ethics. Critical reflection is key to significant shifts of frames of reference. In thiscontext the goal of encouraging students to view engineering ethics through the lens of environmentaljustice issues is motivated by transformation learning theory. During the first half of the semesterlectures covered NEPA and EIA in the conventional manner and research papers were assignedfor EIA case studies. Beginning at midterm the relationship of environmental justice issues toNEPA and EIA were introduced and subsequent case study assignments also involvedenvironmental justice issues. For these case studies, the student’s role played the variousstakeholders on both sides of the case study issues. Anecdotally the impact of the interventionwas immediately
response was mixed, though primarily positive (Figure 2). Comments from the end-of-term course evaluations also reflected this dichotomy: • I don't like that you wanted us to struggle with the homework and waste our time. My time is precious. • I liked everything in the class except the fact [that] we did book homework before we learned it. • Homework, online homework, and lectures all went together nicely. • His set up of the homework/glossary/Sappling [sic] made sure you did the work first and had an understanding of the material before it was covered in lecture. • I think that I've learned more in this class in one semester than any other class I've taken here.The principal complaint about the course
used to elicit critical thinking and the application of mathematical conceptsas educators strove to develop a simulation of a physical phenomenon. As the participantsworked through the exercises, the engineering and education faculty pointed out opportunitiesfor reflection on the application of mathematics to solve the problem and asked questions toinitiate discussions of their experiences.One example activity focused on developing a mathematical model for water exiting from ahose. Participants discussed in class what they knew about the situation and what they wanted toknow when they conducted experiments with actual hoses outside. As students collected avariety of data to help develop the model, they wrestled with issues such as how to
and peer-mentoring. Group composition varies tomeet the specific objective of each discussion. For example, broad major groups are used tofacilitate peer mentoring amongst students within disciplines. Groups by year (sophomore,junior, senior) are used to facilitate interdisciplinary discussions amongst students at similarstages in their education. We found that it is important to have less structured time to fosterstudent-student and student-faculty interaction. Topic guidance provides the structure to allowstudents to establish connections, share personally and professionally, and encourage peermentoring. Grading is credit/no-credit and is based primarily on attendance.General seminar themes include student goals and reflections on progress
Paper ID #9395Ethics for the ”Me” Generation - How ”Millennial” Engineering StudentsView Ethical Responsibility in the Engineering ProfessionMrs. Natalie CT Van Tyne P.E., Colorado School of Mines Natalie Van Tyne is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of the Design EPICS Program at Col- orado School of Mines. Her background is in chemical and environmental engineering, and she is a registered professional engineer in Colorado. She has been teaching first year and second year funda- mental engineering design courses since 2002, and her research interests are in service learning, reflective learning, and
students to reflect upon the effectiveness ofthis approach. The students together proposed that anyone posting an authoritative source mustalso post a summary of the content of the source. Later they continued to improve upon this ideaand soon required anyone posting an authoritative source to process it and include in their notehow the authoritative source could be used to improve the ideas in the group’s discourse.MetadiscourseStudies have shown that when students are engaged in metacognitive activities (e.g., self-reflection, self-explanation, or monitoring), their learning is enhanced. However, metacognitivethinking is not spontaneous. Thus, it is important to incorporate metacognitive support in thedesign of learning environments (Lin, X
, classroommanagement practices, and school administration issues.The course schedule has been included in the Appendix, as well as an education bibliography thatwas supplied to all the course attendees.V. Results of First OfferingOverall, it is felt that the first offering of the course was successful. No students dropped thecourse. All students agreed on a final reflection piece that they knew significantly more aboutteaching and had more confidence at the end of the course than at the beginning.During several formative evaluation sessions, using plus/deltas, brainstorming, and reflectionwritings, there were several recommendations that were utilized in the latter portions of thesemester and many more that will be incorporated in the next offering of the
thereforebeen emphasized in a technical course, and a non-technical course was designed to exploresustainability issues in a global development context. Student participation in Engineers WithoutBorders (EWB), a service organization with a mission to provide sustainable engineeringsolutions for developing communities, also provides informal learning opportunities.These three venues provide different contexts in which to understand sustainability. Theirdifferent emphases produce varying perspectives on sustainability and different levels ofawareness, especially about the social impacts of engineering design and practice. This paperprovides a reflection on the ways in which the environmental, social and economic aspects ofsustainability appear to lend
