universal education”, International Review of Research in Open and Dis- tance Learning, vol. 9, no. 1, 2008. [3] David Wiley, T.J. Bliss, and Mary McEwen, Open Educational Resources: A Review of the Literature, chapter 63, pp. 781–789, Springer, fourth edition, 2014. [4] John Hilton III, “Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions”, Education Tech Research Dev, vol. 64, pp. 573–590, 2016. [5] Lori Breslow, David E. Pritchard, Jennifer DeBoer, Glenda S. Stump, Andrew D. Ho, and Daniel T. Seaton, “Studying learning in the worldwide classroom research into edx’s first mooc”, Research and Practice in Assessment, vol. 8, pp. 13–25, 2013. [6] Jean Jacoby, “The
unit(s) along with difficulty finding suitable storagelocations. In this paper, a refrigeration lab is proposed that costs less than $300, and yet may be amore useful activity for students than expensive and bulky training systems. The structure of thepaper is as follows. First, basic vapor compression cycles are reviewed, followed by a descriptionof the lab equipment and exercise. Next, sample results are provided, and finally, potentialmappings of this lab experiment to ABET student outcomes are given.Vapor Compression System AnalysisPrior to the lab exercise, it is highly recommended that students have learned the ideal and actualvapor compression system cycles. This is standard material in any undergraduate thermodynamicstextbook, e.g
, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1999, pp. 110-125. 4. Hartman, J. C., “Engineering Economy: Suggestions to Update a Stagnant Course Curriculum”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 1998. 5. Bafna, K. and Aller, B., “Enhancing the Learning of Engineering Economy with Innovative Technology and Teaching,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 2007. 6. Coates, E. R., Vajpayee, S. K., and Juneau, J., “Introducing Engineering Economy Students to Real Options”, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, 2003. 7. Evans, E., Nachtmann, H., and Needy K., “A Look into Engineering Economy Education Literature
understand what triggers academicdishonesty. Only then will there be insight into why students are cheating in these courses at thisinstitution.References[1] D. D. Carpenter, T. S. Harding, C. J. Finelli, S. M. Montgomery, and H. J. Passow, "Engineering students' perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, pp. 181-194, 2006.[2] D. L. McCabe, "Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective," International Journal for Educational Integrity, vol. 1, 2005.[3] D. E. Allmon, D. Page, and R. Rpberts, "Determinants of perceptions of cheating: Ethical orientation, personality and demographics," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 23, pp. 411- 422
. Elliot, W. Crumpler, and K. Lloyd, “A National Machine Intelligence Strategy for the United States.”Report of the CSIS technology policy program, 2018. [2] China, the State Council, “New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan,”2017. [3] X. Han, X. Liu, F. Hu, et al, “Design of AI+ Curriculum for Primary and Secondary Schools in Qingdao,” Proceedings of 2018 Chinese Automation Congress, Nov.30-Dec. 2, 2018, Xi’An, China, [4] F. Wang, and J .S. Lansin, “From Artificial Life to Artificial Societies--New Methods for Studies of Complex Social Systems,” Complex Systems and Complexity Science, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 33-41,2004. [5]F. Wang, “Parallel system methods for management and control of complex systems. Control and Decision
and other activities.References1. A. Behrouzi, and D. Kuchma (2016, June), Inquiry-Based Learning to Explore the Design of the Built Environment Paper, 2016 ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25725.2. S. Khorbotly (2015, June), A Project-based Learning Approach to Teaching Computer Vision at the Undergraduate Level Paper, 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23432.3. J. Wang, C. Luo, W. Zhao, and X. Li (2017, June), Empowering Students with Self- Regulation in a Project-Based Embedded Systems Course, 124th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE'2017), June 25 - 28, 2017, Columbus, Ohio.4. W
opportunity in the community for continuing the project.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work was supported with a grant from MultiCare Health Systems, Spokane, WA, throughtheir Community Partnership Program.REFERENCES[1] J. Mroz, “Hand of a Superhero,” The New York Times, Feb. 16, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/17/science/hand-of-a-superhero.html. [Accessed Dec. 13, 2018].[2] http://enablingthefuture.org/[3] https://greaterallegheny.psu.edu/feature/students-learn-while-giving-gift-new-hands[4] S. Yagli and S. Hsieh, “MAKER: Designing and Building a Prosthetic Hand for a High School Engineering Design Course,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings, Salt Lake
