Paper ID #18699Switching Midstream, Floundering Early, and Tolerance for Ambiguity: HowCapstone Students Cope with Changing and Delayed ProjectsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analysis, Facilities Planning, and Human-Machine Systems. She is Director of the Galante Engineering Business Program as well as the Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. She has also been an active member of
faculty’s meticuloustutelage and veritable concern with the students under their auspices. They cared about and forus, and that has been shown to be an effective mediator of student learning.51,52 To suggestanything to the contrary about the faculty there or their effect on undergraduates’ level oflearning would be not only a misrepresentation but also an arrant insult to them and their efforts.One could point to this as evidence that Tulane did indeed ultimately offer a nurturingenvironment for its engineering students. That was true at the individual faculty member level,though it may or may not have extended above to the higher administration. Dwelling on this,however, misses the broader point.Initial impressionsThis narrative so far has relied
particular importance, since reflection is oftentimes new territoryfor engineering students [Arizona State University FG08, Bellevue College FG07, BellevueCollege FG10, Clarkson University FG01, all as cited in [14]]. Furthermore, there are indicationsthat a key factor in developing reflexive skills is the attitude towards and modeling of these skillsby mentors and faculty themselves [10][12]. Providing formative assessment on criticalreflection tasks seems to present an opportunity to model reflection for students [Georgia TechFG11, as cited in [14]].On a larger scale, Davis et al. [9], describe how multiple universities have used assessments ofreflection tasks to document ABET outcomes.It seems that the decision whether to assess or not assess a
University Tori Vogel is a May 2014 graduate of American University. She attained her degree in Sociology with a minor in Applied Physics. In her studies she has worked to explore the various intersections between sociology and physics. In particular, she has conducted research on cochlear implants and their impact on the deaf community. In addition, she is actively pursuing a gender study of the sociological implications of factors leading to a career choice in STEM. On campus, Tori has held leadership roles within student groups. These roles include serving for two years as Vice President of Students Fighting Homelessness and Hunger and serving as President of the Downtown Touring Fellowship. While attending American
AC 2011-850: GENDER AND ENGINEERING: USING PHOTO ELICITA-TION AS A METHOD OF INQUIRYKatherine M. Morley Katherine is an undergraduate student in Aeronautical Engineering at Purdue University. As a member of the Society of Women in Engineering, and a participant in the Women in Engineering Program at Purdue University, she took interest in feminist engineering research. She is particularly interested to learn how engineering is conceptualized and gendered.Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Alice L. Pawley is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s Studies Program at Purdue University. She has a B.Eng. in Chemical Engineering
Paper ID #19291A Systematic Review of Sustainability Assessments in ASEE ProceedingsDr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Prior to joining the faculty at The Citadel, Dr. Watson earned her PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from The Georgia Institute of Technology. She also has BS and MS degrees in Biosystems Engineering from Clemson University. Dr. Watson’s research interests are in the areas of engineering education and biological waste treatment.Dr. Elise Barrella, James Madison University
an Emeritus Professor of civil engineering at the University of North Dakota. He received a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois with an emphasis in geothecnical engineering. During a 39-year career as an educator, he served on the faculties of the University of North Dakota, Ohio Northern University, and the University of Illinois. Phillips has been an active member of the National Society of Professional Engineers, serving as National President in 1994-95. He currently serves NSPE on the Board of Ethical Review, as a member of the Licensure and Qualifications for Practice Committee, and as Chair of the Council of Fellows Executive Committee. He served a five-year term, including Chair, of the North Dakota Board
weremodeled after disciplinary communities of practice outlined by McDermott, Snyder, and Wenger[18]. The explicit mission of the program is to: Prepare students to succeed in their careers and to adapt to an ever-changing world by providing opportunities to engage in inclusive and collaborative communities wherein they accumulate proficiency by putting knowledge into practice. Within these communities, students, together with industry and university experts, explore knowledge of a specific topic area, identify personally meaningful problems, take initiative, design technical solutions, obtain support, implement solutions, develop mentor relationships, serve as leaders in professionalism and innovation, and showcase meaningful
