Paper ID #39666”Design of Integrated 5G Chip-set with Microstrips Modules for MobileCommunications with Its Integration in MMIC Course”Dr. Kanti Prasad, University of Massachusetts, Lowell Dr. Kanti Prasad is an emeritus professor since 1/1/2023 in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and is the founding Director of Microelectronics/VLSI Technology program at UMass Low- ell. He holds his Ph.D. from University of South Carolina. He is a registered Professional Engineer, P.E., in the State of Commonwealth of Massachusetts. He has been a senior member of IEEE since 1980. He is the ASEE’s campus representative
to graduating seniors, alumni of the program, and writing assessments.IntroductionThere is a long history of collaboration between mathematics and engineering departments, asdemonstrated through engineering-specific sections of mathematics courses [1], but collaborationbetween English and engineering departments is less common (although see [2]–[4]). Similarly,collaborative efforts to incorporate writing and information literacy into the teaching of thenatural sciences (e.g., biology and chemistry) appear to be more common than in engineeringcurricula [5]–[8]. Because writing is an essential skill for professional engineers, introducing andpracticing engineering writing skills early in a student’s academic career is an opportunity toincrease
LiberatedUniversities of Iraq 1. One of the focus areas of this project was the professional development ofeach University’s engineering educators because of its affordances for sustainable economicgrowth. Subsequently, Purdue University, World Learning, and an Iraqi University conducted ajoint needs assessment to identify the specific areas of interest for the engineering facultymembers. A population survey was conducted with all 161 faculty members of the College ofEngineering. The needs assessment identified student-centered learning, blended learning, andculturally relevant pedagogy as the faculty members’ core pedagogical areas of interest. Theseneeds were identified in a conscious attempt to navigate the disruption to normal day-to-dayclassroom practices
of stereotype threat and thetheoretical framework of epistemic injustice. Stereotype threat examined through the lens ofepistemic injustice offers an extemporaneous perspective on the epistemological interplaybetween culture and individual to tackle the long-standing problem of women’sunderrepresentation in engineering.IntroductionThe origins of engineering in the US stem from mid-19th century universities, in which the firstengineering societies began to form and establish values for the profession [1]–[5]. Becausewhite, cisgender, heterosexual men were the population of individuals that had the most access tostudying engineering in the 1850s, they established the culture and values of engineering basedon their shared identities [6]. As a
advancedcourses. Although there are various reasons affecting the student’s ability to master the conceptswell, two factors are considered often. One factor is class attendance.Regular lecture attendance is typically expected from college students. Indeed, as the findingspresented in [1], [2], and [3] demonstrate, there is a positive correlation between regularattendance and the student’s grades.The other factor is the ability of students to keep up with the material promptly. As study [4]emphasize, some students may wait until the last moment to study the material, which negativelyimpacts their deep understanding of the material.Many studies summarized in [5] believe that in-class quizzes are a valuable tool to encouragestudents to attend classes and
. Resultant implications,limitations, and revelations of these findings conclude this paper.1. The Formal Makerspace Course1.1 Course OverviewDuring the first-year at the J. B. Speed School of Engineering at the University of Louisville(UofL), all engineering students are required to take a course titled Engineering Methods, Tools,and Practice II (ENGR 111) [1-7]. The ultimate goal of ENGR 111 is to instruct students inapplication and integration of institutionally-identified fundamental engineering skills that areintroduced and practiced in the prerequisite Engineering Methods, Tools, and Practice I (ENGR110) course. Other notable general features of ENGR 111 include a formal (15,000 ft2) makerspacesetting that exclusively employs active learning
unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth." – Dr. Cornel WestIntroduction Leadership is a highly sought-after skill and experiential opportunity for engineeringstudents and professionals. Engineering leadership research has explored how engineeringincorporates and conceptualizes leadership in engineering professional and educational settings.For example, engineering leadership research has explored the definitions of what engineeringleadership is [1], [2]; the skills involved in engineering leadership [3]–[5]; and practices tosupport engagement in engineering leadership [6]–[11]. While there are studies that explore howengineering leadership is conceptualized, there is a lack of