Mapped I/O. Laboratory #6: The purpose is to introduce an assembly program that can do a simple task using an ARM Cortex M4F board. Laboratory #7: The purpose is to introduce an assembly program to perform simple S/W button tasks. Laboratory #8: The purpose is to introduce an assembly program to control a bar LED and S/W buttons. Laboratory #9: The purpose is to introduce simple parallel communication between the FPGA board and TM4C123G Launchpad. Laboratory (Extra): The purpose is to write an assembly program and FPGA implementation that can generate a hamming code. Term project: This term project is an extended lab of two weeks. For the term project, students will create a
from the speaker tobe audible, a minimum dBA will be a requirement.References[1] ABET, "Accreditation Criteria & Supporting Documents," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/. [Accessed 28 January 2019].[2] . P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, G. Mark, and A. Palincsar, "Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369-398, 1991.[3] National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment, "Mapping learning: A toolkit," University of Illinois and Indiana University, Urbana, IL, 2018.[4] B. S. Bloom, D. R. Krathwohl and B. B. Masia, Taxonomy of educational objectives: the
): Proceedings of 121st Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June15-18, 2014.[3] REEFE Consortium, “Rising Engineering Education Faculty Experience,” [February 1,2019].[4] M. B. Baxter Magolda and P. M. King, Learning partnerships: Theories and models ofpractice to educate for self-authorship. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, 2004.[5] M. B. Baxter Magolda, “Self-authorship,” New Directions for Higher Education (SpecialIssue), vol. 166, pp. 25-33, 2014.[6] S. Hughes, J. L. Pennington, and S. Makris, “Translating autoethnography across the AERAstandards toward understanding autoethnographic scholarship as empirical research,”Educational Researcher, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 209-219, 2012.[7] C. Ellis, T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner
American coastalengineers is to foster a coastal engineering program(s) at an HBCU and that is precisely therationale for support of this PhD Engineering degree with a coastal engineering emphasis area.The number of MS and PhD Engineering graduates (and those projected for the next two years)along with those in the Coastal Engineering emphasis area are shown in Table 1.Academic MS Engineering. MS Engineering PhD Engineering PhD Engr. Year Graduates (Coastal Engr. Graduates (Coastal Engr. Area) Area) Projected Graduates
-focusedengineering summer camp. Although it is different from most other professional learningexperiences that are available to teachers, having the teachers participate in authentic engineeringexperiences with their students and giving them time to reflect on these experiences during theworkshops, is clearly beneficial to the teachers. With the changes that are being made to the nextGEAR UP Engineering Summer camp, it is expected that the benefits of having the professionallearning experience as a part of the camp will continue and that there will be additional benefitsas a result of the improvements made to the professional learning experience. References[1] S. Boesdorfer and K. Staude, “Teachers’ Practices in
curriculum.Reflection essays, class discussion, individual and group projects/products, peer review andfeedback, or other types of activities will be used to measure learner progress on the learningobjectives and to provide timely and relevant feedback to both the instructor and learner. Thisinformation will be used by both the instructor and learner(s) to guide decision making andengagement in bio-inspired design. Rubrics or grading guidelines will be created for eachformative assessment to ensure they align with the project goals and learning objectives.Research ProgressProgress toward both research objectives has been made at both James Madison University(JMU) and University of Georgia (UGA). A summary of research progress is given in Table 2.Table 2
Engineering Education Standards: Opportunities and Barriers. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 70(5), 21-29.Carr, R. L., Bennett, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K‐12 STEM Standards of the 50 US States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539-564.Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of pre-college engineering education research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2.Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. (2015). NGSS and the landscape of engineering in K‐12 state science standards. Journal of Research
.[8] P. S. Steif and J. A. Dantzler, "A Statics Concept Inventory: Development and Psychometric Analysis," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, pp. 363-371, 2005.[9] G. L. Gray, F. Costanzo, D. Evans, P. Cornwell, B. Self, and J. L. Lane, "The dynamics concept inventory assessment test: A progress report and some results," in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.[10] M. Hohenwarter and J. Preiner, "Dynamic Mathematics with GeoGebra," The Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. Volume 7, March 2007 2007.Appendix AFigure 2: Catalog of drop-down menus in the 2D Geometry view of Geogebra (image acquiredfrom http://www.jensilvermath.com/2013/08/07