for academic careers; the Department of Education’s (DoE) STEMGROW Program to encourage students Latino(a) students and students with disabilities to pursue STEM careers; ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38753 and DoE’s Program YES SHE CAN that provides support and mentoring to female pre-college students. She is also a member of two advisory committees to the UTEP’s President: The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion committee and of the Women’s Advisory Council, in which she served five years as Chair. She is also Co-PI in the NSF Engineering Research Center for Advancing
large state university. Between 2009 and including academic support, special needs services, and2011 we conducted two surveys of over 500 students in multiple counseling. What makes advising challenging is the need tomajors and colleges. These surveys asked students detailed personalize advice for full-time and part-time students,questions about their preferences concerning course selection, transfer students, and students changing majors after satisfyingadvising, and career paths. We present data from this studywhich may be helpful for faculty and staff who advise some of their
onintrapreneurship), but do not discuss those differences in their paper.14,15Zappe, Hochstedt and Kisenwether conducted a study of faculty beliefs regardingentrepreneurship and design education.16 One of their questions asked 37 entrepreneurship andcapstone design faculty members to choose whether Entrepreneurship programs should “focuson: Intrapreneurship Only versus Entrepreneurship Only,” or somewhere along a scale fromzero (intrapreneurship only) to 100 (entrepreneurship only). An answer of 50 means “theirresponses tended to fall between Intrapreneurship Only and Entrepreneurship Only.”16 Themedian for entrepreneurship instructors was 60 (slightly skewed toward entrepreneurship only),while the capstone design instructors’ medium response was 50. The
. Homero Murzi is an engineering educator with 15 years of experience interacting withundergraduate engineering students. He has worked most of his academic career to improve theway students learn engineering concepts by making sure they are engaged and their personalexperiences are valued in the classroom. He is originally from Venezuela where he worked for11 years as a faculty member at a public technical university. Here in the U.S., he has alsoworked at a predominantly white institution and interacted as well as experienced how studentsfrom traditionally marginalized populations have barriers to become engineers. He hasintentionally tried to be aware of how to develop more inclusive experiences in both his researchand teaching practices, while
epistemic matter, faculty agency, and researcher identity.Daniel Patrick Mountain I have a background in chemical engineering, getting my Bachelor's in 2021 in this area. I am currently pursuing my Master's in Chemical Engineering, as well as an Engineering Education Graduate Certificate. I have done past research in engineering education, working with how the COVID-19 pandemic affected engineering students. My current research looks at how perceptions of engineering affect pre-service teachers' self-efficacy at teaching engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comDevelopment of a Hybrid Community of Practice Course
AC 2010-2217: ENGINEERS AS TEACHERS: BRINGING CUTTING-EDGE MATHAND SCIENCE TOPICS INTO UNDERPRIVILEGED CLASSROOMS VIASTUDENT AND PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERSLindsey Jenkins-Stark, Iridescent Ms. Lindsey Jenkins-Stark, Vice President. Ms. Lindsey Jenkins-Stark has a multi-subject credential from the University of California at Dominguez Hills, and an undergraduate degree in sociology with a focus in law from the University of California at San Diego. She was a Teach for America corps member in Los Angeles from 2006-2008. She is a distinguished middle school teacher who has taught math, science and social studies. She has been a member of a Los Angeles Unified District School decision-making
Paper ID #26059Development of Curriculum in Technology-related Supply Chain Manage-ment ProgramsMs. Panteha Alipour, Purdue University Panteha Alipour is a PhD student at Purdue University. Her background is in industrial engineering with a focus on supply network analysis. Her research interests are optimization, network analysis, data analysis and predictive modelling.Dr. Kathryne Newton, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Kathy Newton is an Associate Dean of Graduate Programs and Faculty Success for the Purdue Poly- technic Institute at Purdue University. She is a Professor of Supply Chain Management Technology in the
architecture, has provided the power to combine a series of discrete,unlinked, and unmeasured activities into an enterprise-wide process of continuous learning thatdirectly links business goals and individual outcomes (McCrea, Gay, & Bacon, 2000). Oureconomic, social, and technological forces today are pushing all of us to become moreproductive in every walk of life, and learning is no exception.Timely and an appropriate feedback is a critical element for improving student learning andsimulation-based training is no exception, as it guides and refines learning through scaffolding.A number of studies in literature have shown that students’ learning is enhanced when feedbackis provided with personalized tutoring that offers specific guidance and
