all.Our survey indicated that the top five most important dimensions of global competence are: 1)the ability to communicate across cultures, 2) the ability to appreciate other cultures, 3) aproficiency working in or directing a team of ethnic and cultural diversity, 4) the ability toeffectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences, 5) possessingunderstanding of cultural differences relating to product design, manufacture, and use, and 5)possessing understand implications of cultural differences of how engineering tasks might beapproached. While more research is needed in this area, it is our hope that these findings willlead to a well-supported definition for what it means to be a globally competent engineer
% (3 credits) in the Capstone Design courses. [2] provides design content for each course within the civil engineering curriculum. Special attention should be given to the evaluation and selection of new textbooks for these courses since many authors now include design problems as part of their texts. 3. Prepare a library containing examples of methods, open-ended problems, case studies and mini-projects for each course. These examples should introduce ABET category content such as ethics, safety, economics and creativity. Ethical case studies are enlightening to students on matters related to plagiarism, sexual harassment, conflict of interests, etc. Such an exemplary
demonstrate professional and high ethical standards possess high ethical standards ethical responsibility good communication good communication skills communicate effectively curiosity and a desire to learn lifelong learners engage in life-long learning for life a solid understanding of the identify, formulate, and solve strong analytical skills context in which engineering
activities in CCC ENG 101: Introduction to Engineering course2) Revision of the existing circuit analysis course to have a laboratory component3) Design of two bridge courses in Digital and Electronic areasIntroduction to Engineering: This course is an introduction to the EngineeringProfession, Curriculum, and Design experience. The emphasis is on providing the studentwith the tools necessary to succeed in the Engineering Curriculum and to introduce topicsthat engineering graduates will encounter in the workforce. Students will be presentedwith problem solving techniques, analytical tools, design processes, and ethical conceptsand responsibilities that comprise skills that an engineer should have. We havedeveloped and implemented three
from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and her Sc.D. in Medical Engineering from the joint Harvard/MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology. She teaches the required freshman design sequence, the required junior mechatronics sequence, and electives in musculoskeletal functional anatomy for engineers and medical instrumentation and physiology. She is interested in the use of technology in the classroom and improving student outcomes through hands-on and interactive experiences.April Kedrowicz, University of Utah Dr. April A. Kedrowicz is the Director of the CLEAR (Communication, Leadership, Ethics, And Research) Program at the University of Utah, a collaboration between the
students’ actual performance at the time of graduation andtheir predisposition for growth and adaptability upon employment. The development processfollowed that defined above, with multiple iterations and participation of multiple focus groupsrepresenting both academic and non-academic engineering perspectives. Major stages ofdevelopment are described below.Engineer attributes and performance expectations were compiled from sources including: 1. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) Engineering Criteria 3 and 4 educational outcomes and their expansion6,15, 2. Desired attributes and codes of ethics from engineering education consortia and professional societies1,2,4,5,16,17, 3. Core competencies and performance
], [6]. The first approach is often too broad, unfocused, and shallow, while thesecond aims to create well-rounded critical thinkers without the technical competencies expectedby engineering industries. More middle ground options include adding courses in history, ethics,literature or the performing arts with an intentional engineering focus, though these courseschallenge the high credit requirements of many engineering programs [5], [7], [8], [9], [10].Other attempts incorporate liberal arts through guest lectures, course modules, and pairedcourses, though typically at the cost of some technical depth or breadth [3], [11]. Finally, otherschools have leveraged co-curricular and extra-curricular programs, events, and resources tointegrate the
well as to analyze and interpret data c Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. d Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g Ability to communicate effectively (written and oral) h Understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning j Knowledge of