0 0 5 4 3 2 1 student score time Figure 9In question 10, students are asked if they would perform more work if unlimited time wasprovided. The responses yielded similar percentages to question 9’s agree and strongly agreeand identical percentages to disagree and strongly disagree. The time remaining and the examaverages match what would be expected – the more time remaining, the higher the examaverages. Figure 10 reflects the breakdown of question 10
Model (PSRDM) created by Canneyand Bielefeldt [4]. The model seeks to gauge “the development of personal andprofessional responsibility in [students]” and merges these two dimensions togetherfor the professional connectedness realm [4]. The personal social awareness piecerelates to the development of one’s feeling “a moral or social obligation to help1This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNo. 1635554. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. 1others” while
such projects may be their complexity and possible unrealisticexpectations from the project clients. These potential disadvantages must be considered andproactively addressed by the academic advisor(s) when interacting with the clients and whenguiding the students along their design process.References:1 U.S. Department of Energy, “Hydropower Vision: A New Chapter for America’s 1stRenewable Electricity Source”, https://energy.gov/eere/water/articles/hydropower-vision-new-chapter-america-s-1st-renewable-electricity-source
are introduced to networking. Based on the pre-and post-surveys the students are interested in the Internet of things, and the IoT lab generates enthusiasmfor the course. The students enjoyed the opportunity to use their smart phones as part of class,and appreciate “endless possibilities.”References[1] Blynk, "Democratizing the Internet of Things," [Online]. Available: http://www.blynk.io/. [Accessed 13 12 2017].[2] S. Abraham, "Using Internet of Things (IoT) as a Platform to Enhance Interest in Electrical and Computer Engineering," in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[3] S. Abraham and A. Miguel, "Creation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Innovation Lab," in 2017 ASEE Annual
Description: Design and tune a PID controller for a closed loop control systemthat controls tank level. Transfer function of the servomotor controlled final control element(valve) that controls the liquid flow in to the tank and the transfer of the controller signaltransmission to the final control element are as follows: 10Transfer function of servomotor controlled final control element: and s 20s 2 2 6Transfer function of controller
hypothetical “average”learners) is rapidly developing in the field, as is the body of strategies and interventionsthat have been found to aid in individualized approaches. Being armed with better insightson “who” our students are helps better prepare us for our future objective, that being toaddress the possibility of using the profiles of students to help move towards personalizedlearning in order to aid in the retention - as well as success - of students within the DUEngineering program.References: 1. Hargrove, S. Keith, and Legand Burge. "Developing a six sigma methodology for improving retention in engineering education." Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2002. 2. Zhang, Guili, et al. "Identifying
Reaction,” Internet:http://www.csb.gov/assets/1/19/T2_Final_Copy_9_17_09.pdf, Sept. 7, 2009 [Oct. 10, 2017].2) S.J. Dee, B.L. Cox, R.A. Ogle, “Process Safety in the Classroom: The Current State ofChemical Engineering Programs at US Universities,” Process Safety Programs, vol. 34, no. 4,pp. 314-319, 2015.3) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Shares in the Chemical Engineering Classroom,” Education forChemical Engineers, vol. 9, pp. 94-105, 2014.4) D.C. Shallcross, “Safety Education through Case Study Presentations,” Education forChemical Engineers¸ vol. 8, pp. 12-30, 2013.5) J. Rest, D. Narvaez, M. Bebeau, S. Thoma, “A neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT andschema theory,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 11, pp. 291-324, 1999.6) Q. Zhu, C.B. Zoltowski, M.K
and future discussions will help us refine ourprogramming to better tailor professional development opportunities to the needs ofundergraduate and graduate student instructors.References: 1. O’Neal, C., Wright, M., Cook, C., Perorazio, T., & Purkiss, J. (2007). The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for TA training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 24-29. 2. Jardine, H. E., Friedman, L. A. (2017). Using Undergraduate Facilitators for Active Learning in Organic Chemistry: A Preparation Course and Outcomes of the Experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 94 (6), 703-709. 3. Lewis, S. E. (2011) Retention and Reform: An Evaluation of Peer-Led Team Learning