collaborators in Counseling Psychology, she studies the persistence of engineering students from under-represented minority groups, including women and Latinos/as using the framework of Social Cognitive Career Theory.Dr. Hang-Shim Lee, Konkuk University Dr. Hang-Shim Lee is currently an assistant professor at Konkuk University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. She worked at Oklahoma State University for three years (2014-2017) as as a tenured track faculty. Dr. Lee received her PhD from the University of Missouri-Columbia and completed her pre-doctoral intern- ship at The Ohio State University. She is a member of the American Psychological Association, and her work has been recognized by American Psychological Association. Dr
INCLUDES-funded Women of Color in Engineering Collaborative, whose mission is to work cooperatively with other organizations to provide resources to create a supportive, encouraging, and inclusive environment in the engineering workplace. Her SWE research centers on equity issues in STEM education and the workplace, with studies on gender bias, the development of an engineering identity, and the community college transfer pathway. Prior to joining SWE, she worked in higher education policy research and on programs focused on faculty productivity and student success. She received her B.S. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin, MBA and M.S. in Information Management from Arizona State University, and
obtained a B.S. in Mathematics from Spelman College, a M.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Alabama, and a Ph.D. in Leadership and Policy Studies from Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. Teaching interests relate to the professional development of graduate engineering students and to leadership, policy, and change in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Primary research projects explore the preparation of engineering doctoral students for careers in academia and industry and the development of engineering education assessment tools. She is a National Science Foundation Faculty Early Career (CA- REER) award winner and is a recipient of a Presidential Early Career Award for
Paper ID #44078Engineering Learning among Black and Latinx/e/a/o Students: ConsideringLanguage and Culture to Reengineer Learning EnvironmentsDr. Greses Perez, Tufts University Greses P´ rez is the McDonnell Family Assistant Professor in Engineering Education in the Civil and e Environmental Engineering Department at Tufts University with secondary appointments in Mechanical Engineering and Education. She received her Ph.D. in Learning Sciences and Technology Design with a focus on Engineering Education from Stanford University. As an Afro-Latina engineer and learning scientist, she has dedicated her career
elementary, special education and higher education. Areas of interest and expertise include accommodations for students with disabilities, differentiated instruction, math and science instruction, and action research. Dr. Fahsl received her Ph.D. from Oklahoma State University in 2001.Dr. Stephen McCaire Marlette, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Dr. Stephen Marlette is an associate professor in the Department of Curriculum & Instruction at Southern Illinois University Edwardsville. He has research interests that include the implementation and use of science education standards. His primary undergraduate teaching assignment is elementary and middle school science methods. At the graduate level he has helped
Coordinator for the Engineering Competencies, Learning, and Inclusive Practices for Success (ECLIPS) Lab in the De- partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Johnny is also a Graduate/Teaching Assistant to the Grad School Certificate Program - Preparing the Future Professoriate. He has a Master in Educational Foundations and Management and a Bachelor in Sociology. His research interests include STEM edu- cation (policy and foreign-born students and workforce), migration and immigration issues in education; international higher education/international students; and quality assurance in higher education.Dr. Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Homero Murzi is an Assistant Professor in
undergraduate students perceive industrial partnershipsin engineering capstone courses?MethodologyContext of studyThe study was conducted on students enrolled in a third-year capstone engineering coursefocusing on industrial design at a university. At the start of the course, the students wererandomly grouped into teams of 6 – 7 and tasked to solve a problem provided by a company. Theproblem statements were randomly assigned. Each team was guided by an industry mentor and afaculty member for the duration of 13 weeks as they tackled the problem statement. The teamsmet both faculty and industry mentors weekly to gather feedback on their projects. At the end ofthe course, the teams were assessed by both supervisors.Participants and Data CollectionWe used