addition, during intense, annual multi-day retreatsat Cornell University (winter) and Norfolk State University (summer), trainees come together forfurther technical training, professional development, program self-reflection and redesign.Most of the education and training part of the program is delivered in four courses: (1) Technicaland Professional Writing (6 weeks); (2) Training in Independent Research (12 weeks); (3) BestPractices in Teaching and Learning (8 weeks); and (4) Ethics and Intellectual Property (4weeks). The sequence of short, focused modular courses provides a framework conducive to thecycle of (re-)design, enactment, and study of the proposed graduate training activities. It allowsfor students to learn and practice in the same
, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) at the University of Colorado Boulder. She has also served as the ABET assessment coordinator for the CEAE Department since 2008. She has taught first-year introductory courses for CEAE students and capstone design for environmental engineer- ing since students since 1998. The capstone design course first included service-learning projects in 2001. Bielefeldt currently conducts research on social responsibility among engineering students and practition- ers, teaching sustainable engineering, engineering ethics, and faculty attitudes toward service-learning.Prof. Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder
. recognize ethical and professional Through hands-on projects, students responsibilities in engineering situations and investigate and solve complex engineering make informed judgments, which must problems using PyTorch and explore ethical consider the impact of engineering solutions impacts of the technology in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. function effectively on a team whose Students engage in collaborative and members together provide leadership, create professional coding practices and project a collaborative and inclusive environment, work, aligning with ABET's emphasis on establish goals, plan tasks, and meet professionalism objectives. 6
., 2022Challenges with Intervention Throughout the articles, authors discussed seven main challenges when integratingequitable design concepts into their workshops, courses, or programs: (1) curriculum integration,(2) faculty development, (3) assessment and evaluation, (4) student engagement and motivation,(5) prior experience, (6) long-term impact, and (7) addressing societal challenges (Table 4).During curriculum integration, faculty encountered challenges incorporating new,interdisciplinary concepts into their existing curricula, namely topics on ethics, social justice,accessibility, and sustainability (Forbes et al., 2022; Hoople et al., 2020; Letaw et al., 2022;Motti & Dura, 2021; Rossmann et al., 2020). Engineering education has continued
of the American Society for Engineering Education 5These guests could discuss tax issues with the students, thereby providing an even greater “real-world” experience for the students.Several related extensions could come from this tax study project. In future semesters, a tax casefor various forms of business entities, such as a partnership, could be created. Additionally, thetopic of income taxes could lead to discussions of ethical behavior in a business setting, withpossible development of a class project on ethics. From a broader standpoint, the income taxreturn project could be a springboard for discussion on the role of U.S. taxpayers
the freshman engineering courseto include topics such a teamwork, professionalism and ethics, and fundamentals of theengineering design process.This paper describes the development of an appropriate introductory engineering course forstudents on the Missouri State University (MSU) campus who are participating in thecooperative engineering program operated by Missouri University of Science & Technology(Missouri S&T) in cooperation with MSU.IntroductionOn August 21, 2006, the Governor of the state of Missouri, along with the Curators of theUniversity of Missouri, the Chancellor of Missouri University of Science and Technology(Missouri S&T), and the President of Missouri State University (MSU) signed a Memorandumof Understanding that
communicators of their creative ideas to solve societal needs, to invent new processingtechniques, to reduce wasteful use of resources, to express their ethical concerns about products,and to inform the public on issues of mutual concern.From the National Academy of Engineering’s “The Engineer of 2020”, the attributes of the 21stcentury engineer include the following: As always, good engineering will require good communication…. We envision a world where communication is enabled by an ability to listen effectively as well as to communicate through oral, visual, and written mechanisms. Modern advances in technology will necessitate the effective use of virtual communication tools. The increasingly imperative for