-Based-Learning (PBL) for skillsdevelopment, motivation, and retention (both in terms of students staying in the major and interms of retaining learned skills) of engineering students. While all students take design coursesleading to their senior capstone projects, they do not all build prototypes of their work. Typically,in naval architecture and marine engineering programs, PBL projects focus on building smallmodels due to time, space, and cost issues with using full-scale vessels. Exceptions to thisapproach are taken at two colleges, where students may take elective courses that feature full-scale construction of 10-15 ft long plywood craft. At the United States Coast Guard Academy(USCGA), the first-year, 1-credit, course introduces
identified as male and four as female. The representation of the sample’s race and ethnicity makeup include: Black (n=1), Hispanic or Latino (n=1), Middle Eastern (n=2), and white (n=6). Table 1 provides additional co-researcher demographic information, as reported in the screening survey. Table 1 Co-researcher Demographic InformationPseudonym Race Gender Disability(s) Engineering Year-in-School International Major Student (Y/N)Joe Middle Male Learning Civil First-year Y EasternSammy Middle Male Cognitive
health related help seeking in undergraduate engineering students,a qualitative study was conducted based on the integrated behavioral model (IBM). Through thisstudy, 33 students were asked about their beliefs related to seeking help for a mental healthconcern, as guided by the IBM. The current study aims to characterize the messages that studentsreceive (either explicitly or implicitly) from engineering faculty and staff that might influence theirthoughts around help seeking. After qualitative analysis, three common themes were identified: 1)Supportive explicit and implicit messages around help seeking are often tied to an individualfaculty or staff member, 2) College level change around mental health is viewed positively ifappropriately
and the importance of close mentorship.We motivate further persistence research in ML/AI with particular focus on social belonging andclose mentorship, the role of intersectional identity, and introductory ML/AI courses.IntroductionArtificial intelligence (AI) is now used in almost every industry [1]. As such, ML/AI courses, majorsand careers are increasingly sought out by university graduates. While ML/AI falls within theboundaries of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM), there are elements of this newfield, industry and type of work which set it apart; Thus, a study dedicated to understanding thedynamics of student perceptions of ML/AI can help us better evaluate how the field may beencouraging or discouraging broad
learning objectivesof the course. There are two options that students may choose for the final project: 1) theproblem-solving track and 2) the creativity, or open-ended, track. This paper describes the finalphase of the development of the project option and its assessment results regarding creativity andinclusion. The final project files from three semesters, between Fall 2020 and Fall 2021, and foursections were de-identified and rated for creativity by three experts in civil engineering, using theConsensual Assessment Technique. This paper reports the final project components and rubric,results related to students’ demonstrated creativity for the problem-solving versus open-endedtrack, and the lessons learned, impact, and challenges of
BackgroundResearch and education related to engineering ethics have grown in recent decades, in part due tointernational efforts such as the Washington Accord [1] and the globalization of the engineeringworkforce, which highlight the need for ethics to be embedded in engineering practice.Undergraduate education plays a key role in socializing students into the engineering professionand developing their requisite competencies, including those related to ethical and professionalresponsibilities. Research on engineering ethics education has focused on the integration ofethics in the curriculum such as the topics, pedagogies, and settings [2][3][4], and these reviewssynthesize the body of work on descriptions and outcomes of individual classroom
Engineering Network (KEEN) developed a framework [1] tosupplement the engineering skills already taught to students with outcomes that support thedevelopment of the entrepreneurial mindset (EM) to better prepare engineering students to bepracticing engineers. This framework includes a set of educational outcomes based on the 3C’sof EM (Demonstrating Curiosity, Making Connections, and Creating Value). Entrepreneuriallyminded learning (EML) is an evidence-based practice that improves student learning outcomesand the student experience in engineering courses. Grzybowski [2] demonstrated improvedstudent performance in an EML-infused first-year course compared to the traditional course.Carnasciali [3] presented an assessment of EM learning outcomes
team of faculty to address the current state of instructional practices college-wide. TheCoE had undergone a change in leadership with a new Dean in 2019 and an Associate Dean ofAcademic Affairs in 2021. Building on what the faculty and departments had reported in theirABET Self-Studies during their 2020 accreditation visits, the new administration leaders soughtto first understand the existing culture regarding engineering education within this college.Prior InitiativesIn Fall of 2014, prior college leadership sponsored a six-month internal study conducted by asmall team of engineering faculty and administrators. The team performance was guided by thetraining received in the team alchemy[1] system. Using a process of stakeholder discovery