future potential, a mixed-method investigation of theprogram was conducted. This analysis explored student and faculty usage of Tablet PCs,including benefits and barriers associated with Tablet PC use, through interviews with facultymembers (n = 4), focus groups with undergraduate students (n = 21), an online survey toundergraduate students (n = 1090), and a sociotechnical systems analysis of the COE. Resultsindicated many improvements in student learning related to Tablet PC use as well as severalbarriers toward adoption affecting both faculty and students. Notable benefits associated withTablet PC use included increased student engagement, improved visualization features, morestreamlined classroom presentations/note taking, and better
identify institution-specific climate concerns is an importantfirst step in designing effective change efforts.Our workshop was developed to be run in-person, and in small groups (<12 participants is ideal),with a focus on active discussion amongst department chairs. Based on our research andbolstered by social science literature on faculty job satisfaction, we argue department chairs arekey stakeholders in the department climate change process. We made the decision to groupchairs by college when offering the workshop, with the hope that this would lead to groups ofcolleagues sharing similar challenges and perhaps even a distinct culture within their college.Also, chairs within the same college generally have a baseline level of rapport, which
professional integrity.The time commitment was a challenge for me personally due to a variety of emergent personaland professional commitments. In future projects, having scribe support would be helpful toreduce the number of contact hours needed for the industry representative. One idea would be topair a student with an engineer that is working in industry, have the student do one or a fewworking sessions to discuss a single case and a resulting decision tree, and to then present asummary of the instance and the solution to their peers. This would allow a faculty member togather case studies, would make it easier to find industry contributors due to the decreased timecommitment, and would give engineering students a deeper understanding of at least
post-secondary institutions, the study university has implemented several programs tohelp first-year students transition to college. Three such programs relevant to this study include: 1. First Year Seminars (FYS) – special sections of a three-credit core curriculum course. Compared to other sections of the core courses, FYS include only first-semester students, are limited to an enrollment of eighteen students per section, are taught by a full-time faculty member (instead of adjunct faculty), and include additional learning outcomes intended to develop academic habits of mind (i.e., reflection, explanation, etc.). 2. RWU Experience (RWUXP)41 – a non-credit course meeting one hour per week. Led jointly by a faculty
often place undue emphasis on the categorization ofknowledge and skills, while not sufficiently addressing the process through which studentsnavigate and act on ethical dilemmas. This, we posit, is an area that needs redefining, given thatethical decision-making is rarely a linear process with single objective “right” answers and ofteninvolves iterative reasoning and interactive engagement with the problem. As such, we havedeveloped a suite of ethics-driven classroom games that have been implemented and evaluatedacross three universities, engaging over 400 first-year engineering students over the past 3 years.Now in the grant’s final year, we are finishing the design of two of the game-based ethicsinterventions to (1) more accurately align with
future. Her research focuses on underrepresented minority youth’s access to and persistence in STEM pathways. She holds a B.A. in Anthropology and Community Health and an M.S. in Occupational Therapy from Tufts University.Rachel E Durham Rachel E. Durham (PhD, Sociology & Demography, Pennsylvania State University) is an Associate Professor in the School of Education at Notre Dame of Maryland University, and a Senior Fellow with the Baltimore Education Research Consortium (BERC). With a background in sociology of education, education policy, and demography, her research focuses on graduates’ transition to adulthood, career and college readiness, community schools, and research-practice partnerships.Prof
”, “care” and “knowledge of subject matter” show up almost on everyone’slist of the qualities of a good teacher; but it is becoming increasingly clear that effective teachersdo possess some basic understanding of the learning process (i.e., they are able to make theconnections between what students already know and what we want them to learn).(11)In the Arab Gulf States, young faculty (recent graduates with PhDs) who decide to get intoteaching, and embark on it with hardly any prior preparation or training, except perhaps whenthey served as TA’s in a couple of classes (when they were graduate students), have faced somedisappointments. They have found themselves, often, unable to cope, and many have begun toview teaching as an unpleasant “chore