combined with a student-driven-inquiry teaching style16. Similarly, WISEngineering will incorporate non-linear onlinenavigation elements and will emphasize students’ deep exploration of content. Building upon these approaches, we developed WISEngineering to support authenticengineering design, to foster reflection through the documentation student work, as well as toencourage collaboration among peers.Supporting Authentic Engineering Design Learning from inquiry or design-based approaches depends on careful, appropriate choiceof tasks. Chinn and Malhotra17 define a continuum of scientific inquiry from simple to authentic,with school science often occurring on the simple end, involving over-simplifications and fewdecisions made by the
inproblem solving teams when their unique skills, abilities, or knowledge can contribute to theshared objectives. Part of this development makes use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ® StepII. This assessment provides scores on 40 facets of the eight Myers-Briggs Types. An objectiveof the course is to help students develop a richer vocabulary for thinking about themselves andothers. An individual’s clearest facets are used in the course by each student as part of theirweekly reflections on assigned readings. A visual display of the team’s integrated vocabulary isused as a guide in team decision making. A standard transition from Sensing to iNtuitive toThinking to Feeling then back to Sensing is used as students learn to transition between
in creating writing-related activities that would serve thebroader goals of the course: helping students succeed and stay in engineering. These newlistening, reading, writing and oral communications assignments introduce freshmen to theexcitement of engineering and help them envision themselves as engineers. Many of theassignments focus on the relevance of science and math to the challenging and creative work ofengineering.This paper explains a sequence of communications assignments that encourage critical thinkingand reflection about the intellectual and practical dimensions of engineering. The first group ofassignments integrates practice in Internet searching, listening, note taking, responsive writing,reading and academic writing as
reflections of members from a multi-disciplinaryteam. Even though the focus of this particular group is software based, the take-aways for multi-disciplinary collaboration will apply across non-software teams as well. Ultimately, this paperaffords an opportunity for educators to expand on examples of how multiple disciplines cometogether in the tech/engineering workforce. Additionally, the paper implores engineers to engagein lifelong learning as they interact with increasingly multi-disciplinary teams in the workplace.BackgroundMost students who choose to major in engineering do so to become a part of the community ofpractice of professional engineers [1], meaning that they want their college experience to includeadequate exposure to what a career
, constructing one’s sense of self throughconstant development and self-reflection [5]. It includes the traits and characteristics, socialrelations, roles, and social group memberships that define who a person is within a particularsetting. Engineering identity, especially for students, reflects their acceptance of and recognitionas part of the engineering field, influencing their decision to enter and persist in the field [6].When students possess a strong engineering identity, they tend to perceive themselves as futureengineers, fostering their commitment to their pursuit of an engineering career [7]. This identitycontinues to impact their learning, serving as a guiding force throughout their studies [8]. Morelock synthesized the disperse
data sets anddevelop equity-focused projects. This approach is designed to simultaneously teach computingtechnical skills while integrating social, economic, and political dimensions into engineeringwork. The course redesign includes three main components: 1. Small group and whole-class discussions led by the instructor and supported by Equity Learning Assistants (ELAs), who are trained in equity pedagogy. These activities, typically once a week during a lab session, aim to make students aware of the societal implications of their engineering decisions and encourage them to critically evaluate data and technology within broader sociopolitical contexts. Each lab is followed by a reading and reflection assignment to
additional question was added related to ChatGPT,which had risen to prevalence in that time. 5. I think I will need to use ChatGPT at some point in my career.In addition to the MATE 245 class, in the summer of 2023, two undergraduate research studentswere employed to aid in the development of the plastic 3D printing dataset and case study. Thesestudents spent 8 weeks working on developing the 3D printing case study in the Citrine Platform.During this time the students gained more in-depth knowledge of AI and ML through guided andindependent research. The students were invited to provide prompt-based written reflections ontheir understanding and perceptions of ML and how it might be applied to their future careers.Preliminary Findings and
