–118.[10] L. Aagaard, T. Conner, R. Skidmore. “College textbook reading assignment and class time activity.” J. of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 14:3, August 2014, 132-145.[11] Lei, S. A., Bartlett, K. A., Gorney, S. E., & Herschbach, T. R. (2010). Resistance to reading compliance among college students: Instructor’s perspectives. College Student Journal, 44(2), 219-230.[12] M. French, F. Taverna, M. Neumann, L. Kushnir, J. Harlow, D. Harrison, R. Seranescu. “Textbook use in the Science and its Relation to Course Performance.” College Teaching. 63: 171 -177, 2015.[13] G. Ragusa. “Science Literacy and Text Book Biases” Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID
with member(s) who had completed themodule and incorporated a microcontroller board into their design was also compared to the restof the class by comparing average final project scores. Final project scores for the RubeGoldberg machines were assigned based on performance, complexity, and professionalappearance. The performance score was based on how well the task was carried out and includedpoints for the precision of the device’s timing and for successfully completing the final step(unlocking the door). Project complexity was assessed by counting the number of different stepsin the process from device activation to the door being unlocked. Finally, projects were expectedto be professional in appearance with the team’s name, logo, and theme
Smith from the Lerner College of Business and Economics forpartnering with us on this exciting project and for instructing the UD ADVANCE Women’s LeadershipProgram.References[1] ACE, “Pipelines, Pathways, and Institutional Leadership: An Update on the Status of Women in Higher Education,” American Council on Education, 2017. Available: https://www.acenet.edu/news- room/Documents/Higher-Ed-Spotlight-Pipelines-Pathways-and-Institutional-Leadership-Status-of- Women.pdf. [Accessed 29 November, 2018].[2] C. Bilen-Green, K. Froelich, S. Jacobson, “The Prevalence of Women in Academic Leadership Positions, and Potential Impact on Prevalence of Women in the Professorial Ranks,” WEPAN Conference Proceedings, 2008.[3] C. Bilen-Green
Transnational Education: From the Perspective of Administrators and Students," British Council, 2017.[2] J. K. Y. C. Cedrick Kwuimy, "A first time flipped classroom experience: Measure of outcomes and challenges," in ASEE Proceedings, Southeast Section Conference, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] S. H. P. B. L. D. G. Z. J. Jeongkyu Lee, "Toward Success of Collaborative Program In School of Engineering Between the US and China," in ASEE International Forum, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[4] S. I. Segalewitz, "Seven Years of Success in Implementation of a 3 + 1 Transfer Program in Engineering Technology Between Universities in China and the Unites States," in 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013
Review, 84, 191–215.Brown, S. D. & Lent, R. W. (1996). A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling. The Career Development Quarterly, 44, 354–366.Carpi, A.C.; Ronan, D.M.; Falconer, H.M. & Lents, N.L. (2017). Cultivating minority scientists: Undergraduate research increases self‐efficacy and career ambitions for underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 169-194.Code.org. (2019). Computer Science Principles. Retrieved from https://code.org/educate/csp.Cordes, D.; Parrish, A.; Dixon, B.; Borie, R.; Jackson, J. & Gaughan, P. (1997). An integrated first-year curriculum for computer science and computer engineering. 3. 1354-1358 vol.3 10.1109/FIE
). Rubrics are oriented toward performance ofthe required work, but not necessarily quality or depth of that work; that is, a reflective essay thatexhibits shallow or misdirected learning can be as equally valid for course completion as one thatshows a career-changing experience. The key concern is for authentic and conscientious work onthe deliverables; this is an important course characteristic in light of the varying quality of HILPmentoring and experiences outside the control of the academic faculty. Deliverables deemedunsatisfactory are returned to the student with a one-week opportunity for a single revision. If allthree deliverables (including revisions) are satisfactory, the student receives a grade of “pass.” Ifunsatisfactory deliverable(s
hands-on experience with fabrication tools/processes,and learned how to evaluate them with respect to a certain functional need. Additionally, studentslearned to use prototyping methods to solve design problems, incorporate user feedback, anditerate their designs in a meaningful manner. Figure 5: Course Elements in Relation to Bloom's TaxonomyAcknowledgment: This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy /National Nuclear Security Administration under Award Number(s) DE-NA0003921.Disclaimer: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the UnitedStates Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any oftheir employees, makes any warranty
