imparting critical thinking skillswould be necessary to determine the success of the exercises used by engineering technologystudents.References1 Douglas, E. P. Defining and Measuring Critical Thinking in Engineering. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 56, 153-159 (2012).2 Gardiner, L. F. Redesigning Higher Education: Producing Dramatic Gains in Student Learning. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 7. (ERIC, 1994).3 Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Korn, W. S. & Gilmartin, S. K. The American College Teacher: National Norms for the 1998-99 HERI Faculty Survey. (ERIC, 1999). Page 26.424.74 Ahern, A
* Corresponding author, jafar@nsula.edu 1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, data received from the OPTN/SRTR Annual Report, 2009. 2. Lysaght, M. J., Jaklenec A., Deweerd E. (2008 Febrary) “Great Expectations: private sector activity in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and stem cell therapeutics,” Tissue Eng Part A, (2); 305-15 3. Kumareswaran, K., Evans, M. L., & Hovorka, R. (2009) “Artificial pancreas: An emerging approach to treat type 1 diabetes” .Expert Review of Medical Devices, 6(4), 401-10. 4. Engler, J. A., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., Discher E. D., (2006) “Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification”, Cell Volume 126, Issue 4, 25, Pages 677-689
that the projects served as a great engagement tool and facilitated subject learning.References:1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. "The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education," Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 121‐130, January 2005.2. Campbell, J. O., R. J. Bourne, P. J. Mosterman, and J. A. Brodersen. "The Effectiveness of Learning Simulators in Electronic Laboratories," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 81‐87.3. Hodge, H., H. S. Hinton, and M. Lightner. "Virtual Circuit Laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 507‐511.4. Leva, A., “A Hands-On Experimental Laboratory for Undergraduate Courses in Automatic Control,” IEEE Transactions
. NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. (2015). at 3. Lent, R. W., Lopez, F. G. & Bieschke, K. J. Mathematics self-efficacy: Sources and relation to science- based career choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 38, 424–430 (1991).4. Hackett, G. Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psycholy. 32, 47–56 (1985).5. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D. & Hackett, G. Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal Vocational Behavior. 45, 79–122 (1994).6. Richardson, F. C. & Suinn, R. M. The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale : Psychometric Data. Journal of
studentscome from a wide range of backgrounds and my experience of over 30 years of teachingundergraduates is that most undergraduates do not have a strong command of unitconversions. This is easy to determine by giving your class a pop quiz. Ask them todetermine the potential energy of 10 lbm 100 ft above the ground in Btu using PE=mgh if1 Btu=550 ft lbf and g=32.2 ft s-2. My experience is that a significant number ofundergraduates (not just first-year students) are not proficient at applying gc for unitconversions. Because units are such an integral part of engineering calculations, it justmakes sense to invest a little time to ensure that all freshmen know how to systematicallyapply unit conversions including the use of gc.COMMUNICATIONS It
requesting the users to open an account and provide contact information. This willprovide information regarding the number of students/teachers/researchers using the material.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food andAgriculture, BE AWARE project (2015-38422-24064).References1. National Research Council (US) Committee on a New Biology for the 21st Century: Ensuring the United States Leads the Coming Biology Revolution. Natl. Acad. Press 1–120 (2009).2. Gilbert, N. Climate-smart Agriculture is Needed. Nature News (2011). doi:10.1038/news.2011.1313. Shames, S., Friedman, R. & Havemann, T. Coordinating Finance for Climate-smart Agriculture. Ecoagriculture
learning: concepts andcases. Peter Lang, Oxford ; New York.4. Tannhäuser, Anne-Christin, and Claudio Dondi. “It’s Lab Time–Connecting Schools to Universities’ RemoteLaboratories.” In Pixel International Conference, 1–5, 2012.5. Charette, Robert N. “The STEM Crisis Is a Myth.” IEEE Spectrum 50, no. 9 (September 2013): 44–59.doi:10.1109/MSPEC.2013.6587189.6. Govaerts, Sten, Yiwei Cao, Andrii Vozniuk, Adrian Holzer, Danilo Garbi Zutin, Elio San Cristóbal Ruiz, LarsBollen, et al. “Towards an Online Lab Portal for Inquiry-Based Stem Learning at School.” In Advances in Web-Based Learning–ICWL 2013, 244–53. Springer, 2013. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_25.7. V. J. Harward, J. A. del Alamo, S. R. Lerman P. H. Bailey, J