Art-Inspired Pedagogies in Engineering EducationUsing Comics, VR/AR, Gaming, and Music in Engineering EducationKai Zhuang1,2, Dimpho Radebe3, Mojgan Jadidi11: Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, Canada2: Brave49, Canada3: Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, CanadaIn recent years, there is growing recognition in engineering education that creative, humanistic,and transferable skills such as emotional intelligence, ethical leadership, and teamwork, areessential to students’ success, thriving, and contribution in university and beyond (Jarrahi et al.,2023; Lappalainen, 2015; Rottmann et al., 2015; World Economic Forum, 2020). However, mostengineering students are used to rigorous curriculums that
Curricula Committee also includes addressing the role of experience and describingthe responsibilities of faculty and practitioners in imparting the BOK.The BOK Curricula Committee has proposed that the 21rst century civil engineer at theprofessional level must have knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the following areas: 1. Technical core 2. Data analysis 3. Problem solving 4. Communicate 5. Engineering tools 6. Design 7. Teamwork 8. Project management/construction 9. Impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context 10. Life-long learning 11. Professional and ethical responsibility 12. Business principles and public policy 13. Leadership 14. Contemporary issues 15. Specialized area The proposed
communicators of their creative ideas to solve societal needs, to invent new processingtechniques, to reduce wasteful use of resources, to express their ethical concerns about products,and to inform the public on issues of mutual concern.From the National Academy of Engineering’s “The Engineer of 2020”, the attributes of the 21stcentury engineer include the following: As always, good engineering will require good communication…. We envision a world where communication is enabled by an ability to listen effectively as well as to communicate through oral, visual, and written mechanisms. Modern advances in technology will necessitate the effective use of virtual communication tools. The increasingly imperative for
Phenomena, Mathematical Methods, Ethics, and Safety• These updated LOs were inputted into GroupWisdom .• Our subject matter experts (SMEs) read through the LOs and individually added LOs in the brainstorming phase.Body of Knowledge Process• Collected and refined learning objectives (LOs) for five graduate chemical engineering courses covering six topics: • Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Reactor Design, Transport Phenomena, Mathematical Methods, Ethics, and Safety• These updated LOs were inputted into GroupWisdom .• Our subject matter experts (SMEs) read through the LOs and individually added LOs in the brainstorming phase.Most added LOs were non-curricular skills or specialized topics.Body of Knowledge Process• The SMEs individually grouped
in classroom education, transportation, computer large number of research articles.programming, construction, space science, engineering, medicalindustry, and many other scientific and technological arenas. Concrete is one of the commonly used construction materialsNevertheless, AI is considered prohibited in many circumstances utilized worldwide because of the availability of its ingredientsdue to ethical concerns, trepidations of job displacement, and its and its relatively easier application. However, application ofportrayal in media. This combination of ethical, economic, and concrete in complex geometric structures, e.g., tunnels,cultural factors drives suspicion and agitation against AI
always the case, technology can be used positively or corresponding answer is shown in Fig. 2.negatively, ethically or unethically. The goal of thisprogramming course, as with every other course, is to educatethe students to fulfill the course’s outcomes successfully. Theysay, “If you can't beat them, join them.” This seems to be theideal case to apply this saying here. II. USE OF AI IN THE COURSE Fig. 1. Interaction of use AI.A. The Proposal We shall avoid proposing to exclude AI from the course ormuch more from the curriculum. This would be something outof anybody's control, much more of the instructor. On thecontrary, we propose an approach to incorporate AI in thecourse in a beneficial way
between Bowers’suggestions and the complicated, technical lists of strategies to stop academic dishonesty in more modern papers (seeSection V for a discussion of this). A 1998 review of empirical cheating research provides several insights into the factors influencing collegiatecheating [22]. Below are presented some of the findings: • Males generally cheat more, though the difference was reported as diminishing over time • Lower G.P.A. students cheat more • Business major students cheat more than others • Personal moral/ethical guidelines affect cheating propensity and feelings about cheating • More surveillance corresponded with less cheating • Observing others cheating, knowing friends who cheat, and sitting next to