The 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & ExpositionFitchburg, WI 53711 Baltimore , 06/25–06/28On This Invoice The 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Non-Member Early - Full Conference Registration 1 $975.00 Total: $975.00 Visa payment XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-5689, Apr 28, 2023 ($975.00) Balance: US $0.00 Thank you for your payment
, women of all racial/ethnic backgrounds,and other underrepresented students [1-4]. While women account for over half of all collegedegrees earned in the United States, the National Science Foundation reports that womencomprise one of the lowest rates of engineering degree recipients [5].Within the engineering workforce in the United States, only 14% of engineers are women and13% of engineers are from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (African American,Hispanic, Native American/Native Alaskan, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) [6]. Thesediscrepancies of representation are addressed in this study as underrepresented minorities(URM). The national need to increase representation in the engineering workforce includesretaining URM students that
and value of the resources currently offered and to gain inputfrom the faculty community and other stakeholders that may lead to an improved program. Thestudy considers and compares four different perspectives: input from faculty who haveparticipated in the program, input from faculty who have not participated in the program, inputfrom the facilitators of the program, and data analytics of web-based resources. This lessonslearned paper will be presented as a poster session.Motivation and Background of the WorkTo an increasing degree, Engineering faculty are expected to expand their knowledge and skillsrelated to developing and delivering effective online and distance education courses and usingtechnology to enhance student learning. [1
and Objectives for a First Year Happiness and Wellbeing Course Muhammad Asghar 1,*, Daniel Kane 1, Angela Minichiello 1, and Wade Goodridge 1 1 Engineering Education Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA * Correspondence: m.asghar@usu.edu AbstractBackgroundStudents in higher education report a multitude of mental health problems. The situation seems to havebeen exacerbated by the Covid-19 Pandemic. In undergraduate engineering education in particular, anoverall stress culture prevails caused by high academic workload, sleep deprivation, higher self-expectations, and other factors that resulted in less time available for students to use directing their
community of practice around engineering education research.This work takes place at a private Tier 1 multi campus global research university that does notcurrently have a dedicated engineering education research program. The primary campus of theuniversity is in the northeastern United States, with multiple campuses located around thecountry, as well as internationally. This paper is situated in the area of communities of practice,and documents our efforts over the course of a year to plant the seeds for such a community togrow organically within our institution.Selected Literature ReviewTo support the development of a community of practice, we designed a set of engagementexperiences which could help to build stronger connections within our peer
it one of the most critical moments in a faculty’s career. Each individual willencounter specific challenges based on their held identities and institutional culture, but teachingis often a shared obstacle among them. One-on-one, 60-minute semi-structured interviews wereconducted with engineering faculty members who have less than two years of total teachingexperience as an instructor. The first stages of Campbell’s Hero’s Journey were used to facilitatethe dialog and provide a narrative structure to the interview. The participants were askedquestions related to three aspects of their teaching story: (1) the call to adventure, (2) challengeson the road, and (3) finding help. Preliminary findings indicate that early-career engineeringfaculty
in the Public Policy Center, and director of the Center for Research on Undergraduate Education at the University of Iowa. His research uses a social psychological lens to explore key issues in higher education, including student success, diversity and equity, admissions, rankings, and quantitative research methodology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Systems Engineering Initiative for Student Success (SEISS) Framework for Transforming Organizational Designs Arunkumar Pennathur1*, Priyadarshini Pennathur1, Emily Blosser2, Nicholas Bowman3 1 Department of Industrial, Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso
the effectiveness of these pedagogies in promoting students’comprehension of engineering principals and interpersonal skills. It presents qualitative datafrom interviews and surveys, along with retention rate data. Overall, the goal is to provideawareness into this pedagogical approach to engineering education and contribute to ongoingdiscussions on approaches that promote holistic, transdisciplinary learning through emotionalengagement of students.BackgroundRetention rates for students enrolled in postsecondary engineering programs have shownfluctuations between forty to sixty percent over the past several decades [1]. According to astudy conducted by the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in 2017, theretention rates for