DBT cyclestudents, successfully develop their engineeringepistemic frame, and also provide a wealth of Prototype presentationdata for assessment of learning and professionaldevelopment that can inform the design of future Exit Interviewcourse, curriculum and learning innovations in Figure 2. Nephrotex workflow diagram. DBTengineering disciplines. = design, build, test.AcknowledgementsThis material is based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grants DUE-0919347 and EEC-0938517.Bibliography1. Schon, D.A., The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in
learn new ideas and new methodologies. Theproject described in this paper, although not a new technique, gave the student a chanceto work in a research related field. As part of the preparation for the work the student wasgiven basic information required for any research project. A review of various relatedstatistical concepts was also completed. This paper reflects the work done in this seniorproject course by the student and the advisor. The paper describes two work samplingstudies, one each on a residential project and a commercial project.IntroductionLow productivity is a key factor in the high construction cost1. A number of problemsaffecting productivity can invariably be noted when the activities in progress on a typicalconstruction site
self-report measures to assess program outcomes.1. Introduction Service-learning is the focus of considerable research and is a feature within manyengineering programs. Within engineering education, design courses embedded in service-learning provide a way to promote students’ development of technical and professional skills forsolving applied problems. The ability to create learning environments for engineering students toapply mathematical and scientific principles when solving applied problems is critical forpreparing students for careers in engineering2. The need for engineering programs to producestudents proficient in these skills upon graduation is reflected in ABET EC 2000. Service-learning courses may provide engineering
scholarship in real-world contexts. The programdoes this through graduate seminars, collaborative courses, peer/faculty/industry mentoring,convenings/symposia/events, and the Summer Incubator. Within this framework, the primarygoals of the incubator are to develop scholarly identity, build community, connect acrossdisciplines, practice core research skills, learn ethics in context, and develop professionalcommunication skills.The Summer Incubator course combines a studio-based learning environment with a designframework whose built-in cycles of reflection and iteration – with an emphasis on prototyping–foster cross-disciplinary connections. We drew inspiration for the structure of the incubatorfrom the design sprint [6], a method created to
like Hemo Globin and Myo Globin responding to a job to deliver oxygen to cells.When asked to respond to the case study done in class, students write short (1-2 page) reportsresponding to questions such as how they responded to the clicker-like case, whether or not theyagreed with the judicial panel’s decision (for the trial), what role they played in the environmentalscenario, or by providing a resume for Hemo Globin or Myo Globin for the discussed job. A questionon the final exam allowed the students to reflect on their favorite case and what they learned related tothe course topic. The Case Studies in Science site is a great resource for case studies that can be easilyincorporated into lecture, lab or discussion sections. There are case
form of the industry experience so the reason why I joined is kind of similar to what the reason why I did Co-OP. I wanted an experience that would teach me something that I probably wasn't going to get from classes and would be more team based as well.” -JohnJohn was not alone in his reflection that he wanted to participate in a humanitarian engineeringproject but did not have the terminology before participating in CEDC. Clemson University doesnot currently offer a humanitarian engineering major, so CEDC allows students to be introducedto and explore humanitarian engineering within their various curricular structures. In addition toreal world connections, Sam and Rachel heard about specific projects within CEDC and
course in which students arechallenged to apply concepts of sustainability through tangible and appropriate projects carriedout with a partnering community/project. The Pennsylvania State University is a publicuniversity with 36,749 full time undergraduates and 6,418 graduate students. The flipped classwas of similar design and make-up, containing 12 students of mixed majors and years in school.Both classes were pilot programs for the National Energy Leadership Corps (NELC). TheNELC is a joint program under development at Penn State and UPitt and is designed to teachstudents about home energy efficiency and sustainability and empower them to conduct homeenergy assessments in their community. The design of the program reflects the need
making utilizing theinstrument. Traditionally, engineering curricular approaches to ethics have been case-based orhave centered around lecture and discussions about ethical frameworks. While necessary, suchapproaches can be supplemented by individual assessments of students’ ethical reasoningabilities and reflective activities about the tasks. Specifically, we address curricular interventionsin multidisciplinary project teams focused on real world applications. These interventions Page 23.1350.3leverage the utility of engineering ethical reasoning models and instruments into curricula. Wefocus on the EERI but recognize that similar models and