- Cost Brain Computer Interface TechnologiesAbstract:Advancing an interest and literacy in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)fields in high school students through summer and after school programs has been widelypopular since the 1990’s, and these programs are effective at improving retention and persistenceafter graduation. However, there still remains a lack of designing programs to increase interestand literacy of biomedical engineering (BME) related applications that are scalable at otherinstitutions. This is typically due to the challenges of providing costly resources that areavailable only in specific laboratory settings and require graduate level expertise to operate. Toprovide a low-cost and scalable approach to
predictions for4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/naivebayes/naivebayes.pdfWeek 1/Art 1 (i.e., row 1, columns 2-5, shaded in blue), suggest that three students (S3, S4, S9)carried forward (repeated) significant content from Art 1 (Week 1) into subsequent essays. Asimilar pattern appears for S7, whose essays were nearly all classified as Week 3, suggesting thatthere was very little change in what this student was reporting across the homework essays.Basically, the algorithm could not detect significant shifts in the content of that student’s essays.Table 1. Confusion Matrix for Naïve Bayes Predictions for the Week Students ComposedArt and Narrative Essays. Students are shown as S#, e.g., S1. ACTUAL
design of the face to face workshops in 2019 were influenced by Techbridge Girls’ expertiseand bank of curricular resources, feedback provided in one-on-one interviews with the firstcohort of Ambassadors in 2018-2019, and EngineerGirl staff and evaluators’ impressions ofcohort 1’s struggles. For example, the difficulty one Ambassador had in securing space for anevent led to the recommendation to have a project management workshop for cohort 2. Table 2below highlights the list of workshop topics that were discussed during the 2019 event. Workshop Workshop Topic Component 1 Icebreakers 2 Gender Responsiveness
Semester(s) Taught (*to be taught) 1 Direct Potabilization Spring 2016, Spring 2017 2 Recover Value from Solid Waste Spring 2016, Spring 2017, Spring 2018 3 Discovering Green Chemistry Spring 2016 4 The Internet of Sustainability Fall 2016, Fall 2017 5 Data Analytics for Energy Fall 2016, Spring 2018 6 Modeling Complexity Fall 2016, Fall 2017, Spring 2019* 7 Deconstructing a Garbage Gyre Spring 2017 8 Environmental Impact in Automotive Systems
, 2012. DOI: 10.1080/02763915.2012.812920[8] C.A. Erdmann and B.A. Harding, “Leveraging the Internet and limited on-campus resourcesto teach information literacy skills to future engineering practitioners.” Paper presented at the2010 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, Ky. https://peer.asee.org/16479[9] C. A. Erdmann and B. A. Harding, “Information literacy: Needs – Skills –Assignments.” In Proceedings of the 1988 ASEE Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. vol. 5, p.2073-2078, 1988.[10] A. S. Van Epps, M. Sapp Nelson, M. Fosmire, and B. Harding, "Nextgeneration of online tutorials: Finding technical information at Purdue." In Proceedings of theInternational Conference on Engineering Education, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3-7, 2007
: Insights from Undergraduates.”[2] J. Dewey, Experience And Education. Simon and Schuster, 2007.[3] D. A. Schön, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.[4] A. R. Carberry, T. S. Harding, P. J. Cunningham, K. R. Csavina, M. C. Ausman, and D. Lau, “Professional and personal use of reflection by engineering faculty, students, and practitioners,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2018-June.[5] L. Boswell, “The structure trap: students’ perceptions of reflection on a co-curricular immersion service-learning trip,” Thesis, Humboldt State University, 2010.[6] G.-D. Chen, C.-C. Liu, K.-L. Ou, and M.-S. Lin
Characteristics to Dimensions of Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness,”Coll. Stud. J., 2006.[4] S. Liaw and K.-L. Goh, “Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations ofteaching,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., pp. 37–43, 2003.[5] C. Kim, E. Damewood, and N. Hodge, “Professor Attitude: Its Effect on TeachingEvaluations,” J. Manag. Educ., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 458–473, 2000.[6] J. S. Pounder, “Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analyticalframework for answering the question,” Qual. Assur. Educ., 2007.[7] T. Hinkin, “The Effects of Time of Day on Student Teaching Evaluations: Perceptionversus Reality,” J. Mangement Educ., 1991.[8] M. W. Ohland, S. D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R. A. Layton,“Persistence
Demonstration in Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST), 2016, Online: http://www.hostsymposium.org/host2016/hardware-demo-list_2016.php[3] A. Holst, J. Jang and S. Ghosh, "Investigation of magnetic field attacks on commercial Magneto-Resistive Random Access Memory," 2017 18th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), Santa Clara, CA, 2017, pp. 155-160.[4] CSAW Embedded Security Challenge, https://www.csaw.io/esc[5] Berrett, Dan. "How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture." The chronicle of higher education 12 (2012): 1-14.[6] Furman, Burford J. "The un-lecture: a computer-assisted curriculum delivery approach for the effective teaching of mechanical design