Society for Engineering Education, 2023 WIP: Three Scaffolding Approaches to Foster a Tolerance for Ambiguity in an Undergraduate Engineering Statistics CourseSociety is becoming increasingly data driven. This is evidenced by the U.S. Bureau of LaborStatistics reports that indicate that the job outlook for occupations focused on data analysis isgrowing at an above-average rate [1]. This increased demand for a workforce with stronganalytical skills includes the engineering profession because of a corresponding growth in theamount of data surrounding the types of problems engineers are asked to address.Fourteen major challenges were outlined by the National Academy of Engineering in their area,that range from issues as pervasive
as campusesclosed and individuals were affected by stay-at-home orders. Many students on residentialcampuses were also forced to move back home during the middle of their academic year aspopulation-dense student dormitories were shut down to further minimize the risk of virustransmission. Against this chaotic backdrop, it is not surprising that data collected during theearly stages of the COVID pandemic show a surge in mental health issues among engineeringand pre-engineering students [1], [2]. By Fall 2021, however, with COVID-19 vaccines widelyavailable, many colleges reopened for in-person learning and students began adjusting to a new,post-COVID normal.As this process continues, and as universities continue to face ongoing waves of
course with respect to the abovemetrics as well as student retention and graduate placement.Introduction:Myriad undergraduate Biomedical Engineering programs have developed programs that seek toprovide an element of "clinical immersion" for students to learn about real-world problemswhich can be solved by engineering design [1-5]. However, given the diversity of such programsacross the country concerning resources available, such as proximity to a major medical school,teaching hospital, active residency programs, etc., it is challenging to derive a universal "one sizefits all" approach for such a course, as well as challenges in reporting their efficacy [6–8]. Theobjective of this WIP paper is to examine the efficacy of the clinical observations
attributed to individuals with a certain adaptabilityprofile being drawn to a career in academia. Accounting for adaptability when considering theextent to which WATPS are used can enable more individualized support for instructors duringperiods of change.I. IntroductionInstructors are challenged to implement and sustain a wide array of teaching practices andstrategies (WATPS) in undergraduate courses because WATPS have been shown to improvestudents’ conceptual understanding, appeal to a diverse set of students, and increase persistencein engineering, especially among underrepresented groups [1], [2], [3], [4]. The adoption of aWATPS can produce more workforce ready engineers that innovate in creative ways. Engineersgraduating from universities
perceptions of their own capacities; self-perceptions of STEM and engineering related strengths are predictive of persistence incoursework, participation in relevant co-curricular activities, and career exploration (Cabell,2021; Simon et al, 2015). Invention education includes a transdisciplinary range of pedagogical strategies that aredesigned to improve children’s inventive habits of mind as well as their awareness ofcommercialization related topics such as intellectual property and business model development(National Inventors Hall of Fame, 2019). Programs often teach invention processes such asidentifying problems, ideating, designing and testing prototype solutions, and sharing the ideawith others 1. Common formats for invention education
successful completion of these courses andadvancement in their majors.In this ongoing study, the researchers developed a two-prong approach to address the above andincrease student success. The approach involves 1) Creation of a specific set of modulesspecifically targeting the MAP prerequisite knowledge needed by the students to be successful inStatics and Dynamics courses and 2) Mentoring of "at-risk" students by student mentors (SMs)starting from the second week of the semester. The developed modules include pretests andtargeted interventions based on each student's knowledge needs. In addition, sets of videos,practice problems, and further assessments are provided to ensure that all students have the samebaseline knowledge and the tools to be
engineering computingcourse [1]. The revised course includes weekly readings followed by small-group discussions oncurriculum-aligned real-world justice topics. For example, students read an article onenvironmental racism that discussed how, contrary to popular belief, environmental pollutioncorrelates more strongly with race than with class. Discussion prompts drew students’ attentionto the data science implications: how what data is collected and how it is analyzed directlydetermines what conclusions can be drawn.This work-in-progress paper develops a case study analysis of post-course interviews of sixinternational students of color. We use a qualitative case study approach to analyze theseinterviews, focusing on students’ expressed identity and