engagement through working in teams, interactive introduction to engineering fields,hands-on applications, and examples of diversity in engineering, rather than the more traditionalmethod of prescriptive learning. To increase the effectiveness of these approaches, the courseutilized a combination of problem-based learning projects, engineering exemplars, near-peermentoring, and provided a psychologically safe and encouraging environment.Working in TeamsThe course design prioritized the development of student awareness surrounding diversity and itsimpact on team effectiveness. An initial reflective activity encouraged students to examine theiridentities and delve into the multi-faceted nature of diversity. Subsequently, students discussedand
determining the extent to which students’ engagement with Frankensteinwas able to facilitate ethical reflection and professional identity formation. To address thisquestion, the current study begins by situating the class discussion of the novel within thebroader aims and structure of the course; then, it analyzes a series of student written reflectionson moral aspects of the novel and its portrayal of Victor Frankenstein specifically. The analysisorganizes the data into salient themes that emerge from the written reflections illustrated byselections of student writing. The data indicate that students were able to articulate severalethical themes that emerge from the novel’s depiction of Victor Frankenstein’s practice of roguetechno-science and
qualitative case study research design and identifies the successes andchallenges of institutionalizing a successful NSF-funded S-STEM recruitment and retentionprogram. Institutionalization of successful educational programs is a goal of many NSF-fundedprograms. Reflection and critique of the institutionalization of our program will provide criticalinsights for similar programs on planning their institutionalization and contribute to theunderstanding of the institutionalization process, timeline, and effort areas. Throughout a“COVID-interrupted” 7-year period, this NSF-funded S-STEM program implemented research-based student success and retention strategies to serve 90 students and provide scholarshipsupport to 42 students. As programmatic elements
space to support the adoption of evidence-based strategies, transfer of methodologies and tools,critical self-reflection of teaching practices, adoption of improved pedagogy by new instructors,and learning of innovative teaching techniques by more established instructors [3], [4]. Althoughmulti-lecturer courses bring these advantages to students and instructors, they can be difficult toplan, execute, and assess. Some of the challenges reported are consistent messaging, classhousekeeping, overlapping roles, the dominance of one discipline, loss of individual autonomy,and poor logistics [2], [5].This paper discusses a team-taught engineering course for pre-college students. Over the pastfour years, a team of three to five graduate student
student reflections, an assignment which asks students to write about what they havelearned during the semester.Results and DiscussionThe finished adventurers showed that the students used additional manufacturing techniques anddesign know-how to develop more creative finished products (Fig. 1). The instructors observedthat the students were generally more engaged because there was more work to spread among theteam members and more ways to succeed in the obstacle challenge. Figure 1. Whegs and giraffe-themed adventurer attached to remote controlled car.Adding the adventurer increased the number of materials and manufacturing techniques eachteam used. The most popular material was cardboard (82%), followed by plywood (18%) andacrylic (11
write notes covering important material. Students with a kinesthetic learning style learn andgain a better understanding of some problems by experience and practice. For instance,kinesthetic students may benefit most by practicing some lecture material in a hands-on,laboratory setting9. For students who favor visual learning the chemical structures of the reactantmolecules and microscopy results will provide a deeper understanding of the self-assemblyprocess.Another model of learning styles is that proposed by Felder and Silverman7, who lookedspecifically at engineering education. The model contains four scales each of which reflects astudent’s particular element of their learning style. They are: (1) sensory versus intuitivelearners, (2
) connect socially and culturally to engineering; and c) find solutions to theworld’s most pressing societal and technical issues. These experiences will be described with examples of interdisciplinary and design-based teaching at The University Texas at Austin. TheGrand Challenges Scholars’ reflections and survey results will represent ways that they engagedin and responded to international and interdisciplinary engineering education projects.Specifically, the experiences of the design and launch of an enterprise in Ghana will create athick and rich description about interdisciplinary, international, service-learning, andentrepreneurial components of engineering designs framed within the 21st Century EngineeringGrand Challenges. This