reason(s) would you give to recommend students participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?What reason(s) would you give to recommend students not participate in projects found onsocialcoder.org?Students generally answered the first question with a variation of ”it is a potential source ofprojects where you can gain experience”.In the second question, the students made notes about the relative lack of project choices, and thelack of communication from the project leaders.The question of why there is a contradiction between these two statements stems from two factors.The first factor was simply the number of projects that the students could apply to. While studentswere allowed to view approximately 20 projects, fewer than 10 were accepting
Google Drive. This practice had several majorbenefits. The most important impact of this practice was that the knowledge and experiencestudent gained in their project accumulated and stored in a single location. The students workingon the same topic had access to the folder as well as the instructor(s). When new students startedto work on the same topic, the Google Drive folder from past teams was shared with them andthey had access to everything the previous team(s) had done and used.The final overall course assessment was according to the following items: Proposal 15% Interim report 15% Final report 30% Progress reports or meetings 20% Poster
students’ knowledge about sustainable engineering: Question 1: What does sustainability mean to you now? How do you define sustainability? Question 2: Who can contribute to sustainability? In what way(s)? Question 3: What can engineers do for sustainability? Question 4: What sustainable engineering design tool/principle do you know? Question 5: Have you heard of any individual or organization take any initiatives for sustainability? If yes, explain the details.The answers before and after showed an obvious progress in students’ knowledge ofsustainability and sustainable engineering approaches. Overall, at the beginning of the semester,a lot of students had the very limited knowledge of all of the questions
understandingof the subjects of network management after taking this course.Bibliography1. Burke, J. R. (2004). Network management concept and practice: A hands-on approach, Pearson.2. Clemm, A. (2007). Network management fundamentals, Cisco Press.3. Yemini, Y. (1993). The OSI network management model. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 31(5). 20-29.4. M.3400: TMN Management Functions. (2000), International Telecommunication Union, Retrieved July 15, 2017, from http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-M.3400-200002-I/en Retrieved February 165. Chou, T. S. (2017). Curriculum Design and Project Evaluation of a Network Management Course Implemented in Distance Education and On-Campus Classes. IGI Global International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course
the input terminalto incorporate the protection device.ConclusionA new laboratory experiment utilizing a new Buck converter module has been developed toimprove students’ learning experience and skills in power electronics. The new lab module wasconstructed with the full support from Monolithic Power Systems, and it was designed toaccommodate new learning outcomes. Initial assessment of the new Buck experiment indicatedthat the new Buck converter is able to effectively fulfill the new learning outcomes. A moreformalized survey is currently under plan to assess the effectiveness of the new lab module inhelping students achieve the learning outcomes.References1. Mishra, S., “Power Converter Systems for Consumer Electronics Devices”, 2016 IEEE
Engineering, vol. 95, p. 100, 1988.[3] G. Gigerenzer, Short cuts to better decision making. London: Penguin, 2007.[4] D. Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Macmillan, 2011.[5] C. R. Wolfe, V. F. Reyna, and C. Brainerd, “Fuzzy-trace theory,” Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective, p. 53, 2005.[6] S. E. Dreyfus and H. L. Dreyfus, “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition,” California Univ Berkeley Operations Research Center, 1980.[7] E. E. Miskioglu and K. M. Martin, “Reasonable or Ridiculous? Engineering Intuition in Simulations,” in Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. New Orleans, LA, June 2016.[8] E. E
Virtual Interactives in Statics to Increase Conceptual Understanding.," presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-27, 2018, 2018, 22759. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/31130.[4] V. Genis, S. Vyas, and J. Milbrandt, "Traditional and Real-time Remote NDT Instruction," Materials Evaluation, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 128-134, February 2010 2010.[5] V. Genis and S. Vyas, "Processing of Large Amount of Experimental Data Collected During Laboratory Procedures.," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15- 18, 2014, 2014, 8659. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/22941.[6] F. DePiero, K. C. McKell