she previously held appointments as Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering
diverse workforce brings moreperspectives to problem-solving. Unfortunately, conventional engineering education has oftenignored Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Belonging, and Justice (DEIBJ) issues, perpetuating biasesand supressing underrepresented groups. Due to this inequity, educators need to create inclusiveenvironments that value and empower all students and reflect engineering design’s collaborativeand multidisciplinary nature. Inclusive Design (ID) values solutions that are accessible and user-friendly to individuals of all abilities, backgrounds, and identities, which aligns with engineeringeducation goals. ID encourages empathy and teamwork by having designers consider diverseuser group needs throughout the design process. By
to make proposals for changes in the curriculum: How could gaps or deficienciesbe addressed? What other data are needed before making changes? (Principles 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5).Again, faculty were highly engaged at each step: 100% of faculty teaching an undergraduatecourse were interviewed, and at the second department retreat, ~70% of faculty participated,including 18 tenure-track faculty (10 full, 4 associate, and 4 assistant), 2 teaching-track faculty,and 1 lecturer. At the conclusion of this retreat, attendees were asked to complete an exit survey.Responses showed clear appreciation for our approach, as well as an acknowledgement that weas a department have work to do together on the curriculum to better reflect our new objectives.Future
know?Systems, andScientific Read fictionalized medical case studies where a organ systems. Identify Doctor Diaries (3) argument components within these texts.Argument Transplant Watch and reflect on a video testimony about an individual’s organTranslating Testimony transplantation journey.Knowledge intoReal-World History of Organ Read and discuss the history of organ donation and transplantation. Transplantation Identify the primary challenges facing the organ transplantation system.Applications:Organ Watch video(s) about animals which have evolved to
members and volunteers solicitedfrom a required first-year engineering course focused on developing engineering leaders. Thecourse contains a mandatory service-learning component, reflection activities and presentationson service learning, and engineering leadership throughout the course. Core club members willprovide undergraduate volunteers with sample activities and hands-on practice with the kit, aswell as training on developmentally appropriate STEM learning goals and the fundamentals ofpositive classroom management, after which, the volunteers will organize activities for themiddle school STEM clubs and lead these activities alongside the core club members over 6weeks.Future WorkWe are in the beginning stages of testing and deployment. Data
Ordering Components of a Class Session: Application of Literature to Design of a Module on Analysis and Modeling of Dynamical Systems in Biology Alex C. Szatmary, National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentThe ordering of components of a class session affects the effectiveness of instruction. Forexample, choosing to start with a real-life example could get students motivated to learn about aconcept, or choosing to end with a worked example could prepare students to do homeworkproblems. Ordering learning activities should reflect an understanding of the steps that people gothrough in a learning cycle. One way of thinking about how best to
-yearstudents. These 84 studies examined what students learned in their first-year and addressed thenature of preparation and composition of students entering engineering. Experiential learningwas mostly measured through the lens of student performance (89%) through different forms ofevaluations including performance checks, surveys, and individual interviews. A second lens wasfaculty evaluations (7%) including instructors’ observations, feedback, and reflections ofstudents’ performance and experience. Finally, a third lens was industry feedback (4%), obtainedto inform capstone design courses where students work at industrial sites on company basedprojects with industry mentors.From our literature survey, we identified four key elements with
technology students enrolled in the Principles ofMechanical Systems course participated in this study, and were tasked with the design of avehicle that would solve overcrowdedness in urban areas in the next century. Focus of theresearch was on innovative bio-inspired design that is backed by scientific evidence and the useof arts to convey the design. The students then expressed their opinions on their design projectusing a photovoice reflection of their learning. Student responses to the photovoice reflectionprompts related to the design were qualitatively categorized under three themes: 1)demonstrating the importance of entrepreneurial thinking from the end user’s perspective 2)stressing the importance of teamwork and communication and 3) using
and the engineering community, and we hope makes it more likely they may considergraduate school or industrial research, perhaps in partnership with the university.There was also a recognition that undergraduates often lack certain skills or knowledge whenthey first join a research lab, and that a bridge or training program would be advantageous. Therehas also been discussion of which identities are most often excluded from research opportunities,and how to provide equitable access and meaningful support to have our research undergraduatesbetter reflect our overall student demographics.Our program was awarded $91,405 (~9%) of the overall university-wide pool in a competitionwith a 22.7% acceptance rate. The funding was partially matched by
about who their customer is, what needs the customerhas, and how to meet them. In other words, they are developing an entrepreneurial mindset [2].In order to meet this shift in societal thinking, the importance of exposure to engineering [3] andentrepreneurship earlier in education increases. In this study, Science, Technology, Engineering,and Mathematics (STEM) Pre-Service Teachers (PSTs) enrolled in an engineering educationcourse where they completed an entrepreneurial Problem-Based Learning (PBL) unit. ThroughPSTs’ reflections, post-assessments, and lesson plans, we gathered their perceptions regardingthe integration of entrepreneurial mindset within their content and future teaching. The researchquestions we investigated are: 1
towards student mental health and circumstances during the pandemic. • Focusing on change for the long-term, not specific to the COVID-19 period. • Mitigating potential academic misconduct challenges.In response, the first-year engineering design curriculum was adapted to a flipped classroom modelusing a modular approach for content. For each module, a framework of individual and team-basedreadiness assessment quizzes, videos highlighting key content, associated studio activities, and a finalmodule exam was used to assess student learning. For each term, deliberate activities that aimed tohelp students build resilience to the stress of isolation included a personal time off (PTO) planningand reflection exercise, creating a community