accessible technology with multisensory learning and assessmentopportunities allows with VIB to access STEM fields more readily. Therefore, it is essential thatthese types of engineering activities be further incorporated into science classrooms as they makethe material accessible to all students.Bibliography1. Erickson, W., C. Lee, and S. von Shcrader. “Disability Statistics from the 2013 American Community Survey (ACS).” 2015 [cited 2015 January 26]; Available from: http://www.disabilitystatistics.org.2. Bottomley, L., et al., Engineering Summer Programs: A Strategic Model Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seattle, Washington. , 2015(June): p. 10.18260/p.23982.3. Napper, S.A., P.N. Hale, and F.J. Puckett
experiences indicate that MDS is apromising educational program, as well as inform future evaluations of learning outcomes. Nextsteps will include true pre-post student surveys, evaluations of students’ creative process usingthe AAC&U VALUE rubric on creativity, and a comparative analysis of students’interdisciplinary attitudes by comparing students and medical learners who participate in MDSversus students and medical professionals who have not participated in MDS.Works Cited1. Hall L, Scott S, Cox K, Gosbee JW, et al. Effectiveness of patient safety training in equipping medical students to recognize safety hazards and propose robust interventions. Quality & Safety in Health Care. 2010;19:3-8.2. Gosbee JW, Anderson T. Human factors
new to the student s/he may feel somewhat at a loss inthe beginning, finding that learning is to be self-motivated rather than directed by the instructor.The second design challenge built upon principles of the first challenge, extending these intechnological complexity and duration. Students presented their solutions to faculty and peers atthe end of the quarter.Design Challenge I (shown below and in Figures 2-4) was planned to span approximately threeweeks, and asked students to design a wheelchair ramp for a home on a very restricted lot,requiring difficult geometric constraints. Each student team was presented with a differentresidence configuration in relation to its vehicle driveway, and asked to design a ramp so that aresident who was
are reproduced below for clarity. Students are prompted to circlethe correct responses on a line shown here: A B C D E F NONE.In order to correctly answer the majority of the questions, students would need to circle morethan one letter. All correct responses need to be marked to receive a point, there is no partialcredit.On the last page are six velocity versus clock reading histories which describe the onedimensional motion of six objects that started out from the origin x = 0m at time t = 0s. Circlethe correct answer(s) for each of the following questions. (a) Which object (or objects) are located at the origin, x = 0, at the clock reading t = 2s? (b) Which object (or objects) spends at
whole to their object(s). We use the term object here in its activity theory sense to referto the problem or purpose towards which an activity is directed. An activity is a set of variousactions (such as ideating, negotiating, planning, agreeing, disagreeing) carried out by a group, asocial unit such as a team, motivated by a socially constructed goal. For our use, the activitiesstudied in this paper are team meetings in which a team uses a whiteboard to mediate a decisionor series of decisions.Togethering, as described by Radford and Roth, “has the purpose of realizing a collectivelymotivated object”9. The concept of togethering allows us to analyze the actions and interactionsof the team members from the different perspectives of the team
2014001),” National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, 2013.[2] E. F. Redish, “Discipline-based education and education research: the case of physics,” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, vol. 21, 2000.[3] E. Longfellow, S. May, L. Burke, and D. Marks-Maran, “‘They had a way of helping that actually helped’: A case study of a peer-assisted learning scheme,” Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 13, 2008.[4] C. Wilson, A. Steele, W.Waggenspack, and W. Wang, “Engineering Supplemental Instruction: Impact on Sophmore Level Engineering Courses,” Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, WA, June 2015.[5] P. Dawson, J. Meer