of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nature Biotechnology, 22:1215-1217.2. Emmert-Streib, F., S-D Zhang, and P. Hamilton. 2015. Computational cancer biology: education is a natural key to many locks. BMC Cancer, 15:7.3. Janes, K.A., P.L. Chandran, R.M. Ford, M.J. Lazzara, J.A. Papin, S.M. Peirce, J.J. Saucerman, and D.A. Lauffenburger. 2017. An engineering design approach to systems biology. Integrative Biology, 9(7):574-583.4. Dunn, M.C. and P.E. Bourne. 2017. Building the biomedical data science workforce. PLoS Biol., 15(7):e2003082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.20030825. Hood, L., R. Balling, and C. Auffray. 2012. Revolutionizing medicine in the 21st century through systems approaches
. 423-451, 2004.[8] R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/, 2013.[9] P. C. Blumenfeld, E. Soloway, R. W. Marx, J. S. Krajcik, M. Guzdial, and A. Palincsar, "Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning," Educational Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 369-398, 1991/06/01 1991.[10] E. H. Fini, F. Awadallah, M. M. Parast, and T. Abu-Lebdeh, "The impact of project-based learning on improving student learning outcomes of sustainability concepts in transportation engineering courses," European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 473- 488, 2017.[11] J. S
seminar was supported bythe Oregon GEAR UP program in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Education, throughthe GEAR UP program, grant No. P334S140033. The opinions expressed are those of theauthors and do not represent the views of the GEAR UP program or the U.S. Department ofEducation.References1. States, N.L., Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States, Education, Editor. 2013, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.2. Yoon Yoon, S., M.G. Evans, and J. Strobel, Validation of the Teaching Engineering Self‐ Efficacy Scale for K‐12 Teachers: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Engineering Education, 2014. 103(3): p. 463-485.3. Board, N.S., Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. 2016: Arlington, VA.4
. Boice, Advice for new faculty members: nihil nimus, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[2] P. C. Wankat, The effective, efficient professor: teaching, scholarship, and service, Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.[3] J. Price and S. R. Cotten, "Teaching, research, and service: expectations of assistant professors," The American Sociologist, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 5-21, 2006.[4] B. G. Davis, Tools for teaching, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.[5] T. Huston, Teaching what you don't know, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.[6] W. J. McKeachie and M. Svinicki, "Countdown for course preparation," in McKeachie's teaching tips: strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 2006
twosentences that the intention is to ‘understand how a steel, circular bar, loaded under torsion,behaves until failure.’For the second section of improvement, the preceding lab manual mostly contained experimentalprocedures in paragraph format, as shown in Figure 2, which made it difficult for students to followand understand. Thus, the authors decided to reformat the procedures in a numbering, hierarchicalscheme such that each step would be followed accordingly (Figure 3). This modificationeliminated the need of having to search in multiple paragraphs for necessary information anddeciding what to implement. In addition, the revised manual specified exactly the type of table(s)needed for recording experimental data. This allowed students to include
of these dimensions, are represented in their ecological model thatincludes a cognitive dimension within an interpersonal dimension, within a broadersocietal/cultural dimension.Our team’s larger study builds uponthe work of these researchers whohave characterized different elementsof systems thinking. We representour working definition of systemsthinking in Figure 1, where the“component” is in the center, whichrepresents a potential solution orsolutions to the engineering problembeing explored. The expandingcircles represent the contexts that canand should be considered in makingdecisions about the solution(s) andtheir appropriateness. Many times Figure 1: Elements of Systems Thinkingthis component is part of a largersystem, thus
National Science Foundation under Grant No.DUE 1712186. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. This work was completed within the framework of University of Toledo protocol202214.References1. Crimson. Top 10 Jobs in 2030: Skills You Need Now to Land the Jobs of the Future: Future Skills. 2018 [cited 2019 January]; Available from: https://www.crimsoneducation.org/us/blog/jobs-of-the-future.2. Vest, C.M., Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. 2012.3. Daigger, G.T., et al., Real World Engineering Education Committee. 2012.4
Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2012.[3] B.J. Tewksbury, “Specific Strategies for Using the “Jigsaw” Technique for Working in Groups in Non-Lecture-Based Course,” Journal of Geological Education, 43(4), pp. 322- 326, 1995.[4] D. Fitzgerald, “Employing think–pair–share in associate degree nursing curriculum,” Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 8(3), p. 88-90, 2013.[5] D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, and S.A. Bernhardt, Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol 128, pp. 21-29, 2011.[6] S. Freeman, et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23) pp. 8410-8415, 2014.[7] S. Martin, D