local vendors in their countries.Student Reflection SurveysCourse benchmarks focused on responses from student evaluation surveys and performance on the finalproject showcase. Three sets of surveys were conducted to assess students' perceptions of the course.First, pre-course questions not listed in this paper gathered students' location and preferred team roleassignment in the first week of classes. Students were then paired into a team of up to 5 students basedon their survey entries. Additional surveys were conducted during the mid-and end of the semester. Thesurvey questions shown in Table 4 was conducted mid-semester to analyze students' experience in thecourse with the intent to circumvent any pitfalls before the completion of the project
semester. During thosemeetings the instructor played the role of “the client” or “the senior engineer in the consultingfirm.” These meetings prevented the students from falling behind and provided them with usefulinformation to continue the design. Also, during the meeting, each team showed what they havedone up to that moment. There were no points for attending the meetings. To assess the PBL implementation, the students were required to take a shortened versionof the NCEES FE exam at the beginning and at the end of the semester. They also took a finalCATME survey and were asked to complete a set of questions reflecting on the project work. In Fall 2019, the design tasks were modified after the course sequence was adjusted
analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Program Chair for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2022 ASEE conference.Titiksha Singh © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comExploring how students attend to the nature and dynamics of complexity in their design problemsAbstractAuthentic design problems necessarily reflect the complexity of real-world dynamic, open systems thathave numerous components and nonobvious connections across different systems or
themselves as not creative and reported that they lacked talent in thearts. Forty percent (40%, n=2) described it in terms of innovation, and none of these participantsexpressed that they had talent in the arts. Participants reflected on the interview question, “Describe how you view yourself as acreative person.” Eighty percent (80% , N=12) of all participants reflected on artistic talent as aprimary measure of creativity, and 73% (N=11) referenced innovation. A notable difference ofstudents with the lowest levels of CSE was that only 40% (n=2) of these students mentionedinnovation, in contrast to 83% (n=5) and 100% (n=4) of participants with medium and high CSErespectively. Participants with higher CSE highlighted their talent and enjoyment
of Mines has been refining a ‘Job ShopApproach’ to capstone in an environment dedicated to implementation of a design firm model withstudents working on multiple projects at different stages of development. A recent study of our studentexperience and overall course assessment provided opportunities for reflection on areas for continuedgrowth.Within HCDS, the dynamic nature of the design studio allows for project timelines that do not alignneatly with the academic calendar. Students serve simultaneously on three different projects over thecourse of two semesters, providing a multi-project, multi-team, multi-client, and varied timeline learningexperience. Similar to traditional capstone models, HCDS student teams work through the designprocess
instance, it is assumed that students learn debugging by havingexperience with debugging [13]. However, a study by Whalley and colleagues revealed thatstudents’ reflections on their experiences with debugging tend to be negative [14]. In this study,students expressed that exploring strategies such as print statements frequently will make themmiss the program’s general idea, forcing them not to follow a methodological approach [14].Although debugging is a challenging task, it is also an essential skill that students must master toacquire other computational thinking skills [15]. Consequently, exploration of students’debugging skills is essential to develop teaching and learning strategies that fully explode theiralready-in-place preferences and
powerful tools for capturing one’s true affective state, asthey are implicit, cannot be reflected upon, and are typically not amenable to participants’voluntary control.Yet, both explicit (self-report) and implicit (psychophysiological) measures can capture differentfacets of complex behavior. A framework that combines phenomenological andpsychophysiological indicators poses the possibility of a balanced and disciplined account ofcognitive phenomena at multiple levels of analysis that can help bridge the biological mind-experiential gap [7]. Although limited in their scope, several recent investigations have providedevidence in favor of joint phenomenological and psychophysiological indicators of complexhuman experience. For example, combining a
inengineering education. We sought to identify how exemplar engineering students describe familypatterns that influence their engineering success. Career genogram construction and semi-structured interviews reflected intergenerational family patterns that contributed to the success ofthree exemplar senior students in engineering. Case-studies were selected using ExemplarMethodology (ExM). Data was collected on familial career exposure and attitudes, resulting inthe development of genograms. Findings reflect supportive communication, encouraged help-seeking, and reliable support were normed in each family system. Observing family memberswith engineering experience, engaging in pre-college STEM-related activities, and familyattitudes about the value of
submission of reflective design reports.Participants assigned to the iterative condition created two prototypes and a final design insequence (Figure 1, left). After the first prototype was 3D-printed and returned to participants inthe iterative condition by the research team, they could test their designs before making changesto their CAD model for the next round of production. This process was repeated for their secondprototype. After receiving their second iteration, participants in the iterative condition couldmake changes to their CAD model for their final design.Participants assigned to the parallel condition created two prototypes simultaneously followed bya final design (Figure 1, right). The research team 3D-printed both prototypes for
students to several topics including problem solving,information literacy, written and oral communication, teamwork, professionalism, ethics, thedesign process, significant figures, dimensional analysis, spreadsheet software, mathematicalsoftware scripts, descriptive statistics and technology applications within the field ofengineering.Within these topics, the current implementation will focus on facilitating learning activities thathelp students to solve problems by developing problem definitions, formulating hypotheses,stating their assumptions, identifying the knowns and unknowns, exploring resources,developing explanations, and communicating and reflecting on their proposed solutions in ateam-based setting. Planned subsequent activities
) provide a focused application of RDM to activevitally important since they are in a special position to inspire research projects. These goals were then separated into indi-future students with the excitement and understanding of vidual learning objectives as reflected in the assessment, below.cyberinfrastructure-enabled scientific inquiry and learning.”[9] One recommended textbook was used for the course: DataFaculty studies concluded that researchers felt that some form Management for Researchers by Kristen Briney.[15] Additionalof data information literacy was needed for their students.[2] resources for the course included DMPtool[16] and the Data Graduate student education on RDM has generally taken