., and Hernandez, A., “Designing Effective Project-based Learning Experience usingParticipatory Design Approach,” 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015-11660, American Society forEngineering Education.[5] Ericksen, S., “The essence of good teaching,” San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1984.[6] Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., “Seven principles for good practice,” AAHE Bulletin 1987, 39(7), 3-7.[7] Kaul, S., and Stone, W.L., “Learning outcomes of a junior-level project-based learning (PBL) course:preparation for capstone,” 2015 Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014-11102, American Society for EngineeringEducation.[8] Widmann, J.M., Self, B.P., Slivovsky, L.A., and Taylor, J.K, “Motivating design and analysis skills acquisitionthrough the
lives. This illustrates one more advantageof a team-taught multidisciplinary project course.Bibliography1 Sarah Summers and Anneliese Watt, “Quick and Dirty Usability Testing in the Technical CommunicationClassroom,” ProComm 2015 Conference Proceedings (IEEE Professional Communication Society), Limerick,Ireland.2 See for example S. Ludi, “Providing Students with Usability Testing Experience: Bringing Home the Lesson “TheUser Is Not Like You,” 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, 2005; and M.A. Atlas,“The User Edit: Making Manuals Easier to Use,” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 24, no.1,pp. 28-29, March 1981.3 For discussions of usability pedagogy, see Summers and Watt (above), as well as L.M
) in the Chemical Engineering Department of the University of Utah. He received his B. S. and Ph. D. from the University of Utah and a M. S. from the University of California, San Diego. His teaching responsibilities include the senior unit operations laboratory and freshman design laboratory. His research interests focus on undergraduate education, targeted drug delivery, photobioreactor design, and instrumentation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation and Usage of an Online Environment in a Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractWe have developed an online system to serve as a hub for student activities in our chemicalengineering
student team consisted of 3-4 members with at least one graduate student and onestudent in the computer science program. The goal of the team project was to provide anopportunity for students to apply some specific testing techniques or tools to one or more chosenSystem Under Test(s) (SUTs) of interest (either open-source software, or software that theydeveloped for other projects). The minimum project requirements were: (1) including bothtesting and QA components, although it was up to each team to decide on the proportion of bothcomponents, (2) developing and executing a test plan, even if testing was a small part of theproject, and (3) performing a manual software inspection for selected modules or the whole SUT. Students were encouraged to
., “Development and Assessment of a Freshman Seminar to Address Societal Context” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon, June 2005. 5. Blowers P.., “A Course on Freshman Survival Skills” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. 6. Cheshier, S. “Studying Engineering Technology: A Blueprint for Success.” Discovery Press, 1998. 7. Miller A., Martinazzi R., and Murad M., “The Alchemy of Helping Freshmen Turn Dreams into Reality.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2004. 8
) Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM, Science, Vol. 341.7. Beyer, S. (2014). Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Computer Science Education, 24(2/3), 153-192.8. Patitsas, E., Craig, Michelle, and Easterbrook, S. (2015). Scaling up Women in Computing Initiatives: What Can We Learn from a Public Policy Perspective? ICER ’15, August 09 - 13, 2015, Omaha, NE, USA.9. National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.10. National
extracted and summarized during coding.The coding table was included in the annex. 1.Looking at the figure in scenario #X, if you pull on the string gently, which way do you predict the spool will move? Right _______ Left ______Won’t Move_______ 2.When pulling, which direction is the friction force? Right _______ Left ______There is no friction force _______ 3.What is the value of the friction force? f k N _____ f s N _____ f s N ______ Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Figure 3. The four scenarios utilized for the IBLAFindingsThe students
an excellent interdisciplinary learning experience in such courses.Bibliography 1. Incropera, Frank, P.; Dewitt, David, P., “Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, 4th. Edition”, J. Wiley, 1996.2. Kreith, Frank, Bohn, Mark,S., “Principles of Heat Transfer, 6th. Edition", Brooks/Cole, 2001.3. Arpaci, Vedat, S., “Conduction Heat Transfer”, Addison Wesley, 1966.4. Ӧzışık, Necati, M,.“Boundary Value Problems of Heat Conduction ", International Textbook Company, 1968.