ethics seminars (Hess &Fore, 2018). To better integrate these concepts, some researchers suggest starting at a smallerscale within existing engineering courses, such as engaging students in sociotechnical thinkingthrough class assignments or rubrics (Claussen et al., 2019; Salzman et al., 2019).Although academic institutions are now working to integrate the social, economic, and politicaldimensions of engineering in undergraduate engineering coursework, there remains a lack offundamental research on how to engage students in these sociotechnical topics. This isparticularly true within the scope of traditionally technical courses, such as the engineeringsciences, where students are only expected to demonstrate technical competencies by the
technical engineering courses fail to raise students’ awareness of thesocial and ethical context of engineering design [16, 20], efforts have been made to increasestudents’ understanding of the sociotechnical nature of engineering by integrating engineeringcourses that highlight this relationship into the curriculum [e.g., 1, 21, 22].Emphasizing the societal context of engineering may also help broaden participation amongstudents from underrepresented groups, given previous research suggesting that marginalizedstudents’ attitudes toward engineering and sense of belonging may be positively impacted byintegrating societal relevance into engineering coursework [23-25]. Students’ attitudes (e.g.,sense of belonging, self-confidence, etc.) play a major
analyzed for emergent themes.ResultsProject participation effects on students’ comfort level with engineering fundamentalsIn order to address research questions 1, What, if any, role does participation in a team-basedmulti-disciplinary humanitarian engineering project have on students’ ability to applyengineering fundamentals to the design process to solve engineering problems, we assessed forany changes pre- and post-semester in students’ comfort level with engineering fundamentals,including the engineering design process, fundamental physics, computer programming, teamcollaboration, technical communications, non-technical communications, engineering ethics,data visualization/analysis, and engineering disparities & issues of access/equity
, anda research agenda. We also comment on the implied experiential component required beyond theuniversity.IntroductionSustainability is cited as the top systems integration problem facing engineering today and intothe futurei. This is corroborated by the Joint Charterii among the American Society of Civil Engi-neers (ASCE), the Canadian Society of Civil Engineers (CSCE), and the Institution of Civil En-gineers (ICE), wherein professional responsibility is asserted for realizing sustainable civil soci-ety across all peoples and through time. Codes of Engineering Ethics from ASCE and the Na-tional Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) reinforce this responsibility. Further, the re-cently-announced aspirational vision of the civil engineering
critically, some caringrelationships seem to have a significance in ‘excess’ of the labor they enable” [21, p. 14]. Tounpack this statement, in her book The Ethics of Care, Virginia Held offers a comparison(originally provided in [21]) of the ways in which a parent and a child-care provider may care forone and the same child in that “both can perform the same work of reassuring the child, hugging[them], transferring [them] from [a parent] to worker, and so on. But the character and meaningof the [parent’s] care may be in excess of the work itself. For the [parent], the work is a responseto the relationship, whereas for the day-care worker, the relationship is probably a response tothe work” [21. p. 33]. In other words, for Vanasupa, the “labor” of
. This course enhanced my awareness of professional ethics and responsibility. This course helped me develop my ability to identify and acquire new knowledge as part of the problem. Assistance is available inside and outside lab. Course Support The content of the lectures and skill sessions were relevant to the course. The lab facilities supported my team’s needs.Quantitative evaluation have always focused on specific course/program objective but the specificquestions changed slightly. Table 2 shows the original questions and the percentage of studentsrating the course with an A or B grade for each objective, accumulated over the first 15
identify problems, finding solutions Creativity Creativity, invention, innovation, thinking outside the box, art Communication Communication skills, oral narrative skills Business and Management Decision making, prioritizing, managing people and projects, troubleshooting Leadership Service, leadership High Ethical Standards Ethical standards, religion (faith), values, belief system, morals Professionalism Professionalism, ethics, judgement, care, subject expertise
better solutions. Students must also learn to manage uncertainty, risk, safety factors, and product reliability. There are additional ways of thinking that are important to engineers that include systems thinking, creativity, optimism, perseverance, and innovation. Collaboration (Team), communication (Comm-Engr), and ethics (Ethics) are distinct key indicators so not included here. K-12 students not only need to participate in engineering design processes but they should also come to an understanding of the discipline of engineering and the