established by the United Nations in 2015.Students had to identify a firm on which to base their project, and then determine which of the17 goals would be most relevant and appropriate for their firm to support, based on its context.This was intentionally open-ended, and could include, for example, the firm’s environmental,social, and economic impacts, sphere of influence, stakeholder interests, and how the firmcould affect or be affected by the issue(s) related to each goal. Students worked in small teams to identify and contextualize the problem associatedwith the selected goal, and then to develop a set of proposed objectives, targets, and actionsfor the firm to contribute to the global goal over the next five years, and present the
semester ifthey plan to work in the vacuum industry or to enhance their skillset in this area. However, theonly way vacuum course(s) can currently be incorporated into the EET program is as technicalelective course(s) taken during the fourth semester. A result of this mis-alignment in sequencingbetween institutions was that some parts of the Introduction to Vacuum Technology course weretoo rudimentary for fourth semester students. As a result, the EET department has since maderevisions to the program that allow for one technical elective course during the third semester.This will allow students to take the introductory vacuum course during third semester and one ortwo advanced vacuum courses during the fourth semester. This will also allow for the
and the City ofFreiburg im Breisgau for their help in facilitating the CREATE Germany program.6. References[1] L. Quitzow, W. Canzler, P. Grundmann, M. Leibenath, T. Moss, and T. Rave, "The German Energiewende–What's happening? Introducing the special issue," ed: Elsevier, 2016.[2] W. Fischer, J.-F. Hake, W. Kuckshinrichs, T. Schröder, and S. Venghaus, "German energy policy and the way to sustainability: Five controversial issues in the debate on the “Energiewende”," Energy, vol. 115, pp. 1580-1591, 2016.[3] L. Gailing and A. Röhring, "Germany’s Energiewende and the spatial reconfiguration of an energy system," in Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition, ed: Springer, 2016, pp. 11-20.[4
of students in thetraditional engineering and computer science programs; need for new types of engineering andcomputing related programs; and the need for branding of the non-traditional programs so thatthey are easily distinguishable from similarly named traditional programs. The results should beof interest to engineering schools and other academic units that are contemplating and/or in theearly stages of implementing non-traditional bachelor degree programs.1. Introduction and Overview of PaperBack in the 1960’s, electrical engineering, computer science, and information systems wereessentially the only computer-related undergraduate programs available to students.9 Thesethree areas were well defined with little, if any, overlap of their
running multi-disciplinary, PBL-based design courses are discussed.IntroductionIn 2005, Friedman published The World is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century,where he describes the rapidly changing and highly competitive marketplace that existstoday1. Friedman makes a strong case for the need to better prepare for this marketplace.However, the engineering and engineering education communities were aware ofFriedman’s “Flat World” well before the book was published. In the 1990’s, it had beenobserved that engineering graduates needed improvement in real-world skills such asdesign, teamwork, and communication, as well as a better understanding of howengineering projects fit into bigger pictures2,3. These skills are significantly differentfrom
who know a lot more than you and can tell you to do things, so it's a very differentatmosphere.”In the military, students in SD106’s classes routinely were senior officers with more experiencethan him who outranked him and had no hesitation in challenging him on course content orordering him to provide them with additional course materials. These time related differences inmaturity and experience level between instructor and student led to a power differential withinthe classroom that faculty in academia rarely experience: “…And so, you know, some folks are receptive, some folks have had -- in some of their jobs have had just a load of experience in this and know way more than you do, and others don't. And when you're done
engineering and project management.David Fisher, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology David S. Fisher has been an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology since 2005. Dr. Fisher received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford University in 2005. Dr. Fisher is a graduate of Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, with a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering.Howard McLean, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Howard McLean is an Associate Professor of Chemistry at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Dr. McLean's interests lie in the fields of biological, environmental and geological chemistry as well as meteorite research.Patrick Ferro, Rose-Hulman Institute