ideasborrowed from environmental ethics seem particularly relevant. One such methodology, firstdeveloped by Johnson, termed a morally deep world view, cautions that both the individual andthe system(s) in which that individual is embedded, matter from an ethical point of view.3 Asecond approach uses the development first offered by Thomas Berry4 and further refined bySwimme 5 and Swimme and Tucker.6 This paradigm takes us from an individual or localperspective on ethical reasoning to an Earth and Universe perspective which is alive, integratedand dependent. Berry described three universal principles that ought to govern our response toethical dilemmas. Those principles include differentiation, subjectivity and communion orcommunity. Here
being conducted by Dr. Daylene Meuschke and Dr. Barry Gribbons, who head the Institutional Research Office of Collegeof the Canyons. Implementation has been facilitated by the invaluable organizationalsupport provided by CREATE Project Manager Gabrielle Temple. Assistance with thecreation of the research design was provided by CREATE Evaluator Dr. Jean Sando. References 1. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century (2005). National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. ISBN 0-309-55006-8 (pdf). National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055. 2. Cullen, E. , Fairhurst, C., Alfano, K, Barnow, B., Henson, S, DeRocco, E
, posture assessment, lifting safety, and anthropometry.The course has an “S” designation associated with it, as it is formally recognized as a service-learning course by the university. This designation communicates that students in the course willapply the course material in a meaningful way to fill a community need. The overall projectaccounted for 30% of the course grade. This included five deliverables: reflective journal (10%),preliminary operations analysis report (30%), preliminary design recommendations report (30%),final technical report (10%), and project showcase (20%).The journals were done individually by each student, and the other deliverables were completedby teams of 5 to 6 students. Students were assigned to groups by the course
& Exposition, Seattle, WA, June.3. Stewart, J., Van Kirk, J., and Rowell, R. (1979). Concept maps: a tool for use in biology teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 41 (3), 171-175.4. Novak, J.D. (1998). Learning Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahway, NJ.5. Novak, J.D., and Canas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition Technical Report, IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 2008-01.6. Ingec, S. K. (2009). Analysing Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Teaching Physics and Comparison with Achievement Tests. International Journal of Science
, Atlanta, GA, United states, 2005. [3] Cornelius J. Dennehy, Steve Labbe, and Kenneth L. Lebsock. The value of identifying and recovering lost GN&c lessons learned: Aeronautical, spacecraft, and launch vehicle examples. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2010. [4] J.D. Novak. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps(tm) As Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Taylor & Francis, 1998. [5] J. S. Bruner. The Process of Education. A Harvard paperback. Harvard University Press, 1960. [6] J. S. Bruner. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31:21–32, 1961. [7] Kirsten R. Butcher and Tamara Sumner. Self-directed learning and the sensemaking paradox. Human–Computer Interaction
is that their curricularhave to meet the requirements of many audiences. The difficulty of developing a communityof scholarship that meets the needs of all these audiences is illustrated by extreme examplesof the questions that the public need to answer in deciding what action they ought to take inresponse to such happenings as the GM and Volkswagen automobile scandals. Anengineering view of technological literacy is inadequate for the task it is expected to do. Aninterdisciplinary approach is clearly necessary.References[1] Krupczak, J., Blake, J. W., Disney, K. A., Hilgarth, C. O., Libros, R., Mina, M and S. R. Walk (2102).Defining technological literacy, Proceedings Annual Conference of the American Society for EngineeringEducation. Paper
. It has 256kB of on-chip SRAM, which has been adequate for the largearray blocks required for sample buffering and DSP processing. It also includes DMA, I2S, andI2C, which are all used in this work. This microcontroller allows for both fixed-point and floatingpoint DSP.The board itself does not include audio resources and the K65’s DAC is only 12-bits. Becauseaudio is the primary application used in the DSP labs, another board (i.e., a CODEC board) isrequired to provide these features.In-House designed CODEC boardThe CODEC board is based on Texas Instrument’s TLV320AIC3007 Stereo Audio CODEC.This CODEC has many configuration options and requires a low chip count for basic audioinputs and outputs as can be seen in Figure 1. The block diagram
Paper ID #17493The Case of an Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department inthe Internationalization Process of a Research I Public InstitutionDr. Fabiola P Ehlers-Zavala, Colorado State University Fabiola P. Ehlers-Zavala was named INTO Colorado State University (CSU)’s Center Director in Novem- ber 2014, having previously fulfilled the role of INTO CSU Academic Director (March 2013-November 2014). In her CD capacity, she works with Colleges across campus, and has a particular interest in the preparation of international students pursuing engineering degrees at the undergraduate and graduate lev